Paper ID #241002018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29STEM Success Stories: Strategies for women and minorities to thrive, notjust survive, in engineeringDr. Carlotta A Berry, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Carlotta A. Berry is an associate professor in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She is the director of the multidisciplinary minor in robotics and co-director of the Rose building undergraduate diversity scholarship and professional development program. She has been the
Canada published a similar policy paper—Leading a Canadian future: The newEngineer in Society, to support leadership and professional skills education in Canadian facultiesof engineering 3. These two national calls for change have been formalized through learningoutcomes (graduate attributes) generated by the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) in the United States and the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board(CEAB) in Canada 1, 2, 7. While engineering practice has historically blended technical,communication and interpersonal skills 8-12, the recent era of accountability in higher educationhas marked these competencies as legitimate features of engineering education.An increasing number of professors, instructors and
AbstractIn this research paper, we explore student responses to Utility Value Interventions in staticscourses. Introductory engineering mechanics courses (e.g., statics, dynamics) are critical pointswithin a curriculum, and student performance in these courses can have a strong influence onfuture success. And while these courses are often thought of as “weed out” courses, the ubiquityof these courses for engineers is what makes them an important place for students to develop themotivation to persist through their engineering education. One particularly promising tool for thisdevelopment has been Utility Value Interventions (UVIs) in which students are given opportunitiesto reflect on how their coursework aligns with their lives through short writing
Paper ID #26528The Tiny House Project: Building Engineering Proficiency and Self-Efficacythrough Applied Engineering at the High School Level (Evaluation)Dr. Jessica D. Gale, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Jessica Gale is a Research Scientist II at Georgia Tech’s Center for education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on project-based learning, STEM inte- gration at the elementary and middle grades levels, design-based implementation research, and fidelity of implementation. Dr. Gale has a particular interest in project-based engineering in elementary school communities and the
their life experiences and felt a sense of belonging whenthese strengths were recognized by faculty [15], [16]. It was also found that faculty and peermentoring, and first year communities positively influenced a sense of belonging, confidence,and identity development for FGS [14], [16], [17]. Engineering IdentityIdentity is constructed from how one recognizes self, and how others recognize them. A widelystudied topic, engineering identity, is developed through one’s sense of interest, recognition, andperformance or competence in engineering [1], [18]. Much of the topics of focus have been onpersistence in engineering as noted by Choe et al. [19], Godwin & Lee [18], and Morelock [20].Engineering identity development is an important
computing And engineering ed- ucation researcher through his professional activities in the ACM, and IEEE. Other appointments include Board of Governors of the IEEE Computer Society, steering committee of the Frontiers in Education Conference and as Chair of the Special Technical Community (STC) for Education. He is a Director of CeTUSS (The Swedish National Center for Pedagogical Development of Technology Education in a Societal and Student Oriented Context, www.cetuss.se) and the IEEE Education Society Nordic Chapter. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Determinants of initial training for engineering educatorsIntroduction and backgroundThe beginning of the twenty
. Departmental boundaries, constraintson resources, and even student and faculty culture can make program reinvention or curricularchange difficult. These challenges will not look unfamiliar to other institutions and programsseeking to drive change and it is intended that the creative solutions developed at UTEP couldhave traction for others as well.Forging a multi-institutional collaborationAlthough UTEP has developed relationships with a number of institutions and programs centeredon engineering leadership, they sought out a significant partnership with the Olin College ofEngineering. Olin College was started from scratch in 1999 through a generous gift from theOlin Foundation to address calls for transformation in engineering education, and graduated
following models prove to be most worthwhile: (a) coursework within engineering and acrossother fields, (b) experiential learning opportunities, (c) stand-alone programs for engineeringstudents and/or multi-disciplinary stand-alone entrepreneurship programs25, 29. Althoughdifferences in views exist, Hagvall Svensson et al., have provided two general routes for enhancingentrepreneurial learning30. Irrespective of the instructional model, these researchers recommendmaking learning more personal and more professional as key strategies for strengtheningentrepreneurial skill development among engineering students30.The nuances of an entrepreneurial engineering identity reflect yet another emergent topic inengineering education. A key component of this
Paper ID #40731The Role of an Artificial Intelligence Certificate in the ComputingIdentity Formation of Hispanic-Serving Community College Students whoWorkDr. Sarah L Rodriguez, Virginia Tech Sarah L. Rodriguez is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member with the Higher Education Program at Virginia Tech. Her engineering education research agenda centers upon engineering and computing identity development of historically marginalized populations at higher education institutions. Currently, Dr. Rodriguez is involved with several large-scale interdisciplinary research projects focused on
” enables womento develop stronger implicit STEM identities through exposure to positive cues in theirsurroundings. The current study suggests that this valuable work within STEM may be valuablysupplemented by students’ experience in other disciplines. The WGS framework and scholarshipgave the students in our study a different, wider-lens view of engineering itself, and enhancedtheir sense of STEM identity.Pawley [42] argues that “feminist science studies are particularly relevant to engineering andengineering education, namely, for scrutinizing what ‘counts’ as engineering content and why.”Our participants felt strongly that all students should be exposed to the theory and methods ofWGS. They identified ways in which this knowledge was helpful to
Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education and an M.S. student in Systems Engineer- ing at Virginia Tech. She is the graduate assistant for the Rising Sophomore Abroad Program, a global engineering course and study abroad program for first year engineering students. Her primary research fo- cuses on the design and assessment of global engineering programs, but she also studies the development of systems thinking skills in engineering students.Kirsten was recently awarded the Harold Josephson award for professional promise in international education by the Association of International Education Administrators.She holds a B.S. in Engineering & Management from Clarkson University and an M.A.Ed. in Higher Education
can be challenged by threats to an imagined future, and animagined future self can also serve as a motivational resource, as a goal to keep striving towards[32].While the concept of liminal identity has been explored in conjunction with examining identitydevelopment in K-12, higher education and adults [31], discussions of liminal identity are rarewithin the engineering education literature [33]. As such, this paper marks a foray intoinvestigating the connection between liminal identity development and engineering identitydevelopment. We use liminal identity as an organizing concept and analytical tool to highlighthow the identities of engineering students are in transition, informed by their perceptions offuture selves but expressed through
Tech. He currently serves as the Director of Programs for the Graduate Student Assembly and is the founding president of the Graduate Engineering Mechanics Society, both at Virginia Tech.Ms. Amy L. Hermundstad, Virginia Tech Amy Hermundstad is a doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant at Virginia Tech. She received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado State University and is currently pursuing an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. Her research interests include the professional development of engineering students through out-of-class activities.Michael Stewart, Virginia Tech Michael Stewart (Ph.D. candidate, Third Lab, Center for Human-Computer Interaction, Dept
Institute at UGA is an innovative approach that fuses high quality engineering education research with systematic educational innovation to transform the educational practices and cultures of engineering. Dr. Walther’s research group, the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic in- terdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineer- ing, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research methodologies in engineering education, the pro- fessional formation of engineers, the role of empathy
personalized learningmodel (PLM) for graduate education within the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. Thismodel aims to transform and modernize graduate STEM education through a personalized, inclusive, andstudent-centered approach, which will, in turn, advance existing knowledge on the relationship betweenpersonalized learning and student outcomes.The principles of personalized learning guide the PLM. It is comprised of five components. The first threecomponents provide an intentional approach to learning: Instructional Goals developed for each studentbased on a learner profile and individual development plans (IDP), a purposeful Task Environment thatbreaks the traditional three-credit coursework into modules and co-curricular
thetraining of their students, it has received almost no attention in engineering education to date.Although VTS might be perceived as too far removed from engineering for relevance, we havedeployed it as a core innovative pedagogical method along with several other artful methods inan experimental graduate course with promising results. The purposes of this paper are to (1)explore how VTS contributes to the development of reflective thinking skills in graduateengineering education, and (2) share insights of interest to educators considering adopting VTSin their courses and curricula.The course in which we have experimented is a 3-credit elective offered through the departmentof civil and environmental engineering. It is led by two co-instructors
enrichment programs. With the wireless communications research experience for teachers, she coordi- nated logistics during the summer and provided day-to-day curriculum development and implementation support for teacher participants throughout the year. Having extensive experience in working with both rural and urban education settings, her current responsibilities at Columbia’s School of Engineering in- clude building partnerships between educational institutions, industry partners, and community schools in an effort to create greater access to high-quality STEM education opportunities for all.Dr. Jonatan Ostrometzky, Electrical Engineering, Columbia University Jonatan Ostrometzky received his B.Sc. degree (Magna Cum Laude
South Korea. She currently works as graduate research assistant in engineering education department. Her research interests are assessment for learners in diverse settings, and teacher education in multicultural settings.Prof. Jeffrey F Rhoads, Purdue University at West Lafayette Jeffrey F. Rhoads is a Professor in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University and is affiliated with both the Birck Nanotechnology Center and Ray W. Herrick Laboratories at the same insti- tution. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees, each in mechanical engineering, from Michigan State University in 2002, 2004, and 2007, respectively. Dr. Rhoads’ current research interests include the predictive design, analysis, and
programs and services for the Hispanic STEM community.Andrea D. Beattie, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Andrea D. Beattie is a graduate from Texas A&M International University in Laredo, Texas, where she earned a Bachelor of Arts and Master of Arts in Political Science in 2011 and 2012, respectively. Currently she serves as Manager, Research and Impact at SHPE. In this role, she assists the organization with research, program evaluation, and data analytics.Dr. Kimberly D Douglas P.E., Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Over 25 years of experience as an engineering educator and administrator developing and funding programs for increasing the persistence and degree completion rates of STEM
. Alain also serves as the lead program manager of the Summer Engineering Camps an effort that is centered on development of the engineering identity through direct experiences with Engineering fields and design challenges in the informal STEM learning space. Finally, he manages and supports research and development of new and innovative approaches to exposing Pk-12 students to active learning frameworks such as Maker Sprints and Project Based Learning. Alain has a Master of Science in Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies from the University of Texas at El Paso and a Master of Arts in Design and Innovation from Southern Methodist University. As part of his goals to contribute across the University Alain also
Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on
are over 100 full-time and part-time faculty and more than 1,100undergraduate and graduate students. In addition to rigorous technical educations where theory isbalanced with hands-on, laboratory-based work, our students experience emphasis on leadership,teamwork, and oral and written communication.All engineering and computer science students participate in a year-long senior design project which issponsored by local industry. Teams of students mentored by a faculty member and a liaison engineersolve real-world engineering problems. Students design, build and test their own solution, writeproposals and reports, and present the result to their sponsors. By bridging the gap between academiaand industry, the senior design project prepares
to science and engineering communication studies 17,18, 19 and a plethora of advice from scientists and communication scholars about how to write forthe public20. Despite this interest, few university science or engineering programs dedicateformal coursework in public communication to undergraduate or graduate students 21. Whenprograms do offer such training, they are usually limited to teaching students to write intraditional genres such as press releases, newspaper-style articles, and essays13, 14, and fail toconsider more personal, informal, and affective forms of communication such as face-to-faceconversations that can occur through science cafes or street science 22, 23 or to make use ofmultimedia genres such as podcasts, blogs, or
laboratory, there also needs to be an appropriate amount of rigor in the coursecontent to help close the gap in preparation for subsequent undergraduate-level STEM courses. Ablend of fun and technical content can lead to increased student engagement [29]. The coursewill develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills and tools that will benefit students in awide range of general education courses. At USAFA, along with humanities, social sciences, andbasic sciences, general education requirements include 15 semester hours of engineering courses.Skills such as literature review, project management, and technical communication, whichstudents will practice in this first-year course, are expected to be useful in several future coursesand in their
higher education and improve learning outcomes. Her research to date has focused on educational designs that emphasize learner ini- tiative and agency through inquiry or problem-based learning in formal and informal learning contexts. She has published several papers on the characteristics of learning environments that support or constrain opportunities for any students (including those from non-dominant backgrounds) to participate in key science and engineering process skills such as scientific argumentation. Her work is largely informed by the principles and perspectives on human development and cognition articulated by Cultural Historical Activity Theory. Putting theory into practice, she teaches a service-learning
for MMW was informed by a number of institutional educational initiativesand programs at BC, including BC’s identity as a Jesuit, Catholic institution, its Renewed CoreProgram, and its development of a new Human-Centered Engineering Department.First, as a Jesuit, Catholic university, BC is committed to educating the “whole person” andembraces courses that advance aspects of social justice. Particularly in the Fall of 2020, whenlayered crises of COVID, racial injustice, climate disruption, and the presidential election placedhigh burdens on universities to respond, we were encouraged by the university administration toembrace these challenging topics in class. We emphasized the humanity of the engineeringdesign process and profession
Paper ID #36904Relationship between High School STEM Self-Competency and Behavior ina Parametric Building Design ActivityStephanie Bunt, The Pennsylvania State UniversityLaura HinkleAndrew WaltonDr. Nathan C. Brown ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Relationship between High School STEM Self-Competency and Behavior in a Parametric Building Design ActivityBuilding designers receive discipline-specific education which prepares them to address distinctdesign goals, but they may struggle to address criteria not considered part of their professionbased on their disciplinary identity. In STEM subjects
working in a team setting,they recognized the relevance and connection of the project to real-world engineering practice,and they could “see themselves as engineers or at least becoming engineers” [2]. In surveyingfirst-year engineering undergraduates as well as high school students exposed to servicelearning, Zarske found positive impacts in identity and attitudes towards community service,especially in underrepresented populations, that may help in recruitment and retention of thosegroups [3].There are a variety of definitions of service learning that are employed in education. For thepurposes of this paper, we will use the definition adopted by Kennesaw State University’squality enhancement plan (QEP) for regional accreditation review
education, her research interests include engineering education, particularly as related to innovation, professional identity development, and supporting the recruitment and persistence of underrepresented students within engineering.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those
University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those strategies to design tools and education. She teaches design and en- trepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, focusing on front-end design processes.Ms. Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is a PhD student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan. She also earned a Master’s in Higher Education at Michigan and a Bachelor’s in