CompatibilityAbstractFew institutions teach techniques of electromagnetic compatibility at the undergraduate level.Even fewer institutions offer hands-on activities to accompany their EMC course. In this paper,an extensive literature review of college curricula which include EMC is summarized. Adding tothe existing library of hands-on activities developed for EMC-interested seniors, three hardware-based “mini-labs” are presented. Each activity can be performed using equipment that is part ofa standard undergraduate electronics laboratory.Keywordselectromagnetic, compatibility, interference, device, hands-on, laboratory, activity, non-ideal,impedance, common-mode, choke, crosstalk, couplingMotivations for This WorkThe primary objective of an electromagnetic
Paper ID #42005Board #14A: Work in Progress: Integrating Information and Data LiteracySkills into Biomedical Engineering Laboratory CoursesMr. Alexander James Carroll, Vanderbilt University Alex Carroll, MSLS, AHIP, is the Associate Director of the Science and Engineering Library (SEL) at Vanderbilt University. Alex leads the SEL’s liaison program, designing and delivering services to support the research enterprise and the teaching mission of the School of Engineering and STEM academic units within the College of Arts and Science. He received his MSLS degree from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s School of
lab (Lichtenstein & Phillips, 2021).Significance of studyLaboratory experiences play an important role in connecting engineering students’theoretical concepts and practical knowledge (May et al., 2023; Yeter et al., 2023).Generally, the hands-on laboratory with machinery and a physical learningenvironment supports students’ active engagement during learning. However, the laterdevelopment of remote and virtual laboratories brings a more technology-basedexperimental environment. Student laboratories’ use experience and preferences areessential for current teaching methods and experimental environments' adaptivedevelopment. This study can provide students’ laboratory use experience andpreferences, the potential factors influencing their
studentsAbstractIn the current engineering education landscape, there is an increasing need for students topossess practical hands-on skills in addition to theoretical knowledge. One aspect of thispractical skillset is the ability to effectively use basic hand tools. This paper outlines theimplementation of a laboratory activity aimed at teaching first-year engineering students how tosafely use some basic hand tools. There is significant value in training engineering students to be able to handle tools safely andeffectively. It can empower students to not only design innovative prototypes but also bringsthem one step closer to realizing these designs. By learning how to use tools like saws and drills,engineering students can fabricate prototypes
) was developed to teach students how to take lessons from nature and utilize them for solvingproblems in the natural environment and ensuring its sustainability. As the course was being taughtfor the first time, it was quickly apparent that students majoring in Biological Engineering andEnvironmental science lacked adequate background and preparation in EES and data science. Thecourse was then adjusted to immerge these students into EES and data science using experientiallearning by developing laboratory exercises and a semester long project on wetland design. Theproject included designed laboratory exercises and hands-on work to teach ecological engineeringskills as well as leadership, teamwork, and communication. Other class modules included
Paper ID #40880The design and development of a laboratory for three-point bending testson 3D printed samples.Dr. Arash Afshar, Mercer University Dr. Arash Afshar is currently an associate professor in the School of Engineering at Mercer University. He earned his M.S in systems and design and Ph.D. in solid mechanics from the State University of New York at Stony Brook. He also received his B.S and M.S in Solid Mechanics from Amirkabir University of Technology in Tehran, Iran. His teaching and research interests are in the areas of composite materials, finite element analysis, mechanical design and machine learning. Prior
read and perform the lab manual,providing valuable feedback to refine the content.For the faculty teaching the course without prior experience with PLC, the course would requiresignificant time commitment to become familiar with the PLC software and to learn how tooperate the PLC and its components. To prepare for teaching the course, several faculty membersattended on-site PLC seminars by inviting an engineer from Schneider Electric. Additionally, theengineer provided the full support by developing and coteaching the course with two otherfaculty members.Besides refinements to improve the recently developed laboratory experiments, additionalexperiments are currently being planned to expand the course due to upcoming transition fromquarter to
Paper ID #44278Work in Progress: Engineering Analysis Laboratory Courses ComplementFirst-Year Physics and CalculusBryan Ranger, Boston College Bryan Ranger is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at Boston College. He earned his Ph.D. in Medical Engineering and Medical Physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and M.S.E. and B.S.E. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Michigan. His research interests include medical devices and instrumentation, ultrasound, global health, AI/machine learning for image analysis, healthcare innovation, and biomedical engineering education.Dr. Avneet
smoother progression for students in their degree programs. ● Given the commonality of similar courses across various institutions offering Electrical and Computer Engineering, these resources have the potential to benefit faculty and students in comparable academic settings.OER Manual DevelopmentFaculty members with extensive experience in teaching the designated course undertook acomprehensive review of the existing laboratory activities. Their objective was to refine thecurriculum, and they successfully identified a range of seven to nine essential activities thatencompass areas such as combinational circuit design, sequential circuit design, VHDL-based design, realization using discrete logic, and implementation with Field
collaboration and partnership with the relevant industries to directly match the industryexpectations and needs. The academic partners in this project come from university andcommunity college. These institutions that specialize in STEM education are listed below.New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) is a public university located in Newark, New Jersey.It is home to 17% Hispanic, 8% other minorities, and 27% female students as of 2017. TheEngineering Technology (ET) Department at NJIT offers high-quality ABET-accreditedprograms that target the immediate and future needs of industries and is recognized for nationalleadership in engineering technology and STEM education through excellence in curricula,teaching, laboratory development, and service
create clinically useful diagnostic tools that personalize therapy. Prior to joining UCLDr. Alireza Rahrooh Senior Professor of Engineering, Daytona State College Alireza Rahrooh received B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from University of Akron, Ohio in 1979, 1986, and 1990, respectively. He worked as an Electronic Engineer from 1979 to 1984. He has been teaching and three different institutions since 1988 and involved in conducting research for forty years in different areas of electrical and electronics. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Moving towards a fully online laboratory in Electric Circuits courseAbstractThe Department of Engineering
/model [Accessed Nov. 29, 2019].[19] Dym, C. L.; et al. Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. IEEE EngineeringManagement Review, 34(1), 65-92, 2006.[20] Chan, Cky. "Rubrics for Engineering Education", Engineering Education Enhancementand Research Asia (E3R Asia), 2015. - Available: https://hke3r.cetl.hku.hk/pdf/Rubrics-for-Engineering-Education.pdf [Accessed Dec. 2, 2022].[21] Arribas, E. et al “Development of a laboratory practice for physics introductory coursesusing a rubric for evaluation by competences”, 2019 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1287 012025[22] Cruz, M.L.; Saunders-Smits, G.N.; Groen, P. (2019): Evaluation of competency methodsin engineering education: a systematic review, European - Journal of Engineering Education,DOI
Frontiers in Education 2014, Madrid, Spain, October 22-25 2014, Piscataway, NJ: Frontiers in Education Clearinghouse, pp. 2684-2691.[14] M. D. Koretsky, M. Vauras, C. Jones, T. Iiskala, and S. Volet, "Productive disciplinary engagement in high-and low-outcome student groups: Observations from three collaborative science learning contexts," Research in Science Education, vol. 51, pp. 159- 182, 2021.[15] T. F. Wiesner and W. Lan, "Comparison of student learning in physical and simulated unit operations experiments," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 195-204, 2004.[16] V. J. Bhute, P. Inguva, U. Shah, and C. Brechtelsbauer, "Transforming traditional teaching laboratories for effective
. ReferencesAgustian, H. Y., Finne, L. T., Jørgensen, J. T., Pedersen, M. I., Christiansen, F. V., Gammelgaard, B., &Nielsen, J. A. (2022). Learning outcomes of university chemistry teaching in laboratories: A systematicreview of empirical literature. Review of Education, 10(2), e3360. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3360Alkhaldi, T., Pranata, I., & Athauda, R. I. (2016). A review of contemporary virtual and remote laboratoryimplementations: Observations and findings. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(3), 329–351.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0068-zAltmeyer, K., Kapp, S., Thees, M., Malone, S., Kuhn, J., & Brünken, R. (2020). The use of augmentedreality to foster conceptual knowledge acquisition in STEM laboratory courses—Theoretical
Electrical Engineering at Morgan State University.Mr. Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University Pelumi Abiodun is a current doctoral student and research assistant at the department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland. Pelumi got his BSc and MSc degree in Physics from Obafemi Awolowo University, where he also served as a research assistant at the Environmental Pollution Research unit, in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. As part of his contribution to science and engineering, Pelumi has taught as a teaching assistant both at Morgan State University and Obafemi Awolowo University. With passion to communicate research findings and gleaned from experts in the field as he advances his career, Olaitan has
inclusive, reflective teaching practices on problem solving proficiencyMotivationDevelopment and implementation of inclusive teaching practices is an important educationalmovement [1]. For four years, we worked to implement three inclusive practices: standards-based grading with reflection [2], [3], co-created assessment [3], [4], [5], and peer review [2] ofwritten deliverables in a sophomore-level experimental design laboratory and lecture course.This work focuses on peer review, though it utilizes the former two practices in doing so.Briefly, standards-based grading (SBG) is a formative assessment approach that allows fortracking of objective proficiency throughout the curriculum and allows for just-in-time
classrooms and reaching engineeringprofessionals. While virtual and remote laboratories are not new to engineering education, thereis an increasing need for these alternate methods of teaching due to decreased availability of labtime (from increased undergraduate classes) and the rise of remote higher education programs,such as remote graduate degrees and continuing education [4], [5].In this study, we perform a scoping literature review to explore the tools and labs available toPSET educators. Specifically, we focus on virtual and remote tools that might aid in theeducation of continuing education students and programs with rigid curriculums that do notallow for additional lab time. We were guided by the two following research questions
go beyond the effort of asingle faculty teaching the same lecture course. This choice could conceivably add a small butindeterminable overestimation of faculty teaching loads.If a professor taught multiple sections of the same class, the faculty was attributed credit for theclass multiple times. In contrast, faculty who taught multiple laboratory sections were onlygiven credit for one section. It was found that some departments offer many laboratory sectionsattributable to multiple faculty members, where it’s unclear how workload is divided. So, if eachlab teaching professor was given credit for each lab course they would have a significantlyhigher credit count than their lecturing peers. These choices could respectively overestimate
Paper ID #44756Teaching concepts in STEM to two generations through senior capstoneprojectsDr. Ravi S Thyagarajan, Texas A&M University Dr. Ravi Thyagarajan is a Professor of Practice in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University in College Station, TX. He teaches senior design courses, is the Faculty Advisor for the TAMU Formula SAE Electric vehicle program, as well as for several other innovative senior capstone projects. Dr. Ravi Thyagarajan has provided technical leadership for almost 30 years in the areas of design, development, and analysis of ground vehicles and occupants, pertaining to
. Specializing in capacity analysis, simulation, and Lean methodologies, he optimizes production workflows and drives cost reduction initiatives with a focus on operational excellence. With a keen interest in AI applications, particularly in aiding production, operations, and manufacturing engineering.Faith Lauren Sowell, The University of Texas at Arlington Faith Lauren Sowell is an Undergraduate Student of Computer Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington. She is the Lead Virtual Reality Developer for the Human Factors Laboratory. Her research interests include virtual reality as a training and teaching aide, and transportation research. She is expected to graduate in the fall of 2024.Vibhav Nirmal, The
When? Journal of Engineering Education 85(2): 93-96. 8. Newberry, Byron. "The dilemma of ethics in engineering education." Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2004): 343-351. 9. Healy, Tim. "Parallels between teaching ethics and teaching engineering." Annual Meeting of the Pacific Southwest Section of the American Society for Engineering Education. San Luis Obispo. 1997. 10. Clancy, Edward A., Paula Quinn, and Judith E. Miller. "Assessment of a case study laboratory to increase awareness of ethical issues in engineering." IEEE Transactions on Education 48.2 (2005): 313-317. 11. Passino, Kevin M. "Teaching professional and ethical aspects of electrical engineering to a large class." IEEE
Perspectives for Engineers o Learning theories applied to engineering education. o Curriculum design: Approaches to planning teaching. o Writing and reading as scaffolding for learning and teaching. o Capstone projects in engineering education. • Module 2: Teaching-Learning Methodologies in Engineering. o Problem-based learning and projects. o Collaborative learning and teamwork. o Use of simulations and virtual laboratories. o Integration of emerging technologies in engineering education. • Module 3: Formative Assessment and Feedback o Evaluate versus qualify as foci of learning. o Design of instruments, criteria, and guidelines necessary to accompany
laboratories. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Teaching Computer Architecture using VHDL Simulation and FPGA PrototypingAbstractAn Instructional Processor design example has been expanded to facilitate teaching of aComputer Architecture course. The system is modelled in VHDL and simulated using Xilinxdesign tools to demonstrate operation of the processor. A basic microcontroller is created byadding memory-mapped input/output (I/O). The system is implemented in hardware on a fieldprogrammable gate array (FPGA). The processor can then be interfaced with peripheral devicesto demonstrate functional applications.A key component of the Computer Architecture course is a student
Paper ID #45006Teaching Engineering Economics through Role Play in a Senior Design ClassDr. Gautom Kumar Das, University of Maryland Baltimore County https://cbee.umbc.edu/gautom-das/ ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work-in-progress: Teaching Engineering Economics through Role-Play in aSenior Design ClassABSTRACTThis work-in-progress study analyzes students' performance on a carefully chosen test questionover two years, revealing concerning results regarding key learning objectives. The traditionalchemical engineering curriculum exposes students to the concepts of engineering economicsonly during their final
WIP: Towards an AI Teaching Assistant for Aerospace Engineering Lab Courses Bobby Hodgkinson hodgkinr@colorado.edu Smead Aerospace Engineering Sciences University of Colorado at BoulderIntroductionThe overarching aim of our current endeavors is to develop a comprehensive AI-based laboratoryteaching assistant framework, eventually including a personalized tutoring system, tailored forhigher education. This concept echoes the utility of platforms like Khanmigo [1] but isspecifically tailored to address the complexities and demands of higher education learningenvironments with large
obstacles is the existence of unconscious and conscious biases in faculty searchprocedures, which put candidates from minoritized identities at a disadvantage (Roper, 2019;Sackett et al., 1991; Steinpreis et al., 1999; Wapman et al., 2022; Wenneras & Wold, 1997; Wu etal., 2023). Such biases may also exist when considering prospective faculty members’qualifications as to their day-to-day responsibilities – teaching, research, and service – which, inmost institutions, involves engaging with people from a wide range of identities in the classroom,in laboratories, and beyond. Thus, DEI-related qualifications such as the ability to employinclusive teaching practices is an important measure of merit for faculty members.Purpose and Research QuestionIt
Paper ID #42701Board 122: Preparing to Teach a Multi-Campus (Distributed Learning) CourseDr. Casey James Keulen, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Casey Keulen is an Assistant Professor of Teaching at the University of British Columbia, where he serves as the program advisor for the Manufacturing Engineering undergraduate program. Casey’s research interests include multi-campus instruction and the development of open educational resources.Dr. Christoph Johannes Sielmann P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver Dr. Sielmann is an Assistant Professor of Teaching at the University of British Columbia in the
Paper ID #42068Global Engineering Modules that Teach Currency Exchange and InternationalTradeDr. Hans M Tritico, University of Mount Union Hans is the Global Engineering Coordinator at the University of Mount Union where he also teaches environmental/water resources engineering classes. He is passionate about broadening students’ perspectives through project-based hands on learning techniques.Dr. Chad S. Korach, University of Mount Union Chad Korach is the Director of the School of Engineering and an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Mount Union in Alliance, Ohio
wonderful and talented people at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and evaluates our practice of teaching and learning human-centered design in formal and informal learning environments. My Research focuses on studying students’ collaborative problem solving processes and the role of the teacher in facilitating these processes in STEM classrooms.Dr. Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Dr. Blake Everett Johnson is a Teaching Assistant Professor and instructional laboratory manager in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include experimental fluid mechanics
].Expectations for TAs:While research shows that TAs believe that content knowledge is the sole key to being aneffective teacher [14], students have a much different idea of what TAs should bring to the table.In a study of seven laboratory and lecture courses in environmental and water resourcesengineering, students were asked to rank what makes an effective TA from 17 categories ofintellectual excitement and interpersonal rapport developed by the American Society of CivilEngineers Body of Knowledge (ASCE-BOK) to describe effective teaching [22]. 21.3% ofstudents ranked fair grading practices as their first choice for what makes for an effective TAfollowed by explaining difficult concepts well (14.9%), coming to the classroom or laboratoryprepared (13.3