engage in those reflections needed to evaluate complex situations, which often involve socio-economic and political considerations. Case studies have been shown to be an effective way to do that, and an effective case study allows students to go beyond the simple facts of the case by looking at laws past and present, historical context, and current practice and lead them to make informed decisions [16]. This process not only enhances their analytical abilities but also encourages them to explore new dimensions of the engineering practice, facilitating that much needed shift to a more equitable and socio-centered engineering practice. This broader perspective encourages students to consider the
with engineering colleagues and students”. 10Most recently, a similar approach in the form of career management courses, is recommended forall engineering students, and not just women.3 A course was introduced at the Women inEngineering ProActive Network (WEPAN) 2015 Change Leader Forum entitled “Empower andIgnite Future Women Leaders”.11 Another group of researchers created an extracurricularoffering, entitled “Gender and Engineering” for interested students and faculty. One goal of thisoffering is to provide female students “with a framework to understand their experience has thecapacity to transform their individually internalized messages of personal inadequacy or notbelonging into a larger contextualized experience that they can name
cycling and the resulting greenhouse gas emissions from constructed wetlands. For the past eight years he has been involved with Engineers Without Borders and is one of the current faculty advisors for the Montana State University chapter. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineers Without Borders-Montana State University: A Case Study in Student-Directed Engagement in Community ServiceKathryn Plymesser, PhD, PE, Montana State University – BillingsDamon Sheumaker, Montana State UniversityChris Allen, Montana State UniversityAbstractEngineers Without Borders at Montana State University (EWB@MSU) is an organization thathas been successful in generating increased student
that the personal support from the successcoach was “simple, but it was powerful” [FGP41 Ad, Male].Other than the advisor, students talked about faculty being a close point of contact for manystudents. This matter is especially true for students who started during the pandemic; forthem, the faculty was the only representative from the university. However, FGPs mentionedfaculty only relate to students narrowly on their courses. FGP31 Ig, a transfer student whostarted school during spring 2020, shared an experience when she heard her uncle died duringa class. At that moment, she did not feel the faculty were approachable enough for her toshare the news; she also did not find any resources about how to deal with the unpleasantsituation. During
Paper ID #40551Innovations in Remote Teaching of Engineering Design TeamsProf. Soyoung Kang, University of Washington Soyoung Kang (she/her) is an assistant teaching professor and Clary Family Foundation early career pro- fessor in the mechanical engineering department at the University of Washington (UW). She is also the executive director of the Engineering Innovation in Health (EIH) program that partners teams of multidis- ciplinary undergraduate and graduate students with health professionals to develop technical solutions to pressing health challenges. Dr. Kang works closely with faculty from across the UW to foster
which engages and develops practical skills in the students. Currently she is exploring the performance and attributes of engineering technology students and using that knowledge to engage them in their studies. In addition to this work, she is interested in professional societies and how they support careers of their members.Dr. Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University Gretchen Hein is a senior lecturer in Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Tech. She have been teaching ENG3200, Thermo-Fluids since 2005. She also teaches first-tear engineering classes. She has been active in incorporating innovative instructional methods into all course she teaches. Her research areas also include why students persist in
institution requires we gain approval from the certifying body for theuniversity's state. All institutions in the state must evaluate the effectiveness of their UCC atregular intervals. Our teaching methods and content has evolved such that the institution's componentcourses and pedagogies of Team Teaching are vital to achieving the desired outcomes. Ourmodel is an "all in" team endeavor; our instructional team meets with all classes, and such is anenterprising dynamic, engaging faculty, staff, and near-peer teachers, working together. Modeling teamwork is a core attribution of our approach. Research-to-practice becomespractice-to-research as we learn new ways to help our students succeed while growing theirpreparedness for future success
be approved by the instructorbefore students can proceed to the building and competition stages. Students are encouraged towork individually, but small teams (2 members, for example) are allowed. Small objects can beattached to different locations on an aircraft to change the center of gravity and to facilitateflying of the aircraft. Students can explore such effects during their test fly and undersupervision of the instructor. At the end of this session, aircraft that flies the longest distance ischosen as the winning design, regardless of weight or size. This module is the least challengingbecause the design process involves fewer steps and foam boards are easy to handle for highschool students.Figure 6: Aircraft Design and Competition
pedagogical approaches in STEM education. Dr. ElZomor has been integrating innovative and novel educational paradigms in STEM education to support student engagement, retention, and diversity.Mr. Piyush Pradhananga, Piyush Pradhananga is a Ph.D. student in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Florida International University (FIU). Piyush holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Tribhuwan University (TU). Following his graduation in 2016, he joined a leading real estate corporation in Nepal as the site engineer working on a multi-million project. He later joined a research firm based in London where he worked as an En- gineering Graduate Researcher. Piyush is currently a Graduate Research Assistant at the Moss School of
number of opportunities andassociated identity development [48]. Whether it was caused by social pressure to take on high-value careers or to tend to family [22], the job market, need for money and documentation [37],or discrimination towards displaced people [60], displaced students were disadvantaged by thelack of opportunities they faced with uncertain career plans [73][74]. In addition, this instabilityand lack of ability to choose freely from all pathways available translated into displaced studentsreporting high levels of anxiety, depression, and PTSD, amongst other mental health issues[34][39][73][75][76]. The lack of control over choices associated with building a career as adisplaced person revealed the limitations on students’ decision
and is good for exposing students to a more general background of ethics; however,this sacrifices the disciplinary context covered by the within-the-discipline method [30]. Theacross-the-curriculum method presents students with ethical dilemmas repetitively in multiplecourses during their engineering education; while effective, this method calls for a commitmentamong faculty members to conduct ethics discussions in their courses [30]. Lastly, an effectiveapproach of bridging engineering with societal concerns involves the use of a curriculum modelwith a range of required courses that have ethics components which highly emphasize engineeringethics and the role of engineers in society [11], [30].However, despite such efforts, it continues to be
Improve Student Engagement and Enhance the Curriculum of Engineering EducationAbstractIn February of 2019, the authors convened a workshop to explore ways to improve student engagement inengineering education. The two-day workshop assembled an uncommon range of stakeholders includingprofessional engineers, engineering faculty, psychologists, anthropologists, pedagogy and educationalscientists, students, curriculum developers, entrepreneurial evangelists, members of the diplomaticcommunity and representatives of industry. Collectively we sought to share existing approaches toimproving student engagement in order to discern what works and what does not. Uncovering strategies toimprove student engagement has meant
Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering fos- ter or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning, to understand
watergeneration system, related to the professor’s research focus on humanitarian engineering anddevelopment. The system under investigation combined desiccant and solar still technologies toharvest humidity from the air at night and evaporate the water in the desiccant, condense it, andcollect the water during the day. The student began by exploring the state of the art in solar stilltechnologies and performed a multi-criteria decision analysis to determine an optimal design forprototyping. In parallel, the student and mentor researched appropriate desiccant materials forthe specific application. The student constructed two prototypes under supervision of his mentorduring the research experience. These prototypes were initially tested solely for their
: Needs assessment and utilization of counseling services,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 247–266, May 2006, doi: 10.1353/csd.2006.0030.[10] C. M. Rummell, “An exploratory study of psychology graduate student workload, health, and program satisfaction,” Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 391–399, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1037/pro0000056.[11] M. Deziel, D. Olawo, L. Truchon, and L. Golab, “Analyzing the Mental Health of Engineering Students using Classification and Regression,” 2013, p. 228 231.[12] E. Hocker, E. Zerbe, and C. G. P. Berdanier, “Characterizing Doctoral Engineering Student Socialization: Narratives of Mental Health, Decisions to Persist, and Consideration of Career
the interventions was consistent for each offering of the course. Two of thesections were taught by a member of the research team and a third section was taught by a faculty memberwho worked closely with the research team. An additional class section (Fall 19) participated in this study asa control group (no interventions were embedded but students were asked to complete the surveys). It isimportant to note that the interventions were not embedded into all available sections of the 104 course duringthe research period due to inconsistency in staffing which resulted in slight variations of the course. Inadditional, not all faculty members who were scheduled to teach the course were interested in embedding theinterventions into their course
Paper ID #26879STEM Engagement through Mentoring: Motivations of STEM MentorsDr. Jerrod A. Henderson, University of Houston (CoE & CoT) Dr. Jerrod A. Henderson (”Dr. J”) is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Cullen College of Engi- neering at the University of Houston. He joined the University of Houston after six years as a chemical engineering faculty member at the University of Illinois. He has dedicated his career to increasing the number of students who are in the pipeline to pursue STEM careers. He believes that exposing students to STEM early will have a lasting impact upon their lives and academic
. She was previously a member of the student support staff for the Virginia Tech Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity where she served as an instructor for the first-year professional development seminar and as co- ordinator for the summer bridge program. Her research interests include equity in engineering education, middle-years of engineering, and engineering student support.Mrs. Janice Leshay Hall, Florida International University Janice is a postdoctoral researcher at Virginia Tech. Her research centers on diversity equity and inclusion with a focus on broadening the participation of historically underrepresented groups in the engineering workforce. Specifically, she examines theArtre Reginald
defense industry,interpreted diversely by the student body. Theprevalence of these organizations, as reflected in thestudent quotes, suggests that the Clark School heavilyleans on this network for career opportunities,influencing the perceptions of student’s professionaltrajectories post-graduation, as the following participantquotation captures, “It's for all engineering majors, but it is Figure 7: Image of Corporate Sponsors especially for aerospace, and it's the constant and Military Organizations Associated dilemma and ethical tension about what to do with the Engineering School with all this military-corporate attraction. And I would say that opportunities from the Clark School grow very
addition, we had informal conversationsabout the work that was occurring and how the chapter is run. Extensive fieldnotes were taken torecord these experiences and interactions.ResultsImpacts on StudentsEWB membership typically begins in universities, and students are often drawn to the servicelearning opportunity through activity fairs, club showcases, or similar campus-wide,extra-curricular events. As an organization reliant on its volunteers, a major goal is to impactstudents in such ways that they continue on as either faculty or professional members. For reasonswe will explore elsewhere, cultivating and sustaining faculty and professional members isparticularly challenging, given the realities of tenure and promotion expectations in the
for manystudents. Especially as experiential learning becomes increasingly prevalent in curriculum designand further emphasized as an important educational tool, engineering technology is beginning togain traction as both a career path and a field of study, particularly among those seeking to spendless time in the classroom. For instance, in 2014, there were over 34,000 students who graduatedwith 2-year engineering technology degrees, versus 4,409 students who graduated with 2-yearengineering degrees, even though the number of graduates with 4-year engineering degreesremained substantially higher than those with 4-year engineering technology degrees [1].As this growth continues, it is increasingly evident that more research needs to be done
Paper ID #24863ADVANCE Women’s Leadership at The University of DelawareDr. Heather Doty, University of Delaware Heather Doty is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Delaware (UD). Dr. Doty teaches undergraduate courses in thermodynamics, statics, dynamics, and technical communication and conducts research on gender in the academic STEM workforce. She is co-PI on UD’s NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant, which aims to recruit, retain, and advance women STEM faculty at UD. Dr. Doty is faculty advisor to UD’s Women in Engineering Graduate Student Steering Committee.Dr. Shawna Vican
Paper ID #18260Work in Progress: Do Students Really Understand Design Constraints? ABaseline StudyDr. J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University Dr. Hylton is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio Northern University. He pre- viously completed his graduate studies in Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, where he con- ducted research in both the School of Mechanical Engineering and the School of Engineering Education. Prior to Purdue, he completed his undergraduate work at the University of Tulsa, also in Mechanical En- gineering. He currently teaches first-year engineering courses as well as
the camp’s agendato give students the information directly so that they feel empowered to speak with their teachersand guidance counselors themselves about course choices. Each day, camp attendees learned a few engineering fundamentals through an engagingpresentation by the University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) faculty and students, then sawthese concepts come to life through guided hands-on activities. In collaboration with the UTAustin Youth Engagement Center, we were able to increase the participation of students whoidentify with groups that have been historically excluded from engineering. Two camps were run(one in Houston and one in Austin) in collaboration with Project Explore in Houston independentschool district (ISD), and
evidence collected, from student artifacts, writtenreflections, class observations, etc. (see Table 1) points to system maps as an effectiveintervention that lies at the intersection of design and social justice.From the faculty perspective one of the most valuable aspects of having student teams createsystem maps is the side conversations that occur. As mentioned previously, the course is taughtin a flipped classroom modality so students work on their system maps during class, enablingrich conversations between faculty members and the design teams. These conversations serve asopportunities to illustrate to students how their engineering work recreates existing social issues.For example, one team wanted to build a system to test water in
institutionalsupport provided to Black graduate students in STEM and the impact of those (or the lack of those)on the students.Each member of our research team was involved in data collection and/or data analysis activities.Along with the faculty leads, our team includes four doctoral researchers and one post-doctoralscholar. Among them are two Black women, one Latinx researcher, and two Women of Color.One of the graduate student researchers is studying counseling psychology, one getting theirdegree in linguistics, and the others are in engineering education. Within our team, one of ourgraduate researchers holds the same professional and racial identity as the co-constructors (i.e., aBlack doctoral student in a STEM program). All other members of our team
works that arereviewed and criticized in a public way among them, On the other hand, even thoughcivil engineering students are also evaluated individually, there is a slight group work insubjects that require laboratories, an activity that is reflected in the reduction of theaverage of individualism as opposed to architecture students.From the results of table 3, we obtain interesting data since the means between bothstudy groups are close to each other, thus there is no significant difference in terms ofindividualism and even though both careers are still on the higher side of the spectrum,there is a greater similarity. These results may be due to how these students had theireducation during the pandemic, being students who had most of their
would actout the roles of an entry-level engineer working on a problem located on ancestral landsintended to aid the local tribal community facing a particular resource-based problem.The participants were required to assess their knowledge of the scenario contents,describe a personal learning plan to better understand the situation and identify keyvariables that would impact decisions made about the situations within the scenario.These two additions to the summer program led to more emphasis on teamwork andleadership skill development to help students learn to communicate better, collaboratewith each other effectively and be more active in setting their own educational goals.These “beyond the curriculum” lessons were found to help students form
students to chooseengineering as a career. With an emphasis on smart and connected cities, the SCR2 programprovides summer research experiences (eight weeks for students and six weeks for teachers).This paper presents our learnings and insights of the program for the past four years withevaluation findings. There have been 116 students and 44 teachers who have successfullyparticipated. The research program was conducted on campus in 2019, but due to COVID-19, theprogram was conducted online in 2020. In 2021 and 2022, the program was redesigned to behybrid, and six host sites participated. Despite the changes in the program, students' prowess wasenhanced by their teamwork and engagement in the projects. The post-program survey raisedconcerns about
the leadership,communication, and cultural competencies increasingly required of today's high-tech workforce.The John Lof Leadership Academy (JLLA) is an innovative leadership program for engineeringgraduate students that was founded at the University of Connecticut in 2018 to create culturallycompetent visionaries in the field of engineering. John Lof Scholars develop their leadershipabilities through focused training, specialized workshops and seminars, and active learning. Runby graduate students from various departments based on a “for us, by us” program philosophy, theJLLA empowers its members to develop as leaders in their fields by aiming leadership trainingthrough the lens of each individual’s career and personal goals. Academy