engagement and learning outcomes [8]. These ten practices are: first-yearexperiences, common intellectual experiences, learning communities, writing intensive courses,collaborative assignments, experiencing different worldviews, community-based learning,capstone experiences, undergraduate research, and internships. In particular, undergraduateresearch and internships are relevant to engineering education but are not utilized by allundergraduate students (as opposed to a required capstone design experience). Thisunderstanding of high impact practices, the engineering education landscape, and the variationsin access to these experiences amongst students led to the focus on the role of undergraduateresearch and internships on engineering task self
engineering problems by comparing results from both application of models/physical principles and measurement data. 5. Students will apply basic teaming principles (such as the Tuckman’s Model) and team effectiveness practices while working with their teams. 6. Students will write a technical report and give an oral/multimedia presentation following [course name] technical communication guidelines which include formatting, explaining and justifying aspects of the project. 7. Students will construct detailed project plans using basic project management techniques (such as scheduling and budgeting) and methods (such as Gantt charts). 8. Students will self-evaluate their prototype design decisions and reflect on the
outcomes and observations on adopting the new method.Based on the results of numerous informal classroom experiments and hundreds of informaldiscussions with students, it was determined that most students do not use effective studystrategies to fully understand key concepts and to master problem solving techniques. Instead,the goal of their current studying and test taking strategies is to “maximize partial credit.” Thesestrategies work as follows. 1. Memorize problems from the homework, in-class examples, or previous exams. 2. Match each problem on the exam to one of the memorized problems that most closely resembles it. 3. Write down the memorized solution, making adjustments along the way so that the solution looks more relevant
color that was clear to read, removing any uncertainties arising from interpreting variations in instructor/grader hand-writing; and ▪ Modify comments and point deductions digitally across the entire set of student submissions without any whiteouts or cross-outs, limiting confusion on any changes.The other advantages students may have recognized in the quantitative survey responses are thatin returning group activities each student received a graded electronic copy to their OneDrivefolder, and that all graded assignments could be easily accessed via a mobile device for studyingfor ARCE 212 and would remain available for reference during subsequent academic quarters.Though there are a number of benefits of using Bluebeam for
own historical performance in feedbackand not compare with their peers. Since similar to leaderBoard, RPG competition among studentsmay frustrate lagged students to lead fixed mindset trend. One of characters of students with fixedmindset is they feel threatened by the success of others 1 .3.1 Experience Points (XP) and LevelsIn RPGs, experience points (XP) and levels are often used to reward players and demonstrate theirprogress through the game. Players earn XP and level up by accomplishing tasks such asdefeating enemies, overcome obstacles, pick up trophies, etc. We design XP and levels in asimilar way but in an educational context.The first design consideration is whether XP/levels are applicable for only a single course
. engineering The program has helped me feel more confident about my ability to do computer programming. The program has helped me feel more confident about my ability to record and analyze data. The program has helped me understand options for further education in science and engineering. The program has helped me understand options for future careers in science and engineering. Perceptions of the Please write three words or short phrases that best describe your program experience in the program. Which aspects of the program did you
engineering through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity in the engineering workplace; 2) discipline-based education research (with a focus on computer science and computer engineering courses) in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women and minorities in computer-related engineering fields.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University at West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Head and Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative
theyengage with business and community facilitators to discuss how they will apply their learningtoward being effective principled leaders as they transition to the next phase of their lives [6].”Annually in the fall, senior students take part in a leadership day where they attend a workshop,often at local companies and interface with working professionals to work through a variety ofwork place issues and ethic case studies. These workshops include discussion of peer andsupervisor interactions, ethical treatment of customers and clients, individual ethical behavior inthe work place, and reporting of suspicious or fraudulent behavior.Engineering students participate in a two semester senior year design capstone experience, ethicsis again addressed in
guided discussions aboutsustainable electronics, each participant’s research progress, and connecting the research processto science standards and curricula. These guided discussions provided an important opportunityfor peer mentoring (teacher participants providing some mentoring for each other), as well asmentoring from the program directors at Purdue University and Tuskegee University. The guideddiscussion occurred via teleconference between teachers on the two university campuses. Thesementoring activities supplemented the research specific mentoring from faculty and graduatestudents. At the end of the program, teachers prepared a technical report, detailing their researchfindings and proposed curricula, and also made oral
Assistant in the Product Design & Development Lab at Texas Tech University. He has published multiple peer-reviewed publications and conference proceedings addressing the topics of Communication in Design, Creativity and Innovation, and Engineering Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Exploring the Relationship among Gender Composition, Activity Structure, and Brainstorming Novelty AbstractIdeation is a critical stage in the engineering design process and has substantial impacts ondownstream decision making. As a result, a better understanding of the factors that positivelycontribute to
two of those scholars to participate in proposal writing activities. Further,several REU scholars have started graduate programs in materials science and engineeringnationwide, with two scholars starting their research at OSU and another scholar applying to ourgraduate program for Fall 2020. One of the significant impacts of this program was in groomingundergraduate engineering and science students to pursue interdisciplinary research with astrong-base in materials science and engineering. We believe that this is critical for developing aworkforce to address global grand challenges in energy, aerospace, medicine, environmentalsustainability and maintain technological leadership position of developed and developingcountries in the 21st
and experiences with team projects that emulate those inindustry. Martin acknowledged a trend in computing education where most software thatstudents write for programming assignments “never see the light of day.” Consequently, Martinargued that “toy projects” that have no real customers or use outside of the classroom areharmful [8].Likewise, Nurkkala and Brandle assessed common gaps between common software engineering“toy projects” and real software practice, explaining: A student project is just that—a project. It is not a product in any meaningful, commercial sense. Such a nonproduct escapes the scrutiny of sales, marketing, and customer relations. It also is isolated from external forces like press reviews, competing
experiments, results, and problems encountered; 2) students had the opportunity toreceive feedback on their work from other faculty mentors in the program (not just their ownassigned mentor) in a collegial, low-pressure setting and to observe how scientific dialogueoccurs in practice; and 3) students had the opportunity to learn about what their peers in theprogram are working on, with the goal of giving them a better appreciation for the breadth ofresearch in the field. An additional goal of the check-ins was for the crosstalk that occurredbetween mentors (and students) in these group meetings also helped students to see commonthreads between the various research approaches and scales among the different projects.At the conclusion of the 10-week REU
preferred having consecutive[evaluation] sessions throughout the semester rather than a just single one at the end. The inclusionof a series of sessions will respond to student learning needs and support their academic growthand development. This insight provides valuable feedback that will help inform futureimplementation and modification of the assessment scheme. “I like the idea of having a point-scale assessment sheet because it puts every student on the same level. In my other classes I feel inferior to my peers because I know they’re smarter than me. But with this assessment, I feel at their level and more confident learning the material.” “I just love the idea of focusing on learning. Grades definitely add more stress.” “Took off
started totake more leadership roles in the program, created their own student organization recognized byuniversity, organized and hosted leadership and professional development activities, organicallydeveloped peer-tutoring during daily study hour in the designated room, and teamed up with variousscience and technology events oriented towards regional public school districts.Eventually, data talks! Figure 3.1 shows from the S-STEM project reporting site shows the impact ofthe project. During the first four years of the project, we awarded a scholarship to 68 eligible andqualified students, with 55 of them graduated by Spring 2019. Among the 16 scholars in theprogram, six of them graduated in Dec. 2019 and the remaining will graduate in May 2020
students’ GitHub repositories and instantly autogrades their project checkpoints. This does not just let students get instant feedback about their progress, but also allows them to resubmit as often as they like before the deadline, which in turn incentivizes them to start early. 12. Constant feedback collection – The instructor introduced in the Spring semester a link that students can always access to provide their feedback anonymously about anything concerning the course. It consisted of a Qualtrics survey that has on box where they can write whatever they want and submit it. The instructor check their feedback once or twice per week and tried to address their concerns as much as possible
, engineers, ambassadors, or role models)directing affirming comments towards students or explicitly telling them they could be engineers[11], or in more subtle ways, like peers seeking one’s help with engineering.Gendered Engineering Identity Development. Though this paper primarily utilizes Godwin andcolleagues’ [8] work to conceptualize our emergent findings, other researchers have createdframeworks to focus on specific populations of students. Capobianco and colleagues et al. [2]focus on the formation of engineering identity in female students, identifying girls’ sense ofacademic identity, school identity, occupational identity, and engineering aspirations as shapingtheir engineering identities, with academic identity and engineering aspirations
for them. Even if they don’t get feedback from employers, there are peer advisors, faculty, staff, and alumni who are happy to work with them to provide input and support throughout their search.Theme 2: Finding the Right OptionsMany students reported that they chose Mechanical Engineering because of the breadth ofopportunities that it presented, then struggled to identify the opportunities that would be mostrelevant or most interesting to them. That issue was compounded by both the hidden job market(i.e.: small companies often don’t post and promote positions in the same way large companiesdo) and the lack of specificity in job postings, with second and third-year engineering studentsoften not having the base of knowledge yet to
writing the requirements and specs would take too long. So that part is missing unless you put the framework around it. So if we make this sort of a convincing little iPod, then what I'm hoping they'll do is if there's an ambiguity in the requirements either that I've put it in intentionally or unintentionally, and both are in there, they'll figure out what would be the answer that makes the better end product, and they'll shape the requirements according to some understanding of the end goal…” (SD107, Full professor) Page 12.441.10The third example shows how an instructor based decisions about delivering content on
-processingalgorithms, data evaluation and modeling. The fact that they were entrusted with thegeneration of a tool facilitating a recently developed method in nuclear solid state physicsproved to be highly motivating.Based on the demand to educate the students to high academic standards, the results of ascientific project have to be properly disseminated. In order to provide students with aplatform for scientific publications several journals for undergraduate researchers werefounded in the last decade. These journals comply with the same directions and qualitystandards as conventional scientific journals, as for instance a peer review system. In this waystudents become familiar with scientific writing in early stages of their academic education.Moreover
.Engineering Education Capability Maturity Model 13Current accreditation processes are binary, the program either gets accredited or not. A multi-level model to facilitate the process of going through accreditation and to help find peers couldincrease the number of LAC programs that seek accreditation. The proposed model is based on afive-level process improvement model proposed in 1995 at Carnegie Mellon University, calledthe Capability Maturity Model (CMM)9. The CMM measures an organization’s processcapability, i.e. the inherent ability of a process to produce planned results. As the processcapability increases, the results become predictable and measurable, and the most significantcauses of poor quality and productivity are controlled or eliminated
information confidential; they would not betray a confidence for personal gain. 17. Students on this team openly admit and take responsibility for the mistakes they have made. 18. Students are willing to give and receive constructive feedback from each other without getting defensive. Page 12.266.7 19. Students on this team are open to considering new ideas or trying new methods. 20. Students seek the input of their peers in attempting to solve problems. Cognitive/ Declarative Knowledge about Teamwork: We have developed a body ofknowledge and question banks designed to tap familiarity with key constructs in each of
practice7. Capacity for generating new ideas (creativity)8. Capacity to adapt to new situations9. Capacity to learn10. Critical and self-critical abilities11. Decision-making12. Elementary computing skills (word processing, database, other utilities)13. Ethical commitment14. Interpersonal skills15. Knowledge of a second language16. Oral and written communication in your native language17. Research skillsPlease rank below the five most important competences according to your opinion. Please write the number of the itemwithin the box. Mark on the first box the most important, on the second box the second most important and so on.Table 3: Questionnaire concerning generic competences for employers, societies, academicsThe results have been very
to solve mathematical problems. Inquiry and reflection includesuse of inquiry-based activities and reflecting on learning experiences individually, in groups, oras a class. Communication includes the ability to articulate one’s mathematical ideas verballyand in writing to peers, teachers, parents, and others.GBMP’s professional development curriculum for teachers involves a sequence of sevenintensive mathematics content courses taught or co-taught by MEC staff each summer. Themathematics content consists of the "big mathematical ideas" of numerical reasoning, algebra,geometry, probability, and data analysis as identified in NCTM’s Principles and Standards forSchool Mathematics [5]. Each course models the attributes of challenging courses and
accomplishment of each objective with individualized learning statementsdrawn from their own academic, professional, or life experiences. The portfolio is to also containevidence supporting these statements; examples of such evidence may include copies ofexaminations or laboratory reports, design drawings, citations from supervisors or peers, honorsor awards, or similar documentation. The faculty mentor evaluates the body of information in theportfolio and provides the student with feedback throughout the process, and ultimately aquantitative grade.The ITA is a primary assessment tool with several important functions. It fills in the picture ofthe student, whom the school may know only from dialog at a distance to this point. It serves as aquality check
information or advice (Gundling33 describes “network, gets things done through others” as an innovation trait sought by 3M, compare also “use peer support” in Scott34) • Time management (Parkinson35 classifies this as an enabling skill for life-long learning, compare also Graduate Attribute x in AMEA4)The mechanism of accidental competency acquisition identified in this example can becharacterized as a meta-effect of curricular elements. The individual parts are the individualcourses the student has to combine to achieve a valid degree schedule. On a higher or meta- Page 11.557.8level this poses a new learning task of dealing with a
), neatness (5). mechanical design (25), software design (25), performance evaluation (10).N like M except weighted 50% midterm + 50% final, and components revalued: attendance (10), subjective contribution to group (20), regularity of design notebook entries (9), neatness (4), mechanical design (24), software design (24), performance evaluation (9).O rubric-matrix system, including informational-but-does-not-count spot-grading of first 8 notebook entries, peer review, and instructor- assigned group dynamics grades (100 points, first and second half; 35% midterm + 65% final).Design Notebook Format:hand handwritten notebooks assumed, no mention of typed or electronic content.P electronic format notebooks strongly
2006-1336: THE ROLE OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN ENGINEERINGATTRITIONGuili Zhang, University of Florida Guili Zhang is research assistant professor in College of Engineering, University of Florida. She received a Ph.D. in Research and Evaluation Methodology at the University of Florida. She also received a B.A. in British and American Language and Literature at Shandong University, China, and a Master of Education degree at Georgia Southern University. Previously, she served as a staff development specialist and researcher at Jinan District Education Commission, China, and took part in the writing and revision of the National Unified Text Books and Teacher’s Reference Books. She
need for peer collaboration and a focus onencouraging teacher community, a finding that has now emerged as a repeating theme within theliterature1,6,7 This focus is included in the National Staff Development Council’s (NSDC)Standards for Professional Development.8 In his synthesis, Guskey did not find evidence of“Data-Driven” or “Family Involvement” NSDC Standards, but in the context of No Child LeftBehind, these characteristics must surface and will become increasingly important.9Increasing the expectations for professional development requires an evaluation process thatreflects the critical characteristics of effective PD. Kirkpatrick’s 4-levels, with over 40 years ofuse in evaluation and formative assessment, outline this process: “Reaction
Dynamics Course throughMulti-Intelligence Methods and Peer Facilitation, in ASEE Annual Conference.2005, ASEE: Portland, Oregon.3. Bransford, J.D., How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school 2000,Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.4. Savery, J.R. and T.M. Duffy, Problem Based Learning: An instructionalmodel and its constructivist framework, in Constructivist Learning Environments:Case Studies in Instructional Design, B. Wilson, Editor. 1996, Englewood Cliffs,Educational Technology Publications.5. Linsey, J., et al., Methodology and tools for developing hands-on activelearning activities, in 2006 ASEE Annual Conference. 2006, ASEE: Chicago.6. Lefebvre, B., A constructivist experiment in particle settling andcentrifugation, in