Session 2530 Problem-Based Freshman Engineering Course Karl A. Smith, Michael Mahler, Jon Szafranski, Dawn Werner University of MinnesotaProblem-based learning (PBL) is undergoing a renaissance in professional education, includingengineering education (Wilkerson & Gijselaers, 1996; ASEE PRISM, 1996). PBL is not a newidea; it had its beginnings in 1969 in the MD program at McMaster University in Hamilton,Ontario, Canada. McMaster graduated it’s first PBL class in 1972. At about the same time theCollege of Human Medicine at Michigan State University implemented a problem-based (Jones,Bieber
Session 2230 Programmed Instruction - Engineered Instruction Re-Visited Wallace Venable West Virginia UniversityAbstractProgrammed Instruction (PI) was one of a number of technologies derived from Behaviorismduring the 1960’s. This paper outlines the elements of PI and summarizes its effective use atWest Virginia University. Behaviorism as a TechnologyAs teachers, our job is to deliver skills and knowledge to our customers. No psychologicalconcept provides more powerful tools to accomplish this task than Behaviorism, a product of
www.fedworld.gov National Institute of Standards & Technology www.nist.gov Sandia National Laboratories www.sandia.govAcademic Sources - Drexel – Materials Engineering www.materials.drexel.edu MIT Materials Science and Engineering www-dmse.mit.edu National Pollution Prevention Center www.umich.edu/~nppcpub Queensland Mining, Minerals, and Materials – mama.minmet.uq.oz.au/~simo Introduction to Material Science (VRML) n/work/index.htm Visualization in Materials Science vims.ncsu.eduOrganizational Sources - The Aluminum Association www.aluminum.org SAMPE
assist graduate students with the academic hiring process; and (6) to develop the skills needed to establish and lead a research program.INTRODUCTIONAs the mean age of ASEE engineering professors is over 50 years, there is the potential for ASEE to fulfillseveral points of its mission statement, “to encourage youth to pursue studies and careers in engineeringand engineering technology; and influence the recruitment and retention of young faculty andunderrepresented groups.” (3) by working with ASEE Student Chapters to prepare future faculty. ASEEcan sponsor events for graduate students, facilitate contact between graduate students and professors, andtake an active role in preparing teaching assistants.To these ends, the University of
opportunitiesThe purpose of this paper is to introduce and describe one department’s, at USMA, attempt atincorporating elements of engineering practice into its’ engineering curriculum. That departmentis the Department of Systems Engineering (DSE). Assessment of the capstone course by thosewho have participated in the course is essential to ensure that the course is producing engineeringgraduates that meet the demands of a rapidly changing technological and work environment.The assessment discussed in this paper was achieved by surveying 2004 graduating seniors.Seniors provided positive feedback on the course’s effectiveness and also offered suggestions forupdating its’ organization and structure.The paper begins with background information of USMA’s
Paper ID #44743Enhancing Engineering Education through MentorshipMrs. Helen Elizabeth Geller, University of Texas at El Paso Helen Geller is the Program Manager for the Center for Research in Engineering and Technology Educa- tion (CREaTE) and the STEMFUERTE grant, funded by the Department of Education at the University of Texas at El Paso. Helen is also a Biology instructor at El Paso Community College.Dr. Peter Golding P.E., University of Texas at El Paso Professor in the Department of Engineering and Leadership at UTEP.Mr. Alejandro GonzalezAnnalisa Perez, University of Texas at El Paso ©American
AC 2009-2228: IMPROVED MATERIALS SCIENCE UNDERSTANDING WITHBLACKSMITHINGDana Medlin, South Dakota School of Mines and TechnologyMichael West, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Michael K. West, Ph.D., Dr. West is an assistant professor in the Materials and Metallurgical Engineering Department at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. His research and teaching interests include physical metallurgy and materials joining. He is also the SDSM&T site director for the NSF funded Center for Friction Stir Processing.Deborah Mitchell, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Deborah Mitchell, MFA, is Associate Professor of Art in the Humanities Department of the South Dakota School
Paper ID #38078Community-focused Senior Design Practicum ProjectsVenkat Allada (Vice Provost for Graduate Studies) Dr. Venkat Allada is a Professor of Engineering Management & Systems Engineering at Missouri University if Science and Technology (Missouri S&T), Rolla, USA. He served as Missouri S&T’s inaugural vice provost of graduate studies from 2007-2017. He served as the 2016-17 chair of the Mid-west Association of Graduate Schools (MAGS). Dr. Allada earned his doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering from University of Cincinnati in 1994. His teaching and research interests are in areas of lean
AC 2007-378: THE DOCTORAL PATHWAY, AN INSTITUTIONAL JOURNEY OFDEVELOPMENTRonald Kane, New Jersey Institute of Technology Ronald S. Kane is Dean of Graduate Studies and Assistant Vice President for Academic Affairs at New Jersey Institute of Technology. Before that he had been Dean of Graduate Studies, Research, and Continuing Professional Education and Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology and before that served as Mechanical Engineering Department Chair at Manhattan College. He has industrial experience in the energy and aerospace industries and worked for a number of years on nuclear safety and alternative energy systems, with focus on modeling and
and at other institutions to advance work on project-based learning. She believes project- based learning holds significant potential for increasing the diversity of students who succeed in college and who persist in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields, and she views her work with the Center as contributing to education reform from the inside out. She holds an M.A. in Developmental Psychology from Clark University and a B.A. in Psychology from Case Western Reserve University. Her background includes working in the field of education evaluation, where she focused primarily on the areas of project-based learning; STEM; pre-literacy and literacy; student life; learning communities; and
: includingdifferences in practices, expectations, norms of interaction, and the culture of school science.This may lead to difficulties with achievement even where interest exists [7, 8].In 2003 we began development of a curriculum for elementary school-aged children that wouldintroduce them to principles of engineering and technology: Engineering is Elementary (EiE).Grounding our work is a belief that individuals, engineering disciplines and solutions, andsociety benefit when all members engage in problem solving, innovation, inquiry, andengineering design. Our materials, therefore, would be designed to reach all children. Our teamwas and continues to be especially committed to attracting, reaching, and engagingunderrepresented, underperforming, and
Rapid Transit district’s 1990’s expansions in the East Bay and SFO Airport at three billion to the New Starts program for the Federal Transit Administration with over a hundred projects and $85 billion in construction value. At the latter, he also acted as source selection board chairman and program COTR for $200 plus million in task order con- tracts for engineering services. Working for the third-largest transit agency in the United States, the Los Angeles County MTA, Michael managed bus vehicle engineering for $1 billion in new acquisitions and post-delivery maintenance support for 2300 vehicles with some of the most complex technology (natural gas engines and embedded systems) in the US transit industry in the
Paper ID #22589Comparing Peer-to-Peer Written Comments and Teamwork Peer Evalua-tions.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in evaluation and research in engineering education, computer science education, teacher education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former
AC 2007-2963: A STUDY OF MINORITY ENGINEERING STUDENTS AND TIMETO COMPLETION OF FIRST YEAR REQUIRED COURSES AT TEXAS A&MUNIVERSITYJorja Kimball, Texas Engineering Experiment Station Dr. Jorja Kimball is the Director of Strategic Research Development office for the Texas Engineering Experiment Station, an agency of the Texas A&M University system. She holds a Ph.D. in Higher Education Administration, BBA and MBA. Her research interests and publications involve engineering education, diversity, and underrepresented engineering groups and issues.Bryan Cole, Texas A&M University Dr. Bryan R. Cole is Professor of Educational Administration in the Department of Educational
Paper ID #40452Tolerance of Ambiguity and Engineering IdentityDr. M. Javed Khan, Tuskegee University Dr. M. Javed Khan is Professor and Head of Aerospace Science Engineering Department at Tuskegee University. He received his Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from Texas A&M University, M.S. in Aero- nautical Engineering from the US Air Force Institute of Technology, and B.E. in Aerospace Engineer- ing from the PAF College of Aeronautical Engineering. He also has served as Professor and Head of Aerospace Engineering Department at the National University of Science and Technology,Pakistan. His research interests
learning how to construct and de- liver online courses. This resulted in a MSEd from Purdue University in Learning Design and Technology (LDT). This widely varied background prepared me well for my next big adventure. Beginning in August 2018 I became the Texas A&M Professor of Practice for the Texas A&M Engineering Academy at Blinn College in Brenham. TAMU Engineering Academies are an innovative approach to providing the planet with more Aggie Engineers. I am a technology learner and and engaged member of the TAMU IEEI (Institute for Engineering Educa- tion and Innovation). My foundations were set by an upbringing on the family ranch near Joshua, Texas and 4 memorable years at Texas A&M where I
(2011); 2) UW College of Education outstanding research award (2015); and 3) UW College of Educa- tion outstanding service award (2016). Her research interests include partnerships with in pre-service and in-service teachers in STEM Education with a focus on engineering education applications. An active member of AERA, ASEE, ASTE, NARST, and NSTA, Dr. Burrows has presented at over 50 conferences, published in ranked journals (e.g. Journal of Chemical Education), reviewed conference proposals (e.g ASEE, AERA), and co-edits the CITE-Science journal. Additionally, she taught high school and middle school science for twelve years in Florida and Virginia, and she was the learning resource specialist for the technology
classes and have been used are also introduced to new technologies, regulatory require- study overseas, and participating students typically earn credit to record lectures for an inverted classroom experience or to Most of the chemical engineering faculty use a hybrid ap- create videotaped lectures for use while faculty attend profes-proach in their classes, combining a variety of content delivery ments, supply chain management concepts, and issues of for two humanities electives from these programs
AC 2007-2356: CIVIL ENGINEERING EDUCATION IN AFGHANISTANM. Keshawarz, University of Hartford M. Saleh Keshawarz is Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Hartford in Connecticut, USA. He has been involved in engineering curriculum issues both in the US and Afghanistan for many years. He has assisted Kabul and Herat universities in Afghanistan in revising their engineeing curricula.MohammadOmar Andar, Kabul University Mohammad Omar Andar is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kabul University. He is currently working on his masters degree in mechanical engineering in Japan. He has been very active in curriculum revision at Kabul
expertise include: teacher education and retention, literacy education, teacher education supervision, multimedia literacy, early childhood special education, deaf education, as well as bilingual elementary teacher education.Fred Meyer, United States Military Academy Colonel Karl F. (Fred) Meyer is an Associate Professor and Civil Engineering Program Director in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy (USMA) at West Point, NY. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia. COL Meyer received a B.S. degree from USMA in 1984, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1993 and 2002
curriculum was formed in the crucible of the cold war.8 Since that time, Page 13.684.2radical changes in transportation, communication, and computer technology9 leave us in a verydifferent world. Popular books such as The World is Flat,10 A Whole New Mind,11 and The Riseof the Creative Class12 suggest that returns to innovation and creativity are especially importantin a world where routine analysis and engineering tasks can be outsourced globally for dimes onthe dollar. Scientific discovery and the integration of technology in everyday life are occurringat an increasing rate. These trends demand a more direct involvement of engineers in
options, mostcame from technology, energy, and utilities. Block also identified four major reasons for notusing real options. 1. Lack of top management support. Managers are not willing to make decisions based on techniques they do not fully understand. 2. Discounted cash flow is a proven method. The heavily favored methods in the literature are discounted cash flow techniques (NPV and IRR). 3. Real options require a high degree of sophistication. Real options tend to be used in industries where upper management tends to have engineering or technology backgrounds. 4. Real options tend to encourage excessive risk-taking. While NPV may underestimate project value, CFOs tend to believe that real options
-09 activities will be included in thepresentation at the Annual Meeting in June.BackgroundThere is no question that today’s engineering student must be prepared to work in a globaleconomy. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) requires thatengineering programs provide “the broad education necessary to understand the impact ofengineering solutions in a global and societal context.”1 The National Academy ofEngineering’s report on educating the “Engineer of 2020” includes similar guidance.2 TomFriedman’s recent popular book, The World is Flat, describes in detail the globalization of theworld’s economies and repeatedly shouts the need for understanding this phenomenon.3 Animportant part of our university’s strategic plan
for evaluation. There are 870 engineering and technology programs offered by 216 schools inMexico2. These numbers are useful for establishing the dimension of the problems. It must be said that untilnow there is little experience on doing external evaluations in Mexico, some of the them have beenimplemented at private institutions such as the Monterrey Technologic (ITESM) and UniversidadIberoamericana. Some others at the public sector, have been using experimental standards developed by theMinistry of Public Education. However the overall number of feasible evaluators is low. ENGINEERING PROGRAMS EVALUATION AT UNIVERSIDAD IBEROAMERICANA Universidad Iberoamericana Educational System is a private catholic system formed by five
,: . Iapproach may seem logical to those directly or indirectly associated with parties primarily concerned aboutreducing cleanup costs. But fi-om the perspective of people who believe that they have been exposed to risksfrom hazardous wastes and see themselves as victims, it breeds anger and confrontation. Prevention, eliminationor minimization of a specific involuntary chemical risk is a legitimate objective. The enormous challenge toenvironmental engineers is to keep some balance between economically driven uses of risk assessments and anemphasis on how use of the best environmental technologies can also help reduce costs while mhimizkg healthrisks.References1. S.E. Hrudey and D. Kreewski, “Is There a Safe Level of Exposure to a Carcinogen
Foundation, the only national award that recognizes outstanding college teaching.Mr. Patrick H. Knowles Jr., Cleveland Mixer Patrick Knowles has had more than thirty years of increasing responsibilities in engineering design, engi- neering education, leadership & personnel supervision, financial & project management, and regulatory compliance. A registered Professional Engineer in Virginia, he recently accepted a position at a manufac- turing firm with duties including engineering design, engineering research, and engineering sales support. Previously he was the Technologies Department Chair of Three Rivers Community College as well as Professor in Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Technology, and an Associate
Paper ID #13649Engineering Leadership as Principled NonconformityDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the Liberal Educa- tion/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and is particularly interested in the role of liberal education in developing engineering leaders. Page 26.631.1 c
some of the “typical” skills that are expected of “typical”software engineer.3. Softwar e Quality Assur ance at Milwaukee School of Engineer ingThe academic schedule at MSOE is based on a quarter system with three quarters in an academicyear. Each quarter involves ten weeks of instruction with the eleventh week devoted to finalexams. Typical software engineering courses are three or four credits, and most have anassociated laboratory session. The undergraduate software engineering program at MSOE [4]began operation in 1999 and had its first graduating class in spring 2002. The SE program wasvisited by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) in September 2002and is one of the first accredited SE programs in the United
ExplorationProgram in the 90’s, the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering (AME) decided toupdate and modernize its AE course sequence, adding new thrust areas in EE and CS to its awardwinning and ABET accredited conventional AE program.Over the last two years, AME has developed a challenging and exciting modern AE curriculumthat incorporates the growing field of intelligent systems as a major aspect into the mix ofcourses and increases the space-engineering component while preserving a strong aeronauticsprogram. Specifically, the digital aspects of AE technology were added: an embedded real timesystems experience and an expanded controls sequence. The standard modern physics coursewas replaced by our own course in astrodynamics and space science
://ucist.cive.wustl.edu/).7. AcknowledgementsThe program is funded in part by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. DUE-9851198).Efforts of the senior authors toward curriculum development is supported in part by the NationalScience Foundation (PECASE Grant No. CMS 97-33272). The undergraduate co-authors havebeen supported in part by the National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergrad-uates Program (Grant No. EEC–9820506) to conduct the independent research projects describedherein in the Washington University Structural Control and Earthquake Engineering Lab. Addi-tional equipment support was provided by Quanser Consulting, PCB, and SMI Technology. Thissupport is gratefully acknowledged.Bibliography1. Dyke, S.J., “Experiences in