Page 11.865.4related to individual work, or from a list of topics as offered by the instructor; the other classmembers were all to develop projects with the theme of aiding in the recent tsunami relief effort.Each group had to develop a proposal that incorporated a statement of purpose; the opportunity,problem, or need addressed; the method the project team intended to use to address this need; theplan and benefits of the plan; a schedule and proposed start and termination date; basic neededresources; and key risks and obstacles that could hinder the successful completion of the project.Upon acceptance of the proposal, each team was allowed to work on its project, and had tosubmit milestone reports throughout the semester, culminating in a
not built to utilize the Sun’s enormous potential. With lower cost gas heat and electric airconditioning and electric lighting, the construction of new homes does not factor in a use for thisnatural resource. Hopefully, new construction in NJ will begin to maximize its solar potential.Now that we know what constitutes great candidate for solar PV installation, we plan to sharethis data regarding PV with building code officials to potentially have an impact on the buildingprocess and even possibly NJ building codes. This would be a great way to ensure that futurehomeowners have a good access to their PV resources in this state. During the spring of 2006,structural assessments will be included in all site visits to ensure that the one trip
window.They noted that the need to establish a timeline was presented during the team training, but thatthe professors should have emphasized this point even more heavily. Additionally, the SEs werecurious about how useful their documents were to the BEs. The author passed along to thestudents that many of the BE teams had used the requirements artifacts and had given credit tothe SEs in funding proposals they had recently submitted. The other SE instructor noted that, inindustry, requirements engineers often wonder how their document is used during development,implementation, and testing; sometimes the document is not used sufficiently. Thus, the SEfaculty plan to follow up with the BE faculty and students in the coming quarters to determine
dangerous for them- they candecrease the life span of the machine and produce noise that is harmful for people. The rotorwith free elements inside it can balance itself automatically 4. The balancing in one plan isshown in Fig.7. The vibration of an unbalanced rotor produces vibration forces that act on freeelements (balls or rollers) and change their position with respect to the rotor. When freeelements occupy the positions that balance the rotor then the vibration and also vibration forcesvanish and these positions are the positions of the ball’s equilibrium. For two balls thesepositions are defined by α 1 f = −α 2 f = arccos(− Me / 2mR) . The behavior of the rotor and theballs are governed by the following equations
2006-755: AN ALTERNATIVE PARADIGM FOR ENGINEERING HOMEWORK:THE CASE OF ENGINEERING ECONOMICSJohn Ristroph, University of Louisiana-Lafayette JOHN H. RISTROPH is jointly appointed as a professor of Engineering and Technology Management and as a professor of Economics and Finance at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. His doctorate is in industrial engineering and operations research, and his non-academic experience includes service to the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources first as Head of Economics and Statistics and then as Director of Policy and Planning. Page 11.171.1© American
problem solving 0.54, use of small groups 0.31, andusing problems 0.20[34]. The competencies supported by the instructional design architecture areby their construction aimed at developing higher level thinking skills. HEERG (2003), anindependent evaluation group from University of California Berkley, provided these commentsabout the activities: “To prepare students for a standard condition of uncertainty, ALTs placestudents in confusing situations for which there is no single correct solution.” HEERG furthercommented, “students are required to make decisions, produce recommendations, compare,balance competing factors, identify variations, justify, make changes, and/or develop andevaluate plans. The modules present realistic challenges for which
different design studiocompetitions that can be used over at a four year cycle without repetition.Finding a Publisher Publishers will want to see a book proposal (or prospectus) to see if it fits their publishingneeds. Each publisher has their own suggested proposal format, but they typically include 1) anoutline of the text (list of chapters, special features, educational goals, approximate length etc.),2) planned on-line supplements, 3) brief author biographies, 4) a description of competing books,and 5) the size of the prospective student audience (such as to which courses it applies - toestimate the sales market). It is not recommended to write a book proposal before completing atleast several draft chapters. Writing a textbook is a long
solutions had to be checked. Finally, eachlaboratory exercise was either edited to correspond to material in the new textbook, revised toupdate the exercise, or developed from scratch. During the second semester of coursemodifications, additional laboratory modifications were implemented. The laboratorymodifications took a lot more time to implement than originally planned, which was the mostsignificant challenge in this project. All of these changes made it frustrating (at times) for the students because the lecturenotes, problem solutions, and/or laboratory exercises were made available only 1-2 days beforethey were covered. (As a side note, even when they were made available several days before theywere covered, few students actually
) Eng. (3) 2. ENG 204- World Literature II 5. HIS 102-World History II 3. Art/Music Electives 6. Social Science MTH 125 MTH 126 MTH 227 MTH 238 ME 312 & L ME 481 ME 482 Calculus I (4) Calculus II (4) Calculus III Differential Heat/Mass Quality and Oprtn. Plan & (4) Equations (3) Transfer (3) Reliability (3) Sch. (3) CHE 101/L PHY 105 PHY 106
topics, and nearly three out of four respondents believed it important that students study or participate in an internship abroad at some point. The preferences of college-bound high school students are especially interesting in this regard. Eighty-six percent said they planned to participate in international courses or programs, and almost 50 percent expressed an interest in study abroad. That is a substantially higher rate than the 3 percent who currently go abroad and, if these preferences materialize, even somewhat, presages a substantial increase in demand. 2. The availability of other forms of campus-based international preparation was also im- portant. Nearly 8 out of 10 national survey respondents remarked that the
year-long design course. This courseplays the critical role of keeping students engaged in engineering while giving them experiencesthat have been shown to promote retention (see discussion below under “Utilization of BestPractices”).Each year of the curriculum has themes that we plan to emphasize. These are shown in Figure 2.In the first two years, we emphasize engineering basics and systems thinking. Two courses inthe sophomore year have been added to promote these themes and two existing laboratories wereadjusted. The two sophomore-level courses are Materials Selection for the Life Cycle, andNanotechnology, Biology, Ethics and Society. Both courses emphasize systems thinking, thefirst in the design process, the second through articulating
Nanoscale Issues in Manufacturing.” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE AnnualConference. Available CD ROM.3. Hallacher, P.M., D.E. Fenwick, and S.J. Fonash. “Pathways from Community College toBachelors of Science in Engineering with a Nanotechnology Minor.” Proceedings of the 2003ASEE Annual Conference. Available CD ROM.4. Alpert, C.L., J.A. Isaacs, C.M.F. Barry, G.P. Miller, and A.A. Busnaina. “Nano’s Big Bang:Transforming Engineering Education and Outreach.” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE AnnualConference. Available CD ROM5. Hallacher, P.M., D.E. Fenwick, and S.J. Fonash. “A Regional Center for ManufacturingEducation in Nanofabrication.” Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference. AvailableCD ROM.6. Walters, R. and A. Lozano. “Planning for the Future
members began looking for an answer for our testing purposes. Throughresearch, discussing with several faculty members in the Engineering Technology Departmentand the Aerospace Department, came up with a plan to test our model. First we needed a model.The team drew a model in Inventor 8 and built a model out of Styrofoam using a FadalVMC3016. With the testing completed, the main factors that had to be improved were theweight and the angle of the hull. The team knew that the lighter the hull, the better the results,but after the DOE we knew by how much. The angle of the hull was critical. If the team had nottested the design, the angle of attack initially chosen would have been devastating. Now that allof the unknowns were solved, the craft was
knowledge gained primarily in the classessuch as: ECET 209 – Introduction to Microcontrollers, ECET 303 – Communication I, ECET367– Internetworking and TCP/IP, and ECET 455 –C++ Object Oriented Programming.However, most important part was the aptitude the students acquire in the ECET program foridentifying problems around us, researching on the topic and the components and subsystems.The lessons learned to do feasibility study and preparing time-line plan and task division andexecution were part of the excellent course in ECET 397 –Directed Project Engineering. Manyinstances came when the task seemed impossible; however, the persistence and applicationopened the path to new solutions. Two of the examples were to solve the problem of isolation
spam analysis, email spam buster software will be useful for computer forensics,spyware buster software will be useful for operating system security or object oriented softwaredesign, intrusion detection system will be useful for operating system security etc.The evolvement of these security modules into a good courseware and the feedback from thestudents will be the topics for the future papers. The author also plan to cooperate with thecolleagues from ECE department in the college of engineering, Computer Science Department inthe college of science, and Computer Information System department in the college of businessfor the exchange and cooperation of security education modules development.It is also possible that different instructors of
Geek Civilization: Amateur Radio and First-Year Projects To Improve Recruitment and Retention In an ECET ProgramAbstractThis paper describes the author’s current efforts and future plans to restore the path which ledmany of today’s senior professionals into electronic technology. That path usually began in theteenage years with an interest in amateur radio and tinkering with electronics, followed by mathand science courses in high school, then pursuit of a degree in engineering or technology.Unfortunately, that path has nearly disappeared over the last twenty-five years or so because ofthe evolution of electronic technology in ways that make it seem less accessible to tinkerers andamateur radio operators and because electronic
departments. We have offered the workshop four times to a total over 60 faculty membersfrom around the United States. This paper will describe the workshop, the intended outcomes,feedback from the faculty involved, the curriculum, and future plans. We will also discuss issuesrelated to recruiting faculty, integration of faculty with different backgrounds, and ongoingfaculty support.IntroductionThe growing need for information security professionals is well documented. Few universitiesoffer a comprehensive program in information assurance and security. The end result is a severeshortage of graduates proficient in the technology and policy issues critical to the security of theinformation infrastructure. While several universities have started programs
public school curriculum.It is not clear how students were able to correctly answer these questions (especially on the 2005test where they had to write out explicit answers). We plan to add supplemental survey questionsto each Olympiad question for the 2006 Olympiad. These survey questions will ask if thismaterial was covered in school (and in what class), through their robotics activities or learned ontheir own.International Robot Olympiad in KoreaThe 2004 and 2005 International Robot Olympiads (IRO) were held in Korea [17]. The IROcompetitions are part of the Federation of International Robot Soccer Association (FIRA)program chaired by Prof. Jong Hwan Kim of the Korean Advanced Institute of Science andTechnology (KAIST). The Olympiad offers a
Company.Jones, M.D., (1998). The Thinker’s Toolkit: Fourteen Powerful Techniques for Problem Solving,New York: Three Rivers Press. p. 5.Juran, J. M. (1986). The Quality Trilogy: A Universal Approach to Managing Quality, Thispaper was presented at the ASQC 40th Annual Quality Congress in Anaheim, California, May20, 1986. p.2.Kowalkowski, F. F. and McElyea, L., (1996). Enterprise Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper SaddleRiver, N.J.Laware, G., (1993). Achieving Business Goals through Information Systems TechnologyHandbook of Information Systems, Boston, MA. Auerbach Publishing, S3-S22.Martin, J., (1990), Information Engineering: Book II Planning and Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 11th Edition, Merriam
Development in the Division of Science and Mathematics Education at Michigan State University. He is responsible for providing vision, direction, planning and implementation for using technology mathematics and science education and developed several introductory computer science courses for non-computer science students serving 2000 students per semester. Page 11.586.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Enhancing Learning of Low Performance Students in Multi-section Freshman Lecture/Laboratory ClassesAbstractBecause of a scheduling “glitch,” in fall semester, 2004, our large
2006-1392: ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF CRITICAL THINKING INSTRUCTIONUPON THE PREPARATION OF FRESHMAN STUDENTS TO PURSUEADVANCED DEGREES IN ENGINEERINGAnnette Donawa, Morgan State University/CAMRA Annette Mallory Donawa is currently working on her Ph.D. in Higher Education and Administration at Morgan State University. Within the NASA-sponsored Center of Advanced Microwave Research and Applications (CAMRA), she assists the Director, Dr. Carl White, with strategic planning, in addition to staff and project management. Her engineering education research is focused on assessing the impact of teaching critical thinking to African American engineering students. The goal is to prepare and motivate
the federalrequirements. A key component of NCLB is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). AYP measuresyear-to-year changes in student participation and achievement on the statewide tests and otheracademic indicators. Ever year the AYP objective is increased, so that all students will berequired to pass the statewide tests by the year 2014. If AYP is not met, the school will sufferpenalties under the NCLB legislation. A school will enter the “In Need of Improvement” planafter two consecutive years of failing to meet the AYP. The “In Need of Improvement” plan isclearly documented on the Georgia Department of Education website, and lists consequences forten years of consequences in the “In Need of Improvement” plan3. The table below
planned design modifications, and to evaluate the impact on cost,performance, and safety of the modifications. Page 11.1041.5 The fifth assignment essentially required repetitive performance analysis, and to identifyadditional modifications. It also required students to conduct a two-hour test. The sixthassignment was similar, and also required the cooler's performance be shown graphically on apsychrometric chart. Students brought to class the finished coolers for a demonstration of itsoperation, and each team gave a 10-minute presentation for the seventh assignment. The coolerswere graded based on performance, safety, budget, style, and
most of these tools, provide details on project progress, and willidentify additional useful tools which we plan to build on top of the current system.IntroductionAuthoring costs have placed limitations on the level of experimentation and testing whicheducators would have liked to carry out with learning objects technology. This is particularly soif what is desired is the production of multimedia, interactive and active, learning objects. Bythese we mean learning objects that provide a substantial degree of engagement with the learner.Today this is a requirement for educational learning object material which may hope to meet theexpectations of the constructivist learning-theorist, not to mention the expectations of studentsstepped into game
the different ways to utilize inquiry to promote deeper understanding.RET Program: Polytechnic University also hosts an intensive summer research and trainingexperience in mechatronics for 10 teachers/year under an NSF funded Research Experience forTeachers (RET) program. The RAISE Fellows supported the RET project as follows: during thefirst two weeks of guided training of teachers, the undergraduate RAISE Fellows served as labassistants and during the final two weeks of the independent research experience phase, thegraduate RAISE Fellows served as project advisors to the teachers, assisting them with theirresearch planning and implementation.7. Conclusion The RAISE Fellows have created a series of modern sensor-based activities for
will discuss the theoreticalframework, methodology, and results of each of the two research questions. This is followed by asection which discusses implications of this work.What important concepts in electric circuits and engineering mechanics do students finddifficult to learn?Theoretical frameworkWe chose to use Delphi methodology to gather expert opinions about which concepts in electriccircuits and in engineering mechanics that were both important and difficult to learn. The Delphimethod is a technique that elicits, refines, and draws upon the collective opinion and expertise ofa panel of experts [4]. Delphi methodology has been used to elicit information and judgmentsfrom experts on anything from planning to problem-solving to decision
Op. cit, note 1, 2005.JOHN O. MINGLE, Ph.D., J.D.Emeritus Professor of Engineering, Kansas State UniversityFirst started teaching chemical engineering in the late 1950’s and experienced significant changes in engineeringeducation during the 1960 - 70’s. Obtained J.D. in the 80’s, retired from teaching nuclear engineering in the early90’s and continues to practice patent law. Served as professor and advisor for co-author Roberts in the 60’s-70’s.TOM C. ROBERTS, P.E., CMCAssistant Dean, Recruitment and Leadership Development, College of Engineering, Kansas State UniversityTom has more than 30 years experience in planning, organizational development, and leadership training programs.He worked for Black & Veatch for 16 years, formed Upward
perceived by students tobe more helpful to their learning than the flashcards. Finally, 65% of the students believed thatthey would have performed worse in a course in which rapid feedback was not provided, whilethe remainder believed they would have performed at the same level.The rapid feedback also had impacts on the authors as instructors. Regardless of the feedbackmethod, we had to be more organized for each class and to plan ahead in preparing skill andconcept questions and placing them appropriately in the lecture period. We also found thatposing the feedback question was useful to get students to refocus or review, even if a questionwas created “on the spot” during class. We observed that the students took the feedback quizzesquite
Page 11.1060.10be capable of performing the mask-preparation process. These systems are available at asignificantly lower cost than the X2-660 used in our work. Although the process has not beenattempted on a double-sided board, we expect that the consistent quality of the final product, dueto accurately registered masking on both sides of the board, will greatly reduce the time andeffort to produce a one-of-a-kind double-sided board.Figure 8. Completed triac driver board.ConclusionsA prototyping process using an engraving laser has been developed that shows promise tostreamline the process of making small quantities of prototype PCBs. It has been tested in thefabrication of small single-sided PCBs; we plan to extend the process to larger
, and a floormanager. These characters introduce the visitor to the tools (e.g. injection molders and Page 11.584.2extruders) and tasks that he or she engages in – like machine calibration and the routingof materials to machines on a factory floor. The third game, Business as Usual,introduces the visitor to strategic planning, and asks the user to decide how to investcapital to best encourage sustained growth.Figure 1. The Design Station, the first of three exhibits installed in the Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum.The remainder of this section describes the design rationales underpinning the games inthis exhibit, with particular attention towards the