efficiency possible from the powercycle? 1 4 3 2 Figure 3a: T-S diagram for Rankine Cycle Figure 3b: Devices in Rankine Power CycleThe temperature entropy (T-S) diagram and the states at the inlet and outlet of the devices areshown in Figures 3a and 3b. For maximum efficiency it can be surmised the power plant willoperate under a Rankine cycle with an isentropic turbine and pump. Ignoring the kinetic and Figure 4a: State Panel (Given P = 2MPa and T=400oC determines all other properties)potential energy effects, the efficiency can be determined using Equation (1) with the enthalpiesat all the states: (ℎ1−ℎ2)−(ℎ4−ℎ3) 𝑛
theirintern(s). For example, they had to actively encourage confused interns to ask questions.Similarly, the mentors learned that the interns were not always willing to admit when they didnot understand new material. I learned that I should encourage students I am working with to ask more questions earlier on and that I should be more active in confirming that my explanations are adequate. I can do this by asking the student to write in words what I have asked them to do or to show me after they do the first step. I learned that even when a student says they understand and gives a one sentence summary it does not necessarily mean that they understand. I have learned to think from the student side and make
viewof ethics, where the engineer is strongly coupled to the system they affect through their work,provides the opportunity for more meaningful feedback through narrative construction [39]; atopic that will be addressed in future work.Bibliography[1] W. R. Bowen, Engineering Ethics: Outline of an Aspirational Approach. London: Springer-Verlag, 2009.[2] K. Rayne, T. Martin, S. Brophy, N. Kemp, J. D. Hart, and K. R. Diller, “The Development of adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, pp. 165–174, 2006.[3] W. Carpenter, “Teaching Ethics To Engineers,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2004, p. 13862.[4] M. A. Selby, “Assessing Engineering Ethics Training
, Power system Author 6 Mechanical Engr. student Liquid cooling systemTable 3: Team CrayowulfFor SBCs, the team chose the Nvidia Jetson TX-2 because each board has a six-core 2-GHzARMv8 64-bit CPU complex, a 1.3-GHz 256-core GPU, and 8 GB of memory. The TX-2’s GPUprovides vector-like SIMD processing, and the vast majority of the current top ten supercomputersin the world are powered by GPUs [20].In October, the team got to work, with Author 6 researching liquid cooling systems and how onemight be designed for the Nvidia Jetson TX-2 SBCs, Author 5 researching post-quantumencryption algorithms and how they might be implemented on a cluster, Author 3 researching thehardware to be purchased, as well as Beowulf cluster system
practice. Then, transfer that knowledge and experience to the final steps in theprocess, when they are fully immersed abroad.The guided CIAs are individual writing, out-of-class assignments that are followed by in-classdiscussions on the significance of the analyses. The papers are structured around the threequestions [24] given below for CIA #1:1. What? – A brief description of: o the most salient emotion(s) experienced so far in your attempt to contextualize and define the design problem o the incident, encounter or activity that evoked the emotion(s)2. So What? o How has the experience impacted your assumptions, expectations and perspectives of the co-learners or design process?3. Now What? o What specific
2017 Mid-Atlantic American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland, 2017.[2] D. M. Schutz, D. Dionne, and Y.-Y. Kim, "The Impact of Veterans and Curriculum Heterogeneity on Online Graduate Engineering Program Performance: An Empirical Study," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 2017, pp. 1-11: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).[3] S. Wasserman, "The Pros and Cons of Online Engineering Masters Degrees," in ENGINEERING.com, ed. Mississauga, Ontario, Canada: ENGINEERING.com, Inc., 2015.[4] C. A. Cate, "Million Records Project: Research from Student Veterans of America," S. V. o
KLI framework, for instance, but toposition it as a necessary and useful framework to balance constraining more of complexity withcapturing more of it. Furthermore, giving students practice with exploring and capturing complexphenomena is becoming ever more important in a world of increasing collaboration andincreasingly complex phenomena. All instruction molds more than just what knowledge we holdin our minds. Integrative pluralism might be a framework to help us attend to that “more”productively and consciously.References[1] S. Lane, A. Karatsolis, and D. R. Sadoway, “Materials Science and Engineering Reasoning: A New Tool for Helping Students See the Big Picture,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New
groups of one to three students to do their respective projects depending on thecomplexity of the project they chose. To get the highest grades in the project, we encouragedstudents to do projects involved with data collection from sensor(s), communicated wirelessly tothe cloud and pulled from the cloud. In this manner, students experienced an end-to-end IoTecosystem endeavor.Some of the projects the students performed are as follows: The mobile-phone accelerometer data was uploaded to IBM Blue Mix and downloaded and presented in real-time TI tags’ data was stored in the cloud (IBM IoT Watson) Used Arduino Uno to store data from a MyoWare ™ muscle sensor and a DHTII temperature sensor in IBM Quickstart Used
knowledge Acquisition of knowledge Time & resource Initiated by instructor but Instructor management have to be managed by student(s) Level of self-direction High Medium to high Level of collaboration and High Low to medium role differentiationLiterature on Simulation EducationSimulation has become one of the critical courses in IE curriculum especially after the 90s withthe increased computerization and computational power in business organizations and highereducation institutions. A wide spectrum of simulation software packages and languages are stillin-use at various institutions worldwide. Literature
furtherFigure 6: The 30-day challenge problems helped me to understand the applicationof course topics to engineering practiceAppendix A: Three challenge problems from Class A Thirty-Day Dynamics Challenge Challenge Problem 2Projectile Motion and Impact: Just for fun, a golfer throws a golf ball horizontallythrough the air and watches it bounce again and again down a long straight concretepath. The ball is thrown horizontally from a height of h0 = 1.5 m with an initialspeed of V0 = 28 m/s. The coefficient of restitution between the golf ball and theconcrete is e = 0.92.(A) Determine the maximum vertical height the golf ball will reach after its third bounce, h3.(B) Determine a formula for the maximum
in examples, case studies, etc. Table 3. Perceptions of MUET faculty regarding course improvements due to participation in CMP My participation in the CMP has improved… Average* a. The learning objectives of my course(s). 4.4 b. The technical content of my course(s). 4.5 c. The student learning assessments I use in my course(s). 4.0 d. The experiential learning elements in my course(s). 4.3 e. The mainstreaming of gender (i.e., inclusion of readings or 2.9** assignments that highlight gender related issues) in
culturally desirable shape of a fish6. Thisexample underscores that value is ultimately in the eye of the beholder(s), and includesperceptions founded within cultural norms and other individual preferences. Another exampleincludes the notion of value within behavioral economics, a field founded on contextualizedeconomic preferences.Other common concepts of value is that it is relative, perceived by the user or customer, and thatit may be situational, seasonal, or temporal7. The perceived value of a snow shovel or bottle ofwater would be vastly different considering a seasonal viewpoint of summer or wintertime.Results from the field of systems engineering provide additional insights into system modelingand value8,9,10. Key findings here include that
- versity. She has a Ph.D. in Experimental Social Psychology from Saint Louis University and has been involved in academic assessment for over 20 years.Dr. Sarah L. Strout, Worcester State University Dr. Sarah Strout is the Assistant Vice President for Assessment and Planning at Worcester State University and was the Associate Director of Assessment at Radford University.Dr. Prem Uppuluri, Radford University Prem Uppuluri is a Professor of Computer Science at Radford University. His primary interests are in cyber security and computer science education. Dr. Uppuluri’s work is supported by grants from NSF and NSA. He is the PI of the NSF S-STEM project titled RU-Nextgen (2014-18) c American
University of Maryland, Baltimore County c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #22296Mechanical Engineer 1989-1995 EEC Consulting Rockville, MDPresident, Dome Enterprises 1989 - 1993 Bethesda MDHONORS AND AWARDSBest Presentation Award, ICESEEI 2016 : 18th International Conference on Educational Sciences andEffective Educational Instructions. Paris France 2016 Outstanding Service and Commitment to the En-richment of the Science and Technology Program, Eleanor Roosevelt H.S., Greenbelt MD, 05/2003SELECTED PUBLICATIONS1. A. Bouabid, B. Bielenberg, S. Ainane, N. Pasha, ”Learning Outcomes Alignment across
Project Based Service Learning". In Proc.of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2009[2] Engineers Without Borders USA. [Online]. Available: http://www.ewb-usa.org/[3] EPICS - Purdue University. [Online]. Available: http://engineering.purdue.edu/[4] J. Pembridge and M. Paretti. "The Current State Of Capstone Design Pedagogy". In Proc. of ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, 2010[5] S. Reichle, A. Bang, and C. Considine. "International Service Learning Projects For Senior Capstone Projects"in Proc. of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2009[6] J. Duffy, L. Barrington, and M. Heredia. "Recruitment, Retention, And Service Learning In Engineering" inProc. of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2009[7] M. S. Zarske, D. T
change request 10 LCA of efficient airplane Comparison between Results for water table wings experimental and experiments computational results Joint ReviewHomework and project assignments are due weekly and cover manufacturing, design andthermo-fluid dynamics. The teaching assistant/s will have office hours with access to the watertable later in the quarter so that students can access the table and conduct tests for the project.Airplanes fly because their wings cause a lift force when air flows past the wings. In addition tothe lift force, the flying airplane experiences thrust, drag, and weight forces (Anderson
., and Tobias, S. “Liberal Studies in Engineering”-Workshop Report, 2015.[2[ Grasso, D., Burkins, M. B., Helble, J. J., and Martinelli, D. “Dispelling the myths of holistic engineering”. In Holistic Engineering Education. Springer New York, 2010, pp. 159-165.[3] Hirsch, L. S., Berliner Heyman, S. L., and Cano, R. M. (June, 2016). “Comparisons of a Female-Only, Male-Only, and Mixed-Gender Engineering Enrichment Program for 4th Graders”. Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.[4] NGSS Lead States. “Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states”. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2013.[5] NAS-NAE- NRC (National Academy of Sciences- National
Should Be Done? Summary of a Workshop. The NationalAcademies Press.[7] Litzinger, T. A., and Lattuca, L. R. 2014. “Translating Research to Widespread Practice in EngineeringEducation.” In A. Johri, and B. M. Olds eds. Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research.Cambridge University Press.[8] Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. 2010. Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: ASurvey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in US Engineering Departments. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 99 (3), 185-207.[9] Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. 2008. Educating Engineers: Designingfor the Future of the Field. Jossey-Bass.[10] Bodilly, S. J., Glennan, T. K., Kerr, K. A., and Galegher, J. R. 2004
task of learning a new curricular culture tosomehow adopt it or to change their own.References[1] King, A. (1993). From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30-35.[2] Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies ofEngagement: Classroom-Based Practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 1-15.[3] Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership, 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.[4] Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), TheSAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGEPublications, Inc.[5] Dreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). A Five-Stage Model of the Mental
frameworkin engineering. Work evaluating the nature of engagement linked to higher levels of learning inengineering classrooms would provide value feedback to faculty seeking to modify theirclassrooms. Further work is needed in the realm of survey development to better understand theways in which students can provide feedback with accuracy.References[1] R. S. Heller, C. Beil, K. Dam, and B. Haerum, “Student and Faculty Perceptions of Engagement in Engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 253–261, Jul. 2010.[2] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson, “Pedagogies Of Engagement: Classroom Based Practices,” J. Eng. Educ., no. January, pp. 87–101, 2005.[3] H. L. Chen, L. R. Lattuca, and E. R. Hamilton
Cyberspace) universities are offering graduate degrees in cybersecurity,” IEEE Spectr., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 26–26, Jun. 2014.[2] A. Bicak, X. (Michelle) Liu, and D. Murphy, “Cybersecurity Curriculum Development: Introducing Specialties in a Graduate Program,” Inf. Syst. Educ. J., vol. 13, no. 3, p. 2015.[3] S. A. Kumar and S. Alampalayam, “Designing a graduate program in information security and analytics,” in Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Information technology education - SIGITE ’14, 2014, pp. 141–146.[4] M. Ardis and N. R. Mead, “The Development of a Graduate Curriculum for Software Assurance,” in Proceedings of the Seventeenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2011.[5] M
engineering.For future research into reducing attrition, deeper analysis into how students feel about theirmajors may be a better route than looking into their expectations. This could be done throughfurther survey of students or by conducting interviews. While the “Push” and “Pull” data wastoo small to be analyzed further in this study, it does provide a topic for future survey orinterview questions.References[1] M. C. Bottia, E. Stearns, R. A. Mickelson, S. Moller, and A. D. Parker, “The Relationships Among High School STEM Learning Experiences and Students’ Intent to Declare and Declaration of a STEM Major in College,” Teach. Coll. Rec. Teach. Coll. Columbia Univ., vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 1–46, 2015.[2] N. N. Heilbronner, “Stepping
., & LaVaque-Manty, D. (2007). Transforming science andengineering: Advancing academic women. University of Michigan Press.[6] Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women's underrepresentation in science:sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological bulletin, 135(2), 218[7] Gaughan, M., & Bozeman, B. (2016). Using the prisms of gender and rank to interpret researchcollaboration power dynamics. Social Studies of Science, 46(4), 536-558.[8] Pereira, M. D. M. (2010). Higher Education Cutbacks and the Reshaping of EpistemicHierarchies: An Ethnography of the Case of Feminist Scholarship.Sociology, 44(2), 287–304.[9] Amâncio, L. (1993). Género: representações e identidades. Análise das representações
bestpractices. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceeding (pp. 1-18).[2] Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering designthinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of engineering education, 94(1), 103-120.[3] Todd, R. H., & Magleby, S. P. (2004). Evaluation and rewards for faculty involved inengineering design education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 333-340.[4] Hadim, H. A., & Esche, S. K. (2002). Enhancing the engineering curriculum through project-based learning. In Frontiers in education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual (Vol. 2, pp. F3F-F3F).IEEE.[5] Dutson, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., & Sorensen, C. D. (1997). A review of literatureon
. (2014). Resilience assessment for geotechnicalinfrastructure assets. Infrastructure Asset Management, 1(4), 95-104.[5] American Society for Civil Engineers (2009). The Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025.Reston, VA: ASCE.[6] Dong, J. and Chen, P. (2014). A Case Study: How Collaborative PBL Affects Learning ofMinority Students in Engineering Courses at Senior Level. ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Indianapolis, IN.[7] Fernandes, S. R. G. (2014). Preparing graduates for professional practice: findings from a casestudy of Project-based Learning (PBL). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 139, 219-226.[8] Wu, W. and Hyatt, B. (2016). Experiential and project-based learning in BIM for sustainableliving with tiny solar houses. Procedia
Science Foundation under GrantNo. 1744539. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] E.T. Iskander, P.A. Gore Jr., C. Furse, and A. Bergeson, “Gender differences in expressedinterests in engineering-related fields: ACT 30-year data analysis identified trends and suggestedavenues to reverse trends,” Journal of Career Assessment, 21 (4), pp. 599-613, 2013.[2] National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Statistics, Survey of GraduateStudents and Post Doctorates in Science and Engineering. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvygradpostdoc/pub_data.cfm, 2010.[3] E.L
puzzle-dispatchingpolicies 33 combining reinforcement learning with evolutionary techniques 12 .3.3 Synthetic EvoParsons ExperimentWe then designed a simplistic synthetic teacher-learner model that still captured essentialcharacteristics of our target application. We used fixed-length integer vectors as genotypes forboth learners and Parsons puzzles; g1 , g2 , g3 , g4 with each of the 4 genes taking value in[1..NG ]. The student vs. puzzle interaction was approximated by simply summing the valuesin a learner’s genotype (S L ) and summing those of the practice problem (S P ). S L representsthe expected number of attempts taken by the corresponding learner to solve an arbitrarypractice problem. The higher this number, the more the learner is
students within COSE, which supplied the funding for this study.BackgroundTheoretical FrameworkThe framework of Astin’s, Swail’s, and Tinto’s models are, in their simplest interpretation, aboutstudent involvement in their chosen college and program. Astin’s involvement model shows thatthe academic performance of a student is directly correlated to their involvement level within theircollege or program [2, 3]. Tinto theorizes that poor integration into the many facets of college life,including academically and socially, is an early indication of a student having a higher risk ofdropping out [4-6]. Finally, Swail et al.’s analysis of minority retention in institutions of higherlearning yields the Geometric Model of Student Persistence and
Engineering Students," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 27, pp. 1072-1080, 2011.[4] G. M. Novak, Just-in-time teaching : blending active learning with web technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.[5] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, et al., "Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of 11 America, vol. 111, pp. 8410-8415, Jun 10 2014.[6] R. R. Hake, "Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student
given the opportunity to attend and present at national conferences, such theAmerican Society for Engineering Education, and they assist with writing the research papers forthese conferences1, 4, 6. The Society of Peer Mentors has also recently implemented a “PeerMentor of the Month” spotlight award to recognize the students who are working hard behind thescenes.References1. King, S., Fadrigalan, S., Steele, A., Dann, S., & Waggenspack Jr., W.N. (2014). Utilizing a Student Organization to Create a Self-Sustaining Mentorship Program in Engineering. Proceedings from the American Society for Engineering Education. Indianapolis, IN.2. DiSC Assessment & DiSC Test: Explained. (2015, February 1). Retrieved February 1, 2015, from