Paper ID #34049Global Impact of Experiment-centric Pedagogy and Home-based, Hands-onLearning Workshop at a Historically Black UniversityDr. Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University Dr. Oludare Owolabi, a professional engineer in Maryland, joined the Morgan State University fac- ulty in 2010. He is the assistant director of the Center for Advanced Transportation and Infrastructure Engineering Research (CATIER) at Morgan State University and the director of the Civil Engineering Undergraduate Laboratory. He has over eighteen years of experience in practicing, teaching and research in civil engineering. His
focus is on the intersecting factors of gender, socio-economic status [SES],national origin, and language, and its impact on Latinx persistence in engineering. In our study,persistence is defined as both completion of an engineering undergraduate program and stayingin the field for one year following graduation. Few studies examine persistence beyond graduation, and, because almost half ofengineering degree holders do not enter engineering occupations [2], we studied participantsduring a critical juncture in their trajectory — the last year of their studies and the first year oftheir professional lives — to better understand this phenomenon. Thus, the research is expectedto contribute to the extant knowledge base on Latinx’ positionality
Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 13–26, 1 2002. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rvst20[36] M. Kargarmoakhar, M. Ross, Z. Hazari, S. Secules, M. A. Weiss, M. Georgiopoulos, K. Christensen, and T. Solis, “The Impact of a Community of Practice Scholarship Program on Students’ Computing Identity,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 9 2021. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623615[37] M. Ross, E. Litzler, and J. Lopez, “Meeting students where they are: A virtual computer science education research (cser) experience for undergraduates (reu),” in Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ser. SIGCSE ’21. New York, NY, USA
competency derives from working effectively in diverse and multicultural international environments [7]. Professionalcompetency is best defined by the ability to communicate and work in diverse teams effectively [6]. Colleges are answering the need for global engineers by offering its students various international experiences throughinternships, projects, study abroad and academic exchange, collaborative research projects, service learning projects abroad,and graduate-level international programs [9], [10]. A survey of international engineering programs reported on the types ofprograms available, their challenges, and best practices [11]. Student recruitment, program scaling, and assessment methodsare some of the major challenges faced by these
Engineering Education Assessment (i2e2a). In 2013, she became founder and owner of STEMinent LLC, a company focused on STEM education assessment and professional development for stakeholders in K-12 education, higher education, and Corporate America. Her research is focused upon the use of mixed methodologies to explore significant research questions in undergraduate, graduate, and professional engineering education, to integrate concepts from higher education and learning science into engineering education, and to develop and disseminate reliable and valid assessment tools for use across the engineering education continuum. American c Society for Engineering
graduation to70% within our Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department.We have achieved this dramatic increase in retention by iterating through several years of interventiondevelopment and deployment. Crucially, our interventions combine elements designed to affect studentsacross a range of affective learning categories—an approach not yet found in the literature. However,while we have anecdotal information from students regarding their responses to many of theinterventions, we have not yet scientifically studied which interventions are important to which studentpopulations. This paper will thus describe successful practices that we have implemented, highlightingthose that are thought to have the largest effect on women based on a
) to create engineering pathways for students in the CSUB service area. She is also the co-PI for an NSF IUSE grant (NSF-DUE1430398) to improve STEM retention and graduation, the Activities Director for a U.S. Department of Education MSEIP grant (P120A110050) to develop an engineering calculus sequence and engineering outreach programs, and the Summer Program Director for another MSEIP grant (P120A140051) to improve pre-calculus and provide research opportunities for first and second year students. Her research interests are focused on network and system security, particularly with respects to protecting mission-critical resources and services. She is also conducting research in applying biological concepts to
her substantial experience supporting students with disabilities, she has assisted faculty members in redesigning instructional content and syllabi to ensure digital accessibility. Furthermore, Elnara has conducted training sessions for instructors and textbook authors to enhance the representation of students with disabilities both in classroom settings and within textbooks. She is a Graduate Research Assistant in the Technology Leadership and Innovation program at Purdue University.Mr. Shawn Farrington, Purdue University Shawn is currently a Senior Lecturer at the Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University. He coordinates the core design thinking course as part of the Freshman Experience, teaches his sections, trains
change higher education. Its 10threcommendation states: Page 26.907.2 Research universities should foster a community of learners. Large universities must find ways to create a sense of place and to help students develop small communities within the larger whole4. (p.34)The Boyer report served as a call to action for colleges to reform their educational practices andrestructure classrooms to increase active learning among students.Scholarly research in the 1980s and 1990s provided the underpinnings of the learningcommunity concept. Vincent Tinto who studied the causes of attrition in college found thatstudents were more likely
universities to help freshmen and upper-classmen succeed in challenging college courses. SI can consist of peer tutoring, instructor officehours, review sessions, study groups, or any combination of these. Students who use SI havebeen shown to earn higher term and cumulative grade point averages (GPA’s) as well as moretimely graduation rates than their peers who do not utilize SI.. [3] [4] [5] It also has been shown thatthere is a statistically significant correlation between higher term GPA’s and more time spent inSI. [2] [6] “The U.S. Department of Education has designated SI as an Exemplary Educational Practice and has validated the following three research findings: Students participating in SI within the targeted
part-time students who were in no hurry to graduate, the Capstone Experience dragged on for up to five quarters.As part of our ongoing ABET assessment process and after several teams completed theprogram, we made some significant changes and these changes represent the CapstoneExperience as currently implemented. Three key changes were implemented: 1. The Capstone course was extended to two quarters. Capstone I is a two-credit course in which the students research the project and create a formal specification that must be approved by their industry mentor. Capstone II is a three-credit course in which the students actually build, debug and validate their design. Capstone II ends with a report, a
organizations, and extra-curricular activities” [1, p. 1]. Many of theseinstitutions have been designated as “veteran friendly” by organizations such as CollegeChoice’s “Best Colleges for Veterans” [11], Best Value Schools’ “Military-Friendly Colleges”[12], and G.I. Jobs’ [13] “Sponsored Schools that Want to Educate You.” These initiatives oftenhighlight the institutional characteristics that contribute to student veteran success. For example,College Choice recognizes that the best colleges establish “a vet-friendly culture at their school,which only happens through a holistic approach that engages the administrators, the studentbody, veterans, service members, and of course their families” [11, emphasis in original].Research indicates these programs
plans for the future. A discussion on theconcept of a polytechnic institution, its definition, and transformative nature is included to clarifythe reasons behind this radical and somewhat unsettling approach to education reformation.IntroductionAcademic institutions of higher learning are facing many difficult challenges, includingdeclining enrollment trends, complaints about costs vs. value, curricular stagnation, and inabilityto adapt quickly to changing environments facing graduating students. Many researchers andauthors claim that the traditional educational methods and structure espoused by universities isoutdated and potentially restrictive to learners. 1, 2 The College of Technology at PurdueUniversity is dealing with these challenges
finite inertia power systems particularly naval vessels. Currently he works at CAPS-FSU as a research associate and as the instructor for Engineering Design Methods at the FSU-FAMU College of engineering.Dr. Nikhil Gupta, Florida State University Nikhil Gupta received his Bachelor of Technology degree from Y.M.C.A. Institute of Technology, Haryana, India in 2008, Master of Science degree from North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, in 2010, and Ph.D from Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, in 2014, all in Mechanical Engineering. He is cur- rently an Adjunct Professor teaching Senior Design in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. He is also serving as Postdoctoral Research Associate at Center of
develop hybrid educational modules linked to engineering grandchallenges to improve science and math concepts in k-12 curriculum.References 1. Ward, J. S., & Fontecchio, A. (2012, October). Work in progress: The NAE Grand Challenges, high school curricula and Graduate student research. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2012 (pp. 1-2). IEEE. 2. Davis, V., Raju, P. K., Lakin, J., Davis, E. (2016). Nanotechnology Solutions to Engineering Grand Challenges. American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference. 3. Mote Jr, C. D., Dowling, D. A., & Zhou, J. (2016). The Power of an Idea: The International Impacts of the Grand Challenges for Engineering. Engineering, 2(1), 4-7 4. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A
this paper is to examine the impacts of different mindsets on the way educatorsapproach their teaching and research. Although the results from this four-person study are notgeneralizable to engineering or education faculty more broadly, gaining a better understanding ofthe problem-solving-relevant mindsets of these individuals can add greater detail andunderstanding to concepts explored in previously established literature.This paper is organized as follows. In the next section, we describe the background and literaturerelevant to our study. Next, we describe our methods for collecting and analyzing the interviewtranscript data. The Findings section describes the mindsets and themes we found in the databased on the analysis process. It is
received her B.S. and M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the Ohio State University in 2017, and her M.S. in Engineering Education Research from the University of Michigan in 2020. As a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education Research at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Sarah is studying the mental health experiences of engineering graduate students.Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson (he/him/his) is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. He believes in a strong connection between engineering education research and practice, and his research
-year project to develop, implement, and studyoutcomes from the curriculum to promote development of inclusive engineering identities. Todevelop our experimental curricula of inclusive engineering practices, we draw on this literaturereview as well as survey data collected from the baseline year of this research project. Thefollowing section reports on baseline findings from students in two first-year engineering coursesthat did not include diversity or identity specific curriculum.Baseline SurveyTo assess the impact of the inclusive engineering identities curriculum, a quasi-experimentalresearch design was adopted. Data collection took place at a large public university with astudent body comprised of 17% underrepresented minorities, 51% women
hypothesis to better align them with the real-world. Inthe last two decades, the National Research Council has encouraged the use of “student-centeredinquiry-learning” teaching methods in secondary and postsecondary curricula6,7. These strategieshave been widely incorporated into classes such as anatomy and physiology8, biology 9,10,mathematics11, business marketing12, among many others. Applications of these techniques ininterdisciplinary programs spanning from science to engineering are still lacking. The student-centered inquiry-learning educational theory and best practices serves as the educationalframework of the proposed program.As illustrated in Figure 1, the process starts with a background evaluation for each trainee andthe follow-up
-winning mentors is the ability to establish and sustain a sense of challenge whilemaintaining meaningful engagement and a sense of achievement amongst students. This requiresan understanding of diverse student backgrounds, and can be transferred to other faculty via facultyconversations and mentoring.8 Undergraduate research is also a high impact practice for retainingstudents in the STEM disciplines.9 A review of nearly forty years of scholarship presents a complexportrait of the myriad factors that influence the undergraduate and graduate experiences of womenof color in STEM fields, providing guidance for advancing the status of women of color inSTEM.10 Best practices have been shown to succeed when transplanted to new universities.11,12This
Paper ID #32198Exploring the Gendered Impacts of COVID-19 on FacultySarah Trainer, Seattle University Sarah Trainer is a medical anthropologist. Her work examines everyday negotiations around identity, wellness, and challenges to these within the context of large organizations. She is currently the Research & Program Coordinator for a National Science Foundation–funded ADVANCE Program at Seattle Uni- versity.Dr. Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University Agnieszka Miguel received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 2001 from the University of Washing- ton, and MSEE and BSEE from Florida Atlantic University in 1996 and
“complex interlinkages”, which is a cousin of systems thinking), social andemotional learning (values and attitudes), and behavioral learning (practical actions). TheEngineering for One Planet (EOP) Framework (2022), developed through the LemelsonFoundation and VentureWell, establishes nine learning outcomes, each of which includes coreand advanced outcomes (these appear to be interchangeable with competencies, despite thedistinction between competencies and outcomes articulated by Wiek et al. 2011); the EOPlearning outcomes are Systems Thinking, Environmental Literacy, Responsible Business andEconomy, Social Responsibility, Environmental Impact Assessment, Materials Selection, Design,Critical Thinking, and Communication and Teamwork. It is
) Apply theories to practice in the real world 3.77 (.927) 4.00 (.816) Balance diverse perspectives in deciding 3.62 (.870) 4.00 (.707)* whether to act Distinguish multiple consequences of your 3.92 (.862) 4.08 (.641) actions Go beyond facile answers to engage with the 3.54 (1.05) 3.69 (.947) complexity of a situation Readily identify ambiguities and unanswered 3.68 (.266) 3.62 (.213) questions Understand the differences among analysis, 3.62 (1.044) 3.92 (.954) synthesis, and comparison Analyzing data for patterns 3.69 (.947) 4.08 (.760) Figuring out the next step in a research 3.62 (.768) 3.69 (.855) project Problem-solving in general
Electrical Engineering and his Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science from Florida International University in 1992 and 1989. Dr. Gonzalez research interest includes the intelligent control of large scale autonomous systems, autonomous vehicles, discrete-event modeling and simulation and human signature verification. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Impacts of Active Learning on Learning Disabled StudentsAbstractOne of the most important best practices in education is active learning. Earlier this year, theWhite House Office of Science and Technology Policy issued a national Call to Action aimed atimproving STEM education through the use of active learning. Active learning
Paper ID #26515Collaborative Research: Supporting Agency among Early Career Engineer-ing Education Faculty in Diverse Institutional Contexts: Developing a Frame-work for Faculty AgencyDr. Courtney S Smith-Orr, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Courtney S. Smith,PhD is an Undergraduate Coordinator & Teaching Assistant Professor at UNC Char- lotte. Her research interests span the mentoring experiences of African American women in engineering, minority recruitment and retention, and best practices for diversity and inclusion in the Engineering class- room. She received her B.S. in Optical Engineering and M.S. in
] Permzadian, V., Credé, M. (2016). Do First-Year Seminars Improve College Grades andRetention? A Quantitative Review of Their Overall Effectiveness and an Examination ofModerators of Effectiveness. Review of Educational Research, 86, 277-316.[10] Young, D. G., & Hopp, J. M. (2014). 2012–2013 National survey of first-year seminars:Exploring high-impact practices in the first college year (Research Report No. 4). Columbia:University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the FirstYear Experience andStudents in Transition.[11] Wintre, M. G., & Bowers, C. D. (2007). Predictors of persistence to graduation: Extending amodel and data on the transition to university model. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science,39, 220–234. doi:10.1037
in 2012, both from the Faculty of Engineering at Cairo University. In 2019, he received his PhD from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh, where he is currently working as an Assistant Professor. His research interests are engineering education, and in the area of optics; he specializes in developing optical fiber-based sensors for monitoring harsh environments.Dr. Irene Mena, University of Pittsburgh Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. She has experience teaching programming, design, entrepreneurship, and sustainability topics, and is the Director of the First-Year Engineering Program at the University
allstudents in Higher Education.8 However, the transfer rates to four-year colleges are low (21%)and the academic track to a BS or PhD degree in STEM fields is often not well defined.7-9, 11Therefore, this REU program is designed to provide students in the large community colleges ofthe Texas Gulf Coast region with intensive exposure to STEM research and support for successat the undergraduate and graduate levels.The Nanotechnology Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) with a Focus onCommunity Colleges concentrates exclusively on students at two-year colleges where 100% ofthe participants originate from schools with limited STEM research opportunities. Thesestudents are integrated into a community of scholars and provided a research experience
collaborations, impacting the quality of the studentlearning experience and research activities done virtually and/or in hybrid and multiple platforms.As faculty respond to changes in their educational philosophy based on best practices for studentslearning, questions need to be raised as to what, if any, methodologies will be continued afteruniversities return to on campus learning [1,2,3]. The educational research that was pursued previously focused on documenting andunderstanding the impact of a personal instrumentation-based pedagogy and its enablingtechnology as a treatment to improve student learning and retention [4,5,6,7]. In the present effort,a similar approach is followed. The treatment is now distance delivery and learning and
environment.Project PathThe semester-long project was organized according to the user-centered design thinking process[4], navigating from the understanding phase to the ideation phase and concluding in the refiningphase. At the beginning of the project students researched the topic mixed reality, learned aboutits origin about 50 years ago [5] and explored MR capabilities with the Microsoft HoloLens, astate of the art MR device.Student teams were asked to respond the question “How could mixed reality impact machinerysolutions for industrial process automation and integration”. Over the course of the semester,students were expected to respond to these important issues: • Explore and identify a design opportunity around a specific theme in which mixed