French in 2020 from the University of Rhode Island. Besides her academic duties, she also works as a Learning and Talent Coordinator and consultant in Providence, RI where she works on various projects on teacher’s loans forgiveness programs, curriculum improvement and case management. Dira’s current research interests align with diversity, equity, and inclusion, specifically for Women of color, as well as community building and involvement American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Thinking as Argument: A Theoretical Framework for Studying How Faculty Arrive at Their Deeply-held Beliefs about Inequity in
native of the Republic of Liberia. Growing up as a kid, he has always been interested in computers, how they work, and their evolving applications. As a result of his curiosity regarding the use of computers, he developed a strong desire to enter the engineering field, which supersedes the goal of just finding a steady job. He holds an MSc. in Computer Engineering and is very passionate about Engineering Education and its application in developing countries. Over the years, he had led several student-centered projects and programs that promote STEM Education and Innovation. Collins creates and uploads Tech-Education-related content via Facebook and YouTube helping others improve their technical skills and remain
from the criticaland sometimes-subtle dimensions of social justice.5 Design cases that involve, for example,“design for the other 90%”6 or designing for people with disabilities redirect attention toquestions of design for social justice. This paper identifies and briefly describes four forms ofdesign: design for technology, HCD for users, HDC for communities, and design for socialjustice. The paper explores how social justice has been enacted—or neglected—in specificdesign contexts within engineering education, and how it can be further integrated in each ofthese forms of design education.This paper is part of a broader project to integrate social justice across three components ofengineering curricula—engineering design, engineering sciences
Paper ID #38017Experiential Learning in Virtual RealitiesProf. Hugh L. McManus, Northeastern University Hugh McManus is an Associate Teaching Professor at Northeastern University. He uses active and simulation-based learning techniques to teach complex and context-dependent subjects such as quality and process improvement, and co-supervises the Industrial Engineering Capstone Program. He is also Adjunct Faculty in the Loyola Marymount Healthcare Systems Engineering program, and a Member of the Faculty at Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, where he teaches lean for healthcare processes. He creates and distributes lean
sudden change in a student’scognitive model will not be effective. Instead, they recommend continuous revisiting andreformulating of a student’s cognitive models. Similarly, incremental imagination exercises canbe used to develop a student’s cognitive and reflexive understanding.Pitfalls in ethics instructionDiscussing ethics instruction in a broad sense is a difficult endeavor, as there are many ways inwhich ethics can be approached in the curriculum. Options can include individual modules onethics within introductory and capstone courses, embedding ethics throughout a series of courseswithin the curriculum, or requiring ethics specific courses. Ethics components can be taught byfaculty within the engineering discipline or by instructors with
, University of Idaho Dr. Beyerlein has taught at the University of Idaho for the last 35 years. His scholarly interests include design pedagogy, program assessment, engine testing, and industrial energy conservation. He was the Mechanical Engineering department chair from 2015 to 2020. He is now retired, but remains involved in the freshman introduction to engineering and multi-disciplinary capstone design programs.Dr. John Crepeau, University of Idaho Professor John Crepeau received his BS degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Califor- nia, Berkeley, and his MS and PhD degrees from the University of Utah. After serving as an NSF-NATO Postdoctoral Research Fellow, he began teaching at th
the program names contribute to some of these challenges,leading to questions about whether rebranding to a different name might be beneficial. Otherstudies have explored renaming motivations and results in geography [13], agronomy [14],writing programs [15], vocational education [16], and institutions [17], [18]. There is a generalconsensus that names are powerful, and changes often reveal tensions with the health and/oridentity of programs. Frazier et al. [13, p. 13] notes: “Do name changes reflect an expandedmission… or other goals such as addressing low enrollment, shifting student interests, or thedesire to project a fresh identity or realign with a new academic emphasis?” There may also beconcern about name recognition or conveying the
, several ofour middle years major-required courses, and a new third-year course designed for students whoexpect to graduate within the next year [29]. The first-year course introduces students toprinciples of reflection as a building block of SDL, in addition to design thinking, and thebiomedical engineering (BME) field. In the middle years’ courses, students engage in signaturelearning experiences that foster their entrepreneurial mindset and encourage them to integratewhat they are learning with some of their prior extra- and co-curricular experiences. In their thirdyear, students complete a new, major-required course entitled The Art of Telling Your Story thatacts as a type of capstone experience in this vertically integrated curriculum.The
years teaching fourth grade in Baltimore as a Teach for America corps member. After her teaching commitment, she moved to the American Institutes for Research where she worked with Department of Education clients on several research and evaluation projects. Monica holds a B.A. in Business Administration from the University of Oregon Page 13.668.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 HILLMAN ENTREPRENEURS PROGRAM - CHALLENGES, IMPACT ON A DIVERSE POPULATION, AND EARLY OUTCOMESAbstractThe University of Maryland (UM), Prince George’s Community
their work, Lesh et al. 14 examined it from theperspective of proportional reasoning as a capstone of elementary arithmetic, number, andmeasurement concepts. Proportional reasoning is the cognitive process behind the ability toreason about the relationship between two rational expressions. Therefore, our first inference isthat proportional reasoning is the required cognitive process in order to attain the proportionalsize and scale cognition. We have identified that scale cognition is composed by the logical Page 13.1063.4proportional and numerical proportional conceptions of size and scale; these conceptions and thecognitive processes behind
technology in education; more recent research contributions include papers on learning outcome assessment in both lower-division core courses and in senior-level capstone design courses.Mark C Johnson, Purdue University Mark C. Johnson is the Lab Manager for Digital and Systems Laboratories at Purdue University. He is a Ph.D. graduate of Purdue University in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE). He supervises the ASIC Design Lab, Computer Architecture Prototyping Lab, and Software Engineering Tools Lab. He also co-advises project teams in Digital Systems Senior Design. He supports and maintains many of the electronic design automation tools used in ECE, and is involved in the
much more cost-effective than hiring high-priced outsideconsulting firms to develop programs, an ironic side effect of the mandated ethics andcompliance provision.Educational AppropriatenessIndustrial ethics games can be a boon to the classroom, for not only do they reinforce the notionwith students that business and industry care about ethics (indeed, now they are required to careabout ethics!), but the games offer insights into organizational structure, which, for mosttraditional-aged college students, is truly new information.As an eight-year veteran of using “The Ethics Challenge” in a variety of classes, including a civilengineering senior-level capstone design project, I can say with certainty that this game is adelight in the classroom
she conducted research in transportation and sustainability as part of the Infrastruc- ture Research Group (IRG). In addition to the Ph.D. in Civil Engineering, Dr. Barrella holds a Master of City and Regional Planning (Transportation) from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Civil En- gineering from Bucknell University. Dr. Barrella has investigated best practices in engineering education since 2003 (at Bucknell University) and began collaborating on sustainable engineering design research while at Georgia Tech. Prior to joining the WFU faculty, she led the junior capstone design sequence at James Madison University, was the inaugural director of the NAE Grand Challenges Program at JMU, and developed
institutional budget allotments to those departments.Figure 1. Customization of the Comm Lab structure to suit each institution’s needs, internalorganization, and funding mechanisms. At MIT, a central Comm Lab administration overseesdiscipline-specific Comm Labs that are embedded within each participating department in theSchool of Engineering. Each departmental Comm Lab has its own assigned manager. TheBrandeis Comm Lab is a centralized resource that serves all seven departments within theDivision of Science, with one director overseeing all operations. At Rose-Hulman, the CommLab is currently embedded within the school’s makerspace, and may in the future be expanded toserve all undergraduates in a senior capstone
, blogs, wikis, etc.).Our department offers Master of Science degree programs in both Engineering Management andManagement Science. Each program of study consists of 36 semester hours and includes aculminating capstone experience. The Probability & Statistics for Engineers course, in additionto being a core requirement for each degree program, serves as either a pre- or co-requisite formany other courses in our program. Additionally, the course fulfills a math or technical electivefor other majors in the School of Engineering. Currently, The Probability & Statistics forEngineers course is offered three times per year (fall, spring, and summer) in a traditionalclassroom setting. Fall and spring terms consist of 16-week semesters while the
courses was estimated as previously described. If a student tooka course more than once, then only the most recent grade was used.For students who had not graduated by the time of publication, an estimated graduation time wascomputed. This estimate was based on their individual course curriculum plan. For example, ifa student had satisfactorily completed the first senior design capstone course in fall 2015, then itwas assumed that the student would graduate in spring 2016 (upon completion of their secondand final semester in senior design).Included with the transcript data was information collected by the instructor during the course.The course structure and topics did not change during the study period (2013-2015). Forexample, Test 1 coverage
College of Engineering experienced an enrollment growth of more than fifty percent, an increase of research expenditures from under $10M per year to more than $40M per year, and a growth of the faculty of about sixty percent. Over the same period, capital projects totaling more than $180M were started and completed.Bob P. Weems, University of Texas, Arlington Bob Weems is an associate professor in the Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering at UTA, com- mencing his career in 1985 after completing a PhD in CS at Northwestern University. His present inter- ests are in algorithms, data structures, online computation, and preference-based matching. He served as the department’s associate chair from 2001-2010. He
. Christopher M Weyant, Drexel University Dr. Weyant has been an Associate Teaching Professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engi- neering at Drexel University since 2011. Prior to this position, he was an Assistant Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at Stony Brook University. He earned his doctorate from Northwestern Uni- versity, master’s from the University of Virginia and his bachelor’s from Pennsylvania State University. In addition to his experience in academia, Dr. Weyant has worked at Honeywell Aerospace, Capstone Turbine Corporation and Sandia National Laboratories.Dr. Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University Dr. Robert Nagel is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at
interdisciplinary research with the goal of improving engineering programs at the undergraduate level. Her research interests include cognitive theories, memory, problem solving, theories of the mind, and the role of identity and motivation in education.Mariaf´e Taev´ı Panizo, James Madison University Mariaf´e Panizo is a first year graduate student in JMU’s Graduate Psychology Doctoral program. She has been working on engineering education research projects for two and a half years, focusing on non- cognitive factors that impact engineering student academic success.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is a Founding Faculty and Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison
development. Currently, Aldin is a lead tutor at the Fulton Schools of Engineering and wishes to develop effective engineering education strategies.Prof. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science
States.Dr. Tanya A. Faltens, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tanya Faltens is the Educational Content Creation Manager for the Network for Computational Nanotech- nology (NCN) which created the open access nanoHUB.org cyber-platform. Her technical background is in Materials Science and Engineering (Ph.D. UCLA 2002), and she has several years’ experience in hands-on informal science education, including working at the Lawrence Hall of Science at UC Berkeley. While at Cal Poly Pomona, she taught the first year engineering course, mentored student capstone re- search projects, and introduced nanoHUB simulation tools into the undergraduate curriculum in materials science and engineering and electrical engineering courses
(2007) to an engineering problem frame of reference and the physical posed to them (the Midwest location codes, with kappa values of .748 Floods problem). and .746 respectively.”Kong, Douglas, In the “qualitative study of “The kappa values were found to be 100%Rodgers, Diefes- student team projects,” the for the definition category, 93% for theDux, & research team used constant evaluation category, and 84% for theMadhavan (2017) comparative analysis to comparison category.” analyze student work products, specifically their
preparation – e.g., capstone projects in the senior year – and because students oftentransfer out of science and engineering majors because of difficulties with solving problems,considerable effort has been directed towards helping students become proficient problemsolvers. To assure that problem-solving skills are mastered, problem solving has become a coreelement in engineering curricula. In U.S. engineering education, ABET (Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology) criteria for accrediting instructional programs treat problemsolving as one of the critical learning outcomes to be achieved throughout curricula and isdirectly addressed in ABET Outcome 3.1 an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complexengineering problems by applying
getting an assignment in a core course at the sophomore level and juniorlevel and senior level, and usually at the senior capstone course.[I4]” Build up IL skills gradually from more generic skills to more discipline-specific bysenior yearFuture StepsSome of the results from the five interviews are informing the creation of information literacymodules for freshman engineers and students in a senior engineering design class. These moduleswill incorporate advice from the interviews of teaching ILI throughout students’ careers, as bothfreshmen and seniors will be the audience of the video modules. Also, the videos build on the ideaof having a strong relationship with faculty as two engineering faculty members created the videosfor the freshman
University of Applied Sciences in Groningen, where he taught both in Dutch and in English. During this time his primary teaching and course develop- ment responsibilities were wide-ranging, but included running the Unit Operations laboratory, introducing Aspen Plus software to the curriculum, and developing a course for a new M.S. program on Renewable Energy (EUREC). In conjunction with his teaching appointment, he supervised dozens of internships (a part of the curriculum at the Hanze), and a number of undergraduate research projects with the Energy Knowledge Center (EKC) as well as a master’s thesis. In 2016, Dr. Barankin returned to the US to teach at the Colorado School of Mines. His primary teaching and course
this grant, he advised over 500 individual calculus students on their course projects. He was given an Outstanding Advising Award by USF and has been the recipient of numerous teaching awards at the department, college, university (Jerome Krivanek Distinguished Teaching Award) and state (TIP award) levels. Scott is also a co-PI for a Helios-funded Middle School Residency Program for Science and Math (for which he teaches the capstone course) and is on the leadership committee for an NSF IUSE grant to transform STEM Education at USF. His research is in the areas of solution thermodynamics and environmental monitoring and modeling.Prof. Carlos A. Smith PhD, University of South Florida Carlos A. Smith is a Professor
contacted at tal2@psu.edu.Mark Wharton, Pennsylvania State University Mark J. Wharton is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at Penn State. He teaches undergraduate courses in Electronics Electronics I, II, and III) and Senior Project Design, the EE capstone design course. He received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Penn State and his M.S. from the University of Colorado in Boulder. Prior to working at Penn State, Mark spent over Page 13.690.1 30 years in industry as an Electronic Design Engineer. He can be contacted by phone at 814-865-2091 or by email at MarkWharton@psu.edu.John
students).After the arrangement of these features twelve types of homogeneous groups were formed: • Public Spanish high school, • Transfer, • Private English high school • Private high school • Rural high school • Pre-basic • Academic difficulties, • Graduate in five years, • Coop, • Private English freshmen, • Public Spanish freshmen, and • Pre-basic freshmen.Fifty five students participated in this project. Twenty three were females and twenty two males,all of them were undergraduate students ranging from the freshmen to the fifth-plus year.Students’ were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding demographic and high school relatedfactors, such as the type of high school they attended, the language of instruction (English orSpanish or
fully incorporate the breadth and depth of knowledge and skills comprised in RPTwork. This belief is supported by Dauer and StGermain’s (2006) assertion that traditionalapproaches to radiological training may not be enough to facilitate deep learning. Theywarn that adherence to traditional educational approaches may result in workers withknowledge and skills deficits. They encourage the exploration and evaluation ofalternative learning philosophies that use such learning strategies as: inductivediscussion, self assessments, case studies, demonstrations, projects, prompting andcoaching, interactive lectures, and guided reflection. We have attempted to incorporatemany of these strategies into our theoretical and instructional design framework
highlighted word of mouth,workshops, and literature as the most common diffusion channel to raise awareness.18 Diffusionof Innovations was also used to investigate the diffusion of the Engineering EducationCoalitions’ SUCCEED program.19 In another engineering education context, Montfort et al.investigated the adoption of a Capstone Assessment Instrument through interviews finding thatspecific university context and perceptions greatly affected adoption decisions.20 Similar toMontfort et al., in this study we investigate early adopters through qualitative interviews.Theoretical FrameworkIn this paper we use the framework of Diffusion of innovations. Through interviews we arespecifically investigating the initial stages of the innovation-decision