institution - Demonstrations or presentations (individual or collective) - Portfolios - Homework Page 25.375.4 - Student scores - Projects at “capstone” courses - Use of rubrics - Evaluation by employers - Tests and oral presentations - Essays and papersSome indirect methods of collection include: - Surveys on attitudes and/or perceptions of students, employers and teachers. - Dropout and failing rates - Focus groups - Interviews with different members of the communityFor Georgia State University learning outcomes assessment is a systematic process of continuousimprovement based on
thefollowing courses: Machine Design, Statics and Dynamics, Intro. to Design and Intro. to Product Design aswell as student Capstone Design Projects. He is also the Faculty Advisor for the Student’s Mini-Bajavehicle competition.Mr. Garen B. Gregorian, PE, MSCE, MSME is a Project manager with Gregorian Engineers and is anAdjunct Professor at Northeastern University in the Department of Art and Architecture. He has 15 yearsof experience in the construction industry and is a registered professional engineer in five states. Page 6.752.15 “Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
Paper ID #42229Exploring the Relationships between Artistic Creativity and Innovation Attitudesin Engineering StudentsDr. Azadeh Bolhari, University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Bolhari is a professor of environmental engineering in the Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her teaching focuses on fate and transport of contaminants, capstone design and aqueous chemistry. Dr. Bolhari is passionate about broadening participation in engineering through community-based participatory action research. Her research interests explore the boundaries of engineering
be dynamic andinterdisciplinary, reflecting the evolving landscape of this fabrication technology[62][63][64][65]. As the field of AM continues to expand across various industries, educationalinstitutions will increasingly emphasize hands-on experience with cutting-edge AM technologies.This applied approach will involve not only operating AM machines but also understanding theentire steps of the production technologies, from design, simulation, material selection, and post-processing, to inspection and quality control.Furthermore, the integration of AM education into traditional engineering curricula is expectedto grow from technical courses to capstone projects [66][67]. Engineering and technologystudents will be exposed to processing
AC 2011-1299: ADDRESSING MISCONCEPTIONS AND KNOWLEDGEGAPS IN THE RESTRUCTURING OF ATOMIC BONDING COURSE CON-TENT TO ENHANCE CONCEPTUAL CHANGEStephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is Professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of bridging engineering and education, capstone design, and introductory materials engineering. His research interests are evaluat- ing conceptual knowledge, misconceptions and their repair, and conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge of students in introductory materials engineering
. Doerry. He has been a leader in internation- alization of Engineering at NAU since arriving in 1999, expanding this initiative to the Natural Sciences starting in 2005. Significant milestones in this area include the development of an effective model of re- ciprocal ”exploratory trips” to motivate international study in engineering; the International Engineering and Natural Sciences certificate program; and the Global Engineering College project, an NSF-funded exploration of a comprehensively internationalized curricular model for engineering education. These efforts culminated in 2010 with the creation of the Global Science and Engineering Program (GSEP), an innovative initiative to establish a comprehensive
Consultants to assist engineering undergraduates with technical reports. She publishes and presents research in two fields: engineering ethics and writing, and literature.Dr. Hyesun You, The University of Iowa Hyesun You, Ph.D., is an assistant professor in the Department of Teaching and Learning. Before joining UI, Hyesun worked as an assistant professor at Arkansas Tech University. She also previously served as a post-doc fellow at New York University and Michigan State University, where she participated in NSF-funded grant projects. She earned her BS in Chemistry and MS in science education from Yonsei University. Her MEd in quantitative methods and Ph.D. in Science Education at the University of Texas at Austin
those activities are properly designed.BYOD in the Measurements and Analysis CourseMeasurements and Analysis with Thermal Science Application is a required junior level coursefor mechanical engineers at Northeastern University. The course consists of three lectures andone lab section per week. It covers topics such as statistical data analysis, experimental design,and measurement of engineering quantities such as pressure, temperature, strain, fluid flow, andheat transfer. Seven lab experiments are performed in teams of 3-4 students during the course ofthe term. Each team is also required to do a term project in which they design, execute, andreport on a measurement experiment of their choosing. These projects have ranged frommeasurements of
students build the instruments at the end of the semesterand prepare for a day out with the SeaPerch ROVs. The success of the outreach competition has beenoverwhelming and the experience our undergraduates have received has been invaluable to their success intheir senior capstone projects as well as in their job searches. Although we are just ending our second year of the implementation (this year we taught anadditional 250 students), we had over 450 students from 15 schools use some of the ROV curriculum wedeveloped to learn about STEM, and then design and build ROVs, and later use those ROVs in the secondUtah ROV Competition. Local media and STEM companies, in addition to the students, parents, teachers
theirsources of intellectual contributions to their design.It was theorized by the authors that presenting an exemplar prior to setting the students onto adesign project could alter, if not hinder, the number and type of creative solutions generated bythe students. Of particular interest is whether the presence of a prototype exemplar contaminatesthe design process for novice designers. That is, does the prototype exemplar cause novicedesigners to fixate on particular design features thereby limiting creativity or does it help them toimprove the performance of their designs?The concept of designers fixating on particular design features is not new to the study ofengineering design. Jansson and Smith1 were among the first who “clearly and
project," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 2417-2424, 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00817.[13] A. Giddens, The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984.[14] W. H. Sewell, Jr., "A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation," AJS, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 1-29, 1992, doi: 10.1086/229967.[15] M. Emirbayer and A. Mische, "What is agency?," AJS, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 962-1023, 1998. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/231294.[16] V. Svihla, T. B. Peele-Eady, and A. Gallup, "Exploring agency in capstone design problem framing," Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 96–119
Second, recommender systems and collaborative filteringstudy had left college entirely within 5 years, while 55% had systems typically do not consider uncertainty of the outcomesof advising actions or the potential long-term effects of this current state to a user-defined goal (e.g., graduation or passinguncertainty. a particular “capstone” course) and presents a sentence in the The notion of explaining why a particular course has been following form:recommended is unlikely to be foreign to experienced Past students have taken Software Engineering
projects” [28, p.1 ], or the “procedure of automatic extraction ofdata from websites using software” [34], or “an interactive method for website and some otheronline sources to browse for and access data” [35]. Other definitions also extend thesedefinitions by suggesting the collection of unstructured data from the web into structured ones in“a central database or spreadsheet” [36]. Web scraping is also referred to as web crawling, butsome argue that web scraping is the extraction of data from a website, whereas web crawling isthe identification of target Uniform Resource Locator (URL) links [34]. Broucke et al. extend onthis and suggest that the crawling term refers to the ability of the program to navigate web pageson its own with the
Paper ID #36732Efficacy of the Dual-Submission Homework MethodJoshua Jay Graduate student from the University of Oklahoma.Doyle Dodd (Assistant Professor of Practice) Industrial & Systems Engr. Department, University of Oklahoma. Teaching-focused professor, currently teaching CAD, Ergonomics, Intro to ISE, Capstone © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Efficacy of the Dual-Submission Homework Method Joshua Jay Dr. Doyle
Research enthusiasm or or commitment to evaluation, expression of or commitment commitment clearly research, potential for CV, research articulated through articulated through future research personal enthusiasm or demonstration of demonstration of research statement commitment interest experience beyond senior project or capstone (research experiences can
, Ethics Data Visualization 1 Data Visualization Machine Learning 2, 8 Machine Learning, Data Modeling, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning Data Mining, Big Data 3, 6 Data mining, Data modeling, systems analysis, Big Data, Data munging Data Science in Context 11 Capstone, Internship, Senior Project, courses in disciplines such as physics, biology, chemistry, the
Program to Integrate Technical Communication Habits (PITCH) initiative.Mr. Brian Harding, Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center Texas A&M University Brian Harding is a PhD candidate at Texas A&M University. His advisor is Dr. M. Sam Mannan in the Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center. His main research topic is the use of Decontamination Foam for Chemical Spill Containment. He has also worked on a variety of different safety related projects such as the investigation team for the ammonium nitrate explosion in West Texas and the use of RFID for corrosion detection in pipelines.Mr. Peter C Montagna, University of New Haven Peter Montagna is head of the Henkel Corporation Adhesives Division Audits &
that orbital debris is an issue, butconflict starts when deciding who should do what to solve the problem [16]. The lesson wasdesigned to introduce students to the exploration of macroethics without pushing them to a‘panic zone’ in which they would disengage and shut down [17]. Future lessons will build ontheir confidence by presenting more disputed topics.A table outlining the agenda of the 80-minute macroethics lesson is provided in Appendix A.While students walked into the classroom (a large lecture hall with stadium-like seating anddesks), we presented what we called the “hook.” We projected a paragraph-long issue brief on1 The authors note that they learned post-lesson and wish to help educate others that “stakeholders” is not
sources were part of a larger research project with the researchethics protocol approved by the Canadian university.In the survey, instructors were asked about the changes in their teaching practices and theirprofessional development activities from 2020 to 2022; their perceptions of certain teachingpractices in terms of teaching effectiveness; and their views on how to move forward. Theresponse rate of the instructor survey was 20%, based on the completed 81 responses. Of the 81instructors who completed the survey, 64% were tenure-stream faculty members, and 36% wereteaching-stream faculty members or sessional instructors. The respondents had varying lengthsof teaching experience, with 43% having taught more than 20 years, 29% having 11 to 20
engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Dr. Benjamin David Lutz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Ben D. Lutz is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Design at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. He is the leader of the Critical Research in Engineering and Technology Education (CREATE) group at Cal Poly. His research interests include critical pedagogies; efforts for diversity, equity, and inclusion in engineering, engineering design theory and practice; conceptual change and understanding; and school- to-work transitions for new engineers
Engineering, KLE Technological University, India. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He was awarded the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018.Mr. Tahzinul Islam, York University Tahzinul Islam obtained his B.Eng (Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering) from Universiti Putra Malaysia, a research-intensive public university in Malaysia. He completed his year-long Bachelors’ re- search project on his own topic of ’Virtual Reality App to teach Psychomotor Skills to Engineering Design students’. He went on to pursue his M.Eng (Innovation & Engineering Design) at the same university, with the dissertation title of ’Innovative Concept Design of a waterjet propelled Flood Rescue Boat’. Currently
Paper ID #34397Overview and Challenges in Developing a Comprehensive LeadershipDevelopment Program in a Fortune 500 CompanyDr. Gregg Morris Warnick, Micron Technology Inc. Gregg M. Warnick is a Global Executive and Leadership Development, Sr. Program Manager for Micron Technology. He provides leadership development and program management globally. He is also Founder and Chief Learning Officer of Boost Leadership Group. He provides consulting and training in leadership development and project management working with fortune 500 companies throughout the world. He previously worked as the Director of the Weidman Center for
ranging from the curriculum requirements of non-engineering courses andengineering capstone projects to the need for engineering instructors to be less negative and moreinformed about the best way to create equitable team projects and articulate their outcomes. Oneof the key recommendations was that students saw the need for and welcomed more suchopportunities to vocalize their concerns and collaborate together in a safe space. It was evidentthat the peer-facilitators were clearly able to convey the goals of the FGs and encourage an open-conversation.3.3 Data Analysis of Open-Ended Questions on Surveys of FG Participants and PeerFacilitators3.3.1 Survey One: Evaluations of the FGs by Student Participants and Peer Facilitators Immediately
hassteadily evolved to be focused on a leadership education approach. At the turn of the decade in2010 to 2013, NILA consisted of historical curriculum based on best practices. On the Thursdayof the conference, attendees went through a series of workshops focused on SHPE organizational,programs, and educational resources with the evenings focused on a team-based case studychallenge. Friday programming consisted of leadership and workforce skill development with thecontinued case study challenge in the evening. As a capstone learning exercise to the case studies,on Saturday the attendees presented the outcomes of their case student challenge in a competitionformat. Competition awards and closing took place on Saturday evening. In 2014, the
-termimpact on how students understand the societal impact of the engineering technologies they areexposed to as students. As part of the course in which the activity analyzed here took place, afinal exam was administered and it included a question that was related to the socio-technicalactivity discussed in this paper. Future analysis of this data could provide a glimpse into short-term retention of socio-technical systems thinking demonstrated by the students. Moreover,about 4-6 semesters after the students take this course, they enroll in their capstone final project. 12The project is highly technical and includes a stakeholder analysis. Getting
current bioprocessing curriculum has sixadditional courses beyond the engineering core curriculum: Microbiology, Organic Chemistry,Introduction to Bioprocess Engineering (BIOE 3000), Bioprocess Validation, Quality and Designof Experiments (BIOE 4000), Bioprocess Separation Engineering (BIOE 4010), Bioprocess PlantDesign, and Simulation and Analysis (BIOE 4020). The bioprocess engineering concentrationcourses are in addition to the two semester capstone design sequence that will also have somebioprocess related component.The faculty of ECU’s engineering program are encouraged to pursue novel approaches toengineering education. The newly created concentration in bioprocess engineering provides anexcellent opportunity to develop and implement a
about the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Dr. Bell also conducts research and develops resources for integrating technology into science teaching. Dr. Bell has maintained strong ties to public schools through a variety of collaborative projects. Most recently, he completed a 28 million-dollar US DOE-funded I3 project designed to provide research-based professional development to Virginia’s elementary and secondary science teachers. The author of more than 170 articles, chapters and books, Randy currently serves as Associate Dean of Academics and Professor of Science Education in the College of Education at Oregon State University. c American Society for Engineering Education
dramatically, 96% were aware of the benefit of interdisciplinary capstone projects, butonly 56% incorporated them in engineering classes[9]. If educators are aware of superior teachingpractices, supported by experimental evidence, why are these practices not standard in engineeringprograms?In an additional survey by Besterfield-Sacre et al. faculty, department chairs, and deans wereindependently surveyed and asked in open-ended fashion to identify opportunities for facultyprofessional development and rewards, to improve the incorporation rate of identified student-centered instructional practices [10]. The researchers then grouped the responses into the formatof the Four Categories of Change Strategies model [18]. Interestingly, numerous responses
Paper ID #26328Facilitating Transfer Student Success in an Engineering Baccalaureate Pro-gramDr. Nena E. Bloom, Northern Arizona University Dr. Nena Bloom is an evaluator and education researcher at the Center for Science Teaching and Learning at Northern Arizona University. The primary area of her work is evaluating STEM education projects that focus on opportunities for, and retention of, K-20 students in STEM areas, majors and fields. She also conducts education research focusing on questions about professional development for educators and how educators support student learning in STEM.Mrs. Jennifer Johnson, Northern