Effective Teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2: 9-34.4. R. Marra, K. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, 2009. Women Engineering Students and Self-Efficacy: A Multi- Year, Multi-Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self-Efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98: 27-38.5. A. Bandura, 1977. Self- Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84: 191-215.6. A. Carberry, H-S Lee, and M. Ohland. 2010. Measuring Engineering Design Self-Efficacy. Journal of Page 22.739.8 Engineering Education, 99: 71-79.7. R. Felder, G. Felder, M. Mauney, C. Hamrin, and E
., Steadman, J. W., Tietjen, J. S., White, K. R., & Whitman, D. L. (2005). Using the fundamentals of engineering (FE) examination to assess academic programs. Clemson: National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying.McNeel, S. P. (1994). College teaching and student moral development. In J. R. Rest & D. Narvâaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 27-49). Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. (2008). Exam development procedures manual: Exam development, scoring, and general procedures: NCEES.Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students : a third decade of
achievements for theperformance indicators, the capstone course assessment can be viewed as a significant indicatorfor the program assessment, as well. It is a best practice that the set of performance indicatorsand rubrics used for identifying the gaps and assessing the course should be developed incollaboration with the program faculty and stakeholders.References1. Henscheid, J. M., “Professing the disciplines: An analysis of senior seminars and capstone courses,” National Resource Center for the First Year Experience and Students in Transition, Monograph No. 30, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, 2000.2. Kerka, S., “Capstone experiences in career and technical education,” Practice Application Brief No16, Clearing house on Adult
studentsagree or disagree with a survey question.Question Survey QuestionNumber1 I understand which technical communication skills are needed and how they are used in a STEM (science, technology, engineering, or mathematics) career field.2 I can compose a standard business letter.3 I can compose a standard interoffice memorandum (memo).4 I can create a data spreadsheet and related graph(s) for the data using a typical spreadsheet program such as Microsoft Excel ®.5 I can compose a complete technical report including title page, cover letter, table of contents, and body of the report.6 I understand what skills are necessary for a team to function
concepts inelectrical and computer engineering at a much deeper level so that they can participate fully inthe design, construction, and testing of mechanical systems. This is forcing changes in theundergraduate ME curriculum. Starting in the 1970‟s,5,6 microprocessors have been incorporatedinto ME courses, usually in a senior technical elective or laboratory course at a number ofschools. Coursework on mechatronics, a discipline form at the overlap between mechanical,electrical, and computer engineering, exist in almost all engineering schools with minors anddegree programs available at some institutions.While a two-course sequence in mechatronics is routinely offered to seniors at Virginia Tech anda Minor in Mechatronics is under consideration
by Sheila Tobias3 and Richard Felder4 in the 1990’s are “second tier” engineeringstudents. Tobias3 defines first tier engineering students as those who have intentions and abilityto earn science degrees and do so. Second tier are students who have the initial intention andability but instead switch to nonscientific fields. For many engineering students who start atcommunity colleges or are a “second tier” student, the calculus math sequence is a key factor intheir decision to complete an engineering degree and then their time to graduation. This is due inpart to the math prerequisites required for engineering and physics courses. To finish anengineering degree in four years, a student needs to start in calculus 1 in the fall of the first
allowed waste-to-energy plants to become highly clean. 3. Explain the important issues and environmental impacts USA is suffering environmental costs by not utilizing the potential of waste to energy plants. The environmental impact is higher greenhouse gas emissions and loss of cheap electricity. 4. Recommended actions. Create awareness that waste-to-energy plants do not mean the end of recycling Streamline the process of selecting and building the incinerators Change public perception by educating them about effective operation of waste to energy plants elsewhere Government funding 5. Based on your analysis/reflection of the environmental impacts what action(s) you would like to take
and World Reports http://www.usnews.com/rankings, 2010.10 Lynch, D. R., Russell, J. S., Mason, J. M. and Evans, J. C. “Claims on the Foundation: Professionalism and its Liberal Base,” ASCE Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Volume 135, Issue 3, pp. 109-116 (July 2009).11 Lynch, D. R., Russell, J. S., Evans, J. C. and Sutterer, K. G. (2008), “Beyond the Cognitive: The Affective Domain, Values and Achievement of the Vision,” ASCE J. of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol.135, No.1, pp.47-56. (January 2009).12 The Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025, ASCE, 2007
). Page 22.927.87 Nakajima, K. & Hori, M. in 2009 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, ICCSIT 2009, August 8, 2009 - August 11, 2009. 319-322 (IEEE Computer Society).8 Huang, Y.-M., Kuo, Y.-H., Lin, Y.-T. & Cheng, S.-C. Toward interactive mobile synchronous learning environment with context-awareness service. Computers and Education 51, 1205-1226 (2008).9 Dagon, D., Martin, T. & Starner, T. Mobile phones as computing devices: The viruses are coming! IEEE Pervasive Computing 3, 11-15 (2004).10 Maniar, N., Bennett, E., Hand, S. & Allan, G. The effect of mobile phone screen size on video based learning. Journal of Software 3, 51-61 (2008
documents seemed veryuseful to evaluate any of the 3 skill areas for a pilot. However, an interesting idea surfacedregarding the team status meetings with the instructor in which an interview Q&A style could beused to gather sufficient evidence.A pilot was conducted in spring 2010 involving the capstone for Electrical Engineering as wellas Computer Engineering majors. The face-to-face meetings with the teams provided anexcellent opportunity to evaluate the skill levels. The instructor reported that each teamemployed all 3 skills at one or more point(s) during the semester. The results are shown in Table5 for all 6 teams. Good performance was observed in 2-3 teams for each skill; however, the bestteams were not always the same. No team
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.3. Bandura, A. "Social Cognitive Theory in cultural context." Applied Psychology: An International Review. 51,2002, pp. 269-290.4. Concannon, James P. and Lloyd H. Barrow. "A Cross-Sectional Study of Engineering Students' Self-Efficacy byGender, Ethnicity, Year and Transfer Status." Journal of Science, Education and Technology 18 (2), 2009, pp. 163-172.5. Ponton, Michael K., Julie Horine Edmister, Lawrence S. Ukeiley, and John M. Seiner."Understanding the role ofself-efficacy in engineering education." Journal of Engineering Education 90 (2), 2001, pp. 247-251.6. Pajares, Frank. "Current directions in self-efficacy research." In M. Maehr and P.R. Pintrich, eds., Advances inmotivation and achievement 10, 2007
automotivelaboratory and research activities. 6. References1. Bosch Automotive Proving Grounds http://www.bosch.us/content/language1/html/2744.htm, retrieved on 01/15/2011.2. Laurent, J., Talbot, M., Doucet, M., Road surface inspection using laser scanners adapted for the high precision 3D measurements of large flat surfaces, Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Advances in 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling; 12-15 May 1997 pp. 303 – 310.3. Si-Jie Yu, Sreenivas R Sukumar, Andreas F Koschan, David L. Page, and Mogi A Abidi; 3D reconstruction of road surfaces using integrated multi-sensory approach; Optics and lasers in Engineering; Volume 45, Issue 7; July 2007; pp. 808-818.4. Tarel, J. P. , Ieng, S.-S., and Charbonnier, P
Press.3. Moran, J. 2002. Interdisciplinarity, New York: Routledge4. Rhoten, D., and Pfirman, S. 2007. Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences. Research Policy, 36(1), 56-75.5. Geiger, R., and Sa, C. 2005. Beyond technology transfer: new state policies to harness university research for economic development, Minerva, 43(1), 1-21.6. Lattuca, L., Vogt, L., and Fath, K. 2004. Does interdisciplinarity promote learning? Theoretical support and researchable questions. Review of Higher Education, 28(1), 23-48.7. Borrego, M., and Newswander L. 2008. Characteristics of successful cross-disciplinary engineering education collaborations. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(2), 123-134.8. Qualters, D., Sheahan
Creativity, Self-regulated Learning, and Motiva- tion through Cyberinfrastructure-enabled Problem/Project-based Learning”, American Education Science Review, vol. 1, no. 1, February, 2010 Wei Zheng, Jianjun Ying, Gordon Skelton, Huiru Shih, Tzusheng Pei and Evelyn Leggette, ”Strategies in Science and Engineering Studies”, Journal of Information Systems Technology and Planning, vol. 2, issue 3, winter 2009. N. Meghanathan, S. Sharma and G. W. Skelton, ”Use of Mobile Sinks to Disseminate Data in Wireless Sensor Networks,” International Journal of Information Processing, vol. 2, no. 2, April/ May 2008. Marc Bitner, Gordon Skelton, ”Low Cost, Highly Effective Parallel Computing Achieved Through a Beowulf Cluster
Tropical Land-Use Change: Greenhouse Gas Emissionsfrom Biomass Burning, Decomposition and Soils in Forest Conversion, Shifting Cultivation andSecondary Vegetation”, Climatic Change, 46(1-2), p. 115-158, (2000).2 “The Revised 1996 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines”, http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/invs1.html3 P. M. Cox, R. A. Betts, C. D. Jones, S. A. Spall and I. J. Totterdell, “Acceleration of globalwarming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model”, Nature 408, p. 184-187(2000).4 M. Asif and T. Muneer, “Energy Supply, its Demand and Security Issues for Developed andEmerging Economies”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(7) p. 1388-1413, (2007).5 Department of Energy, “Green Technology
of “why” women departengineering.References1. Schneider, C.G. and D. Humphreys, Putting Liberal Education on the Radar Screen. Chronicle of Higher Education, 2005. 52(5): p. B20-B20.2. Nationl Center for Education Statistics, Persistence and Attainment of 2003-04 Beginning Postsecondary Students: After 6 Years, T. Hunt-White, Editor. 2010, U S Department of Education: Washington, DC.3. Brainard, J. and A. Fuller, Graduation Rates Fall at One-third of 4-Year Colleges, in The Chronicle of Higher Education. 2010: Washington, DC.4. Atman, C.J., et al., Enabling engineering student success: The final report for the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. 2010, San Rafel, CA: Morgan &
aregiven for each of the twelve categories. (The accompanying key indicates what each of thesenumbers represents.) Page 22.1102.5 Table B: Four Types of Communication Assignments for Engineering DesignExploratory Activities Heuristics for Higher-Order Document Components Final Artifact(s)(CPR mediated) Mental Manipulations (CPR mediated) (CPR mediate)Assignments to foster Assignments that reflect Assignments that enact The final product (devicediscovery. the “rationalization” of the more “formal
). American Society for Engineering Education. 13. Orr, J.A., D. Cyganski, R. Vaz, “Teaching Information Engineering to Everyone,” Proceedings of the 1997 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (1997). American Society for Engineering Education. 14. Pisupati, S. Jonathan P. Mathews and Alan W. Scaroni, “Energy Conservation Education for Non- Engineering Students: Effectiveness of Active Learning Components,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2003). American Society for Engineering Education. 15. National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/., Accessed
teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(2), 163-182.2. Davis, E.A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 91-142.3. Katz, S., O’Donnell, G., & Kay, H. (2000). An approach to analyzing the role and structure of reflective dialogue. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11(3), 320-343.4. Lee, A., & Hutchison, L. (1998). Improving learning from examples through reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 4, 187-210.5. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2005). Role of Guidance, Reflection, and Interactivity in an Agent-Based Multimedia Game
had nonumerical impact on the students‟ final grades. Instead, it was used to provide feedback forimproved student learning in anticipation of the grade-determining summative final exam to betaken at the end of the semester.The seventh learning outcome, associated with preparation and participation, was assessedcontinuously via readiness tests, daily instructor observation, and a peer assessment survey givenat approximately mid-semester. In the peer assessment the members of each group anonymouslyassessed each other‟s contributions to the group work process.Evaluation: Fall 2010Evaluation of the adapted TBL strategy as implemented in Fall 2010 was done using twoinstruments: continuous observation by the instructor throughout the semester, and
: CRC Press, 2009.[8] D. G. Rickerby and M. Morrison, "Nanotechnology and the environment: A European perspective," Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, vol. 8, pp. 19-24.[9] (28 March 2011). Washington nuclear sensors capable of detecting faintest amounts of radiation. Available: http://homelandsecuritynewswire.com/washington-nuclear-sensors-capable-detecting-faintest- amounts-radiation[10] D. F. Emerich and C. G. Thanos, "Nanotechnology and medicine," Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 3, pp. 655-663, 2003.[11] J. F. S. Jr., "Nanotechnology and Environmental, Health, and Safety: Issues for Consideration ", C. R. Service, Ed., ed: CRS Report for Congress, John F. Sargent Jr
B) Output Power POutput = Q * p where Q is flow and p is the head POutput = 0.0000225 m3/s*6.55kPa*1000 Pa/kPa = 0.147W C) Efficiency Efficiency = POutput / PInput * 100% . Efficiency = *100% = 22.3% . These results are presented in Table 5 for impeller speeds from 2010 to 3510 rpm.C. Determination of System Curve and
, American Society for Engineering Education 142 1. P. M. Fearnside, “Global Warming and Tropical Land-Use Change: Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Biomass Burning, Decomposition and Soils in Forest Conversion, Shifting Cultivation and Secondary Vegetation”, Climatic Change, 46(1-2), p. 115-158, (2000).2. “The Revised 1996 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines”, http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/invs1.html3. P. M. Cox, R. A. Betts, C. D. Jones, S. A. Spall and I. J. Totterdell, “Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model”, Nature 408, p. 184-187 (2000).4. M. Asif and T
Author wishes to express his gratitude to undergraduate students who kindly participated in this study. References 1. Barbuto, J. E. (2000). Developing a Leadership Perspective in the Classroom. Journal of Adult Development , 7 (3), pp. 161-169.2. Brown, L. I. (2001). A Meta-analysis of Research on the Influence of Leadership on Student Outcomes. PhD Dissertation, Virginia Tech, Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies.3. Cramer, S. F. (1994, Fall). Assessing Effectiveness in the Collaborative Classroom. New Direction for Teaching and Learning (59), pp. 69-81.4. Grow, G. O. (1991, Spring). Teaching Learners to Be Self-Directed. Adult Education Quarterly , 41 (3), pp. 125-149.5. Hersey, P., Angelini, A. L., &
fields oflearning. Student satisfaction is high with the current form of the Aerospace Engineering summer campprogram, and the instructors are dedicated to bringing a strong, positive experience to the high schoolstudents, with the aim of generating interest in STEM-related opportunities. The summer programs alsoAcknowledgements Funding for the development of a portion of the course materials from one of the instructors of the summer camp was based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0837009. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not
. The thrustpower is adequate to maintain adequate velocity of the boat to cover 10 to 20 ft/s. The ruddersystem allows quick turning action and a bumper in front of the boat protects it against collisionwith underwater rocks and debris. The NXT based system has also allowed students to use theplatform to learn and implement software tools such as ROBOTC and LABVIEW, over andabove the NXT code that came with the LEGO-NXT system. Current and future efforts with theboat project involve replacing the NXT system with LABQUEST which will be easier interfacewith GPS and Vernier sensors. Students are also developing a low cost fully autonomous Page
EngineeringPrograms on ABET Inc.’s website. 2The University of Detroit Mercy is currently designing a new Core Curriculum that is based onstudent learning outcomes. Engineering and other externally accredited programs are anticipatingthe flow of assessment information from the liberal education part of the core to satisfyaccreditation criteria. (To date, systemic assessment of the current core has not taken place, atleast not in a form that is made available to all academic units.) Key aspects of the core will bedelivered by departments whose members are relatively new, and in some cases resistant, tooutcomes based assessment. Thus it is critical for those within the institution who haveassessment expertise to partner with those who will be delivering the
features for each value are listed in figure 4. Score Rubric 1 Concept exists, no other attributes 2 Topic is defined by originator(s) 3 Local conditions are adapted to fit 4 External interest, some 'buzz' 5 Serious external scrutiny, some hostile 6 Significant speculative growth 7 Self-sustaining from revenue earned 8 Full competition in all major markets 9 Mature technology cash cow 10 End of life management Figure 4. General grading rubrics. Page
AC 2011-1108: A DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS EXPERIMENT FOR THEFLUID MECHANICS CLASSROOMCharles Forsberg, Hofstra University Charles H. Forsberg is an Associate Professor of Engineering at Hofstra University, where he primarily teaches courses in the thermal/fluids area. He received a B. S. in Mechanical Engineering from Polytech- nic Institute of Brooklyn and an M. S. in Mechanical Engineering and Ph. D. from Columbia University. He is a Licensed Professional Engineer in New York State. Page 22.37.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A Dimensional Analysis
instruction. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(3), 313-337. 3. Kearsley, G. (1997). A guide to online education. Retrieved September 2, 2007, from http://fcae.nova.edu/kearsley/online.html 4. Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kupritz, V. W. (2007). Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 27-42. 5. Russell, T. L. (2001). The No Significant Difference Phenomenon: A Comparative Research Annotated Bibliography on Technology for Distance Education (5th ed.): International Distance Education Certification Center. 6. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2006). Teaching and learning at a