Analysis studied FEA using ANSYSMechanical APDL. Five teams of senior students each performed a different type ofoptimization on the FSAE chassis design as the final course project. In both courses, studentsrecord predicted torsional rigidity and predicted chassis weight for their respective designs. Thejunior Vehicle Design I students measured torsional rigidity of two completed FSAE vehicles.Assessment of relevant student learning outcomes for each course and student feedback arepresented.IntroductionThis paper provides a tutorial for using the CATIA V5 Generative Structural Workbench todesign a space frame. Junior level vehicle design students demonstrate the application of theprocess to their own individual FSAE chassis designs. In parallel
(Fundamentals of Materials Science) that lays thefoundation for the mechanical and capstone design courses. Thus, it is paramount to the facultythat through this course, students gain a solid understanding as to how the materials selection andprocessing will ultimately affect their final product. Granta CES EduPack is a comprehensivematerials science software program that is available to the students at the junior and senior levelwithin the ME program. In past offerings, CES EduPack has been introduced at the end of thecourse at a basic level to introduce the students to concepts of materials selection. Prior studentshave not considered the software as a tool for materials selection in their mechanical design andcapstone projects in the past, likely
Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of Engineering at Montana State University (MSU). Plumb has been involved in engineering education and program evaluation for over 25 years, and she continues to work on externally funded projects relating to engineering education.Dr. Douglas J. Hacker Dr. Hacker is a full professor in the Department of Educational Psychology and participates in both the Learning Sciences Program and the Reading and Literacy Program. Prior to receiving his Ph. D. in educational psychology from the University of Washington in 1994, Dr. Hacker worked as a high school science and math teacher and then as a school counselor. From 1994 to 1999, Dr. Hacker was an assistant/associate professor
environmentalchallenges they will face in the decades ahead.” The recent Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS) emphasize the influence and interdependence of science, engineering, and technologyon society [2], yet many science teachers are ill-prepared to teach these in their existingcurricular environments [3], [4], [5]. For high school students to successfully engage withengineering practices, engineering projects need to be authentic, interdisciplinary, and feasiblefor teachers within existing curricular time, materials, and standards requirements [6], [7].The author, a high school physics teacher, developed and implemented a curriculum unit toaddress these needs with the support of a National Science Foundation (NSF) funded ResearchExperience for Teachers
on NSF grant projects related to students’ resistance to active learning and how funding impacts STEM graduate students. His own dis- sertation work examines learning, marginality, and environmental citizen scientists. He has a B.S. and M.Eng in Environmental Engineering both from Texas Tech University.Dr. Prateek Shekhar, University of Michigan Prateek Shekhar is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the University of Michigan. His research is fo- cused on examining translation of engineering education research in practice, assessment and evaluation of dissemination initiatives and educational programs in engineering disciplines. He holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, M.S
are moreinclusive and suited for the 21st century workforce. The CEE Department’s contribution to theRED program is called Revolutionizing Engineering Diversity (RevED). The RevED team isembarking on its second year, building on the momentum established in the prior year. Underguidance from RevED, the CEE Department faculty have taken part in workshops that haveestablished a shared set of values and language around diversity and inclusion. The CEEDepartment is currently engaged in implementing inclusive curriculum in several courses offeredfreshman through senior year. This poster intends to showcase the developments made in severalCEE courses that have developed student projects or assignments that enable students to have amore global and
Paper ID #22967Board 59: Shame in Engineering: Unpacking the Socio-Psychological Emo-tional Construct in the Context of Professional FormationDr. James L. Huff, Harding University James Huff is an assistant professor of engineering at Harding University. He is the lead investigator of the Beyond Professional Identity (BPI) lab, which conducts research that is aligned with unpacking psy- chological experiences of identity in professional domains. Additionally, James directs multiple student projects that use human-centered design in the context of community engagement. James received his Ph.D. in engineering education and
of Institutions of HigherEducation [1]. As the 4th largest academic unit on VCU’s campus, the School of Engineering iscomprised of 2,000 students with demographics that reflect the diverse community in which itserves. The development of collaborations such as public-private partnerships and projects withlocal communities has been VCU Engineering’s essential ingredient for talent development, notonly because of well-established relationships with the business community, but also becausethese community partnerships give way to a continuum of college-bound students that translatesinto a sustainable diverse STEM pipeline. The desire to expand the number of public-privatepartnerships within the local community, however, presents both
. 2012.[4] C. L. Dym and P. Little, Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction, 3rd ed. Wiley, 2008.[5] D. L. Butler and S. C. Cartier, “Multiple Complementary Methods for Understanding Self-Regulated Learning as Situated in Context,” in American Educational Research Association, Annual Meeting, 2005, pp. 11–15.[6] O. Lawanto, W. H. Goodridge, and H. B. Santoso, “Task Interpretation and Self- Regulating Strategies in Engineering Design Project: an Exploratory Study,” in 118th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2011.[7] S. C. Cartier and D. L. Butler, “Elaboration and validation of questionnaires and plan for analysis,” in Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for The Study of Education
introduces different Engineering discipline and is taught by SWE officers, SWEmembers, or students from other Engineering clubs. SWE provides lunch, snacks, a theme-oriented t-shirt and a goodie-bag filled with school supplies to all participants, includingvolunteers. All students participate in a closing ceremony to conclude the event. Additionally, the7th-8th group displays their completed robotic projects in a showcase. Figure 3 shows a sample labfrom all age groups, Kinder-3rd, 4th-6th, and 7th-8th. A sample lab activity is provided in the AppendixA. Figure 3: Imagineer Day 2017Results and AnalysisThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact the outreach event has on K-8 graders,particularly girls, as
recently, as Vice Chair of ACM SIGSOFT and General Chair of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering. She has participated in many CRAW and ACM mentoring events; is a founding adviser of MSU Women in Computing, the MSU ACM-W Chapter; and co-led TechKobwa, a technology camp for secondary-school teachers and female students in Rwanda, for three summers. She was awarded the ACM SIGSOFT Distinguished Service Award in 2017.Ms. Michelle Slattery, Peak Research Michelle Slattery has more than 30 years’ experience as a professional evaluator working with diverse clients on complex project evaluations. Her business, Peak Research LLC, is celebrating 25 years of providing services to evaluate S-STEM, BPC, RED
administrative, operational, and educational tools from on-premise resources to hosted or Software as a Service (SaaS) offerings, K-12 and post-secondaryschool administrators are placing increasing demands on the network, applications used, andstaff supporting those applications. As the importance of the network’s role in day-to-dayeducation operations increases, new ways to measure how the network and services providedover the network are performing are needed.This paper will present the details of a multi-semester undergraduate research project to measurethe quantifiable benefits of shifting from a traditional network monitoring approach toapplication performance or user experience approach in a K-12 school system. This novelapproach aids school
center around education issues in general, and in particular on increasing access and success of those traditionally under-represented and/or under-served in STEM higher education.Dr. William L. Hughes, Boise State University William L. Hughes is an Associate Professor of the Micron School of Materials Science & Engineering at Boise State University. He also serves as the cofounder and Associate Dean of the College of Innovation + Design, as well as the Head of the Vertically Integrated Projects program at Boise State. He received his B.S. and Ph.D. in Materials Science & Engineering from Virginia Tech and Georgia Tech. Prior to his current appointments, he was a National Academy of Engineering Postdoctoral Fellow
Paper ID #23909Designing Humanitarian Engineering from Practice: Experiences and Out-comes in a Developing World Context.Miss Diana Duarte, Universidad Sergio Arboleda Industrial Engineer and Master of Science in Industrial Engineering with emphasis in organizational man- agement from Universidad de los Andes Colombia. Her work experience is focused on research and project management with social and environmental impact in the educational context and the public sec- tor.Ing. Luis Alejandro AngelMrs. MARIA ´ PAULA FLOREZ´ ´ JIMENEZ P.E., Universidad Sergio Arboleda I am Industrial Engineer and
prepare students to learn new skills as needs emerge, hence the emergence of thenotion of ‘robust knowledge’. The adaptation of the underlying Knowledge Learning &Instruction Framework yields a novel approach to integrating systems thinking skills inengineering courses, despite conflicting schools of thought of how and when integration shouldoccur.This work in progress paper describes a systems thinking skills intervention developed for anonline, Project Management course for 3rd and 4th year engineering students. The application of avertical, course thread fosters “deep, connected and coherent” exposure to systems thinking skills.The Conceptual Systems Thinking Integration approach introduced herein not only outlinesinstructional events
undergraduate student at the University of Michigan studying materials science and engineering with a minor in chemistry. He is also a member of the engineering honors program, an instructor for a first-year engineering design course, an instructor in a senior-level materials science course, and a researcher in ultrafast optical sciences.Dr. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She enjoys serving as a ”communication coach” to students throughout the curriculum, and she’s especially excited to work with first year and senior students, as well as engineering project teams, as they navigate the more open-ended communication
class (Fluid Power System Design) that will end with the completion of a semesterproject. In this project, students will develop and test their own prototype system e.g., emulationof a backhoe or a stamping device duty cycle.The reason for the modularization is to offer the option that each module can be offered as a topicin any existing application-based course. Courses with, for example, design, energy, sustainabilitycontent can benefit from the use of any of the proposed modules. Under this development plan allmodules are offered in a single course in order to test and refine them, but it is well known thatthe trend nowadays is to reduce the number of total credits in existing BS programs. Therefore,individual modules can be offered as
companies, it would be beneficial to seek theindustrial expectations on a national scope.This paper targets the industrial expectations for the marine engineering major students on anational scope. Job hunting websites, including indeed, linkedin, glassdoor, monster andcareerbuilder, have been used to collect national information on the 115 marine engineering jobsavailable from May 2017 to Oct 2017. Statistical analysis has revealed the industrial expectationsfor the top job placements (locations), the top job categories, and software skills most in demand.The paper also discusses possible modifications to the existing MMA curriculum and coursecontents to better meet these industrial expectations, including assigning practical projects incourses
- gineering education in informal, traditional, distance, and professional environments. Dr. Goodridge currently teaches courses in ”Teaching, Learning, and Assessment in Engineering Education” and ”Engi- neering Mechanics: Statics.” Dr. Goodridge is an engineering councilor for the Council on Undergraduate Research (CUR) and serves on ASEE’s project board. Dr. Goodridge actively consults for projects includ- ing the development of an online curriculum style guide for Siemens software instruction, development of engineering activities for blind and visually impaired youth, and the implementation and investigation of a framework of engineering content to incorporate into P-12 engineering education.Prof. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah
the Year Award from the National Society of Black Engineers.Dr. Todd Pagano, Rochester Institute of Technology/National Technical Institute for the Deaf Todd Pagano is the Associate Dean for Teaching & Scholarship Excellence and Professor of Chemistry at Rochester Institute of Technology’s National Technical Institute for the Deaf (RIT/NTID) where he is responsible for oversight of NTID’s undergraduate research initiatives and has mentored over sixty Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing undergrads in his own scientific research projects. He was the founding director of the Laboratory Science Technology program at NTID; a unique degree granting program for Deaf/Hard- of-Hearing students. In this role he led the design and
topics and training along with professional skills development seemedcritical to the overall benefit of the program.MethodsPrevious reports described the program structure and evaluation results in the program’s firstyear [1]. Briefly, the eight-week long program consisted of four modules: (1) soft lithographyand microfluidics, (2) fabrication (photolithography and electron beam lithography, deposition,and etch), (3) characterization (microscopy and electrical probing), and (4) finance andcommercialization. Mornings were spent doing lessons on content area knowledge andexplaining techniques, and afternoons had hands-on training and laboratory activities. One dayper week and non-training times were devoted to a research project which spanned the
University Faculty Senate. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Performance of a Linux-based RouterAbstractToday’s routers have increasingly short life cycles. The short life cycle is due to the growingdemand for bandwidth by users. High traffic under limited bandwidth conditions results in asignificant number of dropped connections and excruciatingly slow speeds. Coupled with thepractice of sporadic firmware updates for the majority of commercial routers, consumers usuallyhave to purchase new hardware every two years to maintain consistent speeds. This projectexplores an alternative, building a home-built router suitable for use in senior projects andspecial projects. While our lab
collaborative within the NSF-funded National Girls Collaborative Project which brings together girl-serving organizations across Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. that are committed to increasing the number of young women pursuing science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) careers. Currently, Paige is serving as the Immediate Past President for the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Paige earned her Ph.D. and M.S. in industrial and systems engineering and B.S. in engineering science and mechanics from Virginia Tech. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Title: Exploring the incorporation of diversity and inclusion curriculum in engineering
turn, has shapedsociety [1], [2]. However, the engineering education system is still challenged to be moreinclusive of women and underrepresented minorities to reflect the demographics of society [3].According to the Census Bureau, women were slightly more than half of U.S. residents, andminorities constituted 36% of the U.S. population in 2010 [4]. The projections also suggest thatminorities will be about half of the resident U.S. population by 2050 [4]. However, womenrepresented 21.4% of enrolled engineering undergraduates, 24.1% of enrolled Master’sengineering students, and 26.2% doctorate students in the United States in 2015 [5]. Thesepercentages have remained steady for decades and do not approach the 50.6% representation ofwomen in
distributions, confidence intervals, hypothesistesting, regression, analysis of variance, nonparametric statistics, and statistical quality control.However, these topics are usually taught in standard classroom settings and do not includehands-on solutions to engineering projects. At our institution, the students are required to take aLaboratory Analysis and Reports course, instead of a typical engineering statistics class. Inaddition to this required course, our school also offers an elective course in quality assurance. Inthis class, among other things, students study and solve several engineering statistics problems,analyze the data, and perform error analysis and data interpretation. Such a method of teachinghelps students learn statistics and its
serves as the instructor for the Women in Science & Engineering Program (WiSE), an academic based resource and professional development program for first year women in STEM. Her research interests include pre-service science teacher education, curriculum development, STEM identity, and K-12 outdoor science education. She is currently working on research projects focused on student attitudes towards diversity in engineering and the retention of women in STEM.Mr. Justin Charles Major, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Justin C. Major is a first-year Engineering Education Ph.D student and National Science Foundation Grad- uate Research Fellow at Purdue University. Justin has two bachelor’s
success of their individual industries. Each student responded regarding thereporting structures and processes used in their individual companies to improve communicationand get work completed. Chad noted, “I… learned that a majority of work required information and expertise from multiple people within the project… For any project, we have our Project Executives, Project Managers, and the Lead Estimator work together to understand the whole project and to make sure we understand exactly what the owner and the architect want”. Per his experience, this acknowledges the expectation of accountability and the checks and balances required for quality control by each employee. “Technical work like this had to
works as an instructional designer (graduate assistant) on campus. Her research interests include online learning, curriculum design, and instructional technology.David A Wehr, Iowa State UniversityDr. An Chen, Iowa State UniversityDr. Yelda Turkan, Oregon State University Dr. Yelda Turkan is an assistant professor of Construction Engineering and Management in the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State University. She holds a doctoral degree in civil engineering with emphasis in construction engineering and management from the University of Waterloo in Canada. Prior to joining academia, she worked in the construction industry for two years as a highway design project engineer. Dr. Turkan teaches
. As a result, in 200-level programming classes, faculty membersspent lots of time reviewing fundamental programming concepts that had already been taught inthe introductory course. Another observation is that students often procrastinated taking theirhigher-level programming courses because of unfavorable experiences in the introductory course.Based on the above observations, the goals of this project were to: (1) improve students’performance, (2) help students retain their programming knowledge/skills, (3) motivate studentsin learning programming, (4) improve classroom engagement, and (5) give students a betterprogramming experience in the introductory course so that they will not defer enrolling in 200-level programming classes.Research
Education, and Project Assessment and Evaluation. She is currently internal evaluator and assessment coordinator for multiple grants from the National Science Foundation and the Department of Education.Prof. Oscar Marcelo Suarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Professor Oscar M. Suarez joined the University of Puerto Rico - Mayag¨uez in 2000. A Fellow of ASM International, he is the Coordinator of the new Materials Science and Engineering graduate program, the first of its kind in Puerto Rico. He is also the director of the university’s Nanotechnology Center Phase II, which is supported by the National Science Foundation.Dr. Agnes M. Padovani, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Agnes M. Padovani is a