systems. At Baylor University, he teaches courses in laboratory techniques, fluid mechanics, energy systems, and propulsion systems, as well as freshman engineering. Research interests include renewable energy to include small wind turbine aerodynamics and experimental convective heat transfer as applied to HVAC and gas turbine systems. Page 26.598.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 ENCOURAGING STUDENTS TO SEE THE ROLE OF SERVICE COURSES IN THEIR MAJORAbstractMany departments are involved with service courses which support both their programs andother
tools do not provide enough feedback to the user. Ifthere are fundamental errors related to sketching linkages or to providing specifications, those arenot shared with the user. The users can extract the final results, kinematics or forces, but there isno information about the equations used in the backend. The availability of equations, for instance,will greatly help their usage in course work. If more information is available, students can improvetheir understanding of the step-by-step process taught in lectures or illustrated in technical books.During homework and laboratory activities, a student must spend a lot of time trying to manuallyverify the correctness of their work. The teaching team also experiences delay during the gradingprocess
Dutch and in English. During this time his primary teaching and course develop- ment responsibilities were wide-ranging, but included running the Unit Operations laboratory, introducing Aspen Plus software to the curriculum, and developing a course for a new M.S. program on Renewable Energy (EUREC). In conjunction with his teaching appointment, he supervised dozens of internships (a part of the curriculum at the Hanze), and a number of undergraduate research projects with the Energy Knowledge Center (EKC) as well as a master’s thesis. In 2016, Dr. Barankin returned to the US to teach at the Colorado School of Mines. His primary teaching and course development responsibilities here include the Unit Operations Lab and
varyingextents engineering design is incorporated in the freshman through junior years as well. Currentdesign curricula are expected to achieve many objectives, from teaching a process for solvingopen-ended problems, to improving communication skills, to serving as a platform for assessingthe entire curriculum. Design curricula around the country have many commonalities. Thispaper summarizes both the commonalities and unique features of engineering design curricula.Many of the objectives for design curricula will remain unchanged as design curricula reform;yet some will shift in priority, and methods for achieving particular objectives will likely change.The paper ends with discussion of what the future may hold.IntroductionNo longer is an engineer
Auckland, NZ, developer of the Xorro assessment authoring tool Xorro-Q. His entrepreneurial career spans education, health, energy and gaming sectors. Pablo is an enthusiastic advocate for solutions and practices which open new learning and collaboration horizons.Mr. Wyatt Banker-Hix P.E., California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo Wyatt Banker-Hix is a licensed professional engineer in the state of California with over four years of industry experience in structural and transportation engineering. He also serves as a part-time lecturer at California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly) in the Civil Engineering department. He enjoys teaching a hands-on materials laboratory course sprinkled
Engineering Outreach and Professor in the Department of Biomedical, Chemical and Environmental Engineering at the University of Cincinnati (UC), Cincinnati Ohio, USA. He joined UC on 8/15/00 and before that worked 22 years at University of Oklahoma. He teaches structural mechanics, with research in steel structures, seismic analysis and design, and engineer- ing education. He has won five major university teaching awards, two Professorships, two national ASEE teaching awards, and is internationally recognized in his primary research field.Ms. Julie Steimle, University of Cincinnati Julie Steimle received her Bachelor of Arts in English and Secondary Education from Thomas More College. She served as development director and
: 2009.9 Fila, N. D. & Wertz, R. E. H. Towards Evaluating the Content, Assessment, and Pedagogy in Instructional Laboratories. (2013).10 Smith, K. In Cooperative learning: Lessons and insights from thirty years of championing a research- based innovative practice, IEEE: 2011; pp T3E-1.11 Liljeström, A., Enkenberg, J. & Pöllänen, S. Making learning whole: an instructional approach for mediating the practices of authentic science inquiries. Cultural Studies of Science Education 8, 51-86 (2013).12 Hipkins, R.; Cowie, B.; Boyd, S.; Keown, P.; McGee, C., Curriculum implementation exploratory studies 2. Final report 2011.13 Cunningham, J. W. & Wall, L. K. Teaching good readers to comprehend better. Journal of
Research in Higher Education 21.2 (1984): 150-58.Appendix A: Course Evaluation QuestionsPlease rate the questions from 1 to 5, 1 being the lowest, 5 being the highest:1. Rate the quality of your learning in this course.2. The laboratory assignments and course material reinforced one another.3. The workload for this course in relation to other courses of equal credit was4. Overall, how would you rate this course?5. Describe one or more strengths of this course.6. Describe one or more ways this course can be improved.7. The professor used teaching methods which helped me learn.8. The professor was well prepared for class.9. The professor was available for help outside the classroom.10. The professor seemed genuinely interested in teaching this
Paper ID #29311Professional Development Activities for Secondary STEM Teachers andStudents’ Engineering Content Knowledge and AttitudesEmel Cevik, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the
2006-1823: ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGING: CROSSING DOMAINSTom Roberts, Kansas State UniversityJohn Mingle, Kansas State University JOHN O. MINGLE, Ph.D., J.D. Emeritus Professor of Engineering, Kansas State University First started teaching chemical engineering in the late 1950’s and experienced significant changes in engineering education during the 1960 - 70’s. Obtained J.D. in the 80’s, retired from teaching nuclear engineering in the early 90’s and continues to practice patent law. Served as professor and advisor for co-author Roberts in the 60’s-70’s. Page 11.570.1© American Society for Engineering
various disciplines.These techniques encourage students to stay interested and engaged in the courses. Just like anyother engineering discipline, such techniques are often necessary in systems engineering classes.In this paper, we explore various student centered, active learning, and teaching techniques invarious disciplines and investigate their feasibility for implementation in systems engineering.Key Words: Active Learning, Student Centered, Teaching TechniquesIntroductionIn this research, the author explores a few key student centered active learning techniques thatare applicable in core systems engineering classes at the undergraduate level. Some of thesetechniques are also applicable in graduate classes. Currently there are few
, combining content and pedagogy from two different fields, and building a new program and culture of design at the McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science.IntroductionOn any given Monday in Lecture Room 2 of the McCormick School of Engineering, 110freshmen enrolled in Engineering Design and Communication (EDC) take part in an innovativelecture class that teaches design through a combination of presentation, simulation, anddiscussion. Two faculty members—one from engineering and one from the university’s WritingProgram—typically begin and end the class with a PowerPoint presentation focusing on oneaspect of the design process. Between these two segments, four other faculty, as members of the“NU Concepts Design Team,” are
], which introducessome active programming teaching methods. Portela employed four approaches to develop theinstructional plan, namely: BYOD, flipped classroom, gamification, and using the skills ofindividual students to solve posed problems. Tewolde presented a method for improving studentmotivation in a microcontroller-based embedded systems course to enhance students’ role inactive learning [10]. The method consists of three tools, namely: laboratory assignments forpractical hands-on activities, “peer teaching” techniques, and self-proposal, which enablesindividual creativity. For some complex and difficult to understand courses such as programmingalgorithms-related subjects, Garcia et al. [11] proposed a method in the form of
AC 2011-2762: ASSESSMENT OF SERVICE LEARNINGMysore Narayanan, Miami University DR. MYSORE NARAYANAN obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several encyclopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional , national and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a senior member of IEEE and is a member of
students obtaining feedback fromlikely users, including students with and without disabilities. Students also received feedbackfrom Disabilities Services Office staff and the Social Work Department of their institutionthroughout the design process [11].Prior efforts have demonstrated the effectiveness of a teaching model in which first-yearengineering course students engaged in a two-month design project specifically focused onuniversal design (e.g., redesigning an engineering laboratory to make it more usable to all).Students were provided mentoring from the university’s disability services staff, as well asindividuals with first-hand experience of disability. Results demonstrated that students were ableto understand and apply the principles of
AC 2011-652: TRANSLATING RESEARCH EXPERIENCES INTO CLASS-ROOM PRACTICE: AN RET PROJECTJohn D. Carpinelli, New Jersey Institute of Technology JOHN D. CARPINELLI is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Director of the Center for Pre-College Programs at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He has served as coordinator of activities at NJIT for the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition and as a member of the Coalition’s Governing Board. He previously chaired NJIT’s Excellence in Teaching Awards Committee and is past chair of the University Master Teacher Committee.Howard S. Kimmel, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Kimmel is Professor of Chemical Engineering at New Jersey Institute of
Paper ID #38995RHL-BEADLE: Bringing Equitable Access to Digital Logic Design inEngineering EducationProf. Rania Hussein, University of Washington Dr. Rania Hussein is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering de- partment at the University of Washington, where she also serves as the founder, principal investigator, and director of the Remote Hub Lab (RHLab). With her research focus on embedded systems, medical image analysis, digital twinning, and remote engineering, Dr. Hussein is committed to developing inno- vative solutions that enhance equity and access in engineering education and
teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses related to mechanisms and machine dynamics, integrated product development, solid mechanics and plasticity theory, structural design and analysis, engineering analysis and finite element methods and has interests in remote laboratories, project-based learning and student learning assessment. His research is in the areas of remote sensing and control with applications to remote experimentation as well as modeling of microstructure changes in metal forming processes. He publishes regularly in peer-reviewed conference proceedings and scientific journals. At the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition in Chicago, USA, he received the Best Paper Award for his article ’A
Center for Renewable Energy Advanced Tech- nological Education (CREATE). With funding from the National Science Foundation, CREATE seeks to advance renewable energy education nationwide by supporting faculty and academic programs in renew- able energy. Dr. Walz is an alumnus of the Department of Energy Academies Creating Teacher Scientists (DOE ACTS) Program, and he is an instructor for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Summer Institute, providing professional development for middle and high school teachers. Dr. Walz has been recognized as Professor of the Year by the Carnegie Foundation and the Council for Advancement and Support of Education, and as the Energy Educator of the Year by the
Paper ID #6745A Grand Challenge-based Framework for Contextual Learning in Engineer-ingDr. Lisa G. Huettel, Duke University Dr. Lisa G. Huettel is an associate professor of the practice in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Duke University where she also serves as associate chair and director of Undergraduate Studies for the department. She received a B.S. in Engineering Science from Harvard University and earned her M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Duke University. Her research interests are focused on engineering education, curriculum and laboratory development, and applications of
Engineering Research Center. He joined the BME depart- ment at IIT in 2007, where he is interested in problems associated with molecular and cellular engineer- ing, specifically the computational modeling of cellular migration. David teaches several courses within the BME department, most notably the senior design capstone sequence (BME 419 and 420) which he co-instructs with Dr. Jennifer Kang Derwent. He also is the lead instructor for IPRO 2.0, an interdisci- plinary project-based course required of all undergraduate at IIT. David collaborates actively with IIT’s entrepreneurship academy as well as its math and science education department. David is a member of the Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES) and the American
’ engineering skills; and (3) develop students’ capabilities and dispositions forengaging in collaborative project-based inquiry and critical thinking. To assimilate new information andincorporate it into the existing knowledge, students need to restructure their knowledge for themselveswhich can be accomplished through active learning.A number of tenants underlie this teaching philosophy, including (Knight, 2004) Students take direct responsibility for their knowledge, proactively engaging in the study of their texts and reference materials, participation and leadership in course activities, completing assignments, laboratories, and exploration in the field. The instructor assumes more of a role of a facilitator: “a guide
103or, failing that, any other type of non-applied white-collar worker. Thisunderlying national trait makes effective technical education appropriateto the developmental level of the country extremely difficult. Theory isaccepted while practical laboratory and experimental work or research isshunned by students and teaching staff alike.The government has recognized that the Philippines is passing out of thestage of being underdeveloped, into an intermediate developing level 11 11of industrial and technical achievement and is attempting through planningto prepare the necessary educational, industrial and economic infrastructure.At the same time it is trying to revitalize Philippine
Paper ID #28714Work in Progress: Involving Teachers in International Community EngagedLearning Projects to Enhance Their Understanding of Engineering andIntercultural AwarenessDr. Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton Dr. Margaret Pinnell is the Associate Dean for Faculty and Staff Development in the school of engineering and associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Dayton. She teaches undergraduate and graduate materials related courses including Introduction to Ma- terials, Materials Laboratory, Engineering Innovation, Biomaterials and Engineering Design and Appro
Work in Progress: Thematic Analysis of Engineering Students’ Technical WritingAbstractThis study describes the process of thematic analysis within the context of teaching and learningtechnical writing in a materials testing laboratory course. This process involves searchingstudents’ lab reports for their writing mistakes and sorting the relevant extracts into categoriesand identifying themes. Characterization and theme identification are made by analyzingprevious semesters’ reports for a total of 140 lab reports and pre-defining the themes for futureapplications. Observations may be made at each semester that do not fit into any of the pre-defined categories. For this reason, the themes will grow over the course
). Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering, Journal of engineering education, Vol. 103, Issue 4, Pages 525-548, October 20143. Skurla, C., Thomas, B., & Bradley, W., (2004). Teaching Freshman Using Design Projects and Laboratory Exercises to Increase Retention, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.4. Hall, D., et al., (2008). Living with the Lab: A Curriculum to Prepare Freshman Students to Meet the Attributes of The Engineer of 2020, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA.5. Caverly, R. H., et al., (2015). A Core Course Component in a Project-based First-year Engineering Experience, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington.6
AC 2007-1429: STUDIO-BASED INSTRUCTION IN SIGNALS AND SYSTEMSChristopher Greene, University of Saint Thomas After a 24 year career in industry, Dr. Greene joined the University of St. Thomas School of Engineering where he teaches in both the Electrical and Mechanical engineering programs. He principally teaches Signals and Systems, Digital Electronics and Control Systems. Page 12.1326.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Studio-Based Signals and SystemsAbstractOne of the more challenging aspects of most undergraduate electrical engineering programs isthe Signals and Systems
posit to apply widely researched educational psychology principles and practicesto the engineering curriculum. These practices include: ‚ vignette-based instruction, ‚ embedded signature assignments, ‚ rubric judged laboratory experiences, ‚ value judged internships, and ‚ concept inventory assessments in all courses in the courses.All five of these teaching practices combine assessment to instruction and are linked tostudent performance. Vignette-based instruction is described as a provision of instructionwhere students are provided with real world vignettes or workplace problems and mustsolve these vignette based issues or problems using principles perspectives and practicesthat they have learned in courses1. These are often group
whatever courses theychoose, and freedom of teaching (Lehrfreheit) meant that the professor should be able toinvestigate any problem in the conduct of his research and to reveal whatever findings he mayhave in teaching and in published works. Employing novel instructional techniques in trainingscholars, including the seminar, the specialist's lecture, the laboratory and the monographic study,the German university succeeded in welding teaching and research to produce the creativescholar and the original investigator in every academic discipline.31 32 33The ideals of the German university were the instruments and tools that built Johns HopkinsUniversity in Baltimore in 1876 to become the first true American graduate school. Nonsectarianby design and
Program of Tau Beta Pi, the Engineering Honor Society, which provides interactive seminars on interpersonal communications and problem solving skills for engineering students across the U.S. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Care and Keeping of Graduate Students: An Interactive Panel Discussion for Novice Advisors of Graduate Students1. Introduction and PurposeWhile most young professors expect to juggle teaching with research, service, and grant writing,the expectation to form and lead an (immediately productive) laboratory group is sometimessurprising and often challenging. Graduate students expect that their faculty mentors will