values: •Industry experiences • “Social learning”— • Adopting the must expand the individuals “learn- (ing) profession’s values and university education the ropes” from those norms into one’s belief • Opportunities for around them through system students to reflect on careful listening and • Identifying with the successes and failures observation [1]. profession during
75.7 81.1 70.3 78.4 64.9 Results show that engineering disciplines which were covered during the program recordedhigher numbers of mentions after the program. Prior to the program, only three out of thirty-seven students made mention about industrial engineering, but that number increased to twenty-six at the end of the program. The results reflect the increase in student exposure to otherengineering disciplines beyond any existing prior knowledge. To better assess students’ understanding of each engineering discipline that was covered andtheir ability to distinguish between them, a rating based on a Likert scale was applied to eachstudent response on the same questionnaire based on the following scale definition: • 0 – Student did
related to those. In spite of these constraints, there are plans to expandboth the number of participating institutions and research access to the dataset.Expansion strategy. New institutional partners will receive funding to provide and update data.As the database becomes larger in size, joining the MIDFIELD partnership becomes even moreattractive. Twenty institutions have signed letters of commitment to join MIDFIELD. Newinstitutions will be targeted to reflect variability in geographic region, institution size asdetermined by the number of engineering graduates per year, and institutional control (public orprivate). Institutions will also be targeted that have a high or low graduation rate for under-represented minorities – plans include
Students 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Number of Days Attended Figure 1. Number of days attended by students for the 2015 Engineering Days program.Students’ Perceptions of Disciplines Prior to SessionsIn a written survey, students were asked to reflect on their level of knowledge and
and surface N. 4. Angle factors are available in equation or graphic form in both publications cited in the Reference section. They must be determined from the area and local geometry of all the enclosing “panels” that are “seen” by the person whose comfort is being assessed. Angle Factor Charts and equations are shown in Figure 9. The equations apply to a small horizontal plane, whereas the charts (not shown) reflect the view of a rotated person represented by plane projections. 5. A site visit will be required to measure the window areas and a, b, and c view factor dimensions.bNecessary Assumptions: 1. The indoor glass surface temperature must be calculated or measured
adhereto a manufacturing approach that is within the capabilities of the lab. Several tool catalogs werecreated to reflect the standard tooling kept in the lab’s inventory. Use of these catalogsconstrained students to the tooling available to them, and served as a more effective way ofconveying the tooling capabilities of the lab. Rather than searching for a tool in the lab, a studentis able to simply view the appropriate tool catalog in NX and CATIA, and determine if the tool isavailable. This is not to say that specialty tools cannot be used within the workflow. Rather, it issolely a means to convey the standard tooling capabilities.The real power of the workflow lies in the creation of a process catalog. A process catalog is thekey element that
12 38 African-American 7 5 12 Native-American 0 0 0 Other Ethnicity 10 3 13 Table 2. “Applied Value” survey results for fall semester 2014 and spring semester 2015 at four-year colleges.A total of 23,000 student-hours of microcontroller instruction was delivered at the college levelduring the 2014-15 academic year. The number of student-hours of instruction delivered at thefour-year level was double that delivered by community colleges and may reflect a greater abilityto apply the technology
main tasks for mechanical engineering graduates in the industry is to design new products.This is also reflected in the ABET a-k criteria, specifically item c of the ABET a-k criteria,which is “c. ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs.” Therefore,product design is at the heart of any mechanical engineering major and demands attention [1]. Inorder to conduct successful product designs, the stress/strain of components under loadings mustbe fully explored and known. However, stress/strain of components/ assemblies withcomplicated geometries and loading, which typically encounter in industry, seldom have anexplicit theoretical solution.FEA (Finite Element Analysis) simulation is a numerical technique that
: Harvard University Press. Schön, D. (1983), The Reflective Practitioner, London: Temple-Smith. Blikstein, P. (2008). Travels in Troy with Freire: Technology as an Agent for Emancipation. In Noguera, P. andTorres, C. A. (Eds.), Paulo Freire: the possible dream. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.18 Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Herder & Herder. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American EducationResearch Journal, 35, 465-491. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using aqualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132-141. B Blikstein, P. (2008). Travels in
highest grade point average (GPA) students. The other group seems to experience great difficulty with the open-ended learning and the independent problem solving that is needed for successful project completion. Sometimes they struggle greatly to carry their part of the work for the team to completion. This group does not necessarily correspond to the lower GPA students. The department hopes to explore further how to facilitate better open-ended problem solving earlier in the students’ careers. Perhaps this reflects the need for a combination of the triplet of Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes necessary for successful civil engineering practice. • There continues to be some confusion with the multiple
civilian designteams share leadership. Specifically, civilian capstone design teams investigated in this studyexhibited more shared leadership than their military counterparts with respect to the TCR form ofleadership. Reflecting on the nature of military leadership, these results are not surprising. Thelower TCR decentralization and TCR density measures for the military design teams provideindications that these teams enact somewhat more centralized or vertical leadership than theircivilian counterparts. Centralizing leadership to fewer individuals would result in lessdistribution and amount of leadership within the teams. This tendency may be a by-product ofstudents' intensive military leadership training. Military organizations are often
. [4] Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Definition and Selection of Competencies (DeSeCo) Project. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/41529556.pdf [5] Williams, J. (2002). The engineering portfolio: Communication, reflection, and student learning outcomes assessment. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(2), 199–207. [6] Boiarsky, C. (2004). Teaching engineering students to communicate effectively: A metacognitive approach. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20 (2), 251–60. [7] Gömleksi˙ z, M. N. (2007). Effectiveness of cooperative learning (jigsaw II) method in teaching English as a foreign language to
3.1). Listservs have proven to be one of the leading sources ofinformation for finding out about conferences and other professional developmentopportunities.Subclaim 2.3 Take advantage of learning about engineering through TwitterAnother way the author has learned about the engineering subject matter is through setting upa professional Twitter feed. As she liaises to both sciences and engineering, her Twitter feedsand posts reflect involvement in both fields. The author follows different engineering Twitterfeeds, and by reading the daily posts of articles or re-tweets from others, she has gained a fairamount of knowledge about engineering. She liaises to civil, computer, mechanical,electrical, and general engineering and therefore follows
that assessment is needed for improvement,and improvement, with its internal focus, provides opportunities for the academic community to engage in self-reflection of its learning goals, to evaluate if students’ activities, products, or performances coincide with the academic community’s expectations; information to students about the knowledge, skills, and other attributes they can expect to possess after successfully completing coursework and academic programs. ways for academic units to understand the dimensions of student learning when seeking to improve student achievement and the educational process. evidence of student achievement to accreditation groups, state legislators, and other stakeholders
differential and the number of legs, and explain why semiconductors are better for this application compared to metals and insulators (i.e., regarding phonons vs. electrons). g. Explain how reducing the dimensions contribute to the performance of thermoelectric devices, including addressing how the importance of the mean-free-path changes at the nanoscale. h. Evaluate the potential impact, challenges, and risks of at least one start-of-the-art application of nanoscale thermoelectrics.7. Nanophotonics a. Explain how photons interact with materials generally, including absorption, emission, scattering, and reflection, and the concept of permittivity. b. Calculate the plasma
twenty competency clusters. We have developed our framework based on thecompetencies proposed by Waychal et al. 8, who have proposed a smaller reasonable subset ofVloke‘s cluster. That, we posit, is a good starting point.We developed the framework with an axiom that the throughput of a learning process increasessignificantly with active participation, intense reflections, and collaborative working on casestudies and real-life projects i.e. student-centered learning. We have synergistically combined theelements to ensure the targeted outcome of the workshop - the ability to explain creativity andinnovation and their underlying dynamics, and the ability to apply the understanding to provideinnovative solutions to real-life problems. We do not
, time management, and group problem solving.9 Theimportance of multidisciplinary collaboration is reflected in ABET requirements stating thatengineering graduates should be able to function in multidisciplinary teams.2 However, exposureto multidisciplinary work in the classroom is often limited. Further, many graduating high schoolstudents do not know enough about the various engineering disciplines to make informed choicesabout college majors. This paper describes a week-long, residential summer outreach program called Engineering:Get Into Real Learning (E-GIRL) which was implemented at Texas Tech University (TTU) forthe first time in the summer of 2015. The goal of the program was to enhance interest in pursuingengineering for the group of
ofengineering knowledge available in different communities. This could help substantiate ourclaims. With respect to analyzing specific pre-test questions, future work might include an itemanalysis to examine student responses. The sole focus on pre-test scores prevented aninvestigation on the curriculums ability to overcome or address the negative impacts of studentsand school level factors.AcknowledgementThis work was made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation DLR 0822261.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Wealso acknowledge Dr. Yukiko Maeda, Dr. Monica Cardella, and Dr. Heidi Diefes
DUE# 1400561 “Midwest PhotonicsEducation Center.”Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. http://www.light2015.org/Home/Event-Programme.html?tab=1. Accessed Jan. 11, 2016.2. http://www.aimphotonics.com/. Accessed Jan. 11, 2016.3. http://www.op-tec.org/index.php. Accessed Jan. 11, 2016.4. http://www.op-tec.org/resources/industry-demand-report. Accessed Jan. 30, 2016.5. http://www.mi-light.org. Accessed Jan. 11, 2016.
sociotechnical mindsets that our students can instill inengineering practice.References 1. Huff, J. L. (2014). Psychological journeys of engineering identity from school to the workplace: How students become engineers among other forms of self. Retrieved from ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing (3669254). 2. Huff, J. L., Smith, J. A., Jesiek, B. K., Zoltowski, C. B., Graziano, W. G., & Oakes, W. C. (2014). From methods to methodology: Reflection on keeping the philosophical commitments of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. October 2014, Madrid. 3. Huff, J. L., Jesiek, B. K., Zoltowski, C. B., Ramane, K. D., Graziano, W. G
that the authorstend to hear with respect to the use of WeBWorK. Table 6: Survey Results Regarding Negative Feelings toward WeBWorKIn most areas, there were fewer negative feelings toward WeBWorK in the winter term than thefall term. This may be due to the more positive previous experience with WeBWorK among thestudents taking the course in the winter. A feeling that the problems are too difficult was notedfrom these data. Upon reflection, the authors concluded that many of the newly-crafted problemswere more on the difficult end of the scale, and more were needed at the easier end of the scaleto assist students in building their skills and confidence gradually. Additions to the problemlibrary addressing this concern have since been
of the teacherworkshops and corresponding student Discovery Weekends is that these teachers, with assistancefrom the university project team, will guide their students through the same content during theacademic year. The culminating event for the academic year project will be a design competition..Acknowledgement and DisclaimerSupport for this work was partially provided by the National Science Foundation under AwardNumber IIA-1348314. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.Bibliography1. National Academy of Engineering. Rising Above the Gathering Storm, The National Academies Press, 20072. National Academy of
from Worces- ter Polytechnic Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and assessment of student learning.Dr. Liang Hong, Tennessee State University Dr. Liang Hong received the B.S. and the M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Southeast Univer- sity, Nanjing, China in 1994 and 1997, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri in 2002. Since August 2003
reported general interest in resolving technical issues in the designstudio. Less than 30% of students claim that technical concerns are always a priority in their designwork. Figure 7 shows students’ perceptions of how important technical concerns are to their studiofaculty. These results are among the most emphatic in the whole survey. Approximately 15 % ofstudents agree with the statement that “Very few instructors think it is important” and 70% agreethat “Some instructors think it is important, others do not.” These perceptions (regardless ofwhether they are an accurate reflection of their studio instructors’ actual values) elicit concern. Ifa significant majority of students do not get the message from their design faculty that
education benefits in more than one state. Therefore the national totals in the Annual Benefits Report summary statistics (Appendix table) should not be used to reflect the total number of beneficiaries during the fiscal year as these counts are calculated as the sum total of the state statistics. Figure 1. Department of Veterans Affairs Education Program Beneficiaries: FY2000 to FY201510 Lastly, these GI Bill and VR&E Program benefits may be utilized by accredited entitiesthat accept the benefits for certificate granting schools all the way to doctoral degree programs.Of
inverted sections with those in control sections (i.e., traditional coursemodel). Treatment and control students completed the same measures (e.g., content assessmentsand student attitude surveys) and faculty members, who taught in both conditions, alsocompleted reflection papers related to their experiences. The guiding research questions for thestudy and an overview of the assessment measures are shown in Table 1 below (more details onassessment measures are included in a subsequent section of this paper). In the final year of thestudy, the researchers designed what they felt were “best practices” for the inverted model in allsections of their courses and the same outcome measures were used.Table1.EvaluationQuestionsandOutcomeMeasures
andAdministration department. One person from each department is a leader (Department Head);one person is CEO of the company. The class is provided with basic input information requiredfor the design, such as demand forecast, specification, bill of materials, material requirements,cutting waste, labor time, and the company operating time. The project guidelines reflect ill-structured problem based approach with relaxed framework and freedom for performance. Onlyone written report is required from whole class. Oral presentation of the project should be givenat the end of semester (one from whole class). Each group (department) is responsible for thereport section related to the department’s activity, and for integration of all sections together intoone
. Adams, R. S.; Turns, J.; Atman, C. J., Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design Studies 2003, 24 (3), 275-294.21. Bursic, K. M.; Atman, C. J., Information gathering: A critical step for quality in the design process. Quality Management Journal 1997, 4 (4), 60-75.22. Christiaans, H.; Dorst, K. H., Cognitive models in industrial design engineering: A protocol study. Design Theory and Methodology 1992, 42, 131-140.23. Crismond, D. P.; Adams, R. S., The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education 2012, 101 (4), 738-797.24. Atman, C. J.; Bursic, K. M., Teaching engineering design: Can reading a textbook make a difference? Research in Engineering Design 1996
Workshop should have less speakers Other (please specifiy)Figure 2. Results from the panelist survey based on how the event could be improvedThe results of the attendee survey mirrored the panelists’ responses on the organization andlength of the workshop again noting that it was a well-organized event and the length wasappropriate, though a small percentage felt the event was somewhat long. In addition to thesequestions, the attendees were also asked to reflect on their thoughts regarding workshop content,suggestions for future events, if they would consider attending again and most importantly thebenefit(s) from attendance.The attendees overwhelmingly replied that the topic was of interest to them and that some
learningexperiences planned so as to achieve this desired knowledge? [32]. The key to course design is thedetermination of the enduring outcome for the course. In other words, what is the set of keyoutcomes one would like for their students to have possessed at the end of the learningexperience or even years after they have exited the learning process? For example, in theintroductory circuit course used for study three it was evident that students were expected tohave developed a certain level of engineering problem solving skills that could be translated toother complex learning experiences. The emphasis on working problems in the class or the use oflearning activities meant to provide more class time for working problems were also reflected instudies two