laboratory exercises,since the bulk of entering engineering students lack laboratory experiences. Consequently, many Page 7.1194.1educators are stressing the need for hands-on teaching of fundamentals3-9. Over the past ten Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationyears, the Mechanical Engineering Department of the University of Wyoming (UW) has usedalumni recommendations10, Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) 2000criteria11, as well as UW’s Engineering Task Force on Undergraduate
0 to 10 Difficulty 0 to 10 KNOWLEDGE ELEMENTS (EKEs) Laboratory Section Tensile Strength Testing 8.9 7.1 9.4 7.4 8.6 9.0 Impact Strength Test 9.0 6.7 8.4 7.2 8.1 7.9 Melt Flow Index 9.0 7.6 8.6 8.0 7.4 7.7 Torsional Test 3.9 2.4 3.2 3.8 4.0 3.4 Plastisol 2.4 1.6
. Itmay not be as simple as the scope of the topic from sequential to global or vice versa. TheLearning Styles1 survey from North Carolina State University will help provide a benchmark forcomparison and also shows that not all students are the same despite a small population for thisclassroom research.The primary course of focus is Introduction to Electrical Engineering (EE302), which iscomprised mostly by Electrical Engineering majors in their first semester in this major. Becauseof the small population under research, several semesters were examined. Students enrolled inFall 2007, the first semester the author teaches the course, were the benchmark for anyimprovements made to the course. The original course percentage breakdown is available
or without the pandemic. However,the pandemic is likely to accelerate the changes. The demand to move from traditional learningto online learning may be even higher in computing and information technology programs due togrowing enrollment and tight resources. After the outbreak is controlled, the trend to moveonline probably will continue.This paper will cover the experience in online teaching and learning in our Information andComputer Technology Programs. Strategies of converting in-person courses to online courseswill be discussed.2. MOTIVATIONInformation technology operations in industry have moved from in-house to the cloud steadilyover the past two decades. Since mid-2000s, we have followed the trend and converted many in-person
. Her interests include innovative laboratory experiments for undergraduate instruction, engineering design for first-year stu- dents, and encouraging women to study engineering. For the three years prior to teaching at Michigan State University, she taught freshman and sophomore engineering courses at Rowan University. While at Rowan University she was Co-Director of RILED (Rowan Instructional Leadership and Educational De- velopment), the advisor for the student chapter of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE), and given the ASEE Campus Representative Outstanding Achievement Award. Her teaching experience also includes work as a graduate student facilitator and engineering teaching consultant at the University of
Hands-On Hardware and Simulation Experiences Used To Improve An Analog Communications Technology Course Gale Allen Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Technology (ECET) College of Science, Engineering and Technology Minnesota State University MankatoDuring the past three years teaching the analog communications course for technology studentsthe author with help from other faculty and students has worked to improve the learningexperience through use of simulation tools and hardware-building experiences. The course-improvement process is not complete and hopefully never
, gaming complementsrather than substitutes for more formal pedagogical approaches: integrating standard formalteaching methods and simulation games as a laboratory to test and reinforce the relevance oftheories can be a very effective teaching method. In particular, games have been shown to bemore effective if they are embedded in instructional programs that include debriefing andfeedback.12 Perhaps the most well-known communication game is the “Who are we?” game,designed around the principles of the Johari Window model developed by Dr. Joseph Luft andDr. Harry Ingham. This model identifies sharing and feedback as the keys to building opencommunication. Open communication leads to a climate of trust and access to untappedpossibilities.13In this
an alumnus of the Biology Scholars Program of the American Society of Microbiol- ogy. Prior to becoming focused on engineering education, his research interests included hemodynamics and the study of how vascular cells respond to fluid forces and its implications in vascular pathologies.Dr. Larry Fennigkoh P.E., Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Larry Fennigkoh is a professor of biomedical engineering at the Milwaukee School of Engineering teaching graduate and undergraduate courses in medical instrumentation, biomedical engineering design, biomechanics, biostatistics, and human physiology. He is a Registered Professional Engineer and board certified in clinical engineering. He is also a member of the Institute of
, weight and mass.SummaryThe benefits of team teaching are not optimized by individuals teaching different subjects in theirindividual are of expertise. The freshmen project was developed by multiple instructors frommultiple background designing a student learning experience that integrated elements of appliedmathematics, physics, engineering drawing and a hands-on laboratory experience to design andbuild a simple balance. The hope is that demonstrating the process of integration early in thecurriculum will help students learn to integrate engineering fundamentals and design into appliedpractical projects throughout the remaining 6 semesters of project related course, and may alsobe beneficial in internships and future employment. The authors hope
micromechanics modeling, materials synthesis, structural characterization and device evaluation. The goal of his research is to develop ad- vance structural materials for the next generation ground, aerial and space vehicles with enhanced safety and energy efficiency. Since 2012, his research has been funded by DOE, DOEd, and DOD with a total of 3 million, of which 1.4 million as PI. He has published or submitted 49 technical articles since 2007 (25 referred journals and 24 conference proceedings). Dr. Lin’s teaching interests lies in Mechanical Design, Solid Mechanics, and Dynamics. Currently, he is advising 4 Ph.D. students, 3 Master students, and 2 undergraduate students. Since 2011, 5 Master students graduated from his
Development Specialist in the Faculty of Health at York University. She earned her PhD in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Toronto. Yasaman has extensive knowledge of curriculum design, development, and delivery and has taught numerous undergraduate-level courses at the University of Toronto and OCAD University.Dr. Scott D Ramsay, University of Toronto Scott Ramsay is an Associate Professor, Teaching Stream in the department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto, in Toronto, Canada, and a registered professional engineer in Ontario. Scott earned his PhD in Materials Science and Engineering from the University of Toronto. Scott’s current primary academic interests are in improving
and other underrepresented groups in mathematics, science and engi- neering.Prof. Nicholas Langhoff, Skyline College Nicholas Langhoff is an associate professor of engineering and computer science at Skyline College in San Bruno, California. He received his M.S. degree from San Francisco State University in embedded elec- trical engineering and computer systems. His educational research interests include technology-enhanced instruction, online education, metacognitive teaching and learning strategies, reading apprenticeship in STEM, and the development of novel instructional equipment and curricula for enhancing academic suc- cess in science and engineering.Dr. Erik N Dunmire, College of Marin Erik Dunmire is a
department, college, and university level. He has been recognized as an outstanding faculty member by both Eta Kappa Nu and the Mortar Board. His research activities are focused in the areas of computer networks, communications, and digital design. Prior to joining Kansas State University as a faculty member, Dr. Gruenbacher was a member of the senior staff in the Space Department of the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory from 1994 to 1997 and from 1989 to 1990. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering in 1989, a master’s degree in 1991, and a doctorate in 1994, all from Kansas State. Dr. Gruenbacher has also completed engineering internships with both Motorola Inc. and IBM.Dr. Noel N
Guide, facultyworkshops on effective teaching of communication within the CCE curriculum, and the reviewand modification of several courses and assignments.Introduction:The new curriculum consists of a series of twelve integrated courses beginning in the freshmanyear and ending in the senior year. Some of these courses cover topics that were included in theprevious Civil Engineering (CE) curriculum, such as: § Civil Engineering Projects § Engineering Problems with Computational Laboratory § Graphics for Civil Engineering § Civil Engineering Capstone DesignHowever, the new curriculum places a strong emphasis on the following professional practiceskills: § Leadership Skills § Team Processes in CE Practice § Interpersonal
Session 2264 Materials Education 2003 Topical Trends and Outreach Efforts Craig Johnson, Mark Palmer Central Washington University / Kettering UniversityAbstractThis research explores the history of topical trends in the ASEE Materials Division. This historywill be compared with national trends. It is observed that creative materials education efforts innon-major curricula are highly sought, following national trends of higher contact numbers ofstudents in related engineering programs vs. relatively small numbers of students in materialsprograms. Issues of implementing laboratory
which a Nuclear Engineering Laboratory Course was based. The basic reactor experiments that were performed were quite similar to what thepioneers Enrico Fermi, Leo Szilard, Eugene Wigner and others performed in Chicago in1942 and subsequently at the plutonium producing reactor in the state of Washington.These experiments remain similar to those done at the electric utility reactors and by thenuclear navy at times of refueling and startup. The experiments include 1) confirming the ability to measure neutrons andcalibrating the instrument channels by testing and calibrating to assure that neutrons andonly neutrons are measured, 2) starting with an empty core and then loading fuel andmonitoring neutron multiplication as a
Paper ID #9593Growing a STEM Initiative: Establishing Philosophies, Identifying Needsand, Lessons LearnedProf. Les Kinsler, Kansas State University, Salina Les Kinsler is a Professor with the Engineering Technology Department at Kansas State University Salina campus. Mr. Kinsler received his M.S. Degree in Computer Science from Wichita State University (KS) in 1987 with an emphasis in Software Engineering. He received a B.S. in both Physics and Mathematics from Emporia State University (KS) in 1972. Mr. Kinsler teaches classes in programming, software engineering, and fluid mechanics. His research interests include
of Engineering Educationtypes, and special features which can only be determined by working through thedrawings. The third goal is to teach AutoCAD. “Do you know AutoCAD?” is still the mostcommon question students are asked during job interviews. By learning it during thesophomore year, it becomes a tool that they can use throughout their college career. The course was developed to fit into the curriculum between Surveying in the Fallof sophomore year and the breadth of CE courses at the junior years. Because it usesland descriptions and legal documentation, Surveying is a prerequisite course. It alsofunctionally limits the class to Civil Engineering students. The course also has a co-requisite of Mechanics of Materials to ensure
coastal engineering department strives to buildupon a leading program of exceptional teaching, innovative research and dedicated service bymaintaining a strong curriculum, a highly qualified and committed faculty, outstanding facilitiesand essential funding. The department of civil engineering, which was established in 1905, hasbeen a recognized leader in innovative educational programs and is widely considered to beamong the top programs in the United States. The Department merged with the Department ofCoastal Engineering in 1999 and currently has 44 faculty members in 10 technology areas. There Page 8.296.1“Proceedings of the 2003
University of Missouri E-Business Program was established to support a learningenvironment where students, faculty, and businesses work together toward understanding andenhancing the principles upon which today's global and complex enterprises are created andoperated successfully. Innovative curricula using the latest in technology and teaching methodsare continuously evolving to match the needs of industry with the knowledge and skills ofstudents.The business world has recognized the value of the program since its inception. Industrialpartners have helped establish a solid computing and support infrastructure by providinghardware and software grants in excess of $1 million. The program is strongly supported by theUM System central administration
received her Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from Wayne State University in 1989.Prior to joining WSU’s Division of Engineering Technology in 1993, she taught at Western MichiganUniversity, and held technical positions at General Electric, Ford Motor Company, NASA (Lewis, JetPropulsion Laboratory, and Ames Research Center) and Navy (SPAWAR). Her areas of interest includecomputer networks and communications where she has published a number of papers. She has receivedexcellence in teaching awards from ET Division and the College of Engineering. She has received fundingfrom NSF and other organizations for her scholarly work.Attila Yaprak: Attila Yaprak, Ph.D. is a Professor of Marketing and International Business at Wayne StateUniversity. He is a
experiences with these teams over two semesters.IntroductionWorking in teams, improving communication skills, and enhancing problem solving are all keyobjectives for ABET 20001 as well as for most engineering courses. One way to address all ofthese is to have students work in cooperative learning homework teams. Cooperative learning2,3has been shown to have beneficial effects on student learning and benefits for the instructorincluding fewer and better papers to grade. Organizing the teams requires some work by theinstructor at the beginning of the semester as well as continual monitoring throughout the course.To teach the students about teamwork, it is important that they be provided with a structure forthe roles they are to play rather than just
plot of the release profileof drug from their lozenge is created. Finally they determine the parameter necessary to apply amodel to their system, and they compare their experimental release profile to that described bythe model.IntroductionRowan University is pioneering a progressive and innovative Engineering program that usesinnovative methods of teaching and learning to prepare students better for a rapidly changing andhighly competitive marketplace, as recommended by ASEE[1]. Key features of the programinclude: (i) multidisciplinary education through collaborative laboratory and course work; (ii) Page 5.405.1teamwork as the necessary
adverse student reaction toward structuring the course too muchtoward Internet content was also evident in other ASEE 2001 Internet course content papers. As aresult, the course has been further modified in the recent semesters to re-establish more traditionalinstructor-student classroom activities. Teaching assistant led computer laboratories and help sessionshave been added. In the current semester live lecture and group participation activities have beenreintroduced.This paper builds on the previous paper by presenting additional statistical comparisons from the currentmore balanced approach course and by discussing some of the changed approaches to teaching thecourse.II. Group PresentationsThe class was divided into groups of four to five
à à Session 1742 WEB-BASED COURSES PRODUCTION AUTOMATION I. Stiubiener, R.M. Silveira, W.V. Ruggiero LARC - Department of Electrical Engineering of Universidade de São Paulo Av.Prof. Luciano Gualberto, trav. 3 – 158, sala C1-46, 05508 900 SP, Brasil. itana, regina, wilson@larc.usp.brIndex Terms - automation teaching learning process, online learning, multimedia, and Web applications.Abstract: This work presents the process we implemented to develop our Web basedcourses using multimedia elements. We present the reasons we have decided to
-principal investigator for the National Girls Collaborative project. Dr. Marra teaches course on assessment, evaluation and the design and implementation of effective online learning experiences.Patrick T. Terenzini, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Terenzini is Distinguished Professor and Senior Scientist Emeritus in Penn State’s Center for the Study of Higher Education. He has studied the effects of college on students for nearly 40 years and is co-author (with Ernest T. Pascarella) of the two-volume review of research on college student outcomes published since 1970. For the past 15 years, he has concentrated his research on engineering education and, in 2002, received (with others) the William Elgin
-principal investigator for the National Girls Collaborative project. Dr. Marra teaches course on assessment, evaluation and the design and implementation of effective online learning experiences.Ardie D. Walser, Grove School of Engineering at the City College of the City University of New York Ardie D. Walser is the Associate Dean of the Grove School of Engineering and Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at the City College and Graduate Center of the City University of New York.Patrick T. Terenzini, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Terenzini is Distinguished Professor and Senior Scientist Emeritus in Penn State’s Center for the Study of Higher Education. He has studied the effects of college on students
where the DBF approach has been used to enhance learning ofengineering concepts6, 7, 8, 9.Flight Test Engineering (FTE) as an important element of the design & development cycle of anaerial platform certainly is well known. In view of this aspect, teaching of FTE is incorporated inaerospace engineering curricula at some engineering schools across the US for example10, 11, 12.FTE facilities are also utilized as flying laboratories for explaining concepts in aircraftperformance, stability & control. Page 25.1460.2Engineering students need to be exposed to important aspects such as teamwork, time and spacemanagement, planning engineering
teaching (and learning) about how the PLC works and how toapply the PLC be conducted? Should it be accomplished through customer training by the PLCsystem supplier and/or systems integrator or through the end user’s own training department—asis usually the case with new system installations? Or should this teaching and learning beimplemented through a formal course as part of a university or college curriculum in engineeringor engineering technology? Page 6.782.1 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society of Engineering
to "close" students taking courses that meet in traditionalclassroom settings. A third viewpoint is that "close" students are actually distance students mostof the time, since even they should do most of their learning outside of the classroom; this modelhas the advantage of encouraging lifelong learning. This paper describes some of ourexperiences over the last three years while offering web-based course supplements, designed anddelivered with World Wide Web Course Tools (WebCT) software, at the University of Arkansasat Little Rock. One benefit of web-based course supplements for engineering (as well as other)programs is that they can permit more class time to be devoted to interactive classroom activitiessuch as laboratory experiments and