Asee peer logo
Displaying results 8701 - 8730 of 23728 in total
Conference Session
Industrial Engineering Division (IND) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Oladayo John Akinpelu; Oludayo Samuel Alamu, Morgan State University; Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University; Neda Bazyar Shourabi, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus; Ayodeji B. Wemida; Mulugeta T Dugda, Morgan State University; Jumoke 'Kemi' Ladeji-Osias, Morgan State University; Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University
Tagged Divisions
Industrial Engineering Division (IND)
numerous educators and academics, but resultsabout its impact on learning have been mixed, partly because of a dearth of data [11]. Forcomprehensive, long-term learning, Kolb created a four-step model learning cycle. The steps areknown as active experimentation, reflecting observation, abstract conceptualization, and concreteexperience (doing) (using the ECP approach) as shown in Figure 2. It is anticipated that studentswill retain more information after taking courses that follow all these procedures [12, 13].Students directed through the learning cycle are also exposed to more excellent educationalopportunities and chances for individual thought and self-discovery.Fig.2 Kolb’s Learning Theory3 Methodology3.1 The Use of Experimentation and
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 12
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rachel E. Horenstein, University of Denver; Daniel D. Auger; Peter J. Laz, University of Denver
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
biweekly) basis, attending sponsor-student team meetings, reaching out tosponsors for feedback). Working in collaboration, the co-instructors refreshed the coursestructure to address two reoccurring themes observed in previous cohorts: (1) students strugglingto adopt a “post-academic” mindset; and (2) students not perceiving design documentation asintegral to the design process.The course was restructured to reflect a semi-imaginary consulting engineering firm, “MountainTop Engineering”, where the instructors acted as the firm’s CEOs, the students acted as thefirm’s engineering associates, and the firm’s customers were external industry or non-profitsponsors. (Note: all design projects were funded by external industry or non-profit sponsors.)While
Conference Session
Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mohsen Goodarzi, Ball State University
Tagged Divisions
Architectural Engineering Division (ARCHE)
practice has not yet been evaluated to see if it is making any changes, it can bemeasured by comparing the reflection surveys taken after finishing this course in the previousyears and after infusing NACE competencies into the course syllabus in the Fall semester of2023. The future study can use the findings of the reflection survey to discuss the success of thispractice. This study introduces a process and challenges through which professors andinstructors can evaluate and modify their course outcomes to help prepare students for theircareers.ReferencesBiggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871/METRICSFick, J., & Jones, J. W. (2018). LEED® LabTM
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _ Monday June 26, 1:30 - 3:00
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rosalyn W. Berne, University of Virginia
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
side. Madeline K. Biomedical Engineering StudentAnother UVA biomedical engineering student shared during a class discussion that she mustdisconnect herself from her feelings when injecting toxic nerve agents, used for militaryresearch, into rats.The split in identity expressed by these students reflects a larger cultural schism that begancenturies ago:As Franco notes: “René Descartes’s (1596–1650) description of animals as “machine-like” was heavily criticized by many of his contemporaries, but nevertheless provided scientists a way to justify what would now be considered extremely gruesome experiments in a time when anesthesia, for humans and animals alike, was not available.” [4] (p. 241)Descartes’s
Conference Session
Disciplinary Engineering Education Research – Session 1
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nisha Raghunath M.S., Oregon State University; Karl R. Haapala, Oregon State University; Christopher A. Sanchez, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
EngineeringFundamentals, and might be reflective of the more restricted focus of such degree programs. Assuch, there are several disparities between industry expectations and educational programs.Considering the industry expectations as a baseline, this enables the identification of broad wayscurrent programs might adjust their curriculum to better prepare future technicians or engineersto enter the workforce, or to help current workers upskill for new positions in emergingautomation, robotics, and mechatronics fields as efficiently as possible. This study has several limitations that should be recognized. For instance, the sample ofindustry professionals is limited in many ways and does not encompass the entire range ofprofessions within the field of
Conference Session
Engineering Management Division (EMD) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rebecca Kassa, University of Kansas; Tolulope Ibilola Ogundare, University of Kansas, Lawrence; Brian Lines, The University of Kansas; Jake Smithwick, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Kenneth Timothy Sullivan, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management Division (EMD)
other measurements [20].The existence of group-level effects on individual behaviors is a long-accepted phenomenon inpsychology [4]. Prewett et al. [1] define team personality composition as “a team-level index ofthe personality traits within the team, reflecting the strength (or elevation) of a given trait withinthe team and/or the heterogeneity of a trait within a team”. The study states the primary reason forcreating team-level indices of personality as relating personality characteristics to team-levelcriteria without inappropriately crossing levels of analysis.Personality traits are believed to be critical attributes in team composition research. Teampersonality composition refers to the configuration and aggregation of personality traits
Conference Session
Technical Session M5C
Collection
2022 First-Year Engineering Experience
Authors
Thomas J. Siller, Colorado State University; Erica J Marti, University of Nevada - Las Vegas; Cory Budischak, Temple University; Matt Gordon P.E., University of Denver; Carlo Salvinelli, University of Colorado Boulder
Tagged Topics
Full Papers
information on localproblems and case studies pertaining to the community. This year’s community is the Cape YorkPeninsula in North Queensland, Australia [1]. The NGO is the Centre for Appropriate Technology,which is controlled by the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders peoples. In conjunction with EWB, ajoint design brief is developed that reflects the needs of these communities, along with extensiveresources regarding the culture of the people and region as a context for the design. The design brief canbe accessed as an all-encompassing PDF, but the website for the design brief includes many othermultimedia and interactive elements, including interviews with many residents, and a discussion boardto engage other students and faculty from other
Collection
ASEE-NE 2022
Authors
Marisha Rawlins, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Pilin Junsangsri
assessed in ELEC3150in Summer 2021: • 8 technical topics: flowcharting, coding basics, functions, classes/objects, advanced classes/objects, Standard Template Libraries, data structures, and search/sort algorithms and efficiency. • 4 non-technical topics: report writing, self-reflection and self-assessment, timeliness, and student effort and success.The topics were chosen to match with all instructors in this study. Each topic was graded on amastery scale of 1 to 3: • 1 (beginner) – the available evidence does not meet expectations for competency in the topic. • 2 (competency) – the available evidence meets expectations for competency in the topic. • 3 (proficiency) – the available evidence exceeds
Conference Session
Technical Session M5A
Collection
2022 First-Year Engineering Experience
Authors
Katrina L Carlson, Michigan Technological University; Akua B. Oppong-Anane, Montana Technological University; Michelle E Jarvie-Eggart P.E., Michigan Technological University; Amanda Marie Singer, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Topics
Full Papers
studentknowledge of the different engineering majors. Student definitions collected as a part of thisstudy were coded for common themes by multiple researchers using deductive and inductivecoding techniques [15]. Initial codes were developed based on prior work conducted by theauthors [16] and the INCOSE definition of Systems Engineering [10]. During the codingprocess, new codes were identified and developed as necessary. After each coding cycle,researchers met to discuss and resolve coding differences, adjusting code definitions asnecessary.LimitationsThe results of this study reflect those of two midwestern rural populations that are predominantlywhite and male. Additionally, students had access to the internet while completing these surveysand may have
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
yongxin deng; Wei Shi, China University of Mining and Technology
analysisThe co-word analysis method was proposed by Callon et al in 1983, which is a form ofcontent analysis method. A combination of words and noun phrases can be counted ina single document or document to reflect the intimate relationship between thesubjects.[18] It is generally believed by scholars that the higher the frequency ofoccurrence of two pairs of words in the same paper, the closer the relationship betweenthe two pairs is. Therefore, a co-word network composed of these pairs can be formedby counting the frequency of the pairs of words, and then it can be visualized throughdata analysis.In this paper, UCINET social network analysis software is used to analyze the co-wordnetwork. UCINET(the University of California at Irvine NETwork) is a
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mostafa Batouli, The Citadel; Negin Shamsi, The Citadel; Nahid Vesali, The Citadel; Rebekah Burke, The Citadel
date.Third, courses are grouped based on the published course title and course descriptions. Nonetheless, the authorsacknowledge that actual course content may not be fully reflected in the course title or course description. Lastly,the allocation of elective courses is made based on the elective courses listed within the program content and maynot reflect the elective courses taken with advisor or department head permission or other electives that are not listedin the program content. Table 4: Typical ABET Accredited CONE Program Based on the Frequency of Course Titles Fre Freq Fre General Education Math/Science
Conference Session
Statics Fanatics 2
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Damon Kirkpatrick; Michael Anderson, United States Air Force
and machines were removed from the syllabus to accommodate theadditional lessons and the final project.New Course ProjectsThe new course projects were designed to build upon each other, progressively requiring morefrom the students in terms of technical report writing and engineering analysis and followed thecourse curriculum as it progressed throughout the semester. They also aligned with and assessedseveral lesson objectives, especially the new engineering design lesson objectives. Mostsignificantly, the course projects gave students the opportunity to engage in meaningful designexperiences. The first of the graded assignments was a truncated report that gave the students anopportunity to reflect on the hands-on design exercise from the
Conference Session
CPDD Technical Session 2 - Trends in Student and Faculty Support
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mehrube Mehrubeoglu, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi; Kimberle Kelly; Shannon Walton, Texas A&M University; Rasheedah Richardson, Texas A&M University; Karen Butler-Purry, Texas A&M University; Scott King, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi
identification, and mutual regard to develop [8], [9].Membership in multiple communities of practice provides URM scholars a safety net of supportand can encourage the development of peer groups with scholars like themselves.Job Search and Preparation Activities Embedded in an Interdisciplinary AGEP AllianceThe goal of the TxARM interdisciplinary AGEP alliance is to develop, implement and study amodel of STEM doctoral degree completion and the transition to successful postdoctoralfellowships and faculty careers for groups historically underrepresented in STEM. Figure 1represents the TxARM AGEP alliance research model developed, revised, and used throughoutthe project that reflects the collaborations and activities undertaken under the alliance at TexasA
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Machine Learning, IoT, Writing Center Peer Tutors, Conceptual Modeling
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lizzie Santiago, West Virginia University; Anika Pirkey, West Virginia University
algebraically. For futurework, we also recommend that students need to be trained on what we expect from them whenanswering those types of prompts.When students are presented with metacognitive prompts during their solution of word problems,they are able to reflect on their understanding of the problem. The failure of students toadequately answer some of the prompts, as observed in this study, have also been documented byother investigators [15].In terms of limitations of the work, we noticed that students took a longer time solving wordproblems when prompts were added to a problem. This limits the amount of problems we coulduse in an assessment. We also learned that students need to be trained on how to answer promptsand on how to create appropriate
Collection
ASEE Zone 1 Conference - Spring 2023
Authors
Alexander John De Rosa, University of Delaware; Ashley Lytle, Stevens Institute of Technology; Frank T Fisher, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science); Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware
future to be adaptable, “T-shaped” professionals who are able to apply their knowledgeacross a broad range of subjects [1-5]. This “T-shape” refers to a deep content knowledge orexpertise (the vertical of the “T”) and the ability to apply this theory across a broad range ofcontexts (the horizontal of the “T”).Within the learning science literature, the concept of Adaptive Expertise (AE) has been definedas “the ability to apply, adapt, and otherwise stretch knowledge” such that an individual caneffectively apply their expertise in new contexts [6]. Adaptive Expertise differs from routineexpertise, which defines someone who is able to operate productively within a given field [7], inthat AE reflects the ability to apply one’s expertise more
Conference Session
Equity and Ethics in Engineering-I
Collection
2022 ASEE Zone IV Conference
Authors
Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines; Andrea Gammon, Delft University of Technology; Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Anna Angeli, Colorado School of Mines; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Ryan Thorpe
Tagged Topics
Conference Submission
develop moral reasoning andintuition longitudinally across three cultures/countries: the United States, Netherlands, andChina. We hope that findings in this paper can be useful for engineering educators to reflect onand design subsequent ethics education programs that are more responsive to students’backgrounds and needs when they start their first year in engineering programs. 1 IntroductionMost engineering programs in the United States and other Western countries, such as Australia,have created first-year engineering programs dedicated to teaching fundamental engineeringcompetencies and cultivating a
Conference Session
Engineering and Society
Collection
2022 ASEE Zone IV Conference
Authors
Jonathan Verrett P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Siba Saleh, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Tasnia Naim Anika, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Tagged Topics
Conference Submission
completedanother individual survey and self-reflection exercise (post survey). Student data on deliveriescollected from the project was then passed on to a co-curricular student group, Engineers for aSustainable World, for further analysis to create an estimate for campus GHG emissions fromfood delivery services.The main data collection method used to assess the impact of the CEL project was a pre and postsurvey. Questions for the survey were adapted from a standard survey from the CCEL. Copies ofsurvey questions can be found in Appendix A. An initial bank of eight Likert scale questions was 2 ASEE Zone IV Conference 2022used for students to self-assess their
Conference Session
Ocean and Marine Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Leigh McCue, George Mason University; Adrian Hagarty; Cameron Nowzari, George Mason University; Ali Raz; Jessica Rosenberg; Daigo Shishika; Cynthia Smith, George Mason University; Michael Riggi, George Mason University; Jill Nelson, George Mason University
to be largely complete prior to developmentof the supporting curriculum. In reality, we found that in order to develop the kit, we needed tosketch out the curricular modules in parallel to ensure the kit included the requisite components.As such, at the time of this writing, February 2022, the undergraduate engineers on the team,supported by one MS-level graduate student, are finalizing the kit components to reflect thecurriculum that was developed from October 2021 to January 2022. Next steps include scriptingand recording supporting videos, adding all content to the website, and conducting student andeducator kit testing with focus groups to solicit feedback with which to improve upon the kit andcurriculum. It is anticipated that the kit
Conference Session
WIED: Community
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sharon Mason; Margaret Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); Carol Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); Maureen Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET)
“striving” university. O’Meara [3] defines this as “the pursuit of prestigewithin the academic hierarchy.” At striving universities the expected research activity at tenureand promotion continues to increase. Thus faculty submit an increasing number of externalfunding proposals for grants, fellowships and awards. Reflecting University X’s increasedemphasis on research activities, in 2019 the university achieved the classification of “highresearch activity institution” or “R2” under the updated Carnegie Classification of Institutions ofHigher Learning. In 2021, the university achieved a new record in terms of the cumulative valueand number of proposals submitted [4]. Wolf-Wendel and Ward [5] noted that the nature of astriving university can be
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Becky Huang, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Mingxia Zhi; Joel Mejia, The University of Texas at San Antonio
between female and male students and mentors in theirresponses. Analysis of the open-ended responses also indicated that all stakeholders would liketo see more presentations, discussion, and speakers that integrate gender awareness and a higherrepresentation of females and diverse genders (e.g., LGBTQ+) in the program. Nonetheless,some participants expressed concerns with discussions on gender-related topics, believing thatthe discussions would make the “objective” STEM too political. These results highlighted theneed to improve pre-college programs by making conversations about gender explicit andnormative in order to challenge dominant discourses of engineering and help females seethemselves reflected in engineering careers.Keywords: PREP
Conference Session
ERM: Exploring Educational Technology in Engineering
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Milo Koretsky, Tufts University; Harpreet Auby, Tufts University; John Galisky, University of California, Santa Barbara; Susan Nolen
supports for growth onlonger timescales, potentially helping instructors develop ways to participate more meaningfullyin that conversation, diversifying their use of the tool to better fit the needs of their students. Weargue that this form for professional development contrasts with the traditional workshop-basedmodel by allowing instructors to engage in the following: ● Multiple Sources of Information: expertise is not solely located with the workshop designer/presenter but across contexts with focus on reflection/sensemaking on practice. ● Longer Timescale: allows for ongoing development and new problems/ideas to emerge which allows for gradual development of dynamic decision-making practices. ● Adaptation: promotes the idea that
Conference Session
ECE Division Technical Session 4: Student-centered Learning and Teaching Methodologies
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Zahrasadat Alavi, California State University, Chico
course in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department of CSU Chico.In this study, the author, who has taught this course in four different modalities, looks closely atthe results of this class and compares the effect of different teaching modalities on the DFWrates. The author will also reflect on the effectiveness of each of the teaching modes, studentengagement, and student feedback on each mode. The results could be used for therecommendation of teaching modalities if the course is offered online again due to a pandemic orother need. Additionally, the lessons learned and the technology related features of onlineinstruction can be integrated with in-person instruction to increase the effectiveness of teaching.IntroductionThe Linear
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering: DEI, Flipped Classrooms
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michele Grimm, Michigan State University; Ron Averill, Michigan State University; Sara Roccabianca, Michigan State University; Geoffrey Recktenwald, Michigan State University
Materials course. This model used a modified masteryapproach that stresses formative assessment, guidance in the problem-solving process, andstructured student reflection. We now refer to this new approach as SMART Assessment - shortfor Supported Mastery Assessment using Repeated Testing. The effects of this model have beenvery positive, and results on overall student success in Mechanics of Materials have beenpresented in full at prior ASEE conferences.In this paper, we focus on the effects of this new assessment model on the performance ofstudents who may be at greater risk due to their first-generation status or economic disadvantage,while accounting for other measures such as incoming GPA and performance in the prerequisitecourse, Statics. The
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering: Student Growth
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Seyed-Arman Ghaffari-Zadeh, Carnegie Mellon University; Gerald Wang, Carnegie Mellon University
returned by the end of this week. You may re-do as much of the “ProblemSet the Third!” as you would like to re-do.Several levels of mulligan are available: • “Simple resubmission” (essentially turning in a late and improved version of the assignment): Up to 30% of deducted points will be added back. • “Resubmission + reflection” (in addition to previous material, also attach a memo clearly explaining where you initially erred for each problem, and how you corrected these issues): Up to 60% of deducted points will be added back. • “Resubmission + reflection + hints” (in addition to previous material, also attach a thoughtful set of hints for future students tackling this problem… quality of hints will be judged
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Aidsa Santiago-Roman, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Manuel Jimenez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Luisa Guillemard, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Sonia Bartolomei-Suarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Nayda Santiago, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Oscar Suarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Pedro Quintero; Carla Lopez Del Puerto, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Nelson Cardona, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Manuel Rodriguez-Martinez; Anidza Valentin, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus
, such as teaching, research, andservice commitments. This situation reflects on the mentees who expressed concern about thetime availability of their mentors due to other professional obligations. Regardless, we concludethat the goal of the mentoring program proposed to promote a sense of belonging in mentees duringtheir years of study was accomplished.AcknowledgmentsThe National Science Foundation supported this research under Award No. 1833869. Anyopinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] W. Evans, M. Kearney, B. Perry, and J. Sullivan, “Increasing Community College Completion Rates Among
Conference Session
Disability, Neurodivergence, and Sense of Belonging in STEM: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chartrisa Simpson, Mississippi State University; Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University; Cheryl Gomillion, University of Georgia; Kasia Gallo, Mississippi State University
have made an effort to employ the Walther etal (2013) strategies for quality in qualitative research. For example, literature regarding the digitaldivide and sense of belonging informed the development of our interview protocol, providingtheoretical validation. The protocol was reviewed by a focus group of undergraduates forcommunicative validation. Focus group participants were asked to reflect on the questions,consider the meaning and clarity. Participants were also asked to suggest additional and/oralternative questions to be included. Once the interview protocol was revised, at least 20 studentswere recruited to be interviewed from various relevant student organizations (e.g. TRiO, NSBE,SHPE, SWE), representing a diversity of respondents
Conference Session
How Communities and Systems Influence Equity: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matt Gordon, University of Denver; Scott Leutenegger
whichwe believe engendered additional respect among the students. After going over theground rules, we all watched the TedX video by Ms. Boulamwini on algorithmic bias infacial recognition software. Each student was then asked to respond to variousquestions, focusing on justice, equity, diversity, inclusion and ethics. This initialresponse was done individually and entered into canvas ensuring full participation. Wethen placed students in small groups (2-4 people) to discuss their answers. Lastly,each group then presented key responses to the class which led to a class-widediscussion.This modified pair-share model was used for repeatedly throughout the course: a)individual reflection/response, b) small group discussion, and c) groups reporting to
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tim Foutz, University of Georgia; AnnaMarie Conner; Jenna Menke, University of Georgia; Joanna Schneider, University of Georgia; James Drimalla, University of Georgia; Aida Alibek, University of Georgia; Lorraine Franco; Shaffiq Welji, University of Georgia; Barbara Crawford
# 1741910. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. This project investigates the potential of the Collective Argumentation Learning and Coding(CALC) concept for integrating the teaching of computer coding and other computer sciencecontent into the standard practices already used to teach different elementary (grades 3-5)curriculum content. Elementary school teachers significantly influence student motivation toengage in coding and are being asked to provide increased instruction on coding. Unfortunately,few practicing teachers have academic backgrounds in computer coding. This project aims toidentify
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College; Lee Singleton; Todd Haskell; Kathryn Rupe, Western Washington University; Leslie Glen
page shows PSVT:R results for the entire study population. The posttestscores are higher for both intervention and control conditions. The average gain of 1.54 in theintervention sections is significant at p < .001 on a paired t-test. The average gain of 1.17 in thecontrol sections is also significant at p < .05, but the difference between the gains in theintervention and control sections is not significant (p = .53 from un-paired t-test). In both cases,the gain is consistent with what Sorby reported (gain = 1.47) for the comparison population (nospatial skills course) [7]. This gain may reflect typical spatial skills improvement due toengaging with calculus content or may come from more familiarity with the PSVT:R instrumenton the
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Samantha Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus; Susan Sajadi, Arizona State University; Talia Makarov, Clemson University
respond to a difficult or unexpected work situation using one of the six adaptivebehaviors identified in our previous study of engineering managers. Specifically, they will beasked to reflect on their actions and reactions to the situation, the problems or barriers they facedalong the way, and the resources on which they drew from their work environment or prior work,school, and life experiences. Combined with the manager interviews, they are expected to lead toa rich, more complete understanding of engineering professionals’ adaptability demands, assets,and challenges. Subsequent phases of the project will develop survey instruments and onlinemodules to measure and enhance the adaptability of engineers.AcknowledgementsThis work was funded by a