resistant capitals. An 18-item survey was designed to connect engineeringstudents’ cultural assets to the ways they navigate their present-day lives as college students andforesee their future lives as engineers. The study recruited a sample of undergraduate studentsregistered in engineering majors at three institutions of higher education including a publicHispanic Serving Institution (Angelo State University), a Tier-2 research institution (JamesMadison University), and a Tier-1 research institution (University of Colorado Boulder). Thesurvey findings corroborate results found in other studies. Although our study is limited by asample size of just seventy-five students from three different engineering schools, the findingsshow two key results
Mathematical Preparation and Engineering PersistenceAbstractThis work-in-progress research paper is at the early stages seeking to further understand the linksbetween incoming engineering students’ mathematical preparation and their actual degreeattainment in engineering. The importance of mathematical achievement and preparation toengineering persistence has long been studied. This investigation seeks to further enhance thisresearch-base. A sample of 450 incoming engineering majors were divided into three differentengineering tracks by their university based upon their level of mathematics preparation:Engineering Track 1 (Calculus-ready), Engineering Track 2 (Calculus-ready with Precalculusreview), and Engineering Track 3 (College Algebra-ready
, 2023Sustainability designation, introductory course, and a new textbook in anengineering curriculumSustainability is an important topic. If human societies don’t live sustainably, by definition, wewill experience drastic reductions in our population and/or standard of living and may cease toexist. Knowledge about sustainability has become a foundational component of a generaluniversity education and of being an informed citizen. Sustainability, as a subject of study, isincreasingly popular with students and is an increasingly relevant skill domain in the job market[1]. Given that undergraduate engineering curricula are typically very full of technical content,how is it possible to incorporate sustainability principles into an undergraduate
interests are on studentsˆa C™ problem-solving disposition and instructional strate- gies to advance their ways of thinking. Dr. Lim is particularly interested in impulsive disposition, stu- dentsˆa C™ propensity to act out the first thing thatLisa Garbrecht, University of Texas, AustinPhilip B. Yasskin ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Introduction Mathematics has historically been taught in ways that are a barrier to minority studentspursuing advanced STEM courses in high school and college [1] while current teaching methodsare heavily reliant on spoken and written language, which can be particularly problematic forbilingual students [2]. Consequently, too few underserved students such as
alsopresented.Introduction of Problem and NeedThe benefits of project-based learning have been well established, especially in providingstudents opportunities to develop their independence, responsibility, and social skills [1]. This, inaddition to the push of the Accrediting Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) toinvolve students from multiple disciplines in solving complex engineering problems [2], haveresulted in the implementation of interdisciplinary team-based projects throughout engineeringcurricula.However, team-based project teaching can experience several instructional challenges,particularly when working with a large number of students and projects. Interdisciplinary teamformation can also impose difficulties as students vary in technical skills
on their impressionof the self-revised assignments to evaluate the efficacy of these assignments in three areas: 1. Student academic performance on exams compared to previous cohorts 2. Student perception of the homework and learning experience 3. Instructor perception of the assignment style’s benefits to students and ease of gradingOutcomes proved neutral to slightly positive in each area. Student grades remained similar toprevious cohorts, but struggling students demonstrated increased time spent engaging with thematerial during the revision process. Students reported neutral to positive perceptions of themethod, and instructors generally favored the approach for its reduction in time spent grading.Overall, we recommend other
is the hidden curriculumsurrounding P&T. ‘Hidden curriculum’ refers to unwritten norms, practices, and expectationsrooted in traditional routes to academic advancement. Much attention has been paid in theliterature to the effectiveness of various types of mentoring in helping faculty navigate P&T [1] -[3]. We add to this literature by focusing on the role of pre-tenure peer reviews as mentoringopportunities. These reviews are often conducted in the third year and could serve as a mentoringmoment to help faculty gain a deeper understanding of P&T standards, expectations, and wherethey stand in their progress toward tenure. To learn more about the effectiveness of these reviewsin helping faculty prepare for P&T, we conducted
to contribute significantly to the increase of askilled workforce [1]. According to a previous estimate, about 315,000 civil engineeringpositions must be added by 2030 to meet the need for future civil engineering projects [1].Although the work of civil engineers is increasingly recognized by American society, where theyhave helped improve the sustainability of infrastructure and the quality of the environment [1],the supply of civil engineers is constrained by the steadily decreasing number of studentsenrolled in civil engineering programs. Statistics reveal that while full-time engineeringenrollments nearly doubled between 2010 and 2020, the number of undergraduate studentsstudying civil engineering declined by 3,145 [2], [3]. Although
Fast-Forward Engineering Program is a summer bridge and scholarship programat Louisiana Tech University funded by the National Science Foundation that allows risingsophomore engineering students to continue their curriculum ahead of schedule [1]. Eligibility isbased on unmet financial need and on-track degree progression to achieve a 4-year graduation.The program allows students to get more interaction with the faculty as well as increasedinteraction with their peers. The program also allows students to take part in local industry visitsso that students may see first-hand various engineering workplace settings. Due to COVID-19,the industry visits were virtual for the Summers of 2020 and 2021. Students participated in Zoomlectures from industry
students. This work is important because undergraduate research is wellestablished as an effective tool to support students in moving to graduate programs, in particular forunderrepresented students [1]–[3]. Underrepresented students have reported that mindset and mentoringare important factors in succeeding in STEM fields [4], [5].In 2019 our team developed a faculty development workshop focused on undergraduate researchexperiences in engineering and computer science. Our goal was to help faculty members to think aboutmentoring undergraduate students as an opportunity to help shape student mindsets. We believe thatfocusing on the research experience as a growth-oriented student experience leads to much richeroutcomes than focusing purely on
we will propose appropriate supports, such as workshops andgroup activities, to help international students in engineering adjust to the gender-related culturein the U.S.IntroductionInternational graduate students in engineering are a significant presence in the U.S., with manyof them hailing from countries with distinct cultures from that of the U.S. The Institute ofInternational Education reported that 385,097 international graduate students were enrolled inU.S. higher education during the 2021-2022 academic year [1]. In addition, 54% of internationalstudents pursued degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields,with a majority of them enrolled in engineering and computer science programs [1]. In terms ofthe
reasons why some students view an engineering degree as atransaction, which can help shape more effective approaches to their professional preparation.IntroductionWhile existing literature suggests undergraduate engineering students’ sense of belonging andengineering identity are indicators of their likelihood of graduating and feeling empoweredwithin their major [1], not all undergraduate engineering students desire a strong sense ofbelonging among their departmental cohort or instructors. With the goal of effective professionalformation of diverse types of engineering students, this single case study seeks to provideinsights into the experiences of one minoritized engineering student with a low sense ofbelonging in his engineering department
Classroom Integration: A Critical Feminism Perspective Anna Yinqi Zhang Pennsylvania State University Brian R. Belland, PhD Pennsylvania State University ‘I'm really big into gender equality… women’s rights’ — informant IntroductionThe underrepresentation of girls and women in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics(STEM) has been a long-standing concern for many [1], [2]. Despite a tremendous increase inwomen's college enrollment, men continue to outnumber women in STEM fields, and bygraduation, men outnumber women in nearly every Engineering and Science major and thedifference in majors like Engineering
known that female students often experience a “chilly” cultural climate in engineering,affecting many student outcomes, including persistence in engineering programs, but the currentliterature lacks a comparison of women’s experiences across different engineering disciplines.Perspectives of male students on gender equity and perception of cultural climate across differentdisciplines are also missing. We studied three engineering disciplines—aerospace, civil, andchemical—with varying proportions of female students to investigate the following researchquestions: 1) What is the current state of the cultural climate for women studying engineering intheir respective disciplines at the studied university? How do increased proportions of
, identifying curricular laboratory activities that areeducational, engaging to all students, and that meet students’ career interests is valuable insupporting a positive engineering educational experience.IntroductionIncorporating accessibility topics into engineering curricula is important toward training futureengineers in inclusive design, yet these topics are not commonly addressed in engineeringcurricula [1] . Beyond the didactic motivation to include inclusive design topics for careertraining, previous work has also described that including accessibility and disability topics canincrease participation of students with disabilities and other historically excluded andunderrepresented (HEU) groups in the engineering classroom [2]. In addition
from all 50 Democrats and19 Republicans [1] which authorizes $550 billion in new investments in various infrastructureprojects around the United States in addition to renewing funding for ongoing efforts. It alsoinvolves funding for more traditional infrastructures like roads, bridges, airports, ports, rail, andtransportation in addition to repairing water systems, rebuilding the electric grid, enhancingbroadband and internet access, and building a network of electric vehicle chargers to encouragesustainable transportation modes. Additionally, it contains $21 billion for the environmentalcleaning of hazardous waste sites and $1 billion to "reconnect communities," especially Blackand low-income neighborhoods that were fragmented by earlier
Participation in Computing/Engineering (BPC/BPE)initiatives almost exclusively center a binary gender model focusing on girls and women as staticcategories [1]. However, recent surveys [2] suggests that 2.1% of Gen Z adults identify astransgender (that is, have a gender identity that differs from the sex they were assigned at birth[3]). Additionally, in research presented at the 2022 RESPECT conference, we showed that thereare at least 10,850 nonbinary1 K–12 students in the United States registered across nine differentstates [4]. As the number of people who identify as transgender and nonbinary (TNB) increase,current best practices regarding approaching gender in computing and engineering need to berevised [5]. To further support future gender diverse
majors.IntroductionThere has been significant study associated with the equity of access to college and the collegeadmissions process [1] [2] [3]. There are also advocates who are drawing attention to the fact thatseemingly neutral policies such as requiring remedial courses and limited credit transfers fromassociate degree programs can have unintended consequences and contribute to structural racismin higher education [4]. However, there has been less study of policies regarding tuition and feesoutside of financial aid and assistance. The work recently done in [5], explores how tuition and feesystems in different countries support or inhibit participation of low-income students. While thereare numerous financial aid options in the form of grants and special
following research questions: 1) What types of programs are offered to support community college students in engineering-for-transfer programs? 2) What aspects of these programs contribute to the success of students who have responsibilities like employment or caretaking of another person? The systematized literature review resulted in nineteen peer-reviewed journal articles,published after 2010, collected from the Compendex and ERIC databases. These papers werethematically analyzed and results compared. These papers all addressed, to some extent, theexperiences and transfer outcomes of working or caretaking community college students inScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) degrees. Results
the world. Developments overthe past decade have focused on sustainable long-distance aviation technologies, urban airmobility, low-cost access to space, and the commercialization of human spaceflight, to name buta few. These and other projects continue to demand talented engineers to support their researchand development. The NSF REDO-E grant supporting this study identifies several ways in whichdiversity in engineering consistently yields improvements across many facets of the discipline.Groups with higher diversity consistently demonstrate improved overall performance [1] as wellas improved understanding of relevant subject matter [2]. Such groups are also more adept atmaking ethical decisions [3], which is of especially critical
industry's nominal value added was 4.1 percent of the GDP andis projected to reach a Compound Annual Growth Rate of 5 percent from 2022-2026 [1]. Thisprojection of industry growth exacerbates the ongoing crisis of the current workforce shortage inthe U.S. construction industry. As the Millennial generation continues to enter the workforcewhile the Baby Boomers generation is approaching retirement, there is a growing concern thattraditional engineering and construction education systems do not prepare students for variousworkforce challenges, and the workforce demand will not be met in a timely manner. BabyBoomers are the generation born between 1946 and 1964 that are currently in management andleadership positions. Baby Boomers' generation stands
rights and obligations, and monitoring andregulating risk factors. The paper also assesses the respective strengths and limitations of each ofthe two approaches of partnerships. This paper also studies the applicable situations of the twocooperation modes. Based on the comparative case study, this paper summarizes the key success factors foreffective partnerships between Chinese universities and companies in preparing professionalmaster’s students for the workplace: (1) shared understanding of the educational functions ofpractice studies; (2) clear deliverables; (3) stability of practice duration; and (4) flexibility inconnecting students to projects.1. Introduction With the development of science and technology, the demand for high-end
thinking about faculty mentorship and offers an approach to potentiallyremediate negative mentoring experiences.IntroductionAn activity often cited as critical for success in any field is mentorship. However, scholars fromeducation, management, and psychology have defined mentorship differently [1], oftenconflating such activities with other types of developmental functions or relationships such asrole modeling [2], teaching or coaching [3], and professional development training [4]. Thisvariation in how mentorship is perceived can lead to challenges clarifying mentorship as aphenomenon [5]. Therefore, it’s important to understand effective mentorship and how it mightvary from person to person to ensure such interactions benefit all involved.The
individual and group lab assignments, the authors discovered that (1) students arecomfortable with both individual lab kits and benchtop equipment and view these two resourcesas complementary, (2) students see value in individually-completed labs but also like the peer-to-peer mentoring that can occur when working with a lab partner, and (3) students are using labkits outside of class for a variety of activities, including self-directed learning. Disadvantagesand limitations of lab kits are also reviewed and discussed.1. IntroductionIndividual lab kits have been evaluated as a tool to enhance active learning, even before thepandemic [1], and many types of lab kits have been designed for specific courses [2] [3] [4]. Thepandemic pushed many educators
(https://serc.carleton.edu/stemfutures/index.html) brought together educators from a variety ofuniversities to develop framework-guided curricula that align with the dimensions of 21st centurylearning by Kereliuk et. al [1]. The framework, found in figure 1, illustrates how three types ofknowledge, foundational (to know), meta (to act), and humanistic (to value), relate to learning inSTEM subjects. The framework is designed to “account not only for what ought to be known,but also for the unique contexts, cultures, and challenges that would-be innovators need toinclude in their approach to improving the world.” [1]. Foundational •Core content
Agricultural and Mechanical University, and TennesseeState University are collaborating on a National Science Foundation (NSF) Historically BlackCollege and University Undergraduate Program (HBCU-UP) Award #2000244. Our researchteam was formed at the NSF sponsored HBCU Engineering Faculty workshop hosted by theAssociation of Public & Land-Grant Universities (APLU) at the Tennessee State University backin May 2018. The purpose of the three-day workshop was to assist HBCU Engineering facultywith: (1) Improving student learning in engineering; (2) Sharing innovative strategies to improvethe retention and graduation of engineering students: and (3) Providing tools and strategies fordeveloping grant proposals and effectively competing in national grant
activity exposurechallenge through the implementation of new educational science procedural standards thatincorporate engineering thinking such as SEPS (Scientific and Engineering Practices Standards).The challenge is that K-12 (high school focus) is still very siloed, so a difficult roll-out [1], [2].Some colleges are implementing pre-course trainings to help incoming students better preparefor college, such as summer bridge courses and pre-course preparation sessions [3], [4], [5], [6].These tend to focus on a particular topic and typically do not explore interdisciplinary elements[7], [8].Extracurricular student organizations and clubs are assembled to foster student engagement ofspecific topics. These are often student run with limited faculty
undergraduate studies, including computer science. Some 90% of thestudents in this project were Hispanic. The course was piloted over four semesters, whichallowed the instructional team to perfect the approaches that were most successful for studentsuccess. The leadership course integrated two primary approaches: 1) a relational model ofleadership used to examine complexities that arise when technology professionals encountermultiple perspectives and diverse ideas; and 2) cooperative learning approaches, includingconstructive academic controversy model, used to develop leadership skills whilecontextualizing the role of ethics in computing. The course culminated in an academiccontroversy exercise where student teams examined the Facebook /Whistleblower
further capitalized on (test taking and studentcare services). These results have led the CE department to evaluate the remote and hybriddelivery modes of courses as potential instruction alternative modes to support students in thepost pandemic learning environment. 1. BackgroundWhen the World Health Organization declared the pandemic (Covid-19) worldwide, it forcedshutdown of the universities with its educational in-person activities. As reported by the UnitedNations [1], almost 1.6 billion students were affected by this shutdown. This crisis led schools inthe United States to move to virtual online instruction and remote learning [2][3]. CaliforniaState Polytechnic University, Pomona (CPP) faculty were instructed in a matter of weeks
SHPE’s Virtual STEM Labs: Engaging and inspiring Hispanic youth to pursue STEM degrees and careers.Background/MotivationSolving the world’s most pressing and complex issues, including the recent pandemic, climateand environmental challenges, and sustainable economic development, is dependent on scientificinnovation. This need is reflected in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics(STEM) occupation growth which has increased 79% since 1990 and is projected to grow by10.8 percent by 2031 [1]. To meet these labor market demands, the United States hasconsistently invested over $500 million dollars in STEM education specifically since 2019 withan emphasis on programs that increase participation of