Teams,” Journal of Student Centered Learning, vol 2-1, pp 9-34. 2004.[4] C. Duhigg. “What Google learned from its quest to build the perfect team,” The New York Times Magazine, p. 20, Feb 25, 2016. [Online]. Available: New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com.[Accessed Feb 3, 2020].[5] R. Fowler, L. K. Alford, J.A. Coller, S. Sheffield, and M. P. Su, “Student Perceptions of Teamwork Support”, in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[6] B. Read-Daily, K. M. DeGoede, K. M., and S. L. Zimmerman, “Gallup StrengthsFinder in Engineering”, in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[7] S. Lorimer and J. A. Davis, "Using Strengths of First-Year Engineering Students to Enhance Teaching," in ASEE
context ofan integrated, project-based learning program for upper-division students. Using a commonscience fiction read as a case study for learning ethics in an engineering context has strongpedagogical value. The exercise is both morally sound and engaging. The student engineersparticipating in the experience effectively extracted, discussed, and reflected on ethical themesfrom the reading. Most importantly, they connected their ethical learning in this context to realworld applications.References[1] A. Segall, “Science fiction in engineering instruction: to boldly go where no educator has gone before,” in ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002, pp. 7.993.1- 7.993.8.[2] L. Dubeck, M. Bruce, J. Schmucker, S. Moshier, and J
Rocky Mountain North America Region Award for distinguished achievement by Petroleum Engineering Faculty award recipient, and the 2014 Rocky Mountain North America Region Award for distinguished contribution to Petroleum Engi- neering in Health, Safety, Security, Environment and Social Responsibility award recipient. She is also a SPE Distinguished Lecturer (2019-2020).Dr. Stephanie Claussen, Colorado School of Mines Stephanie Claussen is a Teaching Professor with a joint appointment in the Engineering, Design, and Society Division and the Electrical Engineering Department at the Colorado School of Mines. She ob- tained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2005 and her
Colorado State University (Fort Collins, CO, USA) in 2018. There, she gained experience working as a graduate teaching assistant for computer aided engineering, biomedical engineering capstone design, and biomedical engineering introductory classes. She also served as a Grad- uate Teaching Fellow for the Walter Scott, Jr. College of Engineering during the 2016/2017 academic year. Nicole is currently an instructional post-doctoral fellow in the Transforming Engineering Education Laboratory within the Biomedical Engineering Department at the University of Michigan. Through this fellowship, she spent the 2019/2020 academic year teaching and assisting in curriculum development at Shantou University (Guangdong Province
CEE PhD fellowship cap for the academic year of 2019-2020 for his research contribution in the field of transportation engineering. Research interest of Mr. Rahman include winter roadway maintenance, shared-use mobility, social-media data analysis, traffic operation at intersection, and connected and au- tonomous vehicle.Dr. Karen E Rambo-Hernandez, Texas A&M University Karen E. Rambo-Hernandez is an associate professor at Texas A and M University in the College of Ed- ucation and Human Development in the department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture. In her research, she is interested in the assessing STEM interventions on student outcomes, measuring academic growth, and evaluating the impact of curricular
Paper ID #29239Aligning the chemical engineering curriculum to a common problem-solvingstrategyProf. Nicolas Hudon, Queen’s University Dr Nicolas Hudon is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Queen’s Uni- versity (Canada) since 2016. His teaching activities are mainly concerned with second-year fundamental courses. He is the recipient of the 2019 Carolyn Small Award for teaching innovation from the Faculty of Applied Sciences and Engineering at Queen’s University.Dr. Louise Meunier P.Eng., Queen’s University Dr. Meunier studied mechanical engineering and worked for twenty years as an
invited four graduate students to work on the project alongside theundergraduates. The number of graduate and undergraduate students working in our lab hasfluctuated somewhat, with students joining and leaving the project according to their academic andpersonal needs. However, three of the graduate students from Fall 2018 persisted with the projectsfor three semesters (through the end of Fall 2019) until their graduation. While we anticipated thatthe graduate students would be able to mentor the undergraduates, we found that some graduatestudents did not have the requisite knowledge to provide leadership roles. In reality, the studentsappeared to function more-or-less as equals, with research experience and skill typically beingmore important
not kill the cyber security minor. We continue to offerthe minor for computer engineering, software engineering, computer science, and managementinformation systems students. We believe the cyber security void is so large that each of thesekinds of students can help fill the gaps we are positioned to see in the next 20 years.Footnote: For those who are interested, all laboratories used in the three core technical courseshave been included in the National Security Agency’s National Cybersecurity CurriculumProgram [15]. Additionally, the ISELab is freely available by request at the ISERink web site[6]Lessons learned and future workThe program started May of 2019 without much advertisement. During the summer 2019orientation we had about 30
Design *,” vol. 24, no. 2, 2008.[20] K. E. Shroyer and T. Sun, “Student experiences in a university makerspace: Design as decision making,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2019.[21] R. D. Luce and H. Raiffa, Games and decisions : Introduction and critical survey. New York: Wiley, 1957.[22] M. Klein, “Capturing Design Rationale in Concurrent Engineering Teams,” Computer (Long. Beach. Calif)., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 1993.[23] C. Zannier, M. Chiasson, and F. Maurer, “A model of design decision making based on empirical results of interviews with software designers,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 637–653, 2007.[24] J. Lee, “What ’ s in Design Rationale ?,” vol. 6, pp. 251–280, 1991.[25] J
. 0–5, 2011, doi: 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3710.[17] M. Regan and S. Sheppard, “Interactive Multimedia Courseware and the Hands-on Learning Experience: An Assessment Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 123–132, 1996, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00221.x.[18] Y. Wang, S. K. Ong, and A. Y. C. Nee, “Enhancing mechanisms education through interaction with augmented reality simulation,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1552–1564, 2018, doi: 10.1002/cae.21951.[19] E. M. Starkey, S. R. Miller, and S. T. Hunter, “Deploying Virtual Product Dissection Lesson Modules in Introductory Engineering Classrooms: A Research Driven-Approach,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019
. Yoon, S., Evans, M. G. and Strobel, J. (2014), “Validation of the Teaching Engineering Self- Efficacy Scale for K-12 Teachers: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach,” Journal of Engineering Education, 103: 463–485.18. Schrader, P.G. & Lawless, Kimberly. (2004). The knowledge, attitudes, & behaviors approach how to evaluate performance and learning in complex environments. Performance Improvement. 43. 8 - 15. 10.1002/pfi.4140430905.19. Yoon, S. Y., Evans, M. G., & Strobel, J. (2012, June). Development of the teaching engineering self-efficacy scale (TESS) for k-12 teachers. In 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 25-466).20. Wang, X., & Bowe, A. G., & Kobus, C. J. (2019, June), Board 155
Learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297-306.[8] Marquez, E., Garcia Jr., S., Molina, S. Implementation of Visual Supplements to StrengthenPedagogical Practices and Enhance the Physical Understanding of Fundamental Concepts inEngineering Mechanics. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. June 16-19, Tampa, Fl.Paper ID: 24780.[9] Mills, J., Treagust, D. Engineering Education, Is Problem-based or Project-based Learning theAnswer. Aust J Eng Educ. Jan. 1, 2003.[10] Woods, D.R., Issues in Implementation in an Otherwise Conventional Programme. In Boud,D.& Feletti, G.I. (eds.) The challenge of Problem-Based learning, 2nd ed, Kogan Page, London.173-180, (1997).[11] Woods, D. R., Hrymak, A.N., Marshall, R.R., Wood, P.E., Crowe, C.M
and sophomore enrollment experiencedthe biggest jump, resulting in our FTIC (First Time in College) student enrollment rate in the three-targeted programs reaching more than 30% in Fall 2019. While the SETS project leadership team ishappy to see the rising reputation of the targeted ET programs, and the ever-expanding pool ofscholarship applicants, we are challenged by the shift of students population. With more than 30%FTIC students in the programs, student support and services are urgently needed to help themsuccessfully transition from high-school prescribed learning to college-level independent study. Onthe other hand, the student population characteristics and demographics are continuously changing,sometimes due to external circumstances
, M. Royo, J. Gamez-Perez, M. Segarra, and L. Cabedo, "Acquisition of transversal skills through PBL: a study of the perceptions of the students and teachers in materials science courses in engineering," Multidiscip. J. Educ. Social Technol. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 121, 2015.[12] A. Dominguez, M. E. Truyol, and G. Zavala. “Faculty Development Program on Active Learning for Engineering Faculty in Chile: Sharing Step,” in 2018 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo. Available: https://peer.asee.org/30509.[13] A. Dominguez, M. E. Truyol, and G. Zavala. “Professional Development Program to Promote Active Learning in an Engineering Classroom,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 424–433, 2019.[14] A. Dominguez, M. E. Truyol
. and Recktenwald, G. “A Multi-Instructor Study of Assessment Techniques in Engineering Mechanics Courses.” Conference Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. June 16-19, 2019. Tampa (FL). 2. Recktenwald, G., Grimm, M., Averill, R. and Roccabianca, S. “Effects of SMART Assessment Model on Female and Underrepresented Minority Students.” Conference Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Submitted for review. June 21- 24, 2020. Montreal (Canada). 3. Recktenwald, G. and Averill, R. “Implementation of SMART Assessment Model in Dynamics Courses.” Conference Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Submitted for review. June 21-24, 2020. Montreal (Canada). 4
. Advances in Engineering Education, 2012. 3(1): p. 1-16.28. Liberatore, M., et al. Student-Generated Problems that Reverse Engineer YouTube Videos. in ASEE Annual Conference proceedings. 2018.29. Duckett, T.R., et al., Assessing the Reliability of a Chemical Engineering Problem-solving Rubric when Using Multiple Raters, in ASEE annual conference & exposition;. 2019.30. Asogwa, U., M.W. Liberatore, and A.P. Malefyt. Problem Solving When Using Student- Written YouTube Problems. in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2019. 1231. Donohue, S.K. and L.G. Richards. Factors affecting student attitudes toward active learning activities in a graduate engineering statistics course. in 2009
his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education, as well as a Master of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue University’s School of Civil Engineering. Justin is the 2020 program chair for the ASEE LEES division.Dr. Andrew Katz, Virginia Tech Andrew Katz is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Ethics in Engineering or Engineering in Ethics?AbstractThis paper explores how the relationship between ethics and engineering has been and could beframed. Specifically, two distinct framings will be conceptualized and explored: ethics inengineering and engineering in ethics
and E. Russell Johnston, Jr., Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award from the Mechanics Division of ASEE. Professor Hanson brings four years of military and industry experience to the classroom. Upon completing his Ph.D. in structural engineering at Cornell University, he taught for two years at Bucknell University. He is a registered Professional Engineer.Dr. Matthew D. Lovell P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Matthew Lovell is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and he currently serves as the Senior Director of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment office. He is also serving as the director of the Making Academic Change Happen
interacting with the first-yearstudents. One half of the students in the senior class gave presentations to the freshman classtwice during the semester. The presentations were followed by small group dinners consisting offreshman and these senior design students wherein the students were given time for informal andunstructured interactions. One half of the senior class was not used in the role of a mentor andserved as a negative control for senior cohort in this study. In year two of this project, theinterventions will focus on the sophomore students. Year two’s freshman class will notparticipate in an intervention and serve as a negative control. Fall 2019 Spring 2020 Fall 2020 Spring 2021
, this is the first study thatscales exercise set difficulty from the lower levels to the higher levels of Bloom’s Taxonomywithin AGTs. We study the effects on student learning efficiency, code quality of solutions, andstudent perceptions of their learning experience.MethodsWe ran a field experiment in a CS1 introductory course for non-majors at a large public universityin the Spring of 2019 with 264 enrolled students. This course is primarily taken by undergraduateengineering students, and it is required for their degrees. The course covers typical CS1 topicssuch as variables, plotting data, conditionals, loops, functions, string manipulation, arrays, fileI/O, etc. and the programming language is MATLAB. Students’ learning is assessed via
at Powerhouse ScienceCenter. Without them none of these projects could have become a reality.References 1. Stearns, Peter N. Educating global citizens in colleges and universities: Challenges and opportunities. Routledge, 2009. 2. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3 3. Slattery, Darina M., and Michael P. O'Brien. "Using Service Learning and Virtual Team Projects to Broaden the Curriculum and Enhance the Student Experience." Currents in Teaching & Learning 6.2 (2014). 4. Jacoby, Barbara. Service-learning essentials: Questions, answers, and lessons learned. John Wiley & Sons, 2015. 5. Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette
curriculum, mentoring students, and engineering education research, particularly for project-based cur- riculum, first-year engineering, and transportation. He is active in the American Society for Engineering Education and is the Webmaster for the ASEE First-Year Programs Division and the First-Year Engi- neering Experience Conference. He is affiliated withthe Transportation Engineering program in the NYU Civil and Urban Engineering Department. He is the advisor for NYU student chapter of the Institute for Transportation Engineers.Prof. Jen-Yeu Chen, National Dong Haw University Dr. Jen-Yeu Chen’s research interests span over the areas of networking, control and communications. In particular, in recent years, he focuses
the First Year of a NSF-sponsored Cyber-physical System Cybersecurity Research Experience for Undergraduates Program,” in Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.Appendix A. Discussion Board Topics and ResourcesDiscussion Board Topic 1 – Experimental MethodologiesPlease pick one of the four experimental methodologies listed in page 6 of the Amy Aponpresentation handout and discuss how it could be applied to a computer science researchproblem. Please choose a methodology that someone else has not yet selected, until all four havebeen covered to ensure that we cover all four. By _____, please make your primary post. By_____, please reply to two other posts (at least one of which should be on a
,” Math. Teach. Middle Sch., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 160–165, 2014.[2] B. Walvoord and V. Anderson, Effective Grading: A Tool for Learning and Assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998.[3] J. R. Grohs, T. Kinoshita, B. J. Novoselich, and D. B. Knight, “Exploring learner engagement and achievement in large undergraduate engineering mechanics courses,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 122nd ASEE, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.24066.[4] D. Ryan and M. Woong-Dodge, “Sel-correcting exams: Making the summative, formative,” in National Institute on the Teaching of Psychology, 2009.[5] H. Cooper, “Synthesis of Research on Homework.pdf
through a focus on women in their undergraduate years who havedeclared computer science and/or electrical and computer engineering majors. The programprioritizes peer-to-peer relationships, career mentorship, strategic coaching, and hands-onexperience to recruit and retain such individuals in technology fields. In this paper, we furtherdiscuss the particulars of the program, distinguish it from other programs discussed in theliterature, as well as present evaluation processes and findings from a mixed-methods studyfocused on activities from the 2018-2019 cohort. Our evaluation includes program administrativedata, baseline and post-program survey data from three program sites and focus group data. Weconcentrate on the effect of program activities
middle- or high-school levels and/or for STEM outreach.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the Duke University teaching assistants who contributed to thiswork: Anshu Dwibhashi ’20, Cooper Lair ’20, Martin Li ’19, Edward Yao ’19, and Joanne Zheng’20. Januario Carreiro ’21 was also instrumental in circuit diagrams for the lab experiments.References[1] J. J. G. van Merrienboer, P. A. Kirschner, and L. Kester, “Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 5–13, 2003.[2] H. C. Powell, T. DeLong, and H. Alemzadeh, “An integrative approach to embedded systems courseware. submission type: Work in progress,” in 2019 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference.[3
weighted for relationships”, School Science and Mathematics, vol. 102, no.1, pp.33-44, 2002.27. M.K. Watson, E. Barrella, J. Pelkey, “Concept Maps as Teaching, Learning, and Research Tools”, in First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, Columbus, Ohio, July 2016.28. J. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2014.29. M.M. Martine, L.X. Mahoney, C.M. Sunbury, J.A. Schneider, C. Hixson, C.A. Bodnar, “Concept Maps as an Assessment Tool for Evaluating Students' Perception of Entrepreneurial Mindset,” in ASEE 2019 Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 2019.30. M. Besterfield-Sacre, J. Gerchak, M. R. Lyons, L. J
. 34, no. 8, pp. 905–916, Dec. 2009.[16] R. Haydarov, V. Moxley, and D. Anderson, “Counting chickens before they are hatched: An examination of student retention, graduation, attrition, and dropout measurement validity in on online master’s environment." J. Coll. Student Retent., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 429–449, 2013.[17] I. M. Hasbun, H. M. Matusovich, and S. G. Adams, “The dissertation Institute: Motivating doctoral engineering students toward degree completion,” in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2016, vol. 2016-Novem, p. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).[18] D. H. Mansson and S.A. Myers, “Using Mentoring Enactment Theory to Explore the Doctoral Student-Advisor
Rising Stars (2015-2019) and ME- Green: Manufacturing for the Environment by Generating Renewable Energy in Enterprise Networks (2017-2020). Texas State STEM Rising Stars is a four-years grant related to increase the first and second year retention and graduation rates of students in STEM. ME- Green is a three-years grant to model and design a grid-connected onsite generation system featuring renewable power to realize zero-carbon industrial operations. Dr. Novoa has been also committed to research on strategies to achieve gender equity and cultural inclusiveness in science and engineering.Dr. Bobbi J. Spencer, Texas State University B.J. Spencer, Ph.D., AIA Dr. Spencer is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the