data collected for accreditation.Methodology:ESG 201: “Learning from Engineering Disaster”, a 3 credit asynchronous online undergraduatecourse taught to both engineering and non-engineering majors by the presenter at Stony BrookUniversity for the past 12 years, has proved to be a successful method for teaching ethics as wellas the broader societal implications of engineering processes and technological design (10). Acombination of lectures, case studies, laboratory demonstrations, interviews, video site visits andteam-based collaborative analysis of engineering failures and their implications (societal,environmental, economic, legal, psychological) has proved successful in teaching the role ofengineers and engineering in society, as well as
, multimedia, hypermedia, Internet, virtualreality, interactive TV (iTV), digital TV (DTV), satellite and advanced classroom gadgetry.Convergent content combines conventional books, lecture notes, and video with digitally basedinformation on CD’s and DVD’s, on-line laboratory experiments and demonstrations bothlocally and globally via the internet, internet based information resources, classroom recording ofideas from convergent and divergent thinking, discussions and group activities using visual,audio and text authoring software. The convergent classroom is allowing the same and newcontent to be presented via multiple ways on different platforms and to be saved for future use indigital asset banks and warehouses using multiple means of storage and
contain hands-on laboratory activities to emphasizecourse concepts4, it became apparently that this course should contain similar learningcomponents for teaching professional skills, mainly using simulations. This was supported by theadaptive nature of this course, which is continually redesigned to maintain its relevance in thearea of technology. Thus, new technology components are implemented every two years, whilemaintaining the historical elements of industry practices that do not waiver, such as the history ofthe Internet and Circuitry.The course under examination not only contains a lecture component, but a hands-on computerlab component, which include the simulations. The hands-on lab component allows students theopportunity to actively
Professor of Teaching from 2005-2008.Scott C. Molitor, Ph.D., University of Toledo Scott C. Molitor received his Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in 1997 and has been a faculty member in Bioengineering at the University of Toledo Depart- ment of Bioengineering since 2000. His research is in computational neuroscience, auditory neuroscience and traumatic brain injury. He has also served as the Bioengineering undergraduate program director since 2001.Brian W. Randolph, University of Toledo Brian W. Randolph is the Associate Dean of Undergraduate Studies and Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Toledo. He is the lead investigator for the UT adoption of WSU’s
Learned” paper is to investigate how former graduate studentleaders can employ their experiences to achieve and excel in service requirements as juniortenure-track faculty members. Research skills, and increasingly teaching ability, have been coreto the graduate student curriculum, and match the majority of faculty tenure requirements.However, preparation for the service requirement is often overlooked at both the graduatestudent and faculty level. While a small part of the overall tenure package, there is an unspokenpresumption that faculty members will be able to serve effectively and efficiently. In STEMcurricula, the development of interpersonal skills is often overlooked. While this may not be animpediment in research communications, faculty
routinelyemployed in small laboratory and discussion sessions. Wireless technology coupled with pen-based computing technology that is suited for analyzing and solving engineering problemsprovides an ideal venue for these interactive teaching and learning methods to be applied to alarger, more traditional lecture setting. This study focuses on how Tablet PCs and wirelesstechnology can be used during classroom instruction to create an Interactive Learning Network(ILN) that allows real-time student assessment and assistance. The ILN is designed to enhancethe instructor’s ability to solicit active participation from all students during lectures, to conductimmediate and meaningful assessment of student learning, and to provide needed real-timefeedback and
Freshman CourseMuch research in recent years has verified that an active learning style approach to freshmanengineering design courses adds value to undergraduate engineering programs and improvesretention rates. Many universities have established First Year Programs to coordinate theactivities and classes for first year students. However, not all universities have the funds toestablish programs separate from disciplinary programs. How can faculty that are not assignedto a First Year Program efficiently manage multiple sections of a hands-on course with limitedresources?There are several models for teaching basic engineering concepts in electrical, mechanical,chemical, computer, civil and system engineering to freshman engineering students
vibrational spectroscopy. Rohit has been at Illinois since as Assistant Professor (2005-2011), Associate Professor (2011-2012) and Professor (2012-). Rohit was the first assistant professor hired into the new Bioengineering department and played a key role in the development of its curriculum and activities. He later founded and serves as the coordinator of the Cancer Community@Illinois, which is slated to become the first technology-focused cancer center in the nation. Research in the Bhargava laboratories focuses on fundamental theory and simulation for vibrational spectroscopic imaging, developing new instrumentation c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223–231, Jul. 2004.[11] M. T. H. Chi, "Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities," Top. Cogn. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 73–105, Jan. 2009.[12] S. Freeman et al., "Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 1–6, 2014.[13] C. E. Wieman, "Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8319–8320, 2014.[14] A. Dallal, A. Dukes, and R. M. Clark, "Student performance in partially flipped ECE laboratory classes," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
assisted me in performing and teaching aspects of data analytics and data science. My diverse research background has allowed me to learn about different areas of engineering and I can use everything I have already learned and apply it to the next job, project, or task. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Investigating the effects of course modalityon student performance and satisfaction in online learning.AbstractThe objective of engineering education is to explore and establish effective instructionalstrategies in higher education that can enhance student learning outcomes. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous students have had to transition from traditional in-person learning
M.S.E. in Electrical Engi- neering in 2004, both from Arizona State University. Before that he received his B.E. in Automotive Engineering in 1999 from Tsinghua University. He was a lecturer/sr. lecturer in the Department of Me- chanical and Aerospace Engineering at Arizona State University from 2006-2017 before he joined Penn State Erie in 2017. Dr. Liao’s teaching interests include Engineering Mechanics, Mechanics of Materi- als, System Dynamics and Controls, Vibrations, and Instrumentation and Measurements. He has been a long-time reviewer and contributor of Pearson’s MasteringEngineering online program for Engineering Mechanics and Mechanics of Materials.Dr. Nancy E. Study, Pennsylvania State University Dr
the College of Engineering's commitment to finding ways to enrich teaching and learning. She works in all aspects of education including design and development, faculty training, learner support, and evaluation. Contact k.schmidt@mail.utexas.eduKristin Wood, University of Texas at Austin KRISTIN WOOD is the Cullen Trust Endowed Professor in Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Wood’s current research interests focus on product design, development, and evolution. The current and near-future objective of this research is to develop design strategies, representations, and languages that will result in more comprehensive design
AC 2009-2110: STUDENT-INITIATED SUPPLEMENTAL TRAININGCURRICULUM FOR SUPPORT OF BME DESIGN PROJECTSAmit Nimunkar, University of Wisconsin, Madison Amit J. Nimunkar is a doctoral student in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He is a teaching assistant at the Department of Biomedical Engineering and a lead consultant for the freshman design course, Introduction to Engineering. He also works as a chemistry instructor and curriculum coordinator for the Engineering Summer Program in the College of Engineering and is pursuing a Delta certificate in teaching and learning.Silas Bernardoni, University of Wisconsin, Madison Silas Bernardoni is a graduate
Session 2275 Writing and Publishing Your Way to Tenure Rick Homkes Purdue University - KokomoAbstract New engineering and technology faculty have come into one of the best jobs in the world. They are ableto teach and learn in a field they love. They have worked hard to achieve this position, as it took many years toget an advanced degree. For some, there were additional years acquiring practical knowledge and experience inindustry. It often comes as a surprise when they realize that they have to work even harder to keep
Communication with Competition and Prizes” Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.12. Fiegel, G., and N. Derbidge, 2015. “Introducing Soil Property Evaluation in Geotechnical Engineering – Some Food for Thought,” Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.13. Durham, S., M. Hale, and S. Freyne, 2008. “Classroom Teaching Aids and Laboratory Experimentation to Engage Students in Materials Learning,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.14. Saliklis, E., 2008. "Arch Building for Kids. What did they learn? What did we learn?," Proceedings of the 2008
Graduate Teaching Associate for the Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors program, he is heavily involved with developing and teaching laboratory content, leading the maintenance of the in-house robotics controller, and managing the devel- opment of the robotics project. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Technology’s Role in Student Understanding of Mathematics in Modern Undergraduate Engineering CoursesAbstractThis paper seeks to identify important implications on the use of technology in the teaching ofmathematics in modern undergraduate engineering courses. These are used to create a big pictureof the current situation of engineering mathematics teaching
change, particularly in higher education; learning in the workplace; curricular and pedagogical development; and the preparation of professionals for social justice goals.Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering profession.Dr. Devlin Montfort, Oregon State University Dr. Montfort is an Assistant Professor in the School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State UniversityDr. Ed LeRoy Michor, Oregon State University Ed is currently a postdoctoral scholar
AC 2008-571: ARCH BUILDING FOR KIDS. WHAT DID THEY LEARN? WHATDID WE LEARN?Edmond Saliklis, California Polytechnic State University Page 13.218.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Arch Building for Kids What did they learn? What did we learn?IntroductionThis paper will describe a teaching module that several senior architectural engineering studentsdeveloped as their senior project. The teaching module targeted 5th or 6th grade students with thegoal of creating an engineering outreach program that demonstrated a structural mechanicsconcept in a fun and interesting manner. The purpose of this paper is to describe
technology education units. Field experiences to observetechnology education classes are part of the course. The topics will include:1. Philosophical background;2. Content areas of technology education;3. Curriculum/program design and implementation;4. Instructional strategies – Effective teaching and learning;5. Educational measurement and evaluation;6. Classroom and laboratory management; and7. Development, implementation, and evaluation of a technology lesson learning activity. Page 13.529.7ConclusionOur application to the state department of education for offering the Technology Educationprogram was approved in January 2008, and we expect our first
. The second course is for mechanical engineering, material scienceengineering, and computer science students and focuses on structured programming through theuse of robotics.The future scholars program is the teaching analogy to a research post-doc. The future scholarswork with faculty on the integrated freshmen courses while receiving training on learning andteaching styles.The Hewlett Bridging into Engineering Program is aimed at students who are at high risk ofdropping out based on historic data. The program is being followed up with periodic meetingsbetween the participants and student mentors. Page 9.611.11 This project was
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”modules in place of classroom meetings proved to have advantages for the leaning institution aswell as for various segments of the student body. Several of the University of Phoenix campussites offer a blended form for courses where a third of the meetings are face-to-face and the othertwo-thirds are conducted over the Internet (5). The blended course environment is fast findingitself becoming an effective and efficient alternative to both the classroom model and the distancelearning model.Technology Variations on Course FormatThe major motivation behind any method of teaching is student
of the lecture. In addition to encouraging nearly 100% participation and enabling nearlyinstant grading and attendance, the methodology developed enabled problem-based, peer-interactive learning during the large lecture format. This format enabled the students to work onpractical problems by teaching one another, thereby reinforcing important class concepts.This paper will describe: 1) the background of civil engineering materials classes at Purdue, 2)the motivation for investigating how to improve the learning experience in the materials courses,3) the background of interactive classroom technology, 4) methods to incorporate the personalresponse devices in class, and 5) plans for future developments.1. The Background of the Civil
Paper ID #8375Invited Paper - Faculty Professionalization in Industry Sponsored Projects inAustrian Vocational Education and Training SchoolsDr. Eleonore Lickl, HBLVA for Chemical Industry Former Secretary General of the International Society for Engineering Education IGIP, currently teaching at the Vocational and Technical College For Chemical Industry in Vienna, Austria and at the University of Teacher Education Styria in Graz, Austria. Since 2011 she is editor-in chief of the online journal The International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP). She is also writing in Austrian media related to chemistry, and food
incorporating entrepreneurial skills will beexplored including:· Classroom based teaching, learning and assessment;· Support for students in industrial placement through the use of a Virtual Learning Environment (WebCT);· Development of a portfolio of professional competencies;highlighting the merits and problems associated with each.1. BackgroundThe EU Enterprise Commissioner Erkki Liikanen has stated that, “Innovation is thekey to competitiveness”. Moreover “substantial gains from information technologywill be possible in the future” 1. According to the European Innovation Scoreboard2001 2, the United Kingdom generates a higher percentage of science and engineeringgraduates than any other European state. This is particularly significant as
, laboratories, and practical internships. Mr. Halkiyo has been teaching different Civil Engineering courses at Bule Hora University, Ethiopia, where he also served as a department head and conducted various research and community projects.Sultan Bedane Halkiyu Sultan Bedane Halkiyu pursued his Master of Science degree in Road and Transport Engineering and Bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering at Hawassa University (2017) and Jimma University (2015) respectively. Mr. Halkiyu is working as a lecturer at Bule Hora University, Ethiopia, and teaching different Civil Engineering courses. He is a mixed methods researcher and pursuing his research interests: quality of road construction, and transport/traffic mobility in urban
Paper ID #39253Making Electric Machinery Labs Easier to GradeDr. Glenn T. Wrate P.E., Northern Michigan University Dr. Wrate returned to his boyhood home and began teaching at Northern Michigan University in 2014. He was promoted to full professor in 2016 and tenured in 2018. He is a member of HKN and IEEE and is a past chair of the Energy Conversion and Conservation Division of ASEE ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Making Electric Machinery Labs Easier to GradeAbstractThe best way to teach electric machinery is with hands-on labs. At the beginning of the Fall2020 semester
in 1983. Thereafter, he worked in a multinational industry for a little over three years before joining Tulane University as a graduate student in the fall of 1987. He received a master’s degree from Tulane University in 1989 and a doctoral degree from Duke University in 1992. He is a member of the American Society for Mechanical Engineers (ASME), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), and, American Society for Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) and is actively involved in teaching and research in the fields of (i) robotics and mechatronics, (ii) remote sensing and precision agriculture, and,(iii) biofuels and renewable energy © American Society for Engineering
Server Analysis Services (SSAS), Google BigQuery • cloud computing services: Amazon Web Service (AWS), Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud • data plotting and visualization: Matplotlib, Basemap, Seaborn, D3 and Google Visualization API • GIS tools • Computational environment: Jupyter (IPython) Notebook • making a Github siteThe bootcamp culminated with a choice of week-long projects designed with various levels of dif-ficulty. Most of the mini-projects used datasets from Kaggle, [5], or UCI, [6]. The first year thatwe ran the project we had trouble coordinating between the four instructors. The second year, wehad all teaching materials completed one month in advance of the bootcamp so things ran muchsmoother.We preferred students who had
areas of computer simulations,scholarly research, team work, and oral presentation.The course will be further improved by creating our own library of motions for analysis, andadding laboratory experiments to supplement the computer analyses. In the area of assessment, astudent survey will be prepared and given to students to gather detailed data on students’perceptions of the class.Bibliography1. U.S. Dept. of Labor, Occupations Outlook Handbook, accessible at www.bls.gov/oco/ocos027.htm2. R. Polikar, R.P. Ramachandran, L. Head, M. Tahamont, “Integrating BME into ECE Curriculum: An AlternateApproach”, 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, paper AC2005-3993. D. Roberson, F. Hudson, “Biomechanics as a Tool for Teaching Minority Students
laboratories can no longer accommodate afull class. Instructors, accustomed to small, intimate class sizes where they could learn everystudent’s name within the first week, are now facing larger groups where students can easily slipinto anonymity.In the past decade, teachers began incorporating more active-learning activities and hands-ondesign projects. The freshman-level courses, in particular, benefitted from this change inphilosophy. Now, it should be noted that, at TU, freshmen select a major as they enter theuniversity. The introductory classes are discipline-specific and each department teaches theirfreshmen. In chemical engineering, the freshman year has a two-course sequence. ChE 1002 isa two-hour course taught in the fall semester to