(ME). Presently, there is a notableabsence of engineering laboratories available to any Keiser University students. Thus, theintroduction of this facility will provide invaluable hands-on learning experiences for all STEMstudents.The connection between theory and practice has long been recognized as one of the mostchallenging aspects to teach in engineering education. Hands-on experience in a laboratoryenvironment offers a vital tool to solidify concepts covered in lecture courses. The proposedproject aims to significantly enhance undergraduate instruction related to recent trends anddevelopments in emerging technologies, including alternative energy, drone technology, andbiotechnology. The laboratory will supplement various engineering
chemicalengineering majors. The course is also open to juniors and other engineering / sciencemajors when space is available. It is a four-credit course, meeting twice weekly for twohours. This block schedule was adopted in order to allow flexibility in the use of classtime, as described below. It is a “permission” course, having no formal pre- or co-requisites listed, although the course relies on students’ coursework in mass and energybalances, heat transfer, thermodynamics, and chemistry to a significant extent.We wanted to have a food-safe laboratory available as part of this course so that studentscould not only prepare and assess food products, but also taste what they had made. Westrongly suggest that anyone wishing to bring this course to their
’ commitment and planning efforts. The instructors should meet to discuss the scope of the collaboration and the length of the planned interactions. COIL activities can range from 3 weeks to an entire semester of combined teaching. Aspects to consider include time zone differences, languages, the number of participating students, and the students’ level (e.g., senior vs. sophomore) of the engineering courses at both institutions. Instructors should also discuss previous experiential learning opportunities for students of different backgrounds. Some students may not know about co-ops, teaching laboratories, internships, or volunteering/service opportunities, which promote multicultural learning
concepts in engineeringmechanics courses in order to maximize the effectiveness of experiential learning lab modulesfor students due to the limited laboratory sessions available in one semester.The survey is focused on obtaining a student perspective regarding the most difficult coursetopics, but also included education professionals in order to capitalize on their regular experienceof teaching the concepts in the classroom. The survey was distributed via email using a Googleform link, with conditional settings to skip questions in which the recipient self-identified as nothaving relevant experience (i.e. if the student had not taken dynamics yet, the student was notasked to rank the dynamics topics in order of difficulty). For this reason, the
AC 2010-1107: HOW STUDENT-FACULTY INTERACTIONS INFLUENCESTUDENT MOTIVATION: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY USINGSELF-DETERMINATION THEORYKatherine Winters, Virginia Tech Katherine Winters is a doctoral student and Graduate Teaching Fellow in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She has a M.S. in Civil Engineering and a B.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Brigham Young University. Her research interests include engineering student motivation and identity.Holly Matusovich, Virginia Tech Holly Matusovich is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Matusovich recently joined Virginia Tech after completing her doctoral degree in Engineering
Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD). Dr. Wood completed his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in the Division of Engineering and Applied Science at the California Institute of Technology, where he was an AT&T Bell Laboratories Ph.D. Scholar. Dr. Wood joined the faculty at the University of Texas in September 1989 and established a computational and experimental laboratory for research in engineering design and manufacturing, in addition to a teaching laboratory for prototyping, reverse engineering measurements, and testing. During his academic career, Dr. Wood was a Distinguished Visiting Professor at the United States Air Force Academy. Through 2011, Dr. Wood was a Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Design
7 3% 4%Table 2 shows the employment categories of the respondents. The mismatch between Educatorand College employed is 69 to 91, but a similar ratio has been seen before and can be explained Page 25.1276.3by non-teaching College employees doing administration and outreach activities. Thedistribution of responses indicates a strong presence of opinions from manufacturers.Table 2 - Responses to ‘Your Employer’Your Employer No. % 2012 % 2011College or University 91 43% 45%K-12 School
and inclusion. She has served as PI and co-PI for grants from multiple sponsors including NSF and Amazon totaling more than $9M. In addition, her STEM outreach programs and curricula have impacted hundreds of thousands of K-12 students nationwide. She is the co- founder and director of Georgia Tech’s K-12 InVenture Prize, a statewide invention competition, open to all students and teachers in Georgia. She earned her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign in 2007, and her Masters and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2009 and 2012. Dr. Moore received the Georgia Tech Teaching Effectiveness Award in 2018.Michael Helms Dr. Michael Helms is a Senior Research
research groups [7]. The interactions of thesetwo factors (e.g., advisors and peers) play a crucial role in a student's performance in researchenvironments [7]. Graduate students are often engaged in faculty-led laboratories (or research groups) andcollaborative teams as students develop both their teaching and research skills [7, 16, 17].Depending on the size of the research group, faculty advisors' roles and interactions might vary(e.g., large-size, mid-size, or sub-size) [7]. Crede and Borrego found that there were substantialdifferences in the perceived roles and interactions between faculty and graduate students acrossdifferent sized labs [7]. In particular, large-sized groups appeared to be run more like smallbusinesses (i.e
domestic undergraduate students in focus in the United States higher education institutions. In addition, Mr. Halkiyo is interested in broadening the participation of engineering edu- cation in Ethiopian universities to increase the diversity, inclusivity, equity, and quality of Engineering Education. He studies how different student groups such as women and men, rich and poor, students from rural and urban, and technologically literate and less literate can have quality and equitable learning experiences and thrive in their performances. In doing so, he focuses on engineering education policies and practices in teaching and learning processes, assessments, laboratories, and practical internships. Mr. Halkiyo has been
deformation can be an obstacle to structural mechanicseducation and learning. Teaching structural mechanics is traditionally delivered by a primarylecture component usually complemented by structural laboratory demonstrations. While thelecture component covers the theoretical concepts and derivations, the laboratory demonstrationsare known to improve the students’ understanding of the concepts through observation andexperimentation. Students often work with line drawings of members with idealized loadings andboundary conditions, but struggle to understand the dimensional reduction of load path (i.e. 3Dcombined loading reduced to member force effects) within a multi-story building systems [1, 2].Other shortcomings in traditional modes of teaching
collaborative instructors with like-minded teaching goals. Well organized EML online-modules such as elevator pitch makes deployment easy to implement in the engineering classroom [15]. Inthis semester-long project, students were introduced to new engineering topics in lecture, they practicedtechniques in mini labs, and then applied the knowledge to their project while considering theentrepreneurial mindset at every step. In this paper, we hypothesized that an EML module that utilized aproject-based approach would improve student engagement, improve technical laboratory and writing skillsand foster student’s curiosity to learn about human body motion. This project led to a mastery in kinematics,kinetics and human body motion technology with a stronger
will be links to previous labsfor review purposes, and perhaps even to those from previous courses. In the future, we intend to provide data acquisition hardware and software for the PC’sand corresponding Web-based instruction. Students will be able to acquire data, analyze iton the PC, and design and construct controllers while in the laboratory. We believe thatthis idea has applications to continuing education, worker training, and documentation ofmaintenance and repair procedures in industry.7 ConclusionThis paper has discussed the design and implementation of tutorials for teaching Matlab forcontrol system design and analysis using the World Wide Web. The primary advantages ofthese education aids are their wide accessibility and
EducationInfusing engineering-related concepts into K-12 level curriculum is a rather new initiative forpublic school teachers in the United States, especially those who teach technology education.Maurice Thomas, in a paper presented at the Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher EducationConference, stated that “Technology education has the opportunity to become a partner withengineering and benefit from their image, support, and political power. Many argue that we[technology education] would gain a great deal and lose little because engineering content fitscomfortably with technology education objectives and content.”1 Many technology teachers,however, wonder if this new initiative is viable for the future of the technology educationprofession, or that
Paper ID #26996Execution Details and Assessment Results of a Summer Bridge Program forEngineering FreshmenMrs. Rezvan NazempourProf. Houshang Darabi, University of Illinois, Chicago Dr. Houshang Darabi is an Associate Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering in the Depart- ment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (MIE) at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). Dr. Darabi is the recipient of multiple teaching and advising awards including the UIC Award for Excellence in Teaching (2017), COE Excellence in Teaching Award (2008, 2014), UIC Teaching Recognitions Award (2011), and the COE Best Advisor
Paper ID #12140Fostering the entrepreneurial mindset through the development of multidis-ciplinary learning modules based on the ”Quantified Self” social movementDr. Eric G Meyer, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Meyer directs the Experimental Biomechanics Laboratory (EBL) at LTU with the goal to advance experimental biomechanics understanding. Dr. Meyer teaches Introduction to Biomechanics, Tissue Mechanics, Engineering Applications in Orthopedics and Cellular and Molecular Mechanobiology. He has been an active member of the engineering faculty committee that has redesigned the Foundations of Engineering Design
industrial application such aspharmaceutical and specialty chemicals. Software companies are constantly increasing thecapability of simulators to include novel technology and expand their applications market.In the last twenty years simulators have also become much more user friendly and have beenexpanded to incorporate equipment design and costing tools. As a result, Chemical Engineeringprograms throughout the nation started using them for a variety of reasons. Some professors seeprocess simulators as a must-do-must-teach so students are familiarized with their use by thetime they graduate. In this case process simulators are generally introduced during the seniordesign sequence or simply in plant design courses. Others have found in process
contract number DAAH04-96-1-0449.undergraduate level. Since the author’s area of expertise lies primarily in the realm of digital signal andimage processing, the injection of research opportunities into the curriculum was limited to regularteaching assignments and more informal student advisement related to these topics. Several advantagesand disadvantages of this teaching mode are provided, in which student evaluation comments are used toassess the utility of education/research integration. This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes background information regardingeducation/research integration, including project categories and research productivity ratings as definedby the author. A number of research and design-oriented
mostly lectureand laboratory based (Grayson, 1993). Engineers learn and exercise their theories and practiceswithin particular social settings - within classrooms, within a laboratory, and during the designreview (Bucciarelli, 2001 , p. 298). In this study we consider the studio environment as a socialclassroom setting (where some laboratory facilities are within the students reach) and wherestudents are engage in the process of design. IStudio Model Page 24.1113.2 A slightly different teaching and learning model in technical education is the “studio model”(Little & Cardenas, 2001). According to Kuhn (2001), Little and Cardenas (2001
Paper ID #6416The State of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in Engineering Educa-tion: Where do we go from here?Dr. Flora S Tsai, Singapore University of Technology and Design Dr. Flora Tsai is a lecturer at Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) and an associate lecturer at Singapore Institute of Management (UniSIM). She has over eleven years of teaching experience for undergraduate software engineering subjects. She was a graduate of MIT, Columbia University, and NTU. Dr Tsai’s current research focuses on developing intelligent techniques for data mining in text and social media. Her recent awards
Institute for Leadership in Technology and Manage- ment and from 2003 through 2007 as Associate Dean of the College of Engineering. In 2003 he received Bucknell’s Christian R. and Mary F. Lindback Award for Distinguished Teaching. Prof. Buffinton’s scholarly interests range across the areas of multibody dynamics, nonlinear control, mechanical design, systems thinking, entrepreneurship, engineering management education, and his pri- mary research focus, the dynamics and control of robotic systems. He has been the recipient of external grants from a number of funding agencies including the National Science Foundation, the Office of Naval Research, the Ben Franklin Technology Center of Pennsylvania, and most recently the
IUCEE Young leader for his contribution. He was elected as the Vice-President of the In- ternational Federation for Engineering Education Societies (IFEES) during World Engineering Education Forum which was held in Florence, Italy in 2015. His areas of interests include policy in higher education, integration of technology and entrepreneurship in engineering education, and service learning.Mr. Nick A. Stites, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Nick A. Stites is pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests include developing novel pedagogical methods to teach core engineering courses, leveraging technology to enhance learning experiences, and increasing the
Teacher Education (NE-ASTE) where faculty, researchers, and educators inform STEM teaching and learning and inform policy.Dr. Vikram Kapila, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a DR K-12 research project, and an ITEST re- search project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and con- trol system technology. Under a Research Experience
whether that class is a laboratory, alecture or a design class. Unfortunately, the form is usually directed toward classroomperformance in lecture classes with questions like: • Did instructor presented material clearly and effectively? • Did the instructor encouraged interaction with the class? • Was the teaching assistance available and helpful? • Did the facilities adequately met course needs?These questions hardly seem appropriate for a course with no lectures, with no teachingassistants and for studio courses that must be held in a lecture room because no otherfacilities are provided. Finally, instructor/student interaction is desirable for the studentwhen the student has the choice. When students are forced to participate
Paper ID #40289What Difference Does Difference Make? A Case Study of Racial and EthnicDiversity in a Summer Intensive Research InstituteTryphenia B. Peele-Eady, Ph.D., University of New Mexico Dr. Tryphenia B. Peele-Eady is an Associate Professor of Language, Literacy, and Sociocultural Studies in the College of Education and Human Sciences at the University of New Mexico, where she specializes in African American education and ethnographic research. Her reserach focuses on the social, cultural, and linguistic contexts of teaching and learning practices, particularly in the African American community, and culturally
electrical engineering from Tsinghua University,Beijing, China, in 1995 and 1997 respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from theUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2002. From 1997 to 2002, he was a research assistant at theDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.From 2002 to 2005, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the Electromagnetics Laboratory in theUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He was an Assistant Professor with the Department ofElectrical Engineering, the University of Texas at Arlington from 2005 to 2012. He joined the Departmentof Electrical and Computer Engineering, West Virginia University Institute of Technology in 2012, and
INTRODUCTIONBudget cuts and r1s1ng enrollments in Colleges of Engineering acrossthe nation are becoming facts of life. The question is what effectsare these two recurring problems having on the quality of engineeringeducation?Within the past 1-2 years, there has been increasing concern overrapidly rising enrollments in the College of Engineering at theUniversity of \:!isconsin-Madison. Projections made by the engineeringadministration showed the expected enrollments to be far above thenumber of students the College could effectively teach with thefaculty and facilities available. During the period of increasingenrollments (1974-present) the College of Engineering experienced anenrollment increase of more than 100% with no significant budgetincrease
and have been used by students to copy homework solutions sothat faculty have changed how they assign, collect and grade homework.4 The use of Chegg tocomplete homework has encouraged departments to recommend relatively low weights tohomework5,6. Some students have a blurred idea of what is academic dishonesty, especially onhomework7. In many places, homework is not a substantial part of the grade so it is acceptable toreceive online help on homework.8 Some instructors avoid traditional homework and use projects toassess student learning, yet it appears the online tutors are available to not only solve problems butwrite papers and laboratory reports. There appears to be a growing market for online tutoring servicesto help students solve
AC 2009-1468: MANAGING COURSE OFFERING RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS INNEWER GRADUATE PROGRAMS THROUGH SPECIAL TOPICS COURSESBimal Nepal, Texas A&M UniversityPaul Lin, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne Page 14.858.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Managing course offering resource constraints in newer graduate programs through special topics coursesIntroductionMost new graduate programs face many challenges including lower initial enrollments, limitededucational resources such as laboratory equipment, faculty lines, and under developed or“work-in-process” curriculum. While the institution has its resource constraints, the studentsmay
opportunities education majors have to practicediscourse development prior to their student teaching practicum. Discourse simulation activitiesat universities prior to student teaching and internships are often insufficient to prepare teachersfor engaging in discourse with students throughout an entire school day.Traditional Methods of Discourse DevelopmentTraditionally, discourse development begins with pre-service teachers’ own understanding ofmath and science based upon how they were taught when they were first learning the material.Most education programs require pre-service teachers to take at least one laboratory-basedscience course and to complete mathematics courses. Once the students have a foundation inmath and science, they then take courses