Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Azar Eslam Panah, Pennsylvania State University, Berks; Heidi Reuter

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Exposition, 2004.[2] Hertzberg, J., “Seeing Fluid Physics: Outcomes From a Course on Flow Visualization,” Bulletin of the American Physical Society, Paper # QE3, 55 (16), 2010.[3] Poon, M., Todd, J., Neilson, R., Grace, D., Hertzberg, J., “Saffman-Taylor Instability in a Hele-Shaw Cell,” Physics of Fluids, 16 (9), p. S9, 2004.[4] Settles, G. S., “On the Fluid Dynamicist as Artist,” Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Flow Visualization, Gottingen, Germany, 2006.[5] Kleine, H., Settles, G. S., “The Art of Shock Waves and Their Flow Fields,” Shock Waves, 17, pp. 291-307, 2008.[6] Samuel, M., Henley, J., and Shakerin, S., “Development of a Wet Wall: An Undergraduate Research Project,” Paper #37677

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Magdalini Z. Lagoudas, Texas A&M University; So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University; Rodney Boehm, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

affiliates.References[1] J. M. Bekki, M. Huerta, J. S. London, D. Melton, M. Vigeant, and J. M. Williams, “Opinion: Why EM? The potential benefits of instilling an entrepreneurial mindset,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 7(1), 2, 2018.[2] C. J. Creed, E. M. Suuberg, and G. P. Crawford, “Engineering entrepreneurship: An example of a paradigm shift in engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91(2), pp. 185-195, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00691.x[3] National Science Foundation, NSF Innovation Corps (I-Corps™), 2019. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/i-corps/index.jsp[4] A. Huang-Saad, J. Fay, and L. Sheridan, “Closing the divide: Accelerating technology

Conference Session

Faculty Development Round Table

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs; Valerie Martin Conley, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs; Katie Johanson; Kinnis Gosha, Morehouse College; Naja A. Mack, University of Florida; Comas Lamar Haynes, Georgia Tech Research Institute; Rosario A. Gerhardt, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

when it successfully fulfills a human request and the individual has confidence thechatbot can perform well. Figure 1. Conceptual Framework for the User Interface Perceived Trust Efficacy of Chatbots for Future Faculty Mentoring. Adapted from “Enhancing User Experience with Conversational Agent for User Satisfaction Movie Recommendation: Effects of Self- Disclosure and Reciprocity,” by S. Y. Lee

Conference Session

Liberal Education Division Technical Session 11

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

learning approaches with ever-changing research-based and technologically instrumented means, transferring control over education from teachers to mangers of the bureaucracy.Therefore, engineering education is considered as a system that can be studied, controlled,optimized, and assessed. A classic example in this regard is the “pipeline” metaphor [10] that hasbeen widely used in the United States to understand and tackle the systematic challenges withretaining engineering students and recruiting underrepresented populations. Nearly allengineering education graduate programs in the United States are in engineering colleges,schools, or departments. Arizona State University (ASU)’s Engineering Education PhD Programis another good example

Conference Session

It's All About the Student: Integration, Problem Solving, Critical Thinking, and Self-Efficacy

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel; William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel; Timothy W. Mays, The Citadel; Ronald W. Welch P.E., The Citadel; John C. Ryan, The Citadel

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1741611 Encouraging Civil Engineering Retention through Community and Self-EfficacyBuilding. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] "Infrastructure Report Card." American Society of Civil Engineers. (accessed 2 Feb., 2019): https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/.[2] S. Hatch, Diversity by Design: Guide to Fostering Diversity in the Civil Engineering Workplace. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2008.[3] "Criteria for accrediting engineering programs 2019-2020." ABET. (accessed 2

Conference Session

Online Programs and Program Assessment

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Audeen W. Fentiman, Purdue University; Emilie A. Siverling, Purdue University; Rene Alexander Soto Perez, Purdue University; Ruth A. Streveler, Purdue University; Michael C. Loui, Purdue University; Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

increased when students have easyaccess to the learning management system.While our literature review provided us with general guidance on developing online courses, wefound no studies discussing online courses for Ph.D. students. We were particularly interested inPh.D. level courses that require reading, analysis, discussion, and writing with feedback.We hoped to answer three questions ourselves: (1) Given the Ph.D.’s students’ high levels ofmotivation, what kind of environment would foster their engagement in online courses? (2)How can an institution best support faculty members for designing, developing, and deliveringthis kind of course? (3) What are the students’ experiences in these courses?Developing Online Courses for the Graduate

Conference Session

NEE - 3: Improving Homework and Problem-solving Performance

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Derek Breid, Saint Vincent College

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

highlight best practices and solution pathways that are moreconsistent with how the material was presented in class.- Engage with the students’ metacognitive responses! Answer questions that they bring up, orcomment on the good realizations that they have. If they write about needing to improve in acertain way, ask them later how this effort is going, and if they need any ideas.[1] P. C. Wankat, “The Role of Homework,” ASEE Conf. Proc., 2001.[2] P. C. Wankat and F. S. Oreovicz, “Testing, homework, and grading,” in Teaching Engineering, 1st ed., McGraw-Hill College, 1993, pp. 213–234.[3] W. Li, R. M. Bennett, T. Olsen, and R. McCord, “Engage Engineering Students In Homework: Attribution of Low Completion and Suggestions for

Conference Session

Tales from the Flip Side

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angel Ari Perez-Mejia, Quinnipiac University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Society, 2015.[4] B. Swartz, S. B. Velegol, and J. A. Laman, “Three Approaches to Flipping CE Courses : Faculty Perspectives and Suggestions,” 120th ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2013.[5] A. Lee, H. Zhu, and J. A. Middleton, “Effectiveness of flipped classroom for mechanics of materials,” ASEE’s 123rd Annu. Conf. Expo., no. May, 2016.[6] A. B. Hoxie, T. Shepard, and R. Feyen, “The Flipped Classroom : A Means to Reduce Cheating?,” 122nd ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., no. Paper ID #11445, p. 16, 2015.[7] J. Laman, M. L. Brannon, and I. Mena, “Classroom Flip in a Senior-Level Engineering Course and Comparison to Previous Version,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2012.[8] G. S. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and K

Conference Session

New Developments in ECE

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arthur Ball, Virginia Tech; Liesl M. Baum, Virginia Tech; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

: Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists”. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003.[2] F.A. Banakhr, M.J. Iqbal and N. Shaukat, "Active project based learning pedagogies: Learning hardware, software design and wireless sensor instrumentation," in 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Tenerife, Spain, April 17-20, 2018, pp. 1870-1874.[3] D. Perkins, “Beyond Understanding,” in Threshold Concepts Within the Disciplines, R. Land, J.H.F. Meyer, and J. Smith, Eds. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2008, pp. 3-19.[4] D. Reeping, L. McNair, M. Wisnioski, A. Patrick, T. Martin, L. Lester, B. Knapp, and S. Harrison, “Using Threshold Concepts to Restructure an Electrical and Computer

Conference Session

New Developments in ECE

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego; Zoe Nemerever, University of California San Diego; Paul Andreas Hadjipieris, University of California, San Diego; Sheena Ghanbari Serslev; Carolyn L. Sandoval, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

thesuccessful results with the take-home tests and to increase student engagement with the coursematerials, the instructor will increase the number of take-home tests to three such that studentswould take one test before their midterm exam and the other two tests between the midterm andfinal exams.AcknowledgmentThe researcher acknowledges the assistance, mentoring and reflection on teaching sessionsoffered by the Center for Teaching and Learning at UC San Diego.ReferencesAhern, A., O’Connor, T., McRuairc, G., McNamara, M., & O’Donnell, D. (2012). Criticalthinking in the university curriculum - The impact on engineering education. Journal ofEngineering Education 37(2), 125-132.Baghdadchi, S., Hardesty, R., Hadjipieris, P. A., & Hargis, J. (2018

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tonisha B. Lane, University of South Florida ; Jonathan Elliot Gaines, University of South Florida; Selene Willis, University of South Florida; Salam Ahmad; Kali Lynn Morgan, Georgia Institute of Technology; Eugenia Vomvoridi-Ivanovic, University of South Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

; 1 SB Mentor Tenets: Community & Legacy 3 SB Growth ID Empathy Activity SS Basic Mentoring Skills D A D a S Hardware Introduction a PS Mental Health Skills for Mentors y SS Hacker Card Game y SS Afternoon Social 2 PS Art of Listening 4 SS Afternoon SocialThe training delivered by the Bulls-EYE PRIDE PI. Each day of the training program and itsusefulness to culturally responsiveness is described as followsDay 1: The first day of the training begins with introductions. Mentors mention what major theyhave declared and do brief

Conference Session

Engaging Community through STEM partnerships

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica A. Kuczenski, Santa Clara University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

. Shekar, "Project-based Learning in Engineering Design Education: Sharing Best Practices", ​https://peer.asee.org/22949​, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/project-based-learning-in-engineering-design-education-sharing-best-pr actices. [Accessed: 01- Feb- 2019]. [3] ​ . Haag, N. Hubele, A. Garcia, and K. McBeath, “Engineering undergraduate attrition and S contributing factors,” ​Social and Personality Psychology Compass,​ 01-Jan-1970. [Online]. Available: https://asu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/engineering-undergraduate-attrition-and-contri buting-factors. [Accessed: 01-Feb-2019]. [4] P. Howard and P. Wolfs, ​Balancing project based and lecture centric education in a restructured

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeremy A. Magruder Waisome, University of Florida; Kyla McMullen, University of Florida; Tiffanie R. Smith, University of Florida; Simone A. Smarr, University of Florida; Juan E. Gilbert, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Smith1 Smarr1 Gilbert1 jam323@ufl.edu kyla@cise.ufl.edu tiffan3@ufl.edu ssmarr@ufl.edu juan@ufl.edu 1 Department of Computer & Information Science & Engineering University of FloridaAbstractIn 2014, an American land-grant research university in the South began a new cycle of theNational Science Foundation (NSF) Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (S–STEM) grant entitled the Human-Centered Computing Scholars (HCCS):Fostering a New Generation of Underrepresented and Financially Disadvantaged Researchers.This project was a continuation of NSF Grant No. 1060545, which supported students at

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Focusing on Student Success

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qudsia Tahmina, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

, June), Advising Engineering Students to the BestProgram: Perspective, Approaches, and Tools Paper presented at 2012 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/20898[8] Bonwell, C.C., and J. A. Eison, “Active Learning: Creating Eccitement in theClassroom,” ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No.1, George Washington University,Washington, DC , 1991.[9] Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., &Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering,and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.[10] Johnson, D., R., Johnson, and K. Smith, Active Learning: Cooperation in the CollegeClassroom

Conference Session

Continuous Improvement in Engineering Leadership Development Programs

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University; Christopher McComb, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Julie Rojewski, Michigan State University; Astri Briliyanti, Michigan State University; Dirk Joel-Luchini Colbry, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

and programming willalternate between interactive content delivery and team-based work periods. Session participantswill apply design thinking to a narrowly-scoped project, guided by one or more facilitators.AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to thank T.J. Nguyen for his work on the CyberAmbassadors project; thevolunteers and staff members of TBP who make the EF program possible; and our partners at theNational Research Mentoring Network (NRMN) and the Center for the Improvement ofMentored Experiences in Research (CIMER). This material is based upon work supported by theNational Science Foundation under Grant No. 1730137. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Wednesday Cornucopia (Educational Research)

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaylee A. Dunnigan, NYU Tandon School of Engineering; Jack Bringardner, NYU Tandon School of Engineering; Gunter W. Georgi, NYU Tandon School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

predefined projects, with the knowledge they had coming into the course and with theadditional resources.Qualitative responsesTable 4-6 lists some representative responses from the students open-ended statements.Table 4: Project Preference Qualitative Statements Given the three available options (RAD, AGP, and Pre-defined Projects), describe which project(s) you would prefer and why. 1. I prefer something where there are a set of rules and principles that I would follow. I do not feel confident in creating anything because of my current lack of technical knowledge. 2. AGP [prompt-based OEP] because there is structure but also it is open ended. 3. RAD [free-choice OEP] because it gives the best relevant experience to creating, designing

Conference Session

Innovation and Fun in the Civil Engineering Classroom

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Chang P.E., University of Idaho, Moscow

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

agree.While the overall intent of this self-grading exercise was to give students another learningopportunity as they completed their homework assignment, it was observed that some studentscompleted their self-grading during the break immediately before class on the day that the gradedassignment was due; in retrospect, this defeated the purpose of the self-grading exercise. As analternative, students could be asked to qualitatively explain why a mistake was made, if oneoccurred. This tactic might be more conductive to learning; if the student is not grasping the rootcause(s) associated with errors in thinking then the effectiveness of this approach misses itsintended objective.ConclusionsA homework assignment represents one method to gauge student

Conference Session

Architectural Division Technical Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shannon Massie Chance, University College London and TU Dublin; Mike Mimirinis, Anglia Ruskin University; Ines Direito, University College London; John E. Mitchell, University College London; Emanuela Tilley, University College London

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering

, When, Why, and How” behind participants’ initial statements andask them to describe differences and similarities among their own statements.AcknowledgementsThis project has been supported by a Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) individualfellowship from the European Union (Call identifier: H2020-MSCA-IF-2016, Project 747069,Project acronym: DesignEng, Project title: Designing Engineers: Harnessing the Power of DesignProjects to Spur Cognitive and Epistemological Development of STEM Students) and UCL’sCentre for Engineering Education.ReferencesÅkerlind, G. S. (2012). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 115-127.Anthony, K. H. (1991). Design juries on trial: The

Conference Session

Faculty Development Medley

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tareq Daher, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Jody Koenig Kellas, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Wayne A. Babchuk, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Lance C. Perez, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

felt they did not have enoughinformation to interpret them. During their exit interview, researchers shared with faculty members theprofiles that emerged from the cluster analysis and discussed the findings from the TPI and COPUSobservations. They were also given references to articles on Stains et al.’s (2018) profile analysis for moreinformation on each profile. Faculty clearly placed value on the clusters, but longed for more detail.For example, one faculty member said,” [It was] nice to know I wasn’t in cluster 1 or 2, but how to interpret…?...I don’t know that I want every class period to be cluster 7….[It’s] not clear yet on the differences between the profiles other than student centered is better than interactive or didactic. I’m

Conference Session

Teaching and Assessment in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lucas James Landherr, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

, M.D.. Journal of Documentation, 2003, 59, 647-672.(4) Mayer, R.E.; Bove, W.; Bryman, A.; Mars, R.; Tapangco, L. Journal of Educational Psychology1996, 88, 64-73.(5) McGrath, M.B.; Brown, J.R. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 2005, 25, 56-63.(6) Arnheim, R. Visual Thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.(7) González-Espada, W. J. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 2003, 2, 58-66.(8) McCloud, S. Understanding Comics. Northampton: Tundra Publishing, 1993.(9) Hanson, D. J. “Gains In Chemistry Grads Persist”. Chemical and Engineering News, 2009, vol. 87,47, 38-48.(10) Yoder, B.L., “Engineering by the numbers,” College profiles printed by the Amer. Soc. Eng.Educ., Washington, DC, USA, 2011.(11) Willingham

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kyle Alexander Toth, Purdue University Northwest; John Moreland, Purdue University Northwest; Chenn Q. Zhou, Purdue University Northwest; Anusree Balachandran, Center for Innovation through Visualization and Simulation, Purdue University; Fangzhou Zhang, Purdue University Northwest; John Claude Roudebush, Ivy Tech Community College

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, October 2017. She and her co-authors also received the AIST Josef S. Kapitan Award in 2005, 2016, and 2017, the AIST Computer Applications Best Paper award in 2006 and 2017, the 2017 AIST Hunt-Kelly Outstanding Paper Award – First Place, and the 2014 International Thermoelectric Society Outstanding Poster Award, She was named ”One of 12 Most Influential over 50” by Northwest Indiana Business Quar- terly Magazine in 2014. Dr. Zhou received the awards of Outstanding Faculty in Teaching, Research, and Engagement at Purdue University Northwest. Dr. Zhou has been a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers since 2003. Dr. Zhou has been very active in professional societies. She has served as the chair of the

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zachariah J. Beasley, University of South Florida; Les A. Piegl, University of South Florida; Paul Rosen, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

one that maynever reach a final resting state, however, it is accurate, scalable, and defendable, all of which areof utmost importance in assessment today.References [1] C. E. Kulkarni, R. Socher, M. S. Bernstein, and S. R. Klemmer, “Scaling short-answer grading by combining peer assessment with algorithmic scoring,” in Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference. ACM, 2014, pp. 99–108. [2] M. Zhang, “Contrasting automated and human scoring of essays,” R & D Connections, vol. 21, no. 2, 2013. [3] K. N. Ballantyne, G. Edmond, and B. Found, “Peer review in forensic science,” Forensic science international, vol. 277, pp. 66–76, 2017. [4] C. H. Davis, B. L. Bass, K. E. Behrns, K. D. Lillemoe, O. J

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Emily Parry; Joanna Wright, University of Washington; Lauren Summers, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

for addressing Sustainability: a = 0.88 global resource scarcity in my work/career. Table 3: Effect Coding of Independent Variables for Linear Regression Models Characteristic Variable Effect Coding Name(s) Engineering Business = -1; Education = -1; Environment = -1 Business Type of Major Business Business = +1; Education = 0; Environment = 0 Education Education Business = 0; Education = +1; Environment = 0 Environment

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles E. Pierce, University of South Carolina; Gurcan Comert, Benedict College; Samuel Darko, Benedict College; Balaji Iyangar, Benedict College; Robert Petrulis, EPRE Consulting LLC; Zulfikar Berk, University of South Carolina; Nathan N. Huynh, University of South Carolina

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

appropriate to its solution; (2) design, implement, and evaluate a computer-basedsystem or program to meet desired needs; and (3) develop software system(s) within teams.4.3.2 EFFECT Learning Objectives and OutcomesIn the context of improving lane departure guidance systems, students will learn aboutrequirements for the sensing system on driverless vehicles (e.g., drones) and the embeddedvehicle control system (e.g., drone controller). Through hands-on experimentation, students willdevelop an understanding of the necessary specifications for the sensors and vehicle controlsystem to ensure that driverless vehicles can safely navigate complex topologies and physicalenvironments. Specifically, students were required to inquire and study the

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sagit Betser, University of California, Davis; Lee Michael Martin, University of California, Davis; Rebecca Ambrose Ph.D., University of California-Davis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Recognition was also central in Barton et al.’s [8]longitudinal study tracing the identity work of girls from nondominant backgrounds. They foundthat girls imagined for themselves possible futures in science when their identity work wasrecognized and scaffolded while they engaged with science in formal and informal learningsettings. These studies contribute to a growing realization of the complex work girls face inconstructing and sustaining a disciplinary identity in STEM. These researchers, along withothers, call for further studies to enrich our understanding of the aspects of identity construction,especially with regards to the interaction between gender, ethnicity, and STEM in the transitionto adulthood.One avenue that holds promise to transform

Conference Session

Best In DEED

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susannah Howe, Smith College; Robin Ott, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Cristian Hernandez; Jessica Deters, Virginia Tech; Chris Gewirtz, Virginia Tech; Francesca Giardine, Smith College; Anne Kary, Smith College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Engineering Design Process Activities with Secondary Students

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Austin C. Wong, The Cooper Union; George J. Delagrammatikas, The Cooper Union; Elizabeth M. Waters, The Cooper Union

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 7: Learning and Research in Makerspaces

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lee Michael Martin, University of California, Davis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Development, vol. 72, pp. 187-206, 2001.[9] M. K. Ponton, J. H. Edmister, L. S. Ukeiley, and J. M. Seiner, "Understanding the Role of Self- Efficacy in Engineering Education," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, pp. 247-251, 2001.[10] A. R. Carberry, H. S. Lee, and M. W. Ohland, "Measuring engineering design self‐efficacy," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, pp. 71-79, 2010.[11] T. D. Fantz, T. J. Siller, and M. A. Demiranda, "Pre-Collegiate Factors Influencing the Self-Efficacy of Engineering Students," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, pp. 604-623, 2011.[12] H. M. Matusovich, R. A. Streveler, and R. L. Miller, "Why Do Students Choose Engineering? A Qualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 24: Studies on Socioeconomic Status

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

DeeDee Conway, Southern Methodist University; David Deggs, Southern Methodist University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

aspirations in an urban community college: Differences between immigrant and native student groups. Community College Review, 37(3), 209-242. [9] Donaldson, J.F., and Graham, S. (1999). A model of college outcomes for adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 50(1), 24-40. [10] Goldrick-Rab, S. (2010). Challenges and opportunities for improving community college student success. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 437-469. [11] National Center for Education Statistics (2018). Digest of Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_104.80asp?current=yes. [12] US Census Bureau (2018). Educational Attainment. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/topics/education/educational

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 17: Student Cognitive Development

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph A. Lyon, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Martin R. Okos, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry,” Educ. Res., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 5–8, 2003.[6] S. Barab and K. Squire, “Design-based research : Putting a stake in the ground,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2004.[7] L. T. Louca and Z. C. Zacharia, “Modeling-based learning in science education: Cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions,” Educ. Rev., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 471–492, 2012.[8] M. Kapur and K. Bielaczyc, “Designing for productive failure,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 45–83, 2012.[9] M. Kapur, “Productive failure,” Cogn. Instr., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 379–424, 2008.[10] H. A. Diefes-Dux, T. Moore, J. Zawojewski, P. K. Imbrie, and D. Follman, “A framework