. Industry-centered studies over the lasttwo decades show fresh graduates have limited workplace and interpersonal skills [3]. Thisscenario is associated in the literature with the shortage of dedicated engineering courses toincorporate these relevant blends of competencies into students’ coursework.In this study, we explore the efficacy of a sequence of coursework and activities designed by theUniversity of South Florida's Department of Electrical Engineering to support students’professional proficiency and technical skills development. Undergraduate students participatedin a series of Professional Formation of Engineers (PFE) courses and technical courses withinspecialized tracks designed by the department. A sample of students who had taken the
community-building and connection-making with engineering faculty and industry partners. More emphasishas been placed on introducing students to engineering in both academic and industrialsettings. In 2016 a change was made to invite all admitted female-identifying engineeringstudents and institute a selection process that values an essay about what the student anticipatesthey would get from participation in the bridge program. The tenth anniversary of the programwas in the summer of 2018, so a more comprehensive longitudinal study of outcomes forparticipants has been undertaken.As a living program that has been evolved based on formative assessment, the same essentialgoals of increasing the retention, success (measured by GPA) and graduation of
. Continual support throughfinancial incentives and mentorship are important as well as delivering positive messages thattranscend gender stereotypes and emphasize engineering’s ability to help people and to becompatible with family life. Frome et al.20 found that “leaks” in the STEM pipeline were relatedto young women’s perceptions of a lack of occupational flexibility in STEM that would interferewith being able to balance family and career. Pitching engineering to girls must be done in athoughtful and consistent manner within the systems of influence surrounding the student. Educators at the high school and college level and practicing engineers can work togetherlocally to support the development of a community and culture in which there are
students take a rigorous and intensive University course (e.g., chemistry,calculus) with other non-Summer Scholars participants, as well as a cohort-based elective(Engineering Projects, Research, or Professional Development). In addition to their coursework,students are mentored in successful student behaviors such as study skills and participate inactivities that promote community-building and growth as engineers (e.g., local industry visits).While Summer Scholars is open to all students, in-state, underrepresented students (concerningrace/ethnicity, gender, and rural counties) are targeted with special invitations and scholarships.Summer Scholars significantly differs from traditional summer bridge programs, as this programtargets students
research and experiences in the Mechanical Engineering Department atOhio University’s Russ College of Engineering and Technology that identified‘professionalizing’ engineering education as an approach worth further investigation tosignificantly change the learning and professional development of engineering students. Ourapproach, which has been branded Pro-op education, involves prioritizing (and leading with)development of Professional Attitudes, Behaviors and Competencies (Pro-ABCs) as foundationalskills, and interweaving traditional coursework with small but significant professionalexperiences designed to emphasize aspects of the U.S Department of Labor’s engineeringcompetency model (primarily personal and workplace effectiveness). The
students’ ethical awareness. Both of thesepapers emphasized how instructors play a crucial role in communicating the relevance of ethicsto professional engineering identity, either by encouraging students to develop their own ethicalcode as a fundamental part of professional development or by leading them to believe that ethicsare ancillary to day-to-day engineering work (and thereby, as well, to engineering identity). Inthis respect, the current state of ethics education in engineering programs appears to be as much,if not more so, the result of HC as of formalized curricular content.One important outlier among our research set bears special mention for its alignment with ourgoals in the present analysis. The publication, which we classified as
focuses on the design, implementation, and evaluation of technologies, programs, and curricula to support diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM fields. Currently, through this work, she is the Backbone Director for the Alliance for Identity-Inclusive Computing Education as well as Education and Workforce Director for the Athena AI Institute. Having garnered over $40M in funding from public and private sources to support her collabo- rative research activities, Daily’s work has been featured in USA Today, Forbes, National Public Radio, and the Chicago Tribune. Daily earned her B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Florida Agri- cultural and Mechanical University – Florida State University College of
Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University. Her research interest focuses on interdisci- plinary students’ identity development, belongingness in engineering, and recognition.Miss Brittany Nicole Boyd, Morgan State UniversityMr. Kevrick Watkins c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Minority Serving Institutions: America's Underutilized Resource for Strengthening the STEM Workforce Report – Implications for Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)AbstractIn 2018, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine released a reportentitled, Minority Serving Institutions: America’s Underutilized Resource for Strengthening theSTEM Workforce. The
fields, and factors influencing students’ learning and development. Author of 6 books, over 75 journal articles, more than 100 conference paper and abstracts, Strayhorn is co-editor of Spectrum: A Journal on Black Men and member of several boards.Mr. Leroy L. Long III, Ohio State University Leroy L. Long III earned his master’s in Mechanical Engineering at Ohio State University and his bach- elor’s in Mechanical Engineering at Wright State University. He is now a doctoral student in STEM Education within the School of Teaching and Learning at Ohio State, where he studies topics including but not limited to cognitive development, learning, teaching, and the social contexts within which they occur. He is a Lead Graduate
the City College Black Male Leadership and Mentoring Program and has taught courses in Black Studies and Chemistry at the City College. At the NYC Alliance, he oversaw the day- to-day operation of the NYC Alliance programming across the 18 participating campuses at the City University of New York for 20 years. Dr. Brathwaite began his college education at Hostos Community College, received his BS in Chemistry from the City College of New York and his Ph.D. in Organic Chem- istry from the Graduate Center of CUNY. He served as a Chancellors Fellow, and conducted additional postdoctoral training at Weill Cornell in the Division of Molecular Medicine. ©American Society for Engineering Education
-programs/dual-degree-engineering/dual-degree- engineering-requirements28. Perry, Reginald J. "An analysis of a pre-engineering program model used to predict a student's persistence to graduation." Frontiers in Education Conference, 2013 IEEE. IEEE, 2013.29. Ennis et al, “GoldShirt Transitional Program: First-Year Results and Lessons Learned on Creating Engineering Capacity and Expanding Diversity, 2011 ASEE Conference,30. Knight et al, “The Impact of Inclusive Excellence Programs on the Development of Engineering Identity among First-Year Underrepresented Students, 2013 ASEE Conference, Atlanta, GA.31. Kingma et al, “The Washington STate Academic RedShirt (STARS) in Engineering Program, 2014 ASEE Conference, Indianapolis, IN.32
project director of a National Science Foundation GK-12 grant, Liz developed a highly effective tiered mentoring model for graduate and undergraduate engineering and education teams as well as a popu- lar Family STEM event offering for both elementary and middle school communities. Current projects include providing comprehensive professional development, coaching and program consulting for K-8 integrated STEM using engineering schools in several states and serving as a Professional Development partner for the Engineering is Elementary program. She is also a Co-PI on two NSF DR-K-12 grants focused on practice and research in K-8 engineering education and the chair of the ASEE Long Range Planning Committee on K-12
official course pathways of a large public engineeringcollege. While prior research investigating change models in engineering education hasdiscussed the importance of developing a shared vision, utilizing the power of stories,implementing change through just and fair processes, and viewing curricular change as thecreation of alternative educational scales [4]–[7], we acknowledge that these change strategieswere neither explicitly adopted nor employed prior to making a significant policy changebetween Year 1 and Year 2 of pilot course implementation. Specifically, the status of the WSMclass at our institution changed from optional in Year 1 to mandatory in Year 2 for all studentsentering the engineering college classified as not ready for single
AC 2011-467: ASSESSMENT OF FIRST YEAR EXPERIENCES AT SJSUPatricia R Backer, San Jose State University PATRICIA BACKER is a professor of Technology and the Director of General Engineering at SJSU. In 1997, she received a Fulbright Scholar award in Peru where she taught on the topics of computer-based multimedia. At SJSU, she is involved in developing and assessing outreach programs to increase the number of underrepresented students in engineering.Emily L. Allen, College of Engineering, San Jose State UniversityJanet Sundrud, San Jose State University JANET SUNDRUD is a graduate student in the Department of Communication Studies. She specializes in performance theory, queer identities, gender equality, and critical
studentfeedback and instructor reflection. ‚ Provide clear information to the seminar speakers about the backgrounds of the freshmen students. Several speakers’ presentations were at a highly technical level that made it difficult for the freshmen to follow. ‚ Invite junior- and senior-level female students into the class to talk about their experiences in addition to graduated engineers and faculty members. ‚ Include at least one more “hands on” session. We spent one session talking about engineering design and building paper towers from index cards. The students wanted more sessions like this one. ‚ Include at least one more community-building session where we spent time talking about classes and freshmen
Paper ID #37665’It Gives Me a Bit of Anxiety’: Civil and Architectural EngineeringStudents’ Emotions Related to Their Future Responsibility as EngineersDr. Madeline Polmear, Vrije Universiteit Brussel Madeline Polmear is a Marie Sklodowska-Curie, EUTOPIA Science & Innovation Cofund Fellow at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium. Her research interests relate to engineering ethics education and the development of societal responsibility and professional competence through formal and informal learning. Madeline received her Bachelors in environmental engineering, Masters in civil engineering, and PhD in civil
Paper ID #32556Investigating Potential Gender Differences in First-Year EngineeringStudents’ Academic Motivation and Homework Submission BehaviorMiss Cara Mawson, Rowan University Cara is a graduate student pursuing her Ph.D. in Experiential Engineering Education (ExEEd) at Rowan University. Her research focuses on the relationship between gamification and motivation in undergrad- uate engineering students. Previously she earned a B.S. in Physics where she performed research in biophysics, astrophysics, and cosmology. In addition, she has taught science, computer science, and technology through Project Lead The Way at a
Paper ID #25863Participation in Small Group Engineering Design Activities at the MiddleSchool Level: An Investigation of Gender DifferencesJeanna R. Wieselmann, University of Minnesota Jeanna R. Wieselmann is a Ph.D. Candidate in Curriculum and Instruction and National Science Foun- dation Graduate Research Fellow at the University of Minnesota. Her research focuses on gender equity in STEM and maintaining elementary girls’ interest in STEM through both in-school and out-of-school experiences. She is interested in integrated STEM curriculum development and teacher professional de- velopment to support gender-equitable
(International Flavors and Fragrances) prior to his current role. He served on the executive committee of the ASEE Women in Engineering division from 2010 to present.Dr. Michael D. Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Johnson’s research focuses on engineering education; design tools
engineering side. I like math. I like building stuff. I discovered later – actually, I developed a passion later…for the field, for the coursework. It wasn’t as much linear algebra and math stuff; it was taking some of that and building circuits and stuff. You know, projects – taking that stuff and using it and that was really cool. So I really got excited. (Brent)Whether interested in how things work in general, or in new gadgets and high-tech items, ormath and science, or more hands-on building, these men were distinctive in that the activitiesthey find inherently motivating and enjoyable would be best fulfilled through an engineeringcareer. For example, other professional career fields would be unlikely to provide
Engineering Through a Humanistic Lens” in Engineering Studies 2015 and ”A Game-Based Approach to Information Literacy and Engi- neering in Context” (with Laura Hanlan) in Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference 2015. A classroom game she developed with students and colleagues at WPI, ”Humanitarian Engineering Past and Present: Worcester’s Sewage Problem at the Turn of the Twentieth Century” was chosen by the Na- tional Academy of Engineering as an ”Exemplary Engineering Ethics Activity” that prepares students for ”ethical practice, research, or leadership in engineering.”Ms. Laura A. Robinson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Lead Research & Instruction LibrarianProf. John M. Sullivan Jr, Worcester
(volume 2): a third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2005.16. Banks, J.A., Banks, C.A.M. Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley and Sons, 2010.17. Merolla, D.M., Serpe, R.T. STEM enrichment programs and graduate school matriculation: the role of science identity salience. Social Psychology Education 16:575-597, 2013.18. Bilimoria, D., Joy, S., Liang, X. Breaking barriers and creating inclusiveness: lessons of organizational transformation to advance women faculty in academic science and engineering. Human Resource Management, 47(3): 423-441, 2008.19. Yoder, B.L. Engineering by the numbers. Engineering College Profiles & Statistics ASEE, 2012.20. CRA-W, Career mentoring
Purdue University. He also holds a courtesy faculty appointment in the School of Engineering Education. His research focuses on assessment development and the professional formation of students.Dr. Jennifer S. Linvill, Purdue University Dr. Jennifer S. Linvill is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership & Innovation at Purdue University. Her research examines organizational challenges related to future work and learning, specifically within the context of workforce development. Her research portfolio focuses on workforce development through the lens of the changing nature of work and is strategically designed to address organizational challenges by providing novel solutions through an
thinking.The final list of course objectives developed for the engineering and society freshmanseminar is listed in Table 2. For clarity, the learning objectives are grouped into fourcategories, with an additional category of retention through community-building tocapture the goals of increased mentoring and peer interaction among the students.After high-quality learning objectives are defined, assessments and activities arerelatively easy to select. In fact, the Teaching Goals Inventory in Classroom AssessmentTechniques3 is designed to point the reader to specific assessments based on thoseobjectives scored as highest priority. This was the method used for the course describedhere. For example, some of the ethics activities were altered to draw
AC 2007-2999: EXPANDING GIRLS’ HORIZONS IN MATH AND SCIENCE: ALONGITUDINAL EVALUATION OF EYH CONFERENCE OUTCOMESMary Virnoche, Humboldt State University Mary is an associate professor of Sociology at Humboldt State University. Since graduate school she has been committed to community-based research and applied work with a focus on race, class and gender inequities. While a gradaute student and then a research associate at the University of Colorado, she facilitated partnerships between STEM professionals, educators and marginalized communities in addressing digital divide concerns. Since joining the faculty at HSU, Mary has focused on facilitating the participation of girls in the STEM pipeline and
White) peers disappeared. This has strong implications for bothfaculty and TA professional development. It also strengthens support for further research thatemphasizes both how students feel through emotional engagement as well as what they dothrough more traditional measures of engagement.IntroductionThis study investigates the role of gender, race/ethnicity, first-generation status, and internationalstudent status in engagement in engineering classrooms. We also consider the effect ofinstructional support and interactions in the relationships between demographic groups andmultiple forms of emotional engagement that students report in the engineering classroom.Demographic categories of interest were chosen based on how the existing literature
than one course. Thirty-seven full-time engineering faculty members havetried service-learning at least once so far, just about half the faculty.Faculty were recruited via personal contacts and through workshops offered in the summer andfall of 2004. All engineering faculty were invited. The summer workshop was an all day affairwith presentations by Dwight Giles as well as community partners and breakout discussions;Dwight Giles is a well-known researcher in service-learning9 and was a consultant on the project.A second workshop was about 3 hours and focused on assessment, and again Dwight Gilespresented. A planning grant from NSF allowed faculty to develop S-L courses throughminigrants and graduate student support, and a part-time S-L
, teen pregnancy prevention/positive youth development programming, and public health eval- uation.Dr. Ann Saterbak, Duke University Ann Saterbak is Professor of the Practice in the Biomedical Department and Director of First-Year En- gineering at Duke University. Saterbak is the lead author of the textbook, Bioengineering Fundamen- tals. Saterbak’s outstanding teaching was recognized through university-wide and departmental teaching awards. In 2013, Saterbak received the ASEE Biomedical Engineering Division Theo C. Pilkington Out- standing Educator Award. For her contribution to education within biomedical engineering, she was elected Fellow in the Biomedical Engineering Society and the American Society of
2 1 Professors 2 1 1We used a purposive sample - students were selected because they either majored in engineeringor intend/intended to major in engineering and came from an underrepresented community, andprofessors were selected because they teach engineering at the college level. Once the potentialinterviewees were identified, we reached out to them via email to set up an interview by Zoom.The interviews lasted between 30 and 60 minutes and were recorded for transcription purposes.Interviewees were not paid for participation.The interview protocol was developed specifically for this project. The prompts from theprotocol that focused on assessment and identity
that a crucial factor in students’ learning and development ofengineering identity is how they are socialized into a research community. Our study (funded byNSF EEC RFE 1606868) draws on theories from the fields of education and science andtechnology studies, such as expertise [7], identity formation [8], and situated learning [9]. To investigate learning in labs, we collected qualitative data about students’ everydayinteractions with communities of graduate students, postdocs, and PIs. We conducted participantobservation in two engineering laboratories in a medium-sized public university for the academicyear of 2016-2017, which included attending meetings and shadowing undergraduates during labwork. The labs are about the same size and