). Page 15.1096.1411. F. W. Taylor, The Principles of Scientific Management, New York: Harper & Brothers.12. B. E. Ashforth, S. H. Harrison and K. G. Corley, “Identification in Organizations: An Examination ofFour Fundamental Questions”, Journal of Management, 34(3), 325 (2008).13. F. A. Mael and B. E. Ashforth, “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the ReformulatedModel of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103 (1992).14. R. Van Dick, J. Ullrich and P. A. Tissington, “Working under a Black Cloud: How to SustainOrganizational Identification after a Merger “,British Journal of Management, 17(S1), S69 (2006).15. C. Bullis and B. Bach, “Socialization Turning Points: An Examination of Change in
by a retired industrial practitionerwho had a good idea of the types of deliverables that were representative of what studentswould encounter in the workplace, but this may not be the case today. In addition, theadvent of process simulators in the 1970’s and 1980’s had a huge impact on the way thatsenior design is currently taught. This paper summarizes the author’s selection of themost effective, innovative approaches for the capstone design course reported recently inthe literature or discussed at previous conferences. The challenges associated withteaching senior design, and approaches successfully applied to address these challenges,are also described.IntroductionThe senior design course in chemical engineering typically includes both
engineering science.Paul Steif, Carnegie Mellon University Paul S. Steif is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. He received a Sc.B. in engineering from Brown University (1979) and M.S. (1980) and Ph.D. (1982) degrees from Harvard University in applied mechanics. He has been active as a teacher and researcher in the field of engineering mechanics. In particular, Dr. Steif develops and implements new approaches and technologies to measure student understanding of engineering and to improve instruction.Louis DiBello, University of Illinois at Chicago Louis DiBello is an Associate Director of the Learning Sciences Research Institute (LRSI) and
Graduate Engineering Program.Rosalyn Hobson, Virginia Commonwealth University Dr. Rosalyn S. Hobson is the Associate Dean for Graduate Studies and Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, Virginia where she joined the faculty in 1996. She also serves as the Director of the VCU - University of KwaZulu Natal International Partnership. She received her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia. She served as a Science and Technology Diplomacy Fellow at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) as a Higher Education Science and Technology Specialist and provides leadership for
-books: the views of 16,000 academics: Results from the JISC National E-Book Observatory”, Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives 61(1):33-47.7. Appleton, L. (2005) “Using electronic textbooks: promoting, placing and embedding”, The Electronic Library, 23(1):54-63.8. Dong, S., S. Xu and X. Lu (2009) “Development of online instructional resources for Earth system science education: An example of current practice from China”, Computers & Geosciences, 35:1271–1279.9. Ravid, G., Y. Kalman, and S. Rafaeli (2008) “Wikibooks in higher education: Empowerment through online distributed collaboration”, Computers in Human Behavior, 24:1913–1928.10. Crestania, F. and M. Melucci (2003) “Automatic construction of hypertexts for
Renewable Energy Bioactuation (BSBA) Bioactuation (BSBA) Biomass (HyBi) Biomass (HyBi) And Env. Design (SEED) And Env. Design (SEED) Storage (RESTOR) Storage (RESTOR) S. Chi Liu , CMMI S. Chi Liu , CMMI George Antos, CBET George Antos, CBET Larry Bank, CMMI Larry Bank, CMMI L. Esterowitz, CBET L. Esterowitz, CBET Y. Gianchandani*, ECCS Y. Gianchandani*, ECCS J. Regalbuto*, CBET
Renewable Energy Bioactuation (BSBA) Bioactuation (BSBA) Biomass (HyBi) Biomass (HyBi) And Env. Design (SEED) And Env. Design (SEED) Storage (RESTOR) Storage (RESTOR) S. Chi Liu , CMMI S. Chi Liu , CMMI George Antos, CBET George Antos, CBET Larry Bank, CMMI Larry Bank, CMMI L. Esterowitz, CBET L. Esterowitz, CBET Y. Gianchandani*, ECCS Y. Gianchandani*, ECCS J. Regalbuto*, CBET
Setra pressure transducers. All flow loops wereconstructed using 2” PVC with the ability to connect pressure transducers and flow meters toLabview modules or multimeters. This setup is capable of producing stable volumetric flow ratesbetween 5-130 GPM with a maximum pressure of 45 PSI.The external flow equipment was primarily composed of an Engineering Laboratory Designwind tunnel with a working test section of 0.3x0.3x0.6m and a maximum linear free streamvelocity of approximately 7.2 m/s. For the purpose of the external flow experiment a cylinderwith a pressure tap on one face was mounted to a rotating damper actuator and allowed to rotatearound its axis. This allowed the pressure at any point along the surface of the cylinder to bemeasured
development of achat-bot built on student’s questions and understandings and perceptions of course contentprovides the instructor with a unique look onto the minds of students. With the oversight anddirection of the instructor and with the aid of students a true content specific engineeringartificial intelligence may be created. Through this process we may better understand thecomplex learning process of our students. Page 15.181.12Bibliography1. S. Crown, "Using Web-Based Games to Enhance the Teaching of Engineering Graphics" Proceedings of theIASTED International Conference, Computers and Advanced Technology in Education. Philadelphia, PA. May1999
research facilities available to accredited biofuel engineering programs. Pending in House subcommittee on Energy and the Environment. Community College Energy Training Act H.R.3731 • Provides grants to community colleges for workforce training and education in sustainable energy industries and practices. (Pending in House Subcommittee on Higher Education, Lifelong Learning, and Competitiveness.) • Related Senate legislation S.1097 is before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. NASA Re‐Authorization Issues: • Human space exploration—how • Keep using International Space far; at what cost? Station after 2015? • Augustine estimate: $3 billion • Growing
4.08 .97 technology. Item 5. I know how engineering can be used to help society. 4.25 .81 Item 10. I know how to apply engineering-related concepts in my daily life. 2.97 1.21 Item 11. I know how to explain engineering-related concepts to my child(ren). 2.97 1.18 Item 12. I know how to help my child(ren) with his/her engineering ideas and 3.00 1.15 skills. Item 14. I know how to find out more about engineering information to help 3.58 1.30 my child(ren)’s learning. Item 16. I am aware of engineering curriculum at my child(ren)’s school. 2.94 1.29 Component 2: Attitude
of universities have also provided facilities for students to submit anonymouscomments on a class. However, these tools are rarely used by students, tend to attractemotional complaints, and do not provide a coherent mechanism for improving delivery of acourse.Some instructors have rolled their own midterm evaluations using LMSs or off-the-shelfsurvey tools. These have often proved cumbersome. Austin and Austin [5]’s LMS lackedanonymous response capability; instructors could see who had answered a question. Thus,if they logged in to view results at a time when only a single student had responded, theycould figure out what that student had written. Second, substantial administrative supportwas needed: Instructors needed to import a Zip file
excellent example of the innovative and transformative pedagogy that mostacademic institutions aspire to.Bibliography 1. AbouRizk, S. (1992). “A Stochastic Bidding Game for Construction Management.” SecondCanadian Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering, CSCE, Ottawa, Ontario, pp. 576-587. 2. AbouRizk, S. and Sawhney, A. (1994). “Simulation and Gaming in ConstructionEngineering Education.” ASEE/C2E2 /C2EI Conference, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, AmericanSociety for Engineering Education. 3. Aldrich, C. (2005). Learning by Doing: A Comprehensive Guide to Simulations, ComputerGames, and Pedagogy in E-Learning and Other Educational Experiences. San Francisco: Pfeiffer. 4. Al-Jibouri, H. S. and Mawdesley, J. M. (2001). “Design and Experience with
engaging the enemy tank, the chassis C, translates relative to the ground at aconstant speed v ( v OC vcˆ1 ) and turns with a time varying spin rate 1 with respect to theground, the turret T, turns with a time varying spin rate 2 with respect to the chassis, and thebarrel B, depresses with a time varying spin rate 3 with respect to the turret. Let point S be along a line drawn from OT in the tˆ3 direction at the intersection of thechassis and turret (fixed in C and T), such that r S / OC s1 cˆ1 s2 cˆ 2 s3 cˆ3 . Let point Q be along aline drawn from OB in the bˆ direction at the rotation point of the barrel (fixed in T and B) such 1that r P / S q1 tˆ1 q2 tˆ 2 q3 tˆ 3 . Let the tank round
mightbe true and that students, in fact, may be better than they used to be.Bibliography1. Gimmestad, B. J. (1989). “Gender differences in spatial visualization and predictors of success in anengineering design course.” Proceedings of the National Conference on Women in Mathematics and theSciences, St. Cloud, MN, 133-136.2. Terlecki, M. S. & Newcombe, N. S. (2005). “How Important Is the Digital Divide? The Relation ofComputer and Videogame Usage to Gender Differences in Mental Rotation Ability.” Sex Roles, 53 (5/6),433-441.3. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A.R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three dimensional spatialvisualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599-604.4. Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N. S., & Little, M. (2008
, numeric integration).6. Themes: Each module must address the themes assigned below using in-class or out-of-class activities. You may “trade” themes from module to module. You may address more themes than your area has been assigned. • Analysis vs. design (E,G) • Maintenance and rehab (C,S) • Sustainability (C,T) • Planning (E,T) • Public financing (C,T) • Forecasting/modeling (E,T) • Societal impact (S,G) • Operations (E,C) • Ethical considerations (T,S) • Access (S,T) • Economic impact (T,C) • Risk (E,S) • Historical perspective (S,G
shaft vs. Shaft speed 120 20 m/s 15 m/s 100 10 m/s 5 m/s 80 Pshaft (W) 60 40 20 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Shaft Speed (rpm) Fig. 1: Power vs. Shaft Speed curvesNote: The power shown in Fig.1 was scaled by a factor of 1/15 and a gear ratio of 50 was usedfor the shaft speed. This was
Performance(GRASP).IntroductionProficiency in engineering domains requires experience applying the governing principles withina specified domain and the tools needed to support the comprehension and monitoring of factorsindicating a system‟s performance (ability to achieve a function). These tools may appear simpleto describe in its form and function, but difficult to apply strategically to a context. The contextis defined as strategically, because it requires a multi-step logical, systematic interaction with Page 15.28.2domain knowledge. As experts we may be blind to this interaction1; therefore, we makeassumptions about what it takes for our
). Effects of Problem-Based Learning: A meta-analysis from the angleof assessment. Review of Educational, 75 (1) 27-61.8. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.9. Collins, A, Brown, J. S., & Newman, (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching students the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed), Knowing, learning, writing, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-493). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.10. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L., (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering monitoring activities. Cognition & Instruction, 1, 117-175.11. Lepper, M.R. & Henderlong, J
Foundation was followed with additionalfunding and equipment donation from industry and other organizations.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supplied by the National Science Foundation under grant No.0552885. Additional funding and support were generously contributed by Conacyt,Turbomachinery Research Consortium, Honeywell Turbo Technologies, NASA GRC, TRC,Capstone Turbine Corp, Haas, Unist, MA Ford, Cideteq, Comimsa, and Agilent Technologies.References[1] Chittipolu, S., Micromachining of 316L Stainless Steel, Thesis, Texas A&M University, 2008.[2] Hung N.P., Chittipolu S., Kajaria S., Makarenko M., Purdy A., Bickston L., and Williamson D., “Micromachining of 316L Stainless Steel,” Micro/Nano Manufacturing Conference, SME
registration; and 3) to motivate students to learnengineering concepts related to other fields by generating enough interest in the subject5, 6. Thepast research shows that motivating the students to learn in service courses is a challengebecause most students are unable to understand the link between the knowledge acquired in theservice courses and their majors7, 8.This longitudinal study was conducted on Electronic Instrumentation and Systems (EI&S)course, a typical service course offered by the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE)department of a large Midwestern university. The objective was to explore and understand theroot causes of why students underperform in service courses. The research question formulatedfor the study was: “What are
further analyses. According to student survey feedback, allparticipants were impressed by the new pulse oximeter module and found the laboratory to beenjoyable and informative. The survey-based laboratory assessment indicated a 40% qualitativeimprovement in students’ self-perceptions of their abilities relative to the learning objectives forthe laboratory. Page 15.40.11References[1] S. Warren, J. Yao, and G. E. Barnes, "Wearable Sensors and Component-Based Design for Home Health Care," in 2nd Joint EMBS-BMES Conference, Houston, TX, Oct. 23-26, 2002, pp. 1871-1872[2] M. J. Drinnan, J. Allen, and A. Murray, "Relation
programs. These numbers aresubject to change annually as institutions present new programs for accreditation upongraduation of their first students(s) or anytime thereafter, or, on the other side, as an institutiondoes not seek re-accreditation of a presently listed program or may in fact terminate the program.In this multidisciplinary engineering program analysis, the following five groups of accreditedmultidisciplinary engineering programs are identified from the ABET listing. As of the March 2,2010 date, there are 35 programs called Engineering and 2 programs called General Engineering.There are also 10 programs with the title Engineering Science or Engineering Sciences, and 19programs labeled Engineering Physics (including one labeled as
academic supervisor23. Such programs exist in the United States, Sweden,Denmark and the United Kingdom (U.K.)21, 23-28. More literature is available on the programs inthe U.K., thus is the focus of this section. Universities in the U.K. have been partnering withindustry for approximately twenty years with support from U.K.’s Engineering and PhysicalSciences Research Council (the U.K.’s equivalent to the National Science Foundation). Inaddition to technical coursework, students take courses in strategic management, finance andhuman resource management. Students completing the program earn a research basedengineering doctorate 25.Students in the United Kingdom’s program transition through four roles: consultant, researcher,innovator and entrepreneur
generation of concept 7, the drying rack, he emphasized the constraints of"inexpensive and portable." He also indicated flexibility in the way he interpreted the problemstatement: The problem indicated the need to design a food cooker, but he recognized the deeperproblem was that users' goals were to eat. Thus, he expanded from a strict definition of“cooking” to include designs for warming and drying other foods.Case Study 2: Engineer 2. Six diverse concepts were identified in Engineer 2's work. His firstconcept was a magnifying glass aimed at a metal pot with a cover. “Basically we’re going tomagnify the sunlight, if it were frying ants. Hopefully that will fry the water and people will behappy.” His second concept was a black pot with the driving
research at the FDA: 1)Faculty at FDA; 2) Graduate Student Fellowships; 3) PostdoctoralFellowships; and, 4) Undergraduate Student Research Experiences.Number of Awards Anticipated: 3 to 10Funding Anticipated: $500,000Due Dates: April 27, 2010; March 15, 2011; March 15, AnnuallyThereafter CBET/DOE Initiative• Details Expected to Be Public Soon13 FY 2010 NSF Initiatives FY10 Budget Request to Congress è Cyber-enabled Discovery and Innovation (CDI) è Science and Engineering Beyond Moore‛s Law (SEBML) è National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) è RE-ENERGYSE è Graduate Research Fellowships (GRF) è CAREER Awards è Broadening Participation è Science & Technology
6.8% DOE Defense 5.0% EPA 4.7% USGS 4.3% DOE Science 3.8% NIH 3.1% VA 1.5% DOT 0.6% DOD -4.4% USDA -5.5% DHS -9.0% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% DOD "S&T" = DOD R&D in "6.1" through "6.3
environment class 454 3.4978 1.22834[Integration] Interdisciplinary project and/or class including 454 3.4427 1.18677the concept of sustainability[Prior Experience] Experience and practice related to 454 3.6784 1.31978sustainable construction[Facility or Campaign] Sustainable facility or campaign in the 454 3.3612 1.20774university or college[Faculty] Professor(s) teaching sustainable construction 454 3.4361 1.21765The correlation coefficients between student’s attitude
must build and demonstrate an SDR that addresses the problem(s) defined by the WirelessInnovation Forum and supporting the target waveform(s). The SDR domains provides a methodto tie together many of the subjects in a typical electrical engineering and computer science andengineering undergraduate’s curriculum. Although student teams may choose to use whateverdevelopment environment they wish, we have had success with the GNU Radio developmentenvironment as well as the MATLAB Simulink environment. Simulink allows a model-baseddesign approach, which allows students to take a systems approach to designing the overall SDRtransceiver, which provides them with exposure to this important aspect of project development.In this paper, we discuss the
. In the aggregate, the results did indicate a potential level of interestadequate to financially support a test should one be available. Survey questions and acompilation of the results are documented in the reference, which can be viewed on theAssociation‟s page of the ETD website.(ii)The key results, however, had to do with the costs which respondents were willing to pay foraccess to testing. Respondents were asked to identify a price level at which they would bewilling/able to take advantage of testing, and to estimate how many students they would test eachyear at that price level. Those results provided a basis for estimating a price point that wouldmaximize revenue from an ongoing testing program. When these results were reviewed with