faculty in engineering educationresearch, regardless of institution type. While only a small fraction of CAREER proposals arerecommended for funding, former EEC deputy director Sue Kemnitzer frequently remindedapplicants that the process of applying for a CAREER award has value in itself. By this claim,she included the self-reflection on a faculty member’s research agenda, a plan to integrate theresearch and education activities throughout the individual’s career, and the discussions heldbetween the early career faculty member and their department chair, senior mentors, and, insome cases, deans and other constituencies. These key activities provide many opportunities forfaculty development and encouraging growth in all aspects of faculty life
possible effectiveness of an intention intervention in the relationship betweenmotivation and course performance. Planning is a self-regulatory strategy involving a mentalsimulation of concrete actions in future situations. By simulating future events, individualswould be able to anticipate possible obstacles and make pre-planned, more realistic strategies.This active mental representation thus leads people to have greater accessibility to the plans andact as planned [21]. Therefore, by planning, students may devote more time to study and findmore effective ways to perform better in the course even if their motivation to go to college islow.MethodsThe engineering majors at Miami University have several required courses that they take in theirfirst
their own by supporting themselves, pursuing education, and planning theirown adventures 5 . She used the admiration of the public to spark discussion about femininity, equalopportunity regardless of gender, woman’s rights, and equality 4 .Edward Elliott, President of Purdue University, was impressed by Earhart and realized she wouldbe the perfect role model for the female students his institution. After much discussion and severalvisits to the institution, Earhart, in 1935, joined the staff as a Counselor in Careers for Women andtechnical advisor in the Department of Aeronautics. Before officially starting, Earhart created anddistributed a survey to measure female students’ interest in pursuing a career and how they wouldbalance that pursuit
standardization) from 1990 through 1994. He has been active in SONET’s National and International Standardization since 1985. In addition, Rodney has published numerous papers and presentations on SONET. Rodney began his career with Fujitsu Network Communications in 1989 as the Director of Strategic Plan- ning. He also held the positions of Director of Transport Product Planning, Vice President of Business Management, Senior Vice President of Sales Management, Senior Vice President of Manufacturing, and Senior Vice President of Business Development. Before joining Fujitsu, Rodney worked for Bell Labora- tories, Bellcore (now Telcordia), and Rockwell International. He earned both his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in
Tennessee atChattanooga--that this positive evaluation took place in the first semester in which the new criteriawere effective is regarded as particularly notable. While an earlier version of this work describedthis process as a partially implemented strategy [1], the plan has now been completely detailed,implemented, and validated by the ABET visit which found no shortcomings. This paper describesthe assessment processes, along with the two-year cycle of the assessment schedule, and givesexamples of assessment artifacts and rubrics. The paper also describes some common assessmenterrors and misconceptions, and recommendations on how to avoid them. While each programshould thoughtfully develop its own assessment plan based on its curriculum, its
experience of the new doctoral students and postdoctoralresearchers. Given the high attrition rates in graduate education, the retreat was also designed tofoster retention by integrating attributes of the Workforce Sustainability model.The retreat was framed around four objectives: (1) build community, (2) communicate groupnorms and expectations, (3) develop individual strategic plans, (4) and introduce research skills.The retreat encouraged individual and collective reflection on goals, deliverables, andexpectations. The experience was guided by the notion of beginning with the end in mind and, inthis case, meant aligning individual professional development plans with that individual’s long-term career goals and vision of the research group. The
process to beperformed in the organization for the institutionalization of a process:1. Establish an Organizational Policy 7. Identify and Involve Relevant Stakeholders2. Plan the Process 8. Monitor and Control the Process3. Provide Resources 9. Objectively Evaluate Adherence4. Assign Responsibility 10. Review Status with Higher Level Management5. Train People 11. Establish a Defined Process6. Control Work Products 12. Collect Process Related ExperiencesInstitutionalization of ABET Metrics at California State University, FullertonData plays a key role in any improvement effort since it shows the areas that
tenure at ETSU, he has authored several papers, taught numerous courses, and presented at professional meetings. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Graduate Program Review and Lessons Learned Mohammad Moin Uddin and Keith Johnson East Tennessee State UniversityAbstractThe Department of Engineering, Engineering Technology and Surveying at East Tennessee StateUniversity offers a graduate program – MS in Engineering Technology. The program has twoconcentrations – Engineering Technology and Entrepreneurial Leadership. The EngineeringTechnology concentration is for students who plan to become, or are now, involved insupervising or
offered in a lecture/discussion format, with all students completing the same set ofrequired assignments. The lecture consisted of guest speakers providing information aboutengineering departments, specific opportunities and the field more broadly. Despite beingpresented with information about the available learning experiences, enrolled students indicateda lack of confidence in making educational decisions [14]. In addition to the lecture, upper-levelstudents mentors led weekly discussions (15-25 students per discussion) on topics such asstrengths, identity and values, which are necessary to support the development of future plans[15] and thereby an integral component of experiential learning.In early 2020, we piloted a new model for the course
software of the mechatronic device will be highlighted in thispaper. Initial plans of growing turnips with the FarmBot were unsuccessful due to the severity ofwinter weather. The project team has completed building a hoop house around the FarmBot toextend the growing season. Immediate installation plans for powering the FarmBot with solarpanels and wind turbines and meeting its irrigation needs through rainwater harvesting are inprogress.1.0 IntroductionFarmBot efforts at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore(UMES) are integral to smartagriculture and precision farming efforts[1,2] funded by the National Institute of Food andAgriculture(NIFA) and Maryland Space Grant Consortium. Smart agriculture endeavors havebeen ongoing for several years now
particular in support of the data-driven and self-driven management of large-scale deployments of IoT and smart city infrastruc- ture and services, Wireless Vehicular Networks (VANETs), cooperation and spectrum access etiquette in cognitive radio networks, and management and planning of software defined networks (SDN). He is an ABET Program Evaluator (PEV) with the Computing Accreditation Commission (CAC). He served on many academic program design, review and planning efforts. He serves on editorial boards of multiple journals including IEEE Communications Letter and IEEE Network Magazine. He also served as chair, co-chair, and technical program committee member of multiple international conferences including IEEE VTC
among treatments.Patients are looked at from a disease cluster consideration, rather than as an individual patientrequiring personalized care. Large volumes of complex data, forming the big data, can bereviewed and analyzed to arrive at a personalized plan for patient case management. Theobjective of this project is to review examples of current applications of big data in healthcare,highlight the corresponding benefits, and make suggestions for future improvements.Big data analytics refers to the comparison and utilization of high volume, variety, velocity andveracity of relevant data to select a treatment approach for a given patient. Applying the analyticson relevant big data and zooming in on a specific patient’s case to determine
students “work as an engineer,” the courseinstructors took a backward design approach to redesign this course. First, learning outcomesfor the course were redefined to highlight problem-solving skills, which are essentialoutcomes according to the ABET criteria. Second, a comprehensive assessment plan wascreated to measure student progress in each of the learning outcomes. Rubrics-based gradingfocuses on assessing five dimensions of student work: the solution’s efficacy, quality oftechnical writing, oral communication, completion of prototypes, and testing plans and results.Finally, the newly developed learning outcomes and assessment plan were aligned withlearning activities in the course, including design, prototyping, testing, as well as
; accountability from theirpeers; dedicated time and space to work on their new ideas. For a course redesign plan facultyhad to develop student-learning outcomes, an assessment plan, and an implementation plan forthe course changes. In addition, for fully participating, faculty received a summer salarysupplement and an additional supplement after implementing the class changes and assessing thesuccess of those changes.Twenty faculty participated in the summer 2019 program with 95% of the workshop participantsmeeting all of the summer program requirements, including presenting their work/plans at thefinal summer meeting. During the 2019-2020 academic year, faculty implemented their coursechanges and were required to submit a final deliverable focusing on
. Teresa Lee Tinnell, University of Louisville Terri Tinnell is a STEM Education Curriculum and Instruction PhD Candidate and Graduate Research As- sistant at the University of Louisville. Research interests include: interdisciplinary faculty development, first-year engineering student retention, STEM teacher education, and collaborative, team-based learning experiences.Dr. Thomas Tretter, Thomas Tretter is professor of science education and director of the Gheens Science Hall & Rauch Plan- etarium at the University of Louisville. His scholarship includes collaborative efforts with science and engineering faculty targeting retention of STEM majors in entry-level STEM courses.Dr. Marie Brown
techniques, and the infusion of globalperspectives that includes how different regions of the world are addressing climate change andadaptation planning, has been particularly enriching to the student experience. The authorsdiscuss how CGA has incorporated climate science into engineering education and how thecourse provides exposure to best practices used in civil engineering to promote infrastructureresiliency in a changing environment.Key words: Climate Education, Civil Engineering, ResiliencyIntroductionThe United States Coast Guard Academy (CGA), located in New London, Connecticut is thesmallest of the United States military academies with approximately 1000 cadets and its missionis to educate, train and develop leaders of character who are
engineering economic analysis and stochastic, modeling, analysis and simulation. Professor Ryan’s research interests lie in the planning and operation of energy, manufacturing and service systems under uncertainty. Her work has been funded by several single and multi-investigator National Science Foundation grants, including a Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) award, as well as by industry, private foundations, and the U.S. Department of Energy through its ARPA-E initiative. She is PI of a National Research Traineeship on Innovations at the Nexus of Food, Energy and Water Systems. Dr. Ryan is a Fellow of the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers and serves as Editor-in-Chief of The Engineering Economist.Dr
are encouraged to takeresponsibility for individual tasks and work together in a team according to the project plan andachieve project goals. This paper presents a case study of senior design projects (in the ElectricalEngineering department) at PMU systematically administered and monitored to meet the qualitystandards and ABET student learning outcomes. Evaluation methods (both direct and indirect)and developed assessment tools used are also presented along with survey results of students’feedback.Administering Capstone Senior Design ProjectThe Capstone senior design projects at the EE department at PMU are administered and executedover a period of two semesters comprised of the following two courses which are worth 3 credithours each: 1
engineering ethics, the Fundamentals of Engineering Design 101 instructional team at New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) planned the engineering ethics module in three parts – Part 1 - background theory, Part 2 - a mock debate, and Part 3 – student debate presentations to demonstrate their grasp on the topic. Details of all three parts are given in the table below. Table 1. Engineering Ethics Debate Activity Breakdown [1-4]Activity Breakdown Description (No. of Lectures) • Students were introduced to engineering ethics and ethical dilemma often faced by practicing engineers through real life
even in the worse winter weather, and enjoys camping. Dave also served in the US Air Force. Dr. Yearwood continues to research and collaborate with colleagues. He can be reached at Yearwood@und.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 An Innovative Project-based Learning Approach to Teach Project ManagementAbstract Project-based learning often asks students to create a project plan for a real or imaginaryclient that is built upon what is learned in one or more courses. However, while the project-basedlearning pedagogical approach appears to be a useful candidate for providing students withhands-on experiences, how can we as educators create meaningful project planning
community and build personal • Listening skills networks • Problem solving and critical • Gain hands-on experience in a thinking community setting • Communication • Build professional connections • Teamwork useful for future internships or jobs • Learning more about • Science communication cultures/populations different from • Project planning their own • Cross-disciplinary collaboration • Understand both assets and needs in • Other
participants and mentors to address the impact of the project on the participants,to ask whether the goals and objectives were accomplished as planned, and to identify strengthsand limitations of the projects. These evaluation strategies will be detailed with special emphasison the steps taken to modify the educational programming in response to evaluation findingsfrom year one.Center OverviewThe Center for Innovative and Strategic Transformation of Alkane Resources (CISTAR) is aNational Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Research Center (ERC) grant. ERCs aredesigned to integrate engineering research and education with technological innovation totransform national prosperity, health, and security. Purdue University is the lead institutionpartnering
Autonomous People Mover Alex Avery, Joe Hudden, David Ruan, Eric Schulken, Cody Smith, Jessica VanGiesen, Michael Zielinski, Ray Ptucha Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA of majors work in groups to complete projects over the course ABSTRACT of two semesters. The class structure dictates that the firstMost automobile forecasters predict that by the mid-2020’s semester be devoted to design, research, and planning, whileautonomous driving will transform the automobile market. the second semester is to be
workforce.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University at West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and a Ph.D. degree in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University. Dr. Main examines student academic pathways and transitions to the workforce in science and engineering. She was a recipi- ent of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Award, the 2015 Frontiers in Education Faculty Fellow Award, and the 2019 Betty Vetter Award for Research from WEPAN. In 2017, Dr. Main
Mentors review1:45-2:00PM Break2:00 – 2:45PM Session 5: Timetable (45 minutes) Brief Presentation what is needed for time table? (10 minutes) Hands on: PIs create draft timetable Mentors review2:45-3:00PM Break3:00 – 3:45PM Session 6: Management plan (45 minutes) Brief Presentation what goes in the management plan? (10 minutes) Hands on: Drafting a management plan Mentors review3:45-4:00PM Break4:00 – 4:45PM Session 7: Budget 1 (45 minutes) Presentation – the budget, what’s allowed, do’s and don’t Indirect Rate (IDR) and the impact on budget Q&A about budget5:00 – 6:00PM Session 7A: (30-60 minutes
with ARC officers and the courseinstructor. After the training students formed teams of three and visited homes in the most fireprone neighborhoods of Philadelphia to install smoke alarms, replace alarm batteries and helpresidents make home fire escape plans. The students also provided education and materials onhome fire preparation. In the past five years they distributed materials and provided informationto over ten thousand people in homes and on the streets of the city.The students were required to submit a technical report about the behavior of steel under hightemperatures (i.e., home fires). The report also required a two-page reflection on the service.“The Environment” class was taught 23 times from Fall 1991 through SP 2013. An
Paper ID #30509Developing a Research Agenda for the Engineering Ambassador CommunityDr. Stacey V Freeman, Dr. Stacey Freeman is the Director of National Outreach for the College of Engineering at Boston Uni- versity. In this role, she is responsible for planning, developing, and implementing outreach and diversity programs and initiatives to promote Engineering and increase the K-12 pipeline for women and underrep- resented minority students.Dr. Sandra Lina Rodegher, Boston University Dr. Sandra Rodegher is the Manager for National Outreach Initiatives for the Office of Outreach and Diversity in Boston University’s
Participatory Action Research Model that ultimatelyends with continual program enhancement. The structure of the initiative is not only based on the detailsof the schedule but also on the feedback of the participants. The lack of URMs in the college provokedan idea from personal experiences at other minority events. With the use of a systematic onlinedocument review of current weekend outreach programs, a plan of action was developed, and effectiveprogram designs were synthesized.Based on the systematic review of similar programs, the current plan is to implement a program inFebruary of 2020 that will target about 30 participants. Mentees will be able to connect with multipleorganizations such as the VEX robotics club, the National Society of Black
, sample of the labs will be introduced. Finally, the student’s feedback regarding incorporating visual components software with the programming industrial robots’ course will be presented. Keywords: Robot simulation software, Visual Components software, industrial robot, 3D CAD data, virtual commissioning, Process Optimization, robot integratorIntroduction:The Visual Components (VC) simulation software has become an increasingly essential toolfor manufacturing professionals having the responsibilities of layout, planning, and optimizingthe work cell design for virtually commissioning the robot and accelerating the time toproduction [1]. It uses 3D CAD data to create a virtual model of the robot
security issues in their software engineering careers.Students were asked to rank the learning objectives on a Likert scale of 1 to 5 where 1 was theworst ranking and 5 was the best ranking Generally, the results of the survey demonstratedstudents ranked the objectives well, with the lowest score for the objective about developing anaction plan for ethics indicating ways to improve the module in future course offering. Thehighest values were given to considering multiple viewpoints, indicating the mindset aspects ofthe project may have been successful.Based on the outcome and student feedback recommendations for future implementation of themodule in the curriculum is discussed.IntroductionThis paper describes a classroom module designed to develop