Banquet each spring, allows all the Scholars to network with the coreSTEM team and our internal and external partners in an informal setting.In addition to academics, Scholars are encouraged to take up leadership positions in studentorganizations (American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Engineering Student Council(ESC) and National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE)) and participate in student teams(Concrete Canoe, Steel Bridge, Robotics, etc.). We have had a field trip to the Coreslabprecasting yard and plan for more field trips this year. Scholars have also attended severalseminars organized within the College of Engineering and a mentoring session with some of ourExternal Partners under the auspices of the Civil Engineering Association of
is underway, with plans to expand to the College of Sciences.Outcomes will be measured using interviews, surveys, reflective writings, and peer teachingobservations. Educational Research This poster will highlight an IRB-approved qualitative study that is being conducted aspart of the grant project. The research is guided by the HSI servingness framework [7]. Theoverall purpose of the research is to understand the ways in which the university is serving itsSTEM students, using a mirror approach [13] to study and self-reflect on the institution, herebyfocusing on the organization as the main unit of analysis. Findings from this research willdirectly inform plans and actions to revise policies and
project in a team at the USU campus.Depending on the selected research project, REU participants acquire competency indeveloping and justifying research ideas, formulating research hypotheses, implementing aresearch plan; analyzing collected data; communicating and disseminating research results;and developing strong technical, professional, communication, and team-working skills. EachREU participant was provided with an office cubicle in a graduate student room to facilitatedaily interactions between REU participants and the graduate student and faculty mentors.Each office cubicle was equipped with a desktop computer with Internet and printerconnections. In addition, all REU participants had access to a multi-purpose room where theycould discuss
trauma-informed frameworks of care in their approach to supporting graduate students?Preliminary Results from Phase 1Initial plans for Phase 1 were based on a sequential mixed-methods design, starting withcollecting data from a nationally representative sample of engineering GPDs and following withsemi-structured interviews of a subset of engineering GPDs selected as a result of their surveyresponses. To that end, we began adapting the Supporting Graduate Student Mental Health andWell-Being Survey instrument [1] to focus on both institutional and program-specific resources.In addition, we planned to augment the survey with open-ended questions about GPD roles andresponsibilities and how integrating frameworks of care could occur across
scaleoutreach events. One such event was the first annual A+E Day for mechanical engineering (ME)students hosted for the first time in the fall of 2023 for the ME 110: Introduction to MechanicalEngineering class. The event was such a success that there are plans for a second A+E Day forME in the spring of 2024 semester. The “day” consisted of a three-hour lab block split into two90-minute sections that hosted 65 students across five modules – glassblowing, welding,blacksmithing (forging), casting, and glazing. The overarching theme of the kinesthetic moduleswas thermodynamics in materials processing, and the students all received a lecture on the subjectprior to attending lab. The verbal feedback from the students was positive, the ME students werealso
follow-up for 5 out 7 CS perception items.3. Specifically, their perception increased continuously from pre to post to follow-up for two itemsTo what extent do educators increase the incorporation of integrated computer science contentwithin their existing coursework after participating in RET?1. All were able to incorporate integrated Computer Science into their lessons or activities2. All plan to extend this incorporation beyond the current school year3. Course participants plan to implement integrated CS in Life Science, Astronomy, Physical Science, Math, Geometry, Machine Learning, Phonics, Reading, etc.To what extent do faculty-research mentors and graduate students assist educators to incorpo-rate integrated computer science content
maps for their courses and guide them through five stagesof course design, centering on the ILOs in the sequence. The research team will provide detailson relevant learning theory, instructional design, and active learning approaches as well asindividual or group prompts at each stage. By the end of the workshop, faculty participants will 3have a plan in place for modifying their courses beginning in the next academic year. The fivestages of facilitation are summarized in Table 2. The effect of the intervention on courseplanning and faculty knowledge of instructional design methodologies will be assessed throughfaculty pre- and post-workshop surveys, a follow-up analysis of course materials in
[23]. This confirmatory factor analysis fully validated the ECTD aspredictive of student performance in classes containing computational thinking and computerprogramming. Using the ECTD, instructors can identify at-risk students and plan interventions tohelp them succeed and enculturate as an engineer.Second Major ResultOur second major result is the documentation of the impact of a wide variety of privileges onengineering student enculturation. In the past year, we performed semi-structured interviews atall three institutions. The semi-structured interview protocol consisted of prompts designed toencourage conversation about curricular and extracurricular pre-university background inprogramming, mathematics, and science. The prompts also
off meeting in January 2013 with the joint internal and external advisory boards; both institutions have hosted their own separate internal advisory board meetings as well. The internal advisory board meetings include other stakeholders from the respective institutions. The strategic planning team that includes the two PIs, two Co-‐PIs and program coordinators meet on a regular basis to provide feedback and to hold brainstorming sessions on the implementation of the program at both the community college and at the university. A new website with the transfer programs at LSU is live and two conference papers have been accepted at the ASEE 2014
-experimental as students werenot randomly assigned to the sections; rather both sections were opened for enrollment, andstudents were allowed to register for the sections without knowledge of the planned intervention.Furthermore, students were prevented from switching sections after they learned of the researchactivities because both sections were full, and the department did not provide overrides forstudents looking to switch sections. The control and intervention sections were 86% and 77%male, respectively, and 5% and 7% ethnic minority students. The classes were primarilycomposed of mechanical (52% control and 46% intervention), civil (32% and 30%), andenvironmental (11% and 16%) engineering majors. Chi-square tests revealed no
about our scholarships and the support system that we provided. 2. A scholarship without additional instruction does not guarantee success. 3. Students need to be made to do what they need to do through assigned homework. A required Academic Success and Professional Development class with a scholarship is a very strong incentive to do the “right things”.Academic Support: 4. Academic help is needed. The Guaranteed 4.0 Plan is the best available.6 5. A minimum GPA of 3.0 for continuation of a scholarship is a strong incentive to spend the time needed for learning. 6. Transfer students should be in a study group for each class and need to be
introduces students to the design process andcommon test/simulation/manufacturing tools available in the Electrical and Computer Engineering(ECE) department. Additionally the course content was augmented to provide an introductoryoverview of the core areas of electrical engineering taught at UAF: communications, power andcontrol, and computer engineering. Teaching the “essence of engineering” during a student’s firstyear is one of the recommendations of NAS Educating the Engineer of 2020 [2005]. Page 24.1278.3During the first half of the semester, students are introduced to design tools and the design cycle(plan, simulate, prototype, build, test
Simulations Components VR Simulation Figure 5. Building of a VR simulation ApplicationAssessmentImpact on sophomore studentsSo far most of the project time was devoted to the development of the virtual laboratorymodules. A comprehensive assessment plan is in place. Only limited assessment data could becollected on modules that were not fully developed. The impact of the virtual laboratory moduleswas then assessed through a post survey of those students who participated in the learningmodules. A group of students served as an intervention group
Power Page 23.1277.5Table III: Sample of research projects in different disciplinesREU PARTICIPANT ACTIVITIESDuring the ten week program the students are presented with a schedule of organized activities.Some are jointly co-sponsored by the NC Office of Undergraduate Research and other summerprograms to create developing inter and multidisciplinary network. A typical schedule ofactivities includes: Campus, safety and laboratory training Professional development seminar on ethics and responsible conduct Workshop on public presentation skills and career planning Graduate school application and fellowship opportunities at
. Currently, she is a postdoctoral scholar and project director for an NSF-funded research study led by the ACCEYSS Research Group in the Department of Organization, Workforce, and Leadership Studies (OWLS) at Texas State University. Dr. Hough’s research includes cultural capital among Black and Hispanic women in computing, work-based learning in secondary schools, and career and education planning and decision-making among young Black women. In addition to conducting education-centered research, Dr. Hough shares her expertise as a part-time lecturer, teaching introductory leadership and STEM education program evaluation courses in the OWLS department. Her passion is empowering young people with valuable knowledge, skills
Education and Faculty Engagement at NYU. Each workshop integratedinteractive discussions, real-world scenarios, and practical strategies. The initiative also incorporatedmaterials from Aspire’s Inclusive Professional Framework (IPF), developed by the NSF Eddie BerniceJohnson INCLUDES Aspire National Change Team. Feedback from pilot sessions was used to refine thecontent, ensuring its relevance and effectiveness.3. Plans for Sustainability at each Alliance institutiona. New York University (NYU) To ensure the Project ELEVATE initiatives are sustained, NYU Tandon School of Engineeringestablished a new position of Associate Director of Faculty Development to assist the Director of FacultyDevelopment in organizing and managing a variety of
a complex range of pedagogical, social, and cultural factors; thesefactors justify the development of evidence-based pedagogical recommendations to supportstudents in using Generative AI ethically and effectively. We plan to elucidate relevant factors andrecommendations through our RFE study. For now, our pilot findings suggest three items that arepertinent to the use of Generative AI in design pedagogy: (1) ChatGPT offers salient and novelperspectives for students to consider; (2) ChatGPT should not replace engineering judgment; and(3) Instructors should provide clear guidance for AI use in courses.The two investigators on this project (Hess and Loweth) are both engineering educationresearchers who have taught engineering design for
available or paid data sources to obtain employment information.3.3. Recommended Actions:Based on the above analysis, we propose the following brief recommendation • Enhance Funding Strategies: Partner with federal agencies, private foundations, and industry to secure resources. • Expand Student Support Services: Increase financial aid, mentorship, and professional development opportunities. • Invest in Data Infrastructure: Develop centralized systems for data collection and analysis to support strategic planning.4. ConclusionAlthough this case study focuses on a single institution at TSU, its findings offer valuableinsights for other HBCUs and minority-serving institutions pursuing similar goals. By sharingstrategies and lessons
diversity and constructive disagreement, intellectual property, copyright and patents,poster preparation, graduate school, and prestigious scholarships & fellowships, and effectivelytalking about research. Based on the student interest, we plan to extend this training for OSUthrough virtual meetings in the following years.Of the nine students, six successfully completed their projects. All students presented theirwork on the program’s final day, with participants from both sites attending the presentations.Each student also prepared and submitted a final project report. Two students’ work led toconference papers: one on federated learning for human activity recognition, which wasaccepted for a poster presentation, and another on willingness to
complex topics having moreintrinsic load, such as engineering topics requiring a foundation in science and mathematicsbefore they can be comprehended. In addition to this, however, lessons often have extra or“extraneous” load, which refers to the cognitive load a student takes on to organize new andunfamiliar knowledge. Thus, an ideal lesson plan would limit extraneous load as much aspossible by organizing and dividing its material. Knowledge that has been learned in anorganized fashion is also easier for the student to recall later, as it is more interconnected withother information (11). Physical models can help reduce the extraneous load of having tovisualize phenomena from a text description or two-dimensional illustration. Currently
own writing teams, the UREfaculty each created shared lessons to help students write and submit a research paper forpublication. Students provided faculty with feedback on the lessons before they were publishedon J ATE online platform.The URE staff met online with the faculty cohort five times. The plan had been for the faculty tomeet during Summer 2023 to develop lessons that would be delivered to the students starting inFall 2023, but a delayed start date, plus extended time to recruit the faculty cohort, pushed theprogram start into the Fall term. The faculty kickoff meeting in October 2023 was followed byan abbreviated version of the Scientific Communication Advances Research Excellence(SCOARE) workshop, which has been shown to improve
me. It allowed me to live on campus for my freshman and sophomore year. Living on campus is an amazing experience, for me, because I can always go to events and spend more time with my friends. It also allowed me more time in my studies because I did not have to dedicate my time each day to a commute from home to school, which was really helpful to me. This program also supported me in my career development. It encouraged me to go to career fairs and talk to recruiters, and it taught me how to promote myself. It also helped me in my time management skills, too, with respect to the time management workshop, I learned how to manage my time better and to plan out my week ahead of schedule, I
or schematics of potential solutions 12. Account for potential future impacts in developing a solution 13. Prepare technical communication, including written and oral reports or use of figures to represent work 14. Demonstrate social awareness, empathy, and self-awareness in interactions with others 15. Follow proper data collection procedures 16. Account for ways natural environment may affect or be affected by one's work 17. Interpret data, such as results from modeling, validation, and other data processing 18. Develop plans and procedures for experiments 19. Build tangible artifacts as models, prototypes, or working products 20. Consider ethical responsibility 21. Negotiate
significantly more time to explore programming and manufactur-ing. In addition, the student(s) should be able to implement assembly design modifications rela-tively quickly or test several designs during the course of the semester. The only fabricated com-ponent of this CNC machine is the modular block itself. All other components can be readilypurchased in bulk from a retailor thus reducing the cost for organizations that plan to use this inthe classroom. The remainder of this section discusses the design, development and manufactureof the modular block.The modular block (figure 3 a-f) is designed as a two-part symmetric clamshell. Each part iscomprised of an internal face (figure 3 a-c) and an external face (figure 3 d-f). The internal faceof the
propensity for innovative problem solving. The ESCPII is used as a predictivefactor and then a dependent variable in our research to determine whether students’ creativityand propensity for innovation predicts their college persistence or if the pedagogical practicessupport and cultivate creativity and propensity for innovation in community college engineeringand science students. Structurally, the CPPI-R is a questionnaire in which students respond toclose set questions associated with socio-demographics, type, duration, frequency, and usage ofpedagogical practices categorized as the three sub-constructs of (1) classroom and programperformance support, (2) college attendance support, and (3) program planning and executionsupport. These practices
; Garufis, 2005), a process often called “writing-to-learn” (Olds, Dyrud, Held, &Sharp, 1993). Pioneering research by Light (Light, 2004) has also shown that the amount ofwriting in a course is more strongly linked to increased student engagement than any othercourse characteristic. So apart from the obvious practical importance that engineers should beable to write well, there is also substantial learning that takes place through the process ofthinking and planning that is required for good writing. The learning associated with writing issimilar to the learning associated with teaching, as both involve the organized communication of Page
Reflectivethe product’s design? ObservationWhat were the planned environmental impacts of this product andwhat were the environmental factors engineers had to consider in the Environmentaldesign of the product?What was the planned impact of the product on the culture and Societalcustomer base?2) Excavation: Using the artifact and associated artifact-inspired information, perform the following tasksObserve how people with different cultures and demographics use the Global/Societalproduct and then
various preparation events and attending aprevious ________ tour before enrolling full-time at _____ allowed me to adapt to this newenvironment. Having the ________ community has also helped out in mitigating anynegative feelings about feeling isolated as a transfer student.The first year was really rough for me due to mental health reasons. I'm grateful that _____offers many resources that led me to the professional help I needed.Currently for my second year, I'm working to get back on track with my education plan,utilizing academic accommodations from the OSD.It was tough at first. Everything went a lot faster than usual. The affects of my bad habitsbecame more apparent (procrastination). I feel like I've adapted much better now. I took
included in the numerator of the retention rate.DiscussionThe biggest challenge in this study was the pandemic. COVID-19 limited in-person instructionand increased the academic workload for students and faculty alike. Student mental health issueswere exacerbated by COVID-19. Additionally, social distancing restrictions limited coordinationbetween instructors and course designers and required the use of hybrid and remote instruction.The hypothesis is that this corequisite course could improve retention and graduation rates forlow-income students. The plan was to rely heavily on survey data from student participants forsocioeconomic information. Unfortunately, there was a low responses rate on our survey andfocus groups. This made it a
informed that they had to give up thelocation of the Bayview Park due to uncertainty of the master plan of that region, they dived intodesign for bus stops right away with enthusiasm. After selecting the bus stop right outside theKnight Club (an on-campus student coffee shop, Phase II in Figure 2), they realized that theentire roof of the Knight Club might be available. Therefore, the system size was scaled biggerfor the newly-identified location. The focus shifted from an “aesthetically pleasing attraction…”to “harvesting renewable energy to reduce the utility bill for the Knight Club”. Students spenttime and effort to search for a suitable system for the roof size and researched regulations for thesite. Unfortunately, due to concerns for the