currently facilitates an interdisciplinary project entitled ”Developing Reflective Engineers through Artful Methods.” His scholarly interests include both teaching and research in engineering education, art in engineering, social justice in engineering, care ethics in engineering, humanitarian engineering, engineering ethics, and computer modeling of electric power and renewable energy systems.Ms. Ngan T.T. Nguyen, Texas Tech University Ngan Nguyen is a research assistant and doctoral student in the Department of Curriculum and Instruc- tion at Texas Tech University. Her research is focused on fostering the learning experiences of Asian international graduate students in higher education.Dr. Roman Taraban, Texas Tech
for students from minoritybackgrounds [23]. While the range and type of learning communities may vary [24, 25], mostlearning communities embody several vital characteristics, including the use of smaller groupsamong faculty and students; the bringing together of faculty and students in more meaningfulways; curriculum integration; emphasis on the development of academic and social supportnetworks; and a focus on learning outcomes [26]. Learning communities help foster increasedstudent engagement, defined by Astin [27] as “the amount of physical and psychological energythat the student devotes to the academic experience” (p. 518).Description of InterventionThis project builds on a previous grant-funded project aimed at small cohorts of
belt and place them accurately into a drop-off fixture. In an effort togenerate interest within the robotic program and from local industries, the Department ofEngineering Technology at Drexel University responded to strength its curriculum by adding newinnovative components in its robotics and automation course, such as machine vision. A keycomponent in the robotics and automation course is the hands-on experience where student teamsuse and apply the vision systems hardware and software in an automated work-cell. In addition,the students are taught the principles of vision integration with other control devices, such as robotsand Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs). The experiment results make the studentsunderstand the vast use of sensor
adoption.Institutional Contexts First and foremost, we acknowledge that the work described in this paper is largelythanks to institutional support. At the University of San Diego (USD), where author DAC works,the push towards contextualization in engineering is situated in a larger university mission andstrategic vision, a liberal arts University Core curriculum, and an NSF RED grant sharedamongst leadership in the School of Engineering, as well as a new engineering department andprogram committed to helping students understand how their work impacts society. (Details canbe found in [11].) Due to this multi-layer united initiative, the new Integrated Engineeringprogram at USD is committed to broadening the definition of engineering and providingstudents
preliminarystudies were conducted to justify the suitability and feasibility of the minor. During departmentfaculty meetings the proposed minor degree, Marine Construction (MC) minor, was announcedand an unofficial vote was taken to determine the faculty’s opinion. Once the proposed minorwas approved within the department, an official “academic minor proposal” was submitted to theUniversity’s “Curriculum Committee” and “All University Committee” for consideration andapproval.A critical step in the developing the academic minor is establishing the Program EducationalObjectives (PEOs) and the course outcomes. While the MC minor is not in itself an accrediteddegree, the authors referred to ABET criteria for accrediting engineering degrees [1] indeveloping the
Research Associate at Texas A&M University’s Center for Teaching Excellence, Dr. Clint Patterson supports curriculum research, doctoral education, and academic grant writing. The goal of these efforts is to provide evidence-based information for the Center and Texas A&M academic lead- ership, as well as developing students. Clint graduated from Tarleton State University with a doctorate in educational leadership in 2018. This academic experience offered opportunities to be a researching practitioner in higher education, specifically within student affairs at Baylor University where he worked for twelve years. As an educator in student affairs, Clint developed skills to advocate, support, and lead areas of
need to be taught, supported, and integrated into the curriculum[7].The Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Visual Literacy CompetencyStandards for Higher Education [30] established an intellectual framework and structure tofacilitate the development of skills and competencies required for students to engage with imagesin an academic environment, and critically use and produce visual media throughout theirprofessional lives. The Standards articulate observable learning outcomes that can be taught andassessed, supporting efforts to develop measurable improvements in student visual literacy. Inaddition to providing tools for educators across disciplines, the Standards offer a commonlanguage for discussing student use of visual
Dublin- The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he is an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Ireland. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. He is author of Engineering Education. Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction; The Assessment of Learning in Engineering Education; The Human Side of Engineering, and Empowering Professional Teaching in Engineering. He co-authored A Case Study in Curriculum Assessment - GCE Engineering Science (Advanced).Prof. Carl O. Hilgarth, Shawnee State University Carl O. Hilgarth, M.S., is current division chair of the ASEE Technological and Engineering Literacy
engineering path selection in colleges and universities wasobtained, and content analysis technology was applied to analyze the data in a bid to verifythe theoretical model extract key factors in the construction of new engineering in collegesand universities eventually.Results Research shows that the path of discipline integration, the path of disciplinederivative, the path of Exogenously industry-led, and the path of Endogenouslydiscipline-driven have become the main paths for the construction of "new engineering" incolleges and universities. Moreover, the path of engineering innovation has also been fullyaffirmed by some universities. The nature of disciplines along with the types andcharacteristics of colleges and universities exerts an influence
Engineering ProblemsStudents expressed perspectives on the relationship between social and technical dimensions ofengineering problems – an extension from Theme 1 in Spring 2018 – on two axes, as shown inFigure 5. In this visualization, the horizontal axis ranges from technical-social dualism on the leftto sociotechnical integration on the right, and the vertical axis represents how muchresponsibility engineers have over the social and technical dimensions of engineering problems.Illustrative quotes are provided for each case. By sorting student perspectives into these fourquadrants (I-IV), our team can better represent patterns in students’ perspectives, attempt tounderstand whether any resistance to sociotechnical integration is a result of dualism
students.In this paper, an overview of the IMPACT program will be presented. The curriculum of the FLCand discussion of the theoretical framework will be discussed. Evidence is given of IMPACT’ssuccess as a faculty development and course transformation program since it started in thesummer of 2011. Specific evidence will be discussed regarding the program’s positive influenceon instructors’ teaching practices as well as student success and learning gains in STEM courses.Overview of the IMPACT programThe IMPACT program originally built upon the work of Carol Twigg and the National Center forAcademic Transformation (NCAT). Twigg and NCAT created a tightly structured program bysynthesizing research on active learning5. NCAT targeted large, introductory
Society. It provides the rationale for curriculum implementation, andthe integration of SDG’s topics into the course material.2. Vision of the ProgramThis project has significant institutional support, as Penn State and UNI entered into a university-wide strategic partnership agreement. UNI provides local resources, faculty, coordination andlocal students. At Penn State, the Cross-cultural Engagement and STEM Program has beenadded as a faculty-led program in its portfolio of approved perennial study abroad programs.The Cross-cultural Engagement and STEM Program represents a joint educational initiative,focusing on cultural immersion, exchange and STEM activities between Penn State and UNI. Inthis program, up to 30 Penn State students can travel
, interdisciplinary REUs can help students understand how to transfer thesoft- and hard-skills they learn across other courses and experiences beyond the classroom.Achieving this objective is a matter of configuring REUs to help students see and applyconnections across different learning experiences within the REU context. This paper presents apilot study that assesses how an interdisciplinary summer REU program provided STEMstudents with professional development training. The objective of this experimental programwas to provide educational experiences that allowed participants to integrate soft and technicalskills in an overall biomedical engineering context
graduation) is double among transfer studentscompared to students who entered as freshman. Consequently, transfer studentsdisproportionately lack the family knowledge resource necessary to form realisticexpectations. Researchers have shown that students successfully navigate through transfershock when they are more transfer ready. Transfer readiness is impacted by counseling,advice from students and faculty, and an understanding of the academic requirements of thenew institution [11]. Another prominent factor impacting students’ success in four year completion aftertransfer is integration into the social aspects of the new institution. This social integrationincludes participation in clubs, organizations, and events of different cultures
investigates on the factorsimpacting construction projects delivery in both domestic and international markets and exploresthe desired leadership skills to manage dynamically transforming project delivery process.Acknowledging the necessity of a transformation in leadership approach, the paper also includeshow the author incorporates the respective leadership skill development strategies into his coursecontent. The strategies included joint capstone and design projects for construction and civilengineering students in an international setting (e.g. study abroad), developing the capability toperform life cycle analysis (LCA) by integrating engineering economics problems into ProjectManagement course, inviting guest lecturers from the leadership team of
/troubleshooting, and student participation requirements should be weighed beforeinclusion in curricula.The modern engineering lesson plan and classroom should adapt constantly to match theimproving communication technologies and make regular attempts to blend the most usefultechnological advances with up-to-date, relevant curricula. Keeping educational technology up todate should be thought of as an integral part of an engineering curriculum and in-step with thecutting edge of innovation.References[1] A. W. Chickering and Z. F. Gamson, “Seven principles for good practice in undergraduateeducation,” Biochemical Education, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 140–141, 1989.[2] N. D. Vaughan, M. Cleveland-Innes, and D. R. Garrison, Teaching in blended learning environments
mindset (KEEN,2018). Across the country, undergraduate engineering programs are pursuing the integration ofentrepreneurial studies within STEM curriculum. Private and public institutions aresupplementing a didactic education (e.g. earning a Minor in Entrepreneurship) with co-curricularactivities, such as encouraging engineering student participation in related student organizations,in themed living learning communities, in entrepreneurship competitions, in internships atstartups, and in networking events with alumni entrepreneurs, to name a few. Finally, within thelast few years, there has been an upsurge in physical spaces created to support on-campusstartups and networking with entrepreneurs-in-residence. These so called co-working spaces
retainstudents across wide cross section of the population. While the diverse population of fiveboroughs of New York City provides a large pool of potential candidates, QCC attracts studentsfrom all five boroughs with a majority of student originating from Queens County. The collegealso attracts students from Nassau and Suffolk counties as well. This paper will present ourefforts to maintain and improve the diversity of our student body. The efforts are focused on ourhigh school recruitment effort, the Summer Robotics program, the Women in TechnologySummer Workshop, and the changes we initiated in our curriculum in an effort to maintain andhave our student achieve a successful academic outcome. Research shows that a first-generationcollege student needs
implemented for the first time in the 2018-19 academic yearacross a two-semester senior capstone course. In this implementation, the e-learning module andinitial guest lectures preceded the initial business competition rounds in order to encourage andsupport student teams in their efforts to develop and communicate their business startup ideas,with the ultimate goal being the encouragement of engineering entrepreneurship. Studentperceptions and self-assessment results are presented in order to quantify the effects ofcombining multiple business modules into a single course sequence.IntroductionIncorporating entrepreneurship education into the engineering curriculum has seen a significantincrease in recent years [1]. ASME Vision 2030, an effort to
American Robotics Symposium, Oct 2006, pp. 187–192. [3] A. Gilmore, “Design elements of a mobile robotics course based on student feedback,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/p.23798. Seattle, Washington: ASEE Conferences, June 2015, https://peer.asee.org/23798. [4] A. Minaie and R. Sanati-Mehrizy, “An international study of robotics courses in the computer science/engineering curriculum,” in 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition. Chicago, Illinois: ASEE Conferences, June 2006, https://peer.asee.org/942. [5] R. Alba-Flores and F. Rios-Gutierrez, “Control systems design course with a focus for applications in mobile robotics,” in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta, Georgia: ASEE
Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for student professional development and training. In addition, she is developing methodologies around hidden curriculum, academic emotions and physiology, and en- gineering makerspaces. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Understanding Industry’s Expectations of Engineering Communication
, field program content descriptions as well as administration andsafety measures. Afterwards, an integrated evaluation system combining theperformance assessment with student questionnaires is described in detail. Thequestionnaires require students to answer questions on the effectiveness of the fieldpractice program based on self-assessment. Moreover, independent-sample t-tests areconducted to compare the student learning outcomes between the students who haveparticipated in the program and those who have not, and paired T-tests were alsoperformed to compare the improvement of five required abilities between the studentswho have participated in the program and those who have not based on teachers’evaluation.Results: Through analyses on the
California, San Diego, and then went on to get a doctorate in mechanical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1994. He was a lecturer and Director of the Design Studio at Yale University for four years, and then returned to his alma matter, UC, San Diego, in 1999. He is now a tenured lecturer and Director of the Design Center in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. He teaches hands- on design courses, including an introductory design class, a mechatronics class, and a capstone design class. His interests in design education include increasing student motivation, teamwork, and integration of theory into design projects.Dr. Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego
also at The Ohio State University, specializing in condensed matter theory. Dr. Porter now works in the area of physics education research in the OSU Department of Physics. 2019 FYEE Conference : Penn State University , Pennsylvania Jul 28 Full Paper: Implementing Classroom-Scale Virtual Reality into a Freshman Engineering Visuospatial Skills CourseAbstractIn this study, our team developed a virtual reality (VR) integrated curriculum for a freshmanengineering visuospatial thinking course. Visuospatial skills, especially understanding how a 2Dimage represents a 3D object, are known to be an important part of student success inengineering. To ensure a minimum level of visuospatial skills in later
Paper ID #25117Communicating the Value of a Transdisciplinary Degree: Comparing andContrasting Perceptions Across Student GroupsDr. Lisa Bosman, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Bosman is an Assistant Professor in Technology Leadership and Innovation and the Program Co- ordinator for Transdisciplinary Studies in Technology. Her STEM education research interests include entrepreneurial mindset, renewable energy, competency-based learning, self-regulated learning, transdis- ciplinary education, civic engagement, and faculty professional development. She spent the first part of her career working as a manufacturing
one of theways the difference in frames used to tell the story of faculty tenure and promotion impactedthe department culture: We had been hiring on the basis of this [innovative] vision. We had hired a couple of people. We had set up our unit bylaws so that teaching was an integral part of promotion and tenure, which was different than everybody else at [our university]. And so, we were very focused on delivering the best undergraduate education program we could and we went from that sort of very tightly-knit sort of esoteric-- and we called ourselves the hippies. From that sort of environment to a much more traditional-- the faculty that were merged into the program had much
, who were committed to engineering instruction during their first two years ofclassroom teaching. Both teachers were hired for their first positions by schools with highpercentages of black or Latino/a students, groups typically underrepresented in STEM. Our studyis guided by the research question, how do early career urban elementary school teachers inhigh-needs schools choose to incorporate engineering into their teaching, and what reasoningand beliefs motivate those choices evolve over time?Theoretical FrameworkPrevious research has shown that elementary teachers who integrate engineering into theirestablished curriculum believe it is important to teach engineering to prepare students for theworkforce, help them understand how technology is
]. Electrospray thrusters are now being considered as high specific impulse(propellant efficient), low thrust devices for small satellite maneuvering and control [4,5].Electrospray thrusters for flight missions are a complex technology, requiring a balance ofelectrical performance, fluid flow management in micro-gravity, and manufacturing precision forhigh performance, and system lifetimes. However, the basic principles of the devices can easilybe demonstrated in a lab setting as part of an undergraduate curriculum using a simplifiedterrestrial version of the thruster to demonstrate key principles and operational considerations.Minor modifications can be made to the such a set-up to convert it to a thruster suited to agraduate level curriculum where the
engineering curriculum, as has been done at times with Formula SAE [8].Some of the skills the competitions promote are an entrepreneurial mindset, project management,leadership skills [9], and systems engineering knowledge [10]. AutoDrive is not only one of thelatest collegiate competitions, but perhaps it is the most challenging competition involvingautonomous vehicles at a high level of complexity, defined as SAE Level 4 autonomy, per SAEStandard J3016 [11]. One of the related issues to address is the education and training of studentsdirectly participating in the competition and more generally, of students interested in a futurecareer in the area of autonomous vehicles.Many approaches exist to design and deliver education and training programs
) industry has become morecomplex, requiring changes in both design and construction processes [1]. Three new processesare carrying out an important role to manage this increasing complexity: building informationmodeling (BIM), integrated project delivery (IPD), and lean construction (LC) [1], [2], [3]. Inaddition to BIM, IPD and LC, sustainable construction has been drawing much attention fromthe AEC industry due to the growing concerns on climate change, the depletion of the earth’sresources, and the widespread pollution [4].It is important to emphasize that sustainable construction, BIM, IPD and LC are processes thatrequire effective collaboration among team members and a holistic design approach to guaranteethe construction of buildings with