time.ReflectionsThe problem of retention of engineering students has been the focus of discussion since the1980’s. However, it was not until the landmark study of Seymour and Hewitt that many of usdeveloped any understanding why students were leaving. Unfortunately, too few faculty areaware of this report or have the time to devote to reading it. Sitting in on most departmentmeetings will reinforce that the apparent mismatch between student and faculty perceptions oncourse difficulty and course instruction, which was reported in Carter and Brickhouse’s [5] studyin 1986, can still be found today. As a result, this paper attempts to provide an overview of thosefactors negatively effecting student retention. In addition, a review of a number of curricular
© 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”The third flight lab focuses on the stability characteristics of the airplane. The objectives ofFlight Lab Three are: 1. To determine the effect of center of gravity (CG) location on aircraft stability. 2. To predict the neutral point of the aircraft. 3. To determine the aircraft’s longitudinal dynamic stability response (phugoid). 4. To demonstrate some of the C-182’s static stability characteristics.The beginning of Flight Lab Three is devoted to demonstrating some of the directional andlateral stability characteristics to include Dutch Roll, Adverse Aileron Yaw, and Proverse Roll.These demonstrations truly showcase the benefit of the flight lab program. All of
were a review of the patent literature, an estimate of thecredit(s) to be used in the economic analysis, a market forecast for MMA demand, an assessmentof the process safety, health, and environmental implications of the new technology, and a reporton the potential public relations and financial impact of the ‘green’ nature of the proposedtechnology. This problem involved extensive information searches along with a conventionalchemical engineering process design as well as critical decision points on economic,environmental and safety issues. The technical aspects were well within the grasp of senior andadvanced junior students but these upper-level students relied on sophomores and freshmen tosupply needed information for the critical
to Technical Innovation, Trans. L. Shulyak and S. Rodman, Technical InnovationCenter, Worcester MA, 1997.4. de Bono, E., The Use of Lateral Thinking, Penguin Books, 1990.5. Wycoff, J., Mind Mapping: Your Personal Guide to Exploring Creativity and Problem Solving, BerkeleyPublishing Group, 1991.6. Raviv, D., “Eight Dimensional Methodology for Innovative Thinking,” Cutting Ed (formerly, Creativity,Innovation, and Design (CID) Report), November 2003.7. ---, “Do We Teach Them How to Think?,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference and Exposition, Montrel, CA, June 2002.8. de Bono, E., Lateral and Parallel Thinking, 30 Dec. 2004 (http://www.edwdebono.com/debono/lateral.htm).9. Raviv, D., “Eight
materials for agiven exercise, as long as all materials are reusable from section to section. We also provide aset of classroom extras at the instructor’s table for quick replacement of items that have worn outor disappeared. When consumables are involved in an exercise (e.g., Exercise # 1: Take Apart –Pull-back Car), we generally furnish each instructor with enough of the consumable item(s) forhis/her sections. Dedicated classrooms are nice, but they are not necessary as long as thematerials required for the hands-on exercises are easily transported to the classroom in use.During some semesters, we have needed classrooms other than our usual four, and we thenprovided dedicated wheeled carts that were stocked with hands-on sets and could be taken
the 2002 NBIA conference in Toronto, Canada2 noted a similar trend in WesternEurope with over 900 business incubators reported, a significant increase since the first reportedincubator in the late 1970’s. Evidence that the business incubator movement is gaininginternational importance was further demonstrated at the NBIA 17th International Conference inJune 20031. Attendees from 35 nations traveled to the Conference and non-US attendeescomprised 37 percent of the conference attendance. During the conference, representatives of 17national incubation associations convened and adopted an international definition of a “businessincubator program”:“A business incubator program is an economic and social development process designed toadvise
S-M B3 R1 B1 1. Performance-based promotion Risk Unfamiliar B7 2. Promotion of existing companiesfearsome jurisdictions: G7 M-L