topics: Use the case to illustrate why a particular failure method is important; examples include the I-35W bridge collapse on road-users in the twin cities metropolitan region [24]. Class discussions: Link technical issues to ethical and professional considerations; example includes the Hyatt Regency Walkway collapse [11]. Group and individual projects: Have students research the cases in depth and report back on them. The most successful case studies are those that inspire students to go out, do their own research, and learn more about their chosen profession [5].Research ApproachThe methodology selected for this study included case studies. Case studies can be used to gaininsight on in-depth
University. His upcoming dissertation will focus on how student’s connections of social responsibility and engineer- ing change throughout college as well as how engineering service is valued in employment and supported in the workplace.Dr. Nathan E Canney PE, Seattle University Dr. Canney teaches civil engineering at Seattle University. His research focuses on engineering educa- tion, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sustainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stan- ford University with an
, production processes, concurrent engineering design, and detailed system description. Further it is essential to include a variety of realistic constraints, such as economic factors, safety, reliability, aesthetics, ethics and social impact.”1Senior design is an apprentice-like involvement and the highlight of the undergraduate engineeringexperience. Most projects are sponsored by local industries or motivated by the needs of thedepartment or a faculty member. Since 2003, UST has tried to offer at least one of its senior designprojects to consider the needs of material-resource poor people at the base of the economicpyramid. These projects often bring to life the ‘realistic constraints, such as economic factors,safety, reliability
the weakness oftraditional lecture-based learning modules which may quickly become out of date for rapidlychanging areas like NSNT without diligent attention from well-informed instructors. By its nature,PBL-structured case studies promote learning at the cutting edge of a discipline and thus are well-suited to the emerging NSNT field.A central premise in using the case study technique is that the process of learning is just asimportant as the content [12]. In general, students work cooperatively during case studies to answerchallenging questions or to evaluate complex ethical issues. For PBL-structured case studies,students are expected to investigate and learn necessary content in order to understand the contextof a case. This requires
policy." Ethics & Behavior 11.3, 233247, 2001. [3] Hutton, Patricia A. "Understanding student cheating and what educators can do about it." College Teaching 54.1, 171176, 2006. [4] zyBooks. https://zybooks.zyante.com/. March 2016. [5] Carnegie Research I Universities. http://www.washington.edu/tools/universities94.html, March 2016. [6] David Weerts, State Governments and Research Universities: A Framework for a Renewed Partnership. New York: Routledge, p. 26, 2002. [7] Gregory A. Krohn and Catherine M. O'Connor, "Student Effort and Performance over the Semester" The Journal of Economic Education Vol. 36, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 328, 2005. [8] Judy Shearda, Selby Markhama & Martin Dicka, "Investigating
Program was originally founded through the Center for EnergyEfficient Electronics Science, and has since branched to multiple disciplines includedbiotechnology and robotics. TTE REU was designed as an intervention for students so thatthey would have an opportunity to build their confidence and knowledge in science andengineering with the goal that this intervention would lead to more students transferring to abachelor program. As discussed by S. Artis4, TTE REU brings students from communitycolleges around the state of California to the University of California, Berkeley to complete a9 week summer research internship. The first week of the internship has the students goingthrough a “laboratory bootcamp” where the students learn lab safety, ethics
political identity, social welfare, and perspectives ofdiversity. In reflecting on the personal impact of recent national events and how politicaldiscussions have or have not been integrated into their STEM courses, two themes emerged: 1)political awareness and 2) future-self impact. Findings revealed that first year engineeringstudents recognized the personal and social impacts current national events imposed on theirfriends, family, and society. However, students did not sense the significance of politicaldiscourse concerning the social impact and ethical practice of engineering. Our research showsthat limiting political discourse in the classroom and depoliticizing engineering spacescontributed to students dissociating the relevance of political
Paper ID #24809Measuring the Conceptualization of Oppression and PrivilegeRachel M Johnson, University of Minnesota Rachel Johnson is a PhD student in Biomedical Engineering at University of Minnesota. Her research interests are cardiac tissue engineering and biopreservation. She earned her BS at Oregon State University in Bzioengineering.Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering
moretraining/set-up than it is worth? Does it increase or decrease workloads of professors and staff?3. The engineering workforce?Will this student be a better worker and employee? Will they be responsible, safe, andcommunicative when called upon? Will the technologies used in the classroom carry over toindustry?4. General Society?Will this help the student be an engineer with good ethics? Will this help students speak up whennecessary? Will this uphold the professional engineering ethical responsibility of keeping thepublic safe?DefinitionsThe following terms are either used in, or are important concepts to, this paper:Access Point to Learning: A means by which students can obtain knowledge or skills. Exampleswould be: a tutoring session, a textbook
understanding of howinformation is produced and valued, and the use of information in creating new knowledge andparticipating ethically in communities of learning.There are a number of scholarly works that discuss using PBL pedagogies in higher education.Barron, et al (1998) provide a 40-page primer on PBL as a general pedagogical method. Whilenot dealing specifically with engineering courses, it will provide an overview for those new tothe subject. Another article, this one by Smith Macklin (2001), discusses how to integrateinformation literacy into a one-shot course session using PBL. While not aimed specifically atengineering courses the article provides guidance that could be applicable to any subject area.Guerra, Ulseth and Kolmos (2017) edited a
an HSI”, Proceedings of the 2020ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Canada, June 21-24, 2020.[8] American Society of Civil Engineers, “Code of Ethics,” ASCE, https://www.asce.org/code-of-ethics/ [Accessed February 4, 2020].
the health and safety of our society. This emphasizes that anunderstanding of the cultural, ideological, political, and historical contexts in whichenvironmental problems occur is essential to solving our society’s most pressing environmentalproblems [2-3].Over the past decade, there has been increased interest in the academic field of the environmentalhumanities, along with a push to abandon the narrow disciplinary tradition of solving problems[2]. According to Criteria 3, Student Outcome 4 of ABET, the engineering accreditation body,programs should ensure that graduating students have “an ability to recognize ethical andprofessional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which mustconsider the impact of
, and itcan be the process of questioning and keeping an open mind to evolving circumstances that ismostly highly valued sometimes.” Because Rachael’s training is in the humanities and socialsciences, it is perhaps unsurprising that her response focuses more on holistic abilities such ascritical thinking and ethical responsibility. She notes values that inform her work are “Criticalawareness of situations that enable learners to make ethical decisions about their own practicesand also to take a holistic perspective.”Rachael’s background as a qualitative educational researcher and interpretive cultural studiesanalyst causes her to focus her response on the impossibility of “true objectivity” in research,even when that research includes
in engineering practice, is selected as amentor and is given three (3) credit hours of release time per semester for helping the students intechnical as well as ethical issues related to engineering profession. More senior professors areencouraged to lead this role. The ME department at the University of Florida (UF) in Gainesville iscomparable in size with that of the University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez (UPRM) in the sense of boththe undergraduate student population as well as the faculty strength. Hence, some similarities can beobserved and inferred. Qualitative results of educational research in both the institutions suggestsatisfactory implementation of mentoring by the dedicated senior faculty members [5]. Also, in both theME
beenestablished, the dimensions tend to include attributes similar to the list compiled by Parkinson. 1. Can appreciate other cultures. 2. Are proficient working in or directing a team of ethnic and cultural diversity. 3. Are able to communicate across cultures. 4. Have had a chance to practice engineering in a global context, whether through an international internship, a service learning opportunity, a virtual global engineering project or some other form of experience. 5. Can effectively deal with ethical issues arising from cultural or national differences.While many Multinational Corporations (MNCs) provide training for engineers workingglobally, some
and environmental contexts and demonstrate knowledge of and need for sustainable development. GA8 Ethics Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of engineering practice. GA9 Individual and Team Work An ability to work effectively, as an individual or in a team, on multifaceted and /or multidisciplinary settings. GA10 Communication An ability to communicate effectively—orally and in writing—on complex engineer- ing activities with the engineering community
- tained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2005 and her M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University in 2008 and 2012, respectively. Her current engineering edu- cation research interests include engineering students’ understanding of ethics and social responsibility, sociotechnical education, and assessment of engineering pedagogies.Dr. Jon A. Leydens, Colorado School of Mines Jon A. Leydens is Professor of Engineering Education Research in the Division of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences at the Colorado School of Mines, USA. Dr. Leydens’ research and teaching interests are in engineering education, communication, and social justice. Dr. Leydens is author or co-author of
project dataBy analyzing the assessment data, it seems students in the senior project have weaknesses inthree major areas: Design, Mathematical modelling, EthicsTo improve design, mathematical modelling, and calculation, suggestion is to have one of themajor weekly assignment be an Engineering Logbook. Every week students should submit theirdesign, and calculation. For example, if students use SONAR in their project, in the engineeringlogbook they must write all calculations and how to measure distance or in the case of motorconnection to micro-controller they must write in the logbook all calculations for the requiredcurrent. Regarding ethics, in the course shell one module should be covered the engineeringethics specially IEEE Engineering
unfamiliar (N2 = 181), using the same test toevaluate differences in perceived ease of access and use of these services.Ethical considerationsWe have adhered strictly to ethical principles in our research, which aims to understand theinteraction between the university’s services and the socio-cognitive aspects of sense ofbelonging and self-efficacy.Before data collection, all participants were provided with an informed consent form thatclearly described the purpose of their participation. This form ensured that students were fullyaware of their rights to abstain from answering the survey without any consequences to theiracademic standing or university services. We have ensured that participation was completelyvoluntary, respecting the autonomy of
not sign the consent letter to participate in the IRB-approved evaluationresearch.Evaluation MethodsEvaluation of the project consisted of a pre-post survey instrument focused on perceived self-efficacy in universal teamwork and research skills. This instrument was an adaptation of theResearch Self-efficacy scale [9]. Questions focused on things like the perceived ability to“engage in effective team practices,” “follow ethical principles of research,” “identify my ownstrengths within a team setting,” and “present research ideas in oral or written form.” This pre-post survey was augmented by weekly surveys aimed at understanding fellow engagement in theprogram. A final focus group was held with the project evaluator to further elucidate the
applications in ethical development, equity and accessibility issues (e.g. web scraping) o Future-proofing o Economics o Project management and team software processes o Communication skills o Conflict resolution o Individual software processes, resiliency, self-reflection, self-assessment o Revision control and use of tools o Innovation and creative capacity o Entrepreneurial mindsetOverall, students and faculty both wanted to see more diversity in senior technical electives.These courses also allow students to specialize in specific areas of interest since it is not possibleto cover the immense breadth of software engineering in a limited timeframe. Students, faculty,and
for use;and promoting academic integrity to ensure ethical uses of ChatGPT in an academic context (ThiThuy, 2023).The following research was done by conducting interviews with graduate students and facultiesto understand ChatGPT's abilities by providing the output on the topic of how AI and GPT willimpact academia and libraries. This research explores how graduate students are using theChatGPT and can be used to improve various research capabilities. ChatGPT can be used toimprove research and scholarship in academia in several ways. The breakdown of ChatGPT’suses by graduate students for their research is listed as follows. Based on the student’s giventopic or keyword, ChatGPT can help the researchers in identifying relevant literature
researched, with studies focusing on AI’s role inproviding personalized feedback, enhancing student engagement, and offering scalable learningsolutions. As such, the integration thereof has emerged as a transformative force, reshapingpedagogical approaches and learning experiences. Various studies highlight the significance ofAI literacy, student readiness, and the adaptation of educational frameworks to accommodate theabove based on diverse learning styles, backgrounds, and more.Ng et al. [1] emphasize the necessity of defining AI literacy, which encompasses understandingAI's capabilities and ethical implications, as well as evaluating its impact on learningenvironments. The study proposed four aspects: know and understand, use, evaluate, and
experiences, we can contribute our perspective and add insights intohow engineering education graduate student researchers come to be.Reference[1] F. Goodyear-Smith, C. Jackson, and T. Greenhalgh, "Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees," BMC Med. Ethics, vol. 16, no. 78, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0072-2.[2] C. Ellis, T. E. Adams, and A. P. Bochner, "Autoethnography: an overview," Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, pp. 273-290, 2011.[3] R. Likely and C. Wright, "The Journey of Decolonization as a Scientist and Science Education Researcher," in Equity in STEM Education Research: Advocating for Equitable Attention. Cham: Springer International Publishing
ideas using appropriate presentation tools,Apply the engineering code of ethics, Conduct a proper literature review, Use proper careerplanning tools, and Manage your time.Gender and first-generation status and their relation to technical and non-technical skills wereinvestigated. Figure 1 shows the importance of the top 5 technical and non-technical skills(including ties) identified by students identifying as men and women. The top two skills for bothgenders are non-technical: ‘manage your time’ and ‘work in teams effectively’. Figure 1: Importance of Top 5 Skills by Gender (including ties)Figure 2 shows the importance of the top 5 identified technical and non-technical skills by first-generation and non-first-generation students
Paper ID #41888Case Study: Civil Engineering Student Mental Health and Watching Football?Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director of the Integrated Design Engineering (IDE) program. IDE offers a BS degrees accredited under the general criteria of the ABET EAC and a new PhD degree in Engineering Education. Her research interests include sustainability, social responsibility, ethics, and community engagement. Bielefeldt is a licensed P.E. in
designs. The deductive coded themes for this qualitative analysis were established before dataanalysis based on the seven ITEEA Standards for Technological and Engineering LiteracyPractices: Communication, Optimism, Critical Thinking, Making and Doing, Creativity, SystemsThinking, Attention to Ethics, and Collaboration as defined in Table 2 as these are elements ofwhat engineering education encourages to possess and demonstrate[6]. In addition to theresearcher's analysis of qualitative data, an AI-assisted qualitative analysis was conducted toassist in filling any potential gaps. Table 2: Definition of Standard for Technological and Engineering Literacy Practices Practice: Definition: Evidence in Responses
most technologies, are oftennot chosen and implemented with all community members in mind [7]. The communities thathave been historically marginalized in STEM are often the same communities disproportionatelyharmed by climate change. Without explicit attention to sociotechnical concerns, climate tech islikely to further amplify these injustices. A central goal in this project is to help youth develop aninformed, analytical, critical stance toward technology. To do this, we draw on emerging work oncritical sociotechnical literacy [1], which is related to other recent calls for attention to ethic ofcare [8], compassionate design [9], and macroethics and ideology [10]. Recognizing that theeffects of technology are typically unevenly felt, and
technologiesconnect to real-world problems, while also enhancing their knowledge and skills, learningattitudes, and interests in technology [12].Teacher Professional Development (PD) for ML The success of integrating Machine Learning (ML) into the elementary curriculum isheavily dependent on the preparedness of educators. Traditional teacher professionaldevelopment (PD) programs often focus on subject-specific content or pedagogical strategies,but with the growing importance of AI and ML, there is a clear need for professionaldevelopment that specifically targets these areas. Research highlights that teachers requirefoundational training in both the technical and ethical aspects of AI and ML to feel confident inteaching these topics [1, 13]. Thus
the efficiency of transportation could allow good to be processed in less environmentally impactul places while still lowering the overall impacts.A. D. (2022) sees resource scarcity and social justice as two challenges related to his futurecareer. “Robots aren’t just metals. In fact, they contain a wide variety of materials in their construction. These materials come from many different sources and will vary in cost, environmental impact, and social values. When designing a robot, I will need to find a balance in the materials I am using between the three pillars of sustainability. I will need to ensure the robot is made from sustainable and ethically produced materials, while maintaining a certain