Paper ID #45137A narrative study of food insecure students in engineering and computingDr. Justin Charles Major, Rowan University Dr. Justin C. Major (they/them) is an Assistant Professor of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University where they leads ASPIRE Lab (Advancing Student Pathways through Inequality Research in Engineering). Justin’s research focuses on low-income students, engineering belonging and marginalization mechanisms, adverse childhood experiences, and feminist approaches to EER, and connects these topics to broader understandings of student success in engineering. Justin completed their Ph.D. in
Paper ID #34637Visualizing Arguments to Scaffold Graduate Writing in EngineeringEducationDr. Kristen Moore, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Kristen R. Moore is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at University at Buffalo. Her research focuses primarily on technical communication and issues of equity, inclusion, and social justice. She is the author of Technical Communication After the Social Justice Turn: Building Coalitions for Action (2019), in addition to a range of articles. She has received a number of awards for her research, including the Joenk Award for the best
fields [4][5]. Having aparadigm shift in contemporary perspectives that classifies societies as “First and Third World”may provide opportunities to observe and learn from nations with an open mind. While thesenations are successful in recruiting and retaining women in engineering, study of what makesit difficult for women in the economically advanced nations such as those in the EuropeanUnion and the US, and implement similar strategies after having a solid grasp of thosestrategies that will cause this evolution possible? Finding an answer to these questions was themotivation behind this research work. According to Briseno [6], many female students in developed countries today selectadvanced mathematics and science courses and are
Paper ID #28392Examining Black Diaspora Participation in Engineering using NarrativeInquiryDr. Ekundayo Shittu, The George Washington University Ekundayo (Dayo) Shittu is an assistant professor of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at George Washington University. Professor Shittu conducts basic and applied research that take a systems approach to address the different dimensions of decision making under multiple and sequential uncer- tainties. His focus is on the economics and management of energy technologies, the design and impacts of climate change response policies, sustainability efforts, corporate
professional society they represent foremost in their minds. Theinformation different entities within this organization have access to, and the pressures they feel,inevitably influences their actions and reactions in a time of reevaluation such as the one beforeus now.At the same time, ABET operates within a broader ecosystem of engineering educationorganizations in Washington, including the professional societies, the National Academies,government agencies like the National Science Foundation (NSF), and other coalition-basedengineering organizations such as the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE), theNational Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES), and the AmericanAssociation of Engineering Societies (AAES). The
Paper ID #22256From Toys to Tools: UAVs in Middle-school Engineering Education (RTP)Miss Srinjita Bhaduri, University of Colorado, Boulder Srinjita Bhaduri is a PhD student in Computer and Cognitive Science at University of Colorado Boulder. Her research examines how educational technology can improve student engagement and student learning, often focusing on underserved populations.Katie Van HorneMr. John Daniel Ristvey Jr., UCAR Center for Science Education John Ristvey, M.S., (UCAR, Principal Investigator), is development lead for Engineering Experiences in collaboration with Dr. Tammy Sumner, Srinjita Bhaduri, and Dr
interesting research study might be developing a hackathon like course as a realuniversity class. This class could help the engineering education community better understandthe effect on learning that hackathons have. Other studies could generate hackathons withspecific learning goals in mind and try to steer students into a curriculum while still maintainingthe typical structure of a hackathon. This event would help show the worth of hackathons as aneducational tool.Another point of view for future works could be project management. The types of time andresource managements that participants exhibit within classroom and hackathon settings may bedrastically different. These skills can be vital to a project and their appearance may differ withthe
Paper ID #15028A Review of the Literature Relevant to Engineering IdentityAnita D. Patrick, University of Texas, Austin Anita Patrick is a STEM Education doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and College of Liberal Arts at UT Austin’s Population Research Center. She received her BS in Bioengineering from Clemson University where she tutored undergraduate mathemat- ics and science courses, and mentored undergraduate engineering majors. Prior to coming to UT, she independently tutored K12 and undergraduate mathematics and science. Her research interests include
inducesadditional stress partly because it seems to create an interminable process of identifying andaccomplishing a collection of goals, without even a clear idea of success. Profoundly, sheimplies that a primary objective might be to simply demonstrate an ability to handle variouskinds of stresses (“I have to be like a well-rounded person who can handle these kinds ofstresses”), because in her mind that constitutes well-roundedness as an engineering student. Thisbelief that experiencing high amounts of stress correlates to one’s legitimacy as an engineeringstudent emerges throughout the data, as does the frustration (“I just need more hours in the day”)which accompanies an inability to effectively and consistently satisfy the system of
students joining a department. Community Cultural Wealth (CCW) was created with Communities of Color in mind to highlight the multitude of assets students of color possess. CCW uses familial, linguistic, aspirational, resistant, navigational, and social capital to describe students’ strengths in and out of the classroom. These capitals appear in multiple settings and from many different sources. They also can be depicted simultaneously as a single capital cannot describe some strengths. For example, a role model for a student may provide both aspirational and navigational capitals simultaneously as they aid a student through the college experience. The Engineering and Science Education (ESED) department at Clemson
industry. There is a disconnect between the perception/experience providedin their education years and recent graduates' challenges when managing home and work life.The younger generation entering the workforce expects more flexible working practices and ismore mindful of not over-committing themselves and achieving work-life balance [5]. Theperspective of the younger generation leads to engineering employees changing careers oremployees looking for organizations that meet their expectations.The Bureau of Labor Statistics presented in April 2022 that the engineering profession needs togrow by 15 percent to meet increasing demand and replace retiring baby boomers. Employmentin architecture and engineering occupations is projected to grow 6 percent
classrooms which are focused on student team dynamics are well documented [3], [9][10], [11]. However, it is critical to provide guidance on the value and importance of leveragingthe benefits of diverse teams [12]. When the benefits of diverse teams are not pointedlyaddressed, the effectiveness of a diverse team can be diminished. One prime example of this isinequitable distribution of work and tasks due to gender bias [9], [10], [12],Similar to [12], this work focuses on the integration of activities designed to help students see thevalue and importance of diverse perspectives in engineering design. The engineering program atthe investigator’s institution was launched in Fall 2018. The program was built with ABETaccreditation standards in mind and
field tripThe ski resort hosted two engineering behind the scenes tours: (1) snow making and (2) chair liftoperations. These activities were seen to map to chemical engineering and mechanicalengineering topics, respectively. Therefore, the field trip was specifically designed with thesetwo majors in mind. Senior women from each department were recruited to act as leaders in theplanning and student recruitment of the process along with support from two engineering facultyand an administrative assistant. Trip planning included making transportation arrangements andhotel reservations, creating team building activities, and arranging ski lessons and rentals.The planning team sought to lower the barrier for attending the field trip in several ways
. Be prepared to adapt to new challenges and opportunities in your career, leveraging your project management skills to excel in diverse roles. • Ethical Awareness: When working on generative AI projects, be mindful of the ethical implications of your work. Collaborate with ethics experts and contribute to responsible AI development.5. Conclusion and Future WorkThis research paper highlights the critical role of project management skills in engineeringeducation, particularly in the context of generative AI projects. Educators must adapt theircurricula to equip students with the necessary skills, while students should embrace theopportunity to develop these skills for a successful and adaptable engineering career
motivated and empowered to learn engineering and apply theirknowledge. One interviewee, for example, said, ‘maybe you can say it is not enough, but I assureyou that in a group we are able to make a miracle solution that will be never be forgotten byKakuma.’ Figure 1. Students presenting their capstone projects in the Azraq refugee campCurriculum re-centers learners as local experts The localized curriculum provided the students with a transformative experience wherethey were re-centered and re-localized as local experts, leading to both immediate and sustainedimpact focused on local development. As one student in Azraq said, ‘the course can be about totransform the mind of a student. At the end of the course, it's when your thoughts
Paper ID #241482018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Engineering Identity for Latina Undergraduate Students: Exploring Devel-opment and Intersecting IdentitiesDr. Sarah Rodriguez, Iowa State University Sarah Rodriguez, PhD, is an assistant professor of Higher Education at Iowa State University. Dr. Ro- driguez’s research addresses issues of equity, access, and retention for Latina/o students in the higher education pipeline, with a focus on the intersections of gender and race/ethnicity for Latinas in STEM. She has experience coordinating large
Paper ID #242252018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Women in Computing & Engineering: Differences between Persisters andNon-persistersTim John Weston, University of Colorado, Boulder Tim Weston is a research associate for the University of Colorado’s Alliance for Technology, Learning and Society (ATLAS) where he has conducted evaluation and research on NSF, Department of Educa- tion, NASA and private foundation funded projects for 19 years. Weston specializes in the evaluation of programs with educational technology interventions, assessing new
first was that theRVCC student Engineering Team delivered a fully-functioning product that met or exceeded theCustomer specifications and expectations. This was a significant achievement given thechallenging and open-ended problem, the Team’s initial knowledge level, and the brief executionperiod. The second was that the responsibility of designing and delivering a real product to areal customer, and under authentic engineering conditions, was effective in accelerating studentlearning of important skills that are often acquired later when employed in Industry. Theconcepts of focusing on the Customer, doing what you say you will do, aggressive prototyping,and determination and grit, became real.The result was a mature, cohesive, open-minded, and
the letter grade of “HD” (highdistinction – the highest letter grade) at UNSW, while it is only converted to the letter gradeof “B” at ASU. In practice, it is important to properly prepare students’ minds regarding thesespecial arrangements.Since the participating students were all first-year engineering students, the instructor alsoattempted to evaluate whether and to what extent their skills meet the various requirementsand constraints of a globally distributed team. The evaluation was conducted based on theinstructor’s subjective observations, against the benchmark of the third-year engineeringstudents in another global course [9]. Firstly, most of the students had demonstrated strongcommunication skills. In particular, since there is no
Paper ID #18938Developing Multiple Strategies for an Inclusive Curriculum in Civil Engi-neeringDr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is Professor and Founding Chair of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University (USA) and was 2014-15 Fulbright Scholar in Engineering Education at Dublin Institute of Technology (Ireland). From 1998-2016, Stephanie was a faculty member in Chemical Engineering at Rowan. Dr. Farrell has contributed to engineering education through her work in experiential learning, focusing on areas of pharmaceutical, biomedical and food engineering. She has been honored by the
from that university are pursuing research to study the enculturation ofstudents to the engineering profession. Enculturation is the process by which an individual learnsthe traditional content of a culture and assimilates its practices and values (Richard et al., 2016).In the study, we began by being mindful of the culture, norms and behaviors of the universityand engineering department. From the initial study, we arrived at enculturation factors that havecontinued to serve as the framework for our research. The university is conservative and richwith traditions that influence the norms and behaviors of the students, faculty and staff.Additionally, the college of engineering is actively engaging its nearly 17,000 students to pursuehigh impact
excluded.Of those who said the curriculum did change their minds there were several themes: I have more knowledge about the impacts that can be made by engineers and/or how they can help (20) I know now more about ethics and the care that must be taken when making decisions (13) I now have a desire to make a positive contribution to the world (6) I realized I must think about society as a whole/culture/local traditions (5) This class confirmed my choice of major/career or gave me knowledge about my future career (4) I have more knowledge of the problems that need to be addressed (3) I realize we need to see the big picture/global impacts and connections (3) I have a new world view (3
framing ofcertain engineering disciplines as more altruistic or communal than others. To work towardgender parity, Diekman et al. suggest “interventions… [to] demonstrate how STEM fieldsinvolve “helping” and collaborating with other people” as a way to increase the involvement ofwomen and communal-minded people in STEM more generally4. One potential strategy may befor engineering programs to highlight that many disciplines within engineering have the potentialto meet communal goals, moving beyond those already seen to be female-dominated. Thissignalling would be possible to implement through public-facing documents such as programpromotional materials that already tend to frame engineering in particular ways through languagechoices18.An important
engineering disciplines where women are most expected to succeed. The basis for this studyshould rely on success stories and experiences in Jordan, Malaysia, and other countries, whilekeeping in mind fundamental social and religious Saudi values. Given also Saudi’s challengingclimate, it is recommended (at least initially) that some of the ‘softer’ disciplines such aschemical, civil, electrical, industrial and systems, environmental, earth, and biologicalengineering be first adopted in Saudi higher education institutions. This detailed feasibility survey should be distributed to a large group of high-schoolstudents, parents of students, academics, important figures, government officials, companies,school administrators, and college and
included presenting a paper in the inauguralASEE Military and Veterans Division and receiving the Best Paper Award during the Division’ssecond year.12 In addition, one of our team participated in a panel for this division. 21We are presenting a special session entitled “Answering the How and Why Questions withQualitative Research” and a paper to the inaugural CoNECD conference. 22 CoNECD is acollaboration among:• WEPAN - Women in Engineering ProActive Network• NAMEPA - National Association of Multicultural Engineering Program Advocates• MIND - Minorities in Engineering Division of the American Society for Engineering Education• WIED - Women in Engineering Division of the American Society for Engineering EducationThe special session is similar to
Paper ID #27235Freshman-year Initiative for a Cohort of Largely Engineering Minority Stu-dentsDr. Kamau Wright, University of Hartford Kamau Wright is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Hartford. He spe- cializes in thermo-fluids and plasma engineering. His technical research interests include applications of high voltage plasma discharges to liquids and wastewaters; plasma decomposition of carbon dioxide; foul- ing prevention and mitigation for heat exchangers; oxidation of organic matter in water; and inactivation of bacteria using high voltage plasmas. c
Paper ID #15814An Analysis of First-Year Engineering Majors’ Spatial SkillJaclyn Kuspiel Murray, University of Georgia Jaclyn Kuspiel Murray is currently a research scientist at Georgia Institute of Technology in the depart- ment of biomedical engineering. In May of 2016 she graduated with a doctorate of philosophy in science education from The University of Georgia. She earned a bachelor of science in mechanical engineer- ing from Georgia Institute of Technology and a master of science in biomedical engineering from The University of Tennessee Health Science Center and The University of Memphis. After a brief career in
service. This paper will share the lessons learned that apply to evaluating STEMpedagogy and STEM programs that use nontraditional approaches and assessments. Therefore,this paper is a case study that provides a rich description of the processes involved in thedevelopment of an evaluation of this rocket project.Evaluation of SystemsGo’s Rocket Project: The SystemsGo Effect The following is a summary of the evaluation taken from the annual report2. Beginningwith the end in mind, this summary is the result of our evaluation effort. SystemsGo is a programthat helps students acquire 21st Century science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) workforce skills. What follows is a brief summary of findings, conclusions andrecommendations
understand the real economic and socialimpact of engineering in this century. Another target goal to be achieved is to foster among themthe entrepreneurial mind to pursue other opportunities than finding a job in a company [6]. For theuniversity the final goal is to attract more students and enlarge the number of students inengineering programs. Besides this, by law, universities should provide services to thecommunity, what serves for both student’s practical period and society access to consultancy inengineering that is very expensive otherwise. For the City Hall, this is another community servicefunded by federal government, which could be turned into votes for future elections.Project statusThe groups and the director of the project are doing
Paper ID #14626Sources of Anxiety among Engineering Students: Assessment and MitigationDr. Paul M. Yanik, Western Carolina University Dr. Paul Yanik is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Western Carolina University. His areas of research include human-robot interactions, assistive devices, pattern recognition, machine learning, and engineering education.Dr. Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University Yanjun Yan received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Harbin Institute of Tech- nology (China), and the M.S. degree in Applied Statistics and the Ph.D. degree in