meeting of the History of Science and Engineering course included part of a video,followed by discussion and a review of vocabulary, followed by a vocabulary homeworkassignment. Everyone learned new terms such as causeway, siege engine, floating bridge,pilings, aqueduct, triangulation, canal locks, etc. During the following years, the Mexicanstudents referred to the course as their launching into conversational English, although theyalways spoke Spanish among themselves.The program was free to the students. Instructors were paid from a discretionary fund under thecontrol of the Dean of Science, Mathematics, and Technology. Students were not given credit forIntroduction to Engineering until they enrolled in and paid for the course in the fall
has been unable to maintain satisfactory academic performance. 4) Improve graduate school or career preparation and placement: Most students utilized the career related workshops and fairs (70%) and discussed career choices with their industrial mentor, resulting in 88% of students obtaining engineering-related summer opportunities. Acknowledgements This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No 0965942. References1. American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) (2007), Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology College, Washington, DC.2. American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) (2008), Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology College, Washington, DC
has been unable to maintain satisfactory academic performance. 4) Improve graduate school or career preparation and placement: Most students utilized the career related workshops and fairs (70%) and discussed career choices with their industrial mentor, resulting in 88% of students obtaining engineering-related summer opportunities. Acknowledgements This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No 0965942. References1. American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) (2007), Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology College, Washington, DC.2. American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) (2008), Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology College, Washington, DC
engineering pedagogy, technological literacy, and human- artifact interactions.Prof. P. Suresh C. Rao, Purdue University, West Lafayette Suresh Rao is the Rieth Distinguished Professor of ecological engineering in the School of Civil En- gineering at Purdue University. Prior to coming to Purdue 13 years ago, Rao was on the faculty for 25 years at the University of Florida. His research and educational interest span a broad spectrum of trans-disciplinary themes at the intersection of how human societies alter natural landscapes, and how multitude of ecological adverse impacts cascade through complex coupled systems. He teaches multiple courses with emphasis on application of sustainability and resilience concepts to better
the assessment data of one of theactivities while section 7 contains the conclusion and pre- and post-assessment data for theIMPACT LA Program as a whole.2. IMPACT LA Program Information The IMPACT LA Program partners graduate teaching fellows with middle and highschool math and science teachers in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD),primarily in Local District #5. The program is centered at California State University, LosAngeles (CSULA), and is part of the national NSF Graduate STEM Fellows in K-12 Education(GK-12) Program, which provides fellowships and training for graduate students in science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).3,4 The graduate student fellows serve asvisiting scientists or engineers who
University of Wisconsin, Madison. She currently lives in Rice Lake, Wis., with her husband Mike and her two children Jamie and Jessie.Dr. Mark H. Holdhusen, University of Wisconsin, Marathon County Mark Holdhusen is an Associate Professor of Engineering at the University of Wisconsin, Marathon County. He began at UWMC in Jan. 2005 after completing his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Holdhusen received a bachelor’s in mechanical engineering from the University of Minnesota in August of 1999. He currently lives in Wausau, Wis., with his wife (Elona), son (Milo), and daughter (Odelia
Technology Section 1: Rube Goldberg MachinesSection 3: Assistive Technology Section 4: RoboticsSection 5: Assistive Technology Section 6: Water systemsSection 8: Products for the Local Community Section 7: Green DesignSection 10: Games for Health Section 9: RoboticsParticipantsThe analysis in this report contains survey data information approximately 41% of the 2010incoming freshmen class or 272 FYEP engineering students enrolled in 10 sections of FYEPduring the fall 2010 semester; 20 students were eliminated from the study due to absences duringeither the pre- or post- survey. Participants included 25% females (n= 68) and 75% males(n=204). Most engineering majors
AC 2012-5140: THE EFFECT OF STUDENT NARRATION ON SENIOR-LEVEL ENGINEERING CLASSESLt. Col. Donald William Rhymer Ph.D., U.S. Air Force Academy Donald Rhymer is an Assistant Professor and the Deputy for Curriculum in the Department of Engi- neering Mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy in Colorado. He is a 1995 graduate of the academy with a bachelor’s of science in engineering mechanics and holds both an M.S. and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. He has taught mechanical engineering for more than five years at the Air Force Academy and while his graduate research and teaching emphasis is in the mechanics of materials, he has just as high a passion for excellence in education
developed in consultation with the university’s Centre for Teaching,Learning and Technology (CTLT (www.ctlt.ubc.ca)) and the APSC Centre for InstructionalSupport (CIS (cis.apsc.ubc.ca)). To date, over 430 students have completed the program.UBC APSC engineering undergraduate and graduate student populations come from all over theworld. While this diversity offers a variety of different viewpoints and this adds to a larger poolof ideas and experiences, it doesn’t come without its share of challenges. The TA Trainingprogram aims to provide its students with the tools and skill set necessary to deal with theseeveryday challenges by having the students participate in guided activities and discussionscentered around culture and diversity. The training
AC 2012-4299: INTRODUCING SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CONCEPTSIN A SENIOR CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSEDr. Michael W. Prairie, Norwich University Michael Prairie is an Electrical Engineer who spent 15 years in the U.S. Air Force, managing R&D programs and developing various optical sensor technologies, and then ten years in industry developing infrared system concepts for DoD clients. In 2008, he returned to Norwich University, his alma mater, to teach electrical and computer engineering. His current interests include integrating sensors into embedded systems for controlling processes in various applications that support the courses he teaches.Prof. Ronald Lessard, Norwich University
post test.Key Words: design process, instrument developmentIntroduction Interest in introducing engineering concepts and teaching design as a process toelementary school aged children has continued to increase in recent years for a variety offactors. In some cases, stakeholders are concerned about students learning engineeringcontent for a competitive advantage in the global marketplace 1, 2. Other stakeholders areconcerned by a decline in students’ interest in pursuing engineering during and after college 3.Still others are interested in promoting elementary engineering instruction in order topromote engineering and technological literacy 4, 5. Recent studies have also providedevidence that learning engineering content, especially
that informed citizen of thefuture is a course in Infrastructure for all college graduates. Infrastructure should be taken hereas a widely inclusive term, with many systems and meta-systems (the health care system,electrical power, information technology, transportation, etc.) providing the framework for suchstudies. The how of such a course, what such a course might consist of, possible course syllabi,models and the like, is presented by Hart et al. (2011), but this paper seeks to address a verydifferent question; why require such a course, particularly for non-engineers. More directly put,this paper argues that if we are to address the broad and complex problems posed by ourdecaying existing infrastructure and our demand for future
were used for photography instruction, all class time wasspent in critiques. Also, students were not put on teams, and no students from outside of engineering wereinvited. Unlike FV, this course has not become particularly popular; it has not fully filled, averaging 20 students,while FV is always full at up to 50 students, with a wait list.Perception of Design Course Outcomes: Student Images from Fall 2011 Figure 4: Canning jar by Ball. Image by Alyssa Frank Page 25.206.9Figure 5: Clock technologies, by Justin Curtice. Page 25.206.10Figure 6: Bobby pin by Haley Schneider
examine the impactthat varying incentives have on exam participation rates. We also compare the performance ofstudents who chose to take an optional exam to their performance on mandatory mid-semesterexams and evaluate the impact that optional exams had on overall grades in our assessmentschemes. Surveys of our participants show that over 80% of students viewed the optional exampolicy as a positive change to the assessment scheme and only 3% viewed it negatively.I. Background and MotivationResearchers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) education have beenexpressing concern over graduation and retention rates for decades. Recently, the issue has foundits way into the highest levels of economic and educational policy discussion
our economy depends on technological advancement,which requires a workforce that can be innovative and creative [1] and able to work in dynamicenvironments [2]. The need to prepare innovative engineers has led to research on adaptiveexpertise [2, 3], which focuses on the need for students to be on a trajectory where they are bothefficient (knowing something well and able to solve things fast) and innovative (able to applyknowledge to novel situations) [3]. To start students on a trajectory of adaptive expertise, we needto ensure they have a certain amount of domain knowledge and that this knowledge isremembered in such a way that allows for flexible application. This is an acute need in earlyengineering courses especially (e.g., Statics), as
. Page 25.1473.15 __Freshmen __Yes __Sophomore __No __Junior __Senior __Graduate 11.What is your major? (check all that apply) __Biomedical Engineering __Engineering Technology __Chemical Engineering __Mechanical Engineering __Civil Engineering __Plastics Engineering __Computer Engineering __Undeclared Engineering __Electrical Engineering
the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering from 1984 to 1995 and as Associate Dean of the College of Engineering from 1995 to 2008. He was Interim Dean of the Honors College in 2008-2009. He also serves as Associate Dean of Undergraduate Research and the Honors College, and in this role oversees the undergraduate research programs for the entire campus. He is a professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and a registered Professional Engineer. In 2010-2011, he served as Interim Vice Chancellor/Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer.Dr. Fritz J. Claydon, University of Houston
engineering innovation hands-on projects by usingHP’s technology. The new STEM-preneur learning modules will help students understand STEMconcepts and improve entrepreneurial thinking through hands-on experiences. This curriculuminnovation will also give the students the opportunities to work on the real life hands-on projectsat an Innovation Lab that serves as a connection between college and local industries. A specificevaluation plan is designed to address progress, achievement, and impact of the projectobjectives and overall goals.Literature Review: A large portion of the engineering education research focuses on factorsused to predict the likelihood that a student will successfully complete an undergraduate degreein engineering. These factors
: BiomedicalEngineering Technology and Application, a third year undergraduate course at the University ofToronto.Conclusions A Laboratory Course in Tissue Engineering provides a set of cohesive instructionalmaterials to enhance existing TE lab courses or allow creation of new lab sessions to supportexisting TE curricula. To our knowledge, this is the first commercially available lab manual forTE instruction. Preparation of this textbook was prompted by the numerous requests the authorsand contributors receive for the protocols used in their courses, a desire to initiate a network forsharing instructional protocols, and the hope that more lab courses in TE will be offered tostudents in the near future. Each experiment within the textbook is a
Interdepartmental Graduate Minor in Biorenewable Chemicals. He received his B.S. in electrical engineering from the Rochester Institute of Technology and his Ph.D. in agricultural and biological engineering from Cornell University. He became a licensed Professional Engineer while a faculty member at the University of Tennessee, where he co-taught in the Engage Freshmen Engineer- ing Program with Richard M. Bennett. His research has focused on instrumentation and modeling of biological systems, and also on waste treatment and biomass to energy systems. He is interested in the relationship between fundamental rate constants in biological systems and the overall process economics and life-cycle impacts of those systems
further studies and analysis.The reverse engineering process starts with tearing down an existing product to explore thephysical principles behind it, to gather the technical data for documentation of the observationsmade by the researcher and the operation of a technology or components of a system. Since thedesign process course in our engineering school heavily emphasizes involving the students inhands-on learning activities, it helps them to understand the theoretical rationales behind theengineering design process. Our engineering students are introduced to the concepts of reverseengineering through a series of hands-on experiences of real-world products. Students in groupsof three to four are given a list of basic products to choose from, or
AC 2012-4185: SURVEY OF MANUFACTURING COMPANY EXPECTA-TIONS BASED ON THE SME FOUR PILLARS OF MANUFACTURINGENGINEERINGProf. Paul Nutter, Ohio Northern University Paul Nutter, C.Mfg.E., C.Q.E., C.Q.A., is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technological Studies at Ohio Northern University. He has been teaching manufacturing technology since 2000, and has 26 years of experience in industrial and manufacturing engineering, primarily with Rockwell Automotive. Nutter is active in the Society of Manufacturing Engineers as Faculty Advisor for SME Student Chapter S186, and was the 2011 Chair of the SME Technical Community Steering Committee. He previously served as Chair of the 2009 and 2010 Automated Manufacturing
AC 2012-3169: ENHANCING A STUDENT’S ENGINEERING EXPERI-ENCE THROUGH PARTICIPATION ON STUDENT ORGANIZATIONSDr. Stephan A. Durham, University of Georgia Stephan A. Durham is an Associate Professor in the faculty of engineering in the area of civil engineering at the University of Georgia. Durham teaches and performs research in the area of civil engineering materials, concrete materials and structures, and sustainability. Durham obtained his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in civil engineering from the University of Arkansas. He was an Associate Professor at the University of Colorado Denver prior to joining the University of Georgia in 2012.Dr. Wesley E. Marshall, University of Colorado, Denver Wesley Marshall is an Assistant
AC 2012-4080: CREATION OF A STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PRO-FESSIONAL MASTER’S DEGREE PROGRAMProf. Jennifer H. Gross, Lehigh University Jennifer Gross is a professor of practice and Director of the Master’s of Engineering in Structural Engi- neering program at Lehigh University. She earned her B.S. in civil engineering at Lehigh University and M.S. in structural engineering at University of Texas, Austin. She is a licensed Professional Engineer, with many years of experience in structural engineering of building systems.Dr. Donna M. Mohr, Lehigh University Donna Mohr is the Director of Graduate Recruiting and Program Development for the P.C. Rossin Col- lege of Engineering and Applied Science. In 1999, she earned a B.S
AC 2012-5096: DESIGING THE PATHWAYS OF ENGINEERING ALUMNIRESEARCH SURVEY (PEARS)Dr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford UniversityMs. Michelle Marie Grau, Stanford University Michelle Grau is a junior in mechanical engineering at Stanford University, and was one of the students in the first revision of ENGR 14, Introduction to Solid Mechanics. Her research interests include engineering education, robotics in space applications, and using robots to introduce engineering to middle school students. She is passionate about the FIRST Robotics program, in which she coaches teams and volunteers at competitions. She also does wushu and gymnastics.Ms. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Stanford University Samantha Brunhaver is a fourth-year
AC 2012-3186: AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO THE FUNDAMENTALSOF ENGINEERING COURSEMr. Arthur F. Garcia Jr., Palm Beach State College Arthur F. Garcia, Jr., has been teaching on college campuses since 2000. He taught intermediate algebra and trigonometry at Montgomery College in Maryland prior to moving to Florida in 2002. Since the fall of 2002, he has been an Adjunct Instructor at Palm Beach State College, where he began as an instructor of pre-college algebra classes. In addition, he has taught algebra, statistics and a course on entrepreneurship at Northwood University in Palm Beach county (from 2002 to 2005). Since the Fall term of 2005, he has been teaching Introduction to Engineering (EGN 1002) at Palm Beach State
University, where she is a professor of civil and environmental engineering. She is also affiliated with the School of Architecture and the Institute for Complex Engineered Systems. Finger received her B.A. in astronomy and M.A. in operations research from the University of Pennsylvania and her Ph.D. in electric power systems through civil engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She was the first Program Director for design theory and methodology at the National Science Foundation. She is a founder and former Co-Editor-in-Chief of the journal Research in Engineering Design. Finger’s research interests include collaborative learning in design, rapid prototyping, and integration of design and
engineering and science education.Nichole M. Ramirez, Purdue University Nichole M. Ramirez is a graduate student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in aerospace engineering from the University of Alabama in 2010 and will complete her M.S. in aviation and aerospace management in May 2012. She is a recipient of the Purdue Doctoral Fellowship and currently serves as Committee Chair of the Engineering Education Graduate Student Association. In addition to socioeconomic research, she is also interested in studying ways to integrate aerospace engineering and aviation technology education.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland is Associate
on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Dr. Peter Wolfsteiner, Munich University of Applied Sciences Peter Wolfsteiner is professor in mechanical engineering at the Munich University of Applied Sciences (HM) in Germany. He received his Ph.D. degree in M.E. from the Technical University Munich. Prior to joining the faculty at HM, he worked at Knorr-Bremse Group as a manager in the area of new technologies for rail vehicle braking systems. He teaches undergraduate and
AC 2012-5382: INTERNATIONAL BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING EDU-CATION THROUGH COLLABORATIVE STUDENT SERVICE-LEARNINGEXPERIENCESMr. Jay J. Bhatt, Drexel University Jay Bhatt received a M.S. in library and information science and M.S. in electrical and computer engi- neering from Drexel University. Some of his interest areas include collection development in engineering, outreach to faculty and students, and teaching engineering information research skills to faculty and stu- dents. He is the the 2010 recipient of the Homer I. Bernhardt Distinguished Service award from ASEE’s Engineering Libraries Division and the 2003 recipient of Drexel University’s Harold Myers Distinguished Service Award.Mr. Marko Dimiskovski, Drexel