competing demands that are not, in and of themselves, moral or ethical decisions.Putting students into those situations without the subsequent consequences to their job, career, orpsyche allows them to explore the causes of and alternatives within realistic ethical situations inaddition to the consequences.Role-playing games (RPGs) allow players to assume the role of the character they are playing,their player character (PC), and act in the game world as if they were their PC. Research hasshown that RPGs can be experienced so realistically that players even store memories fromgames in the same region of the brain that they store events that happen in real-life [1]. Theyhave been shown to be effective in phycological therapy [2], in college
strongly emphasized in engineering curricula.Given these definitions, the requirements for accreditation of engineering programs as stipulatedby ABET, help in shaping curriculum to produce engineers with the appropriate WorkplaceSkills. Within Criteria 3 [1], the new 1-7 learning outcomes (as did the old a-k outcomes) providean umbrella coverage for programs to develop their curricula and assessment tools to integrate inskills development. In this regard, one finds that there is a strong and explicit mapping betweenthe criteria’s outcomes and the Professional Skills (3 – Communication, 4 – Ethical Practice, 5 -Teamwork, 7 – Lifelong Learning). The mapping to workplace problem-solving skills ascaptured in outcomes 1 (Problem Solving Methodology), 2
. The results of this case study showedthat the application of this mixed methods type of analysis informed by user-centered designof software systems was effective as a surrogate model of student-centered instructionaldesign. Concluding, we extrapolate the lessons learned from this process and the significantimplications we believe our industry-inspired methodology can have for engineeringeducators, in terms of evaluating student engagement in college classrooms. IntroductionIn the last few decades, educators have been looking for ways to increase learning outcomesby keeping students engaged during and outside of class. Popular pedagogical approachesinclude active learning [1], peer instruction [2], student-centered activities [3
DAET rubric andanalyzed using the descriptive and inferential statistics, the pre-post open-ended questionresponses were analyzed by using the constant comparative method. Findings from thequalitative and quantitative data analyses are reported.IntroductionScience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields are consideredfundamental to the nation’s economy [1]. In today’s world, it is critical to attract andretain more students in STEM fields [2]. With this in mind, teachers are sources ofknowledge for students, and they inevitably have a significant influence on a student’sself-image and perceived interests and abilities [3]. For these reasons, teachers who holdmore accurate views and images of engineers and engineering tend to
instructional methods within the classroom to improve student understandingand enhance their attitudes towards the subject. [1] Use of traditional lecture alone is typicallynot as effective as incorporating engaging active learning activities by means of classroomdiscussion, hands-on activities, demonstrations, and simulations. Previous studies have foundthat after two weeks, people generally remember 10% of what they read, 20% of what they hear,30% of what they see, 50% of what they hear and see, 70% of what they say, and 90% of whatthey say and do. [2] The Production and Operations Management course in the United StatesMilitary Academy’s Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) accreditedundergraduate Engineering Management program
sections. While the results are quite preliminary, it is possible tobegin to estimate (1) whether student performance in the class (as measured by final grade in the course)is affected by the tutoring, and (2) which student group or class is most strongly affected by the tutoring.Inasmuch as there are confounding variables (such as different instructors among sections and differinglevels of student motivation) that have not yet been controlled, this study is submitted as a work-in-progress. While it is not a new insight to say that tutoring helps struggling but motivated students(previous studies have indicated that this peer-to-peer mentoring program has had a good effect onstudent success, by reducing the percentage of students receiving a final
emergingworkforce needs.Overall project goal:There are two overall goals of the ATE-2YC project:1.To broaden knowledge of, build capacity, and increase access to the NSF ATE programamong all community colleges across the U.S. with ATE-allowed 2YC programs in fieldssupported by the ATE program including, but not limited to, advanced manufacturingtechnologies, agricultural and bio-technologies, energy and environmental technologies,engineering technologies, information technologies, micro- and nano-technologies,security technologies, geospatial technologies.2. To increase the number of competitive proposals in the ATE program submitted byfaculty at 2YCs.Workshop formatThe PI and grant staff hosted 2.5-day workshops with mentoring in Ohio in August 2017and
(P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana in 1990 and 1999, respectively. He became the Dean of Engineering at The Citadel on 1 July 2011. Prior to his current position, he was the Department Head of Civil Engineering at The University of Texas at Tyler from Jan 2007 to June 2011 as well as served in the Corps of Engineers for over 24 years including eleven years on the faculty at the United States Military Academy. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Summer Calculus Experience to Encourage Development of
Program Focused on Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset in the Context of the NAE Grand Challenges for EngineeringAbstractThis paper describes the development and implementation of a three-week project-basedentrepreneurial experience summer program focused on the National Academy of Engineering(NAE) Grand Challenges for Engineering through the theme of Sustainability. This programaimed to give students opportunities to (1) apply an entrepreneurial mindset, human centereddesign process and related tools to solve a problem for a client; (2) observe and/or experienceSustainability work in the private, public, and non-profit sectors; and (3) identify and explain theinfluence of societal, technological
emerging technology integration in design.Mr. Efe Kutuk, Kean University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A SURVEY ABOUT INTERNET of THINGS (IoT): WHAT DOES IoT MEAN to INDUSTRIAL DESIGN STUDENTS Prof. Bekir Kelceoglu, Syracuse University Prof. Efecem Kutuk, Kean UniversityAbstractThe concept of the Internet of Things (IoT) is not new. The first “traceable” practical applicationof the IoT technology was a vending machine, which reports the condition of the beveragesinside, developed by Carnegie Mellon University in 1982 [1]. It was a simple system withsimple sensors, compared to today’s extremely sophisticated IoT applications
distributed medical monitoring technologies and learning tools that support biomedical contexts. His research focuses on (1) plug-and-play, point-of-care medical monitoring systems that utilize interoperability standards, (2) wearable sensors and signal processing techniques for the determination of human and animal physiological status, and (3) educational tools and techniques that maximize learning and student interest. Dr. Warren is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020A Survey of Biomedical Design Projects to Inform Skill Development in a New Undergraduate
into the pedagogy of laboratory design.1 IntroductionEngineering is a discipline that requires interaction with the physical world, so it is of littlesurprise that there is broad consensus among engineering educators that laboratory classes are animportant part of engineering curriculums [1]. However, the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) doesn’t specify how many laboratory classes should be inan engineering program, instead offering the guideline that laboratory experiences should be“appropriate to the program” [2]. Literature is also quiet on the question of “how manyengineering laboratory classes does an undergraduate engineer take?”This study tried to answer that question by performing a systematic review of
onstudents.This paper reflects a study on curricular pedagogical methods used to teach engineering studentsparticipating in entrepreneurial programs and ventures about failure and the research being doneto advance the community’s understanding of how to positively teach students about and throughfailure. We conducted a systematic literature review of student failure in the overlapping contextof engineering education, entrepreneurship, and psychology. The primary research questionbeing explored is: How is failure studied in the engineering entrepreneurship educationliterature? This research question is broken down into several sub-questions: 1) Whattheoretical frameworks are used to study entrepreneurial failure in this literature?, 2) How hasfailure been
only journalarticles within the reported results. The focus of the systematized review was to findpeer-reviewed journal articles which were focused on student learning, participation andengagement experience in engineering massive open online courses.The applied search strings and subsequent results from each database are shown in Table1. There were 11 results in Education Source, 23 in Scopus, and one result in ERIC.Following the method advised in Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews andMeta-Analyses (PRISMA) guide Moher (2009), four duplicates were removed from thecollated databases for a total of journal articles 35. The PRISMA flowchart Moher (2009)for the searching and refining process can be seen in Figure 1 at the end of
groupsin STEM graduate degree programs was a limitation for this study, but it also pointed to animportant gap in the literature, which must be addressed in order to create effective interventionsthat broaden participation in STEM graduate studies and furthermore in the STEM ecosystem.Introduction and Literature ReviewAlthough there has been a slow increase of research aimed at understanding URM graduateretention, researchers have made great strides in understanding the factors that influenceeducational attainment for URM STEM undergraduates. Early exposure to STEM is one of theprimary predictors of interest in STEM for undergraduate minorities [1]. The transition fromhigh school to college and students’ adjustment to the college educational
-efficacy [32]. The study reported that there is a significant positive relationshipbetween engineering student’s spatial ability and self-efficacy [16]. Bandura [1] theorized that self-efficacy influence students’ choice of activities, effort, and persistence. Thus, improving students’spatial visualization skills through training may lead to improving students’ spatial abilities as wellas their self-efficacy. The effect on whether an improvement in spatial visualization skills wouldlead to an increase in students’ retention rates in engineering fields has been disputed [32]. Sorbyhas showed that students’ spatial ability can be improved through training over the course of asemester which led to an improvement in students’ retention rate
analyzed.IntroductionOnline education is experiencing an explosive growth over the past decade. According to thelatest report from the Education Department’s National Center for Education Statistics [1], thenumber and proportion of college and university students taking classes online grew solidly by5.7% in 2017, even as overall post-secondary enrollments fell by 0.5%. Despite the tremendousgrowth, online education still faces significant challenges. Among them, the lack of frequent andmeaningful interaction between students and faculty members has often been cited as the mainobstacle for increasing the quality of online educational experience and improving studentoutcomes and satisfaction.The flexibility and personalized learning opportunities offered by online
Gonzalez-Diaz c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020A TALE OF TWO UNIVERSITIES A Tale of Two Universities: An Intersectional Approach to ExaminingMicroaggressions Amongst Undergraduate Engineering Students at an HBCU and a PWI Abstract The current study utilized the intersectionality theory to analyze microaggressionstowards engineering undergraduate underrepresented gender and racial minority students. In thisstudy, participants were sampled from intersecting identity groups (Asian female, Asian male,Black female, Black male, Hispanic female, Hispanic male, White female) at two institutionalsettings: 1) a
courses and programs inmultiple settings. This paper addresses persons interested in education, engineering,architecture, and liberal arts.Attitudes Towards Integrating the Two CulturesPhysicist and novelist Snow [1] provided a stark and controversial portrayal of a polarityoccurring in the mid-20th century British higher education system. The polarity was theseparation and imbalance between the two cultures of the humanities and the sciences. Heclaimed that the educational system was favoring the humanities over the sciences through anantiquated notion of romanticism. He professed that this disparity would inhibit solvingproblems on a global scale in the modern technological world. Snow recognized the U.S.education system as a successful
behavior [1], [2]. As reported by McKinsey Global Institute [3], [4], although companieshave placed a strong emphasis on data and analytics to adapt to this era of data-driven decisionmaking, they are struggling to develop the necessary talent. Similarly, analyses conducted by theUS Bureau of Labor Statistics suggest that by 2024, only 450,000 college graduates will beavailable to fill nearly 1.1 million job openings in computing and information technology [5],[6]. To address this need, we developed a technology pathway program in data technology andapplications at a large, minority-serving public institution. As part of this program, faculty fromthe Colleges of Social Sciences, Engineering, and Education created a minor in AppliedComputing for
courses incomposition and presentation, often being some of the first courses taken. This extends toengineering students, for whom effective communication is an important competency [1] and arequired criterion for degree accreditation (ABET - Student Outcome 3: an ability tocommunicate effectively with a range of audiences). The University of New Haven hasidentified writing skills as a priority and established Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC)initiative to support writing instruction throughout a student’s undergraduate career.In 2011, the College of Engineering at the University of New Haven carried out a survey ofalumni and employers to investigate the skills needed specifically of and by engineeringgraduates. From this, it became apparent
known as constraint-based CAD, allows users to capture design intent and totake full advantage of the desktop computer as a design tool. As a result, required courses in ComputerAided Design have become ubiquitous in undergraduate Mechanical Engineering programs.Typically, students are introduced to the basics of spatial visualization, the theory of variousprojection techniques and the preparation of engineering drawings, all the while mastering themechanics of using a particular software package. As with many courses in today’s credit-starvedcurricula, teaching a CAD course presents a unique set of challenges. Perhaps foremost is the varyingstarting abilities of the students [1]. Some may be distracted by computer graphics, trying to makeparts
the growing demand for online learning fueled by the generationallearning preferences.IntroductionAccording to USNEWS, more students have taken online courses than ever before and thatnumber continues to climb as more programs augment their on-campus offerings with onlinelearning opportunities [1]. Besides the obvious advantages, numerous studies have demonstratedthat online learning can have the same or better learning outcomes as face-to-face courses [2]. Areport on the emerging engineering education leaders identifies blended learning practices as acornerstone of these programs [3]. In fact, an argument can be made that instructors who teachan online course improve their teaching because every element of the online learning experienceneeds
to second and third year students’ attitudes and ability to demonstratebiomedical engineering design skills. The value added to this approach is for second and thirdyear students to gain experience with the design process and early exposure to prototyping skills.Secondary benefits may also be extended to the capstone students in the ability to practiceprofessional skills which are generally considered lacking in many project based learning courses[1]. This includes leadership, communication, and project (both human and task) management.Project Approach Vertical integration with peer education is a curriculum-wide effort in the design coursesfor second, third, and fourth year students. The study takes place via a three week
development of engineers that exhibit an“entrepreneurial mindset coupled with engineering thought and action expressed throughcollaboration and communication and founded on character.” [1] In support of this, KEEN hascreated a framework of student outcomes and example behaviors that may be used to inform thedesign of programs seeking to develop an entrepreneurial mindset. These outcomes andbehaviors are centered around what KEEN calls The 3 C’s - curiosity, connections, and creatingvalue. Specific example behaviors of curiosity, connections, and creating value as described bythe KEEN framework may be seen in Figure 1 [1] and it is through this lens that we haveincorporated entrepreneurially minded learning into our undergraduate curriculum. Fostering
details. The paper introduces thisconcept using (1) Examples, such as a Galton Board and flipping coins, (2) Visualizing basicconcepts and some key concepts, (3) Real-life, experience-based examples such as heightdistribution, (4) A puzzle involving a multiple-choice exam, and (5) An in-class experiment ofrolling a die. It should be noted that this paper is a work in progress. In addition, this method ofteaching is meant to be supplemental and not to replace existing textbooks or other teaching andlearning methodologies. The work in this paper has been presented to 21 students in a Probabilityand Statistics classroom setting. Following the presentation, it has been assessed and receivedvery positive feedback. This visual, intuitive, and
through the volumes worth of materialwritten on the subject in order to simplify the topic of entropy to something that is clear and easyto understand. To accomplish this, the paper contributes by (1) introducing examples ofspontaneous processes that most people should already understand, (2) providing a brief reviewof the general operations of heat engines and the Carnot cycle, (3) framing the Carnot cycle inrelation to entropy, (4) discussing non-ideal heat engines, (5) showing analogies to help thereader understand the significance of the ratio Q/T as a definition for entropy, (6) adding somebrief notes on entropy that are beyond the general scope of this paper, and (7) presentingbrainteasers designed to engage students in the classroom. We
students'academic performance. This intent is to help educators, teachers, mentors, college authorities, andother involved parties to understand students' individual differences for a better training andguidance environment. Second, a closer look at the level of systemic thinking and PP ofengineering students would help to understand engineering students' skillset.Keywords: Systems thinking skills, proactive personality, academic performance, individualdifferences, engineering students, education.1. Introduction and research backgroundAcademic performance of college students, particularly those who are in a STEM engineeringprogram, continues to receive attention in the education literature. For performance efficacy ofstudents in academics, there exists a
undergraduateengineering courses are not designed to provide students with repeated practice and targetedfeedback by use of educational interventions. This project was designed to: 1) iteratively developthe innovative problem delivery and assessment system and evaluate its effectiveness in meetingspecific learning and assessment goals in engineering mechanics, 2) systematically study howthis technology-rich problem-solving interface can enhance the learning, teaching, andassessment of complex knowledge, and 3) critically evaluate opportunities and barriers to scalingand transferring the innovation across educational contexts. By focusing on the development ofstrong analytical problem-solving skills characterized by rich conceptual knowledge, this projectdirectly
-profit industry throughout San Diego and Los Angeles for National University.Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez and State Senator Ben Hueso recently recognized Anna for her workin the MANA De San Diego Latina Success Leadership Program. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Achieving Broader Impacts in STEM at 2-year Hispanic Serving InstitutionsAbstract (optional)IntroductionHispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs) are defined by the United States Department of Educationas institutions of higher education that enroll 25% or greater full-time equivalent Hispanicundergraduate students [1]. HSIs currently enroll 66% of the 3.5 million Hispanics in highereducation, 39% of all Asian American and Pacific Islanders, 21% of