reflect the population as a whole. [1].The report continues to state that: While continuing to pursue increased knowledge and higher standards of excellence in teaching, research and innovation, two- and four-year colleges in Texas will need to consider more explicitly the primary reason most students attend college: to get a better job and achieve a better life. [1]A primary outcome of the 60x30TX initiative relevant to our discussion is the following: By 2030, all graduates from Texas public institutions of higher education will have completed programs with identified marketable skills: The marketable skills goal emphasizes the value of higher education in the workforce. Students need to
entering and working in storm drainagesystems, which are considered to be confined spaces, and step-by-step instructions are provided.Unlike the traditional training related to entering confined spaces, which is paper-based trainingin compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) standard1910.146, the newly-developed, visual program allows learners to get involved safely with theactual process of entering and working in storm drainage systems through a 3D simulationmodel. The main purposes of the model are to educate learners by helping them (1) understandthe dangers of entering and working in storm drainage systems and any associated risks, (2)evaluate hazardous conditions, and (3) make safe and accurate decisions
topic. Assessment techniques include student-based surveys, pre- and post-tests, intervention vs. comparison group statistical analysis, andcourse evaluations. In this way, technical skills building, as well as attitude and perceptions areevaluated. Results indicate that while similar learning was achieved with the games vstraditional lecture, students’ perception was that the games were not worthwhile in replacinglecture. Details on the games and assessment techniques are included, to allow others to easilyadapt this work.IntroductionIt is now generally accepted that active learning methods can help students learn material at adeeper level [1], and that students enjoy game-based learning. Research has indicated that game-based activities
appreciative email was also received from a parent who acknowledgedthe effectiveness of the technique on his son’s skill to communicate and to engage in an effectivediscussion. This paper assessed, compared and documented the impacts of clustering fromgrouping teaching technique on students’ classroom engagement.Keywords: Engagement, clustering, cognitive, behavioral, affirmative.1. Introduction:Technology increase in our society had greatly impact students’ interaction in various classroomsdiscussions and had in one way or another, degraded student classroom engagement. Although,student low engagement has been attributed to instructor inability to motivate students in theclassroom. Notwithstanding, student classroom engagement is a complex issue
engineering from MIT (2007) and a master’s degree in systems engineering from the University of Virginia (2010). Alexandra comes to FIU after completing a postdoctoral fellowship at Georgia Tech’s Center for the En- hancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) and three years as a faculty member at Olin College of En- gineering in Massachusetts. Alexandra’s research aims to improve the design of educational experiences for students by critically examining the work and learning environments of practitioners. Specifically, she focuses on (1) how to design and change educational and work systems through studies of practicing engineers and educators and (2) how to help students transition into, through and out of educational and
innovation in fields, such as business orteaching [1]. The steps include awareness or knowledge, persuasion or interest, evaluation anddecision, implementation and trial, and finally confirmation or adoption. This theory of changewas used to develop a comprehensive faculty development program that included monthlygroup workshops promoting the EM and evidence-based pedagogical best practice and regularindividualized coaching sessions with a peer team comprised of two “experts” – one in the EMand the other in pedagogical practices.While professional development programs for faculty in higher education are relativelycommon, coaching, or targeted one-on-one discussions about teaching strategies and practices,is still quite rare. However, coaching has
semester. Overall the experimental groupoutperformed the control group for the majority of the questions in all three evaluations. Lesspersonal conflict was found in the control group from the first evaluation where differences inresults between the two groups were of statistical significance. Other statistically significantdifferences with better performance from the experimental group were found in results fromareas of healthy, fact-driven conflict (first evaluation); coordination (final evaluation); andcontribution equity (final evaluation).IntroductionTeamwork has long been recognized as an essential skill for engineering graduates to besuccessful in today’s workplace [1, 2]. It is very common for engineering programs to useexperiential
collaborationbrings value but can be challenging.Overall, the results from this qualitative collaborative ethnography provide insight into theexperience of four instructors team teaching using a flipped classroom model. These findings canbe useful to others who are looking at implementing flipped classrooms when there are multiplesections. Future research can further look into other perspectives, including bringing in studentperspective to the instructor experience.IntroductionBlended learning models and flipped classrooms offer opportunities for exploratory, hands-onapplication of technical material during instructor-led class time [1], [2]. While these modelshave been implemented in many engineering programs, large-scale enrollment courses
Kasley, Ph.D, Emeritus Professor, College of Engineering, Colorado Technical UniversityIntroductionTo accommodate the diverse student population of adult-learners, the College of Engineering(CoE) at Colorado Technical University (CTU) offer both evening and daytime classes, themajority of students in CoE work full-time in civilian or military sectors, or are military veterans.The CoE successfully implemented an eleven-week program curriculum, designed for these non-traditional students who are dealing with many distractions. The active-learning approach andflipped-classroom better engages these students and also targets higher-levels of thinking [1].The flipped-classroom helps students determining knowledge, stimulates
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 COMBINING SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENT TO DETERMINE FLUID FORCES IN THE FLUID MECHANICS LABORATORYAbstract: The Fluid & Hydraulic Mechanics course in our Mechanical Engineering TechnologyProgram is the first of the two courses our students take in our ET Department. The course is anintroductory class in Fluid Mechanics and it is structured as a four credit hour course, consistingof a 3 credit hour lecture and a 1 credit hour laboratory component. During the spring 2018 term,a new laboratory exercise was introduced in our curriculum to cover buoyancy and momentumtheory. The exercise consists of two parts: an online simulation using the PhET
in projects andextracurricular activities completed outside the classroom, than those completed within thetransdisciplinary classroom. This information has proved beneficial for program staff as theycontinue to make programmatic improvements.1. IntroductionMultidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary engineering and technology programsare growing in popularity and prior studies have identified advantages to students whoparticipate in these innovative, boundary-crossing programs. Students develop higher levels ofcognitive processing and critical thinking [1], report positive attitudes toward literacy [2],improve research skills [3] and display high levels of teamwork and leadership skills [4]. Thesefindings are by no means
qualitative approach, representing both colleges as case studies.Literature ReviewIn June 2018, Weiner, Lande, and Jordan [1] presented their research of the existing literature, asit related to makerspaces and engineering education. While the focus of that research was onhow makerspaces are used for engineering education, their methodology identified the overallbody of makerspace-related literature that existed at that time, and broke the results into 12primary topics. They also found that, since 2013, only one article related to makerspaces hadbeen published by the Journal of Engineering Education, and 68 had been published asconference proceedings. Furthermore, they also noted that only 26% of the total articles werefocused on makerspaces as
included in the communitypartnerships with two main foci: middle school robotics leagues and a community makerspace.Two surveys (Pre and Post course) helped to identify initial impressions and changes in students’(1) understanding of community partner’s geographic location, (2) impressions of location, (3)propensity to frequent a business in that location, and (4) knowledge of actual persons residing inthe community. Students were asked to write reflections after S-L site visits which acted asassessments of their growth in understanding of course concepts. The reflections were also usefulto see the students’ perception of professional growth and their perception of the community andtheir impact on it.Initial surveys indicated that news and word of
teaching focused professor where he is heavily involved in design education and diversity studies.Dr. Steffen Foss Hansen Steffen Foss Hansen currently is Associate Professor in Regulatory Engineering at the Technical Univer- sity of Denmark (DTU), Department of Environmental Engineering and NanoDTU. He has a Master of Techn. Soc. from Roskilde University, a PhD degree in environmental engineering from DTU and a Doc- tor Technices (dr.techn.) from DTU. He conducts research into 1) how science and engineering can best be used in regulatory settings in situations pervaded by scientific uncertainty and complexity and 2) risk analysis, regulation and governance of nanotechnologies, and the applicability of decision-making
-term study abroad course through Mon- tana State University and an introduction to engineering education course at the Central New Mexico Community College. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Comparative Approaches to Accessibility Education in the United States and RussiaAbstractDifferences in national contexts have led to uneven global development of transportation systemsthat are accessible to people with disabilities. The World Health Organization promotes theworldwide implementation of education and professional training programs to foster a mindsetsupportive of accessibility [1]. The education of future engineers is an essential component inthis
(ordinary) teaching. The results can guide the educators and education decision makersto adopt appropriate technologies especially robotics as pedagogical tools to enhance the teachingand learning outcomes and effectiveness. The limitations and future directions of the research arealso discussed.1. IntroductionBased on years of teaching experiences of undergraduate mechanical engineering courses, it isrealized that there are many mechanical engineering concepts that are fully or partly abstract innature. For example, torque, moment, pneumatics, hydraulics, etc. It is experienced that studentsusually feel difficulty to comprehend such concepts when they are taught such concepts intraditional classroom settings. The difficulty level becomes higher
insubsequent courses.The pressing need to reform the teaching and learning Statics has been established in the pastdecades. To enhance teaching and student learning in Statics, researchers at various institutionshave explored various methods for teaching Statics, such as developing concept map andquantifying students’ conceptual understanding [1, 2, 3], developing on-line homework orlearning modules [4, 5], peer-led-team-learning [6, 7], project-based learning [8], emporium-based course delivery [9], etc. Among them, the flipped-classroom method [10, 11, 12] hasbecome popular in the recent years. In a flipped classroom, the class time is devoted to guidedinstruction where students work through problems with the instructor present to provideassistance
on Undergraduate Research, undergraduate research is defined as “aninquiry or investigation conducted by an undergraduate student that makes an originalintellectual or creative contribution to the discipline [1].” As stated in literature, undergraduateswho conduct research show improvements in thinking independently, thinking critically, puttingideas together, solving problems, analyzing data, analyzing literature, interpreting researchfindings, conducting ethical research, writing and communicating [2-9]. Literature also assertsthat it is rare for students to have enough opportunity to gain higher-order thinking skills fromtheir undergraduate research experiences [10].Students involved in undergraduate research also report outcomes that may
defined by the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) as “ ...theunderstanding and control of matter at the nanoscale, at dimensions between approximately 1and 100 nanometers” [1]. Nanotechnology has a long history, dating back to the roman period,however many of the advancements are quite modern with the first lecture on nanotechnologyoccuring in 1959. More recent advancements include the creation of the scanning tunnellingmicroscope, the discovery of the carbon nanotube, and the creation of dip-pen nanolithography[2]. With constant discoveries being made in nanotechnology it has become ever-more importantfor students entering the field to have an education that prepares them for the challenges thatcome with being on the front lines of
generate profits and retain competitive advantage. In this vein, such dynamic businessenvironment compels organizations to foster and equip a competent workforce with enhancedlevels of skill and quality needed for sustainable advantage. (Markovic, 2008). To achieve this,organizations have adopted various human resource development (HRD) interventions such astraining to ensure their workforce has the necessary competencies to stay abreast of changes inthe market (Potnuru & Sahoo, 2016). Hellriegel and Slocum (2011, pg. 8) have described sevenkey competencies that affect individual behaviors, teams and subsequently the organization: 1. employee’s ethical competency; 2. self-competency; 3. diversity competencies; 4
steps include collecting a larger data set from one or potentially multiple North Americanuniversities and carrying out statistical, rather than descriptive analysis. This analysis can help inunderstanding why institutions necessitate administrating diverse formats of doctoral exams, howstudents perceive it, and if certain formats are found to be more beneficial for the students.IntroductionContrary to doctoral education in Europe or Australia, completion of coursework and a set ofexaminations are the default requirement in North America [1]. The comprehensive or qualifyingexam (hereafter CQ) exam has been shown to impact the Time-to-Degree and Completion Ratesof Doctoral Students [2]. Passing CQ exam is as such a key milestone for an early
to include PLC programming instruction in addition to already-utilizedArduino platform within the course.Instruction of industrial control systems (such as PLCs) are typically experienced in latercoursework of an engineering student’s undergraduate degree program, after theory andintroductory subjects have been explored. Laboratory experiences are costly both in terms ofinstructor time and money, especially in the case of damaged equipment [1]. Thus, to overcomethis, various courses have attempted to use web-based laboratories to educate engineeringstudents on electronics such as PLCs [2, 3]. However, this approach waives the inclusion ofexperience-based hands-on education, which is considered to be a crucial part of the laboratoryexperience
this project is to teach students to understand basiccryptography techniques, how cryptography is used in protecting sensitivedata, understand the basics of Internet hygiene, and how social engineeringcan be used to steal your identity. The lesson is broken into 3 activities: (1) ModernSubstitution Ciphers: Caesar Cipher and other Basic Ciphers, (2) Modern Encryption:Encryption: Public-Key, and (3) Social Engineering: Mortimer’s Social Public-KeyMedia. In the Substitution Cipher activity, students will learn to use simple Introduction to Public
instructional design, facilitation and evaluation. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Fron- tiers of Engineering Education Symposium in 2013 and awarded the American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research Methods Faculty Apprentice Award in 2014. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019AbstractWith today’s growing competitive economic market, having an entrepreneurial mindset can beinstrumental for success. An entrepreneurial mindset encompasses the way a person thinks abouta new idea, product, or innovation [1]. It can include elements such as approaches to productdevelopment, the ability to mitigate risk, creating new professional networks
engineeringstudents for their professional careers.Introduction: Several studies of the engineering workplace have demonstrated a gap betweenengineering education and practice [1-4]. One reason for this education-practice gap is that “[t]oooften in engineering classrooms, the instructional activities required of the students are notaligned with the kind of knowledge those activities are intended to foster” [5]. Another proposedreason for this gap is that engineering practice entails solving complex, ill-structured problemswith knowledge that is distributed amongst other engineers and engineering tools; whereasengineering students are often trained to solve simple problems with little to no ambiguity usingknowledge distributed amongst their instructors
conceptualize howentrepreneurial mindset has been operationalized in current engineering assessmentliterature. We compare and contrast the current usage of ‘entrepreneurial mindset’ toidentify similarities and inconsistencies in the conceptualization of the entrepreneurialmindset in recent engineering education literature and present implications of thesefindings for the engineering entrepreneurship community.IntroductionRecently, entrepreneurship has gained significant traction in undergraduate engineeringeducation. Pushing beyond the goal of venture creation, engineering entrepreneurshipprograms are placing an emphasis on developing more entrepreneurially minded studentsby actively involving students in the learning process [1]. As these programs
, qualitative inquiry can provideintricate details about why students drop out of the engineering field [1]. Qualitative methods inengineering education can be used as a primary or secondary method. It is becoming popular asdemonstrated by the increase in its use in past 15 years [2] and the push for its quality in theengineering education research [3]. Qualitative data usually involves the use of interviewtranscripts or open-ended questions which are analyzed by coders using a codebook. Coding canbe done by a single coder or a team of coders. A team-based approach to coding qualitative dataallows for processing of larger amounts of data. Qualitative analysis is a time-consuming processand heavily relies on inter-rater reliability for
University in College Station. A native of Columbus, Ohio, she attended North Carolina A&T State University where she received a B.S. in Bio Environmental Engineering in 2006. She then began pursuing her graduate education at Purdue University in the Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, completing her Ph.D. in 2015. Her primary research areas include 1) mycotoxin risk assessment and treatment in stored grains and 2) innovate instructional strategies for Biological and Agricultural Engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Connecting specific knowledge areas throughout core courses in Biological and Agricultural
agents and recipients of change, andconfirm that the right work is being done and the wrong work is being avoided.Integrating Theory and Practice: Overview of Four ContextsThis panel paper integrates the lessons of four panelist papers whose authors, institutions, goals,and change theories can be found in Table 1. This section presents a narrative that compares andcontrasts the approaches of the four panelist papers to integrate theory with practice in theirchange projects. For a more detailed description of each context, we refer readers to eachpanelist paper, which can be accessed at http://bit.ly/ChangeTheorytoPractice . Table 1: Overview of the contexts of the four panelist papers Contributors Institution Goal
[1-4]. Particularly, this interest has been motivated by the need to increase thenumber of underrepresented students in STEM programs. The National Science Foundation,along with other national agencies, have discussed the importance of bringing more students withdiverse backgrounds into STEM fields in order to encourage inclusion and close the achievementgap [5-8].One way to attract students to STEM is through informal learning environments and experiencesthat “can kick-start and sustain long-term interests that involve sophisticated learning” [9].Informal learning environments have become common due to different reasons. For example,these summer enrichment programs are seen as programs that "help" students become moreinterested in STEM