environment (ALOE) to provide a practical learning environmentthat facilitates developing many of the needed technical and soft skills without the inherentdifficulty and cost associated with radio frequency components and regulation. We define sixlearning stages that assimilate the standardization process and identify key learning objectivesfor each. We discuss our experiences when employing the proposed methodology at BarcelonaTech in Spain, compare the approach with an equivalent class at Virginia Tech in the US andmake the following observations: (1) The complexity of standards need to be abstracted andpresented in a form suitable for a given class. (2) Educating about cellular communicationsstandards is most effective when students are immersed
spring and fall semesters 2017, the proposedprocedure was implemented successfully in different sections of Mechanics of Materials course.The proposed procedure for drawing the diagrams was assessed by a quiz given to differentsections of the course. The feedback information was collected through the class survey. Basedon the assessment and class survey, most students liked the proposed procedure and believed themethod was practical. The assessment based on the quiz also showed the grades with theproposed procedure were significantly improved. This paper presents the practical graphicalprocedure for drawing the diagrams as well as the results of the class survey and the assessment.1. IntroductionOne of the primary objectives of the mechanical
have a balanced lecture and lab sessions, which are specifically designed to addressthe needs of the term project as the semester continues. In the term project, groups of 2-3 studentswere asked to form a group, where each group was expected to work on a real system to 1)understand, conceptualize, and model the existing system as a mental, then software-model; 2)validate the existing system model statistically; 3) identify areas for improvement (in addition tothe ones given by the supervisor); 4) complete the project with testing out system improvementscenarios and conducting cost/benefit analysis. The effectiveness of project-based learning issurveyed and studied based on the course learning outcomes. The results indicated that theproposed
face significant challenges that prevent broadernational success [1-3]. Educators have increasingly realized that relying solely on traditionallectures is ineffective for engaging a new generation increasingly connected to the digital world,and have therefore initiated numerous efforts to integrate technology into the teaching-learningprocess [4, 5]. In addition to this, there is an increasing recognition that learning complexengineering concepts can benefit from more in-depth clarity pre-requisites than previouslyunderstood [6]. Teaching-learning models that blend technology with traditional lectures to ensurequality of instruction have been reported promising for engaged and effective learning of higherlevel skills [7, 8]. Exploiting more
recognition and a predictive model is developed usinglogistic regression. The following questions are investigated: 1. Can the Mahalanobis Taguchi System forecast important variables used for a STEM retention prediction model? 2. Do community college students have substantially different risk factors than traditional university students?The remainder of this paper is structured into the following sections: literature review andbackground on community colleges, data analysis and predictive model development, validation,and comparison to university models.Literature ReviewCommunity colleges were born out of a need for higher education and technical training (Cohenet al., 2014). Joliet Junior College, founded in 1901, was the first
than six years and joined academia with several years of industry experience. This work shares their experiences and observations on the advantages and disadvantages of electronic note- books learned through implementation in their courses. Though this paper is primarily focused on electronic notebook usage in the electrical engineering program, the gen- eral observations are applicable to a broad range of engineering disciplines.1 IntroductionCreating engineering documentation through an engineering logbook is a critical skill for engi-neering students. It provides a systematic way of cataloging their work and it encourages them toreflect on what they have learned and articulate it in a professional manner. It also
toavoid any potential ethical conflicts. Beyond ethical conflicts, this is also important as there arefaculty both within the college of engineering (CoE) and the FYE group itself with groupinterview experience and one with significant experience with engineering education. Facultybeing interviewed may not have been as forthright knowing data gathering was being performedby their peers. Furthermore, members of the FYE program abstained from surveys responses andfocus groups. A series of four questions was asked in survey form of all faculty: 1. What is your understanding of the rational motivating this curriculum change? 2. From your perspective, what are the potential benefits of the FYE program? 3. What concerns do you have
, patients must wait longer for results. The extended time is dueto the summation of processes that occur before the results are returned. The need for simplifieddevices is evident as healthcare costs have risen astronomically. Such costs have limited theaccessibility to healthcare and has placed social stigmas toward visiting medical facilities.Research and development within pharmaceutical industries has increased to manufacture medicaldevices to improve patient care.IntroductionHuman Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) has become a major world problem, infecting over 78million people, 37 million of which currently live with the virus. Almost 70 % (26 million) ofinfected people live in the resource-limited settings in Sub-Saharan Africa [1]. HIV attacks
for Engineering Education, 2018 A Size and Scale Laboratory Experiment for an Introductory Nanotechnology Course1 AbstractA size and scale laboratory experiment has been developed for an associate level course innanotechnology. This lab will assist students in conceptualizing the size of particles bycompleting three exercises: 1. Physically measuring an oleic acid molecule. 2. Comparingthe molecules length to other nano-sized objects by creating an enlarged scale which isthen compared to familiar objects at normal scale. 3. Examine the quantum effects ofquantum dots to introduce students to the unique properties of nanoparticles. This paperdetails these three exercies and evaluates their effectiveness in teaching
College of Engineering Student Success Strategic Plan. In developing thestrategic plan four organizing themes emerged: messaging, structural, support, and community.Table 1 provides details of the strategic plan themes.B. Strategy DetailsThe structure chosen to improve student experiences and performance in the college includedelements as given above in Table 1. Details are provided below.B.1. Messaging ThemeThis theme concerns how the college messages about engineering to various audiences. Thisincludes the type of work engineers do, studying engineering, preparing for careers inengineering, the nature of engineering work and its impact, and how engineers intersect withothers in society to drive progress and prosperity. In this regard, the 2008
campus ofSt. Christopher Church. The festival offered food and drink, carnival rides, gaming, and livemusic. Hours of operation were from 4:00 to 10:00 PM on Thursday and Friday (July 13 & 14)and from 12:00 to 11:00 PM on Saturday (July 15). Approximately 40,000 people attend thethree-day event where a significant amount of waste was generated. Prior to 2017, waste was notsorted or recycled. All waste was collected by Ray’s Trash Service and hauled to CovantaIndianapolis, a waste to energy facility. Figure 1 illustrates the site layout of the festival. Figure 1 – Festival Site LayoutThe festival facilities that generated waste were characterized in two ways. The first were thosethat were sponsored by the
Michigan Technological University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Study of Augmented Reality for the Development of Spatial Reasoning AbilityAbstractSpatial ability has been reported to be an important predictor for student success in STEM fields[1]. Accordingly, various studies have looked at multiple strategies to help students developthese skills [2].This study tested the use of augmented reality (AR) on smartphones for developing spatialreasoning in the context of a spatial reasoning skills course. The mobile AR app gave studentsthe ability to view digital three-dimensional objects by pointing their phones at a printed marker.They could either move their
experience resulting ina positive impact on the teachers’ understanding of the meaning and scope of engineering, animprovement in their confidence to try new concepts in their classrooms, and an incorporation ofengineering into their overall course curriculum. We anticipate our further research willinvestigate which factors of the summer camp experiences are most beneficial to teachers’professional learning and to confirm teachers’ reports of engineering adoption and expertise intheir classrooms.IntroductionFew engineering summer camp programs exist that rival the scale (1,700 students statewide peryear) and scope (students from kindergarten through twelfth grade) of The Engineering Place’s(TEP) summer camps at North Carolina State University [1] [2
in an Engineering ClassroomIntroductionThis research paper describes a study that examines a testing effect intervention deployed in anengineering classroom setting. The testing effect is based on the premise that learning isimproved when students engage with newly acquired information by challenging themselves toanswer questions about the content instead of using other means of interacting with the content,such as rereading a text. The testing effect has been established in laboratory research studies[1]. To translate this finding into educational practice, classroom research studies [2]-[6] aim todefine the conditions for which the testing effect remains robust in authentic classroom settings.In the classroom domain, a testing effect
completing all thirty problems. As was mentioned previously, each extracredit point (including the bonus points just mentioned) was added to students’ exam pool. Witha maximum of 35 bonus points attainable this amounted, considering the weighting of exams tothe overall course grade, to a maximum of 5.25% for both classes.The end of the challenge period roughly corresponded to the end of the semester at which pointstudents were asked to complete a voluntary survey to gauge their level of participation in thechallenge and whether or not they felt they had benefitted from it. In both courses, students wereasked the same survey questions. Some of the questions surveyed the students about theirvoluntary participation in the challenge asking them (1) why
Arkansas Tech University. The collecteddata is analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The data analysis involvescomputation of correlations and reliability coefficients, t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA).IntroductionDesigning objects and systems to meet the demands of society is one of the primary tasks ofengineers. In light of technological developments and emerging fields of study, mathematicalmodeling is increasingly being used as a primary form of the design [1]. The engineers areexpected to apply, adapt and create mathematical models as part of engineering design process.They are also expected to work in multi-disciplinary teams, communicate effectively with diverseaudiences and engage in system design
theconcepts and eventually to a disconnect from the course material.The TIED UP framework aims to address this concern through careful planning in creating the coursecontent. This follows nine protocols while developing course materials. These protocols are: (1)connecting the new concept to the necessary pre-requisite materials, (2) creation of a neural network, (3)integrating an active learning element, (4) repeating the use of neurons, (5) making use of the zone ofproximal development (ZPD), (6) Adding an emotional component to the course content, (7) generatingpatterns of meaning, (8) providing an element of choice, and (9) generation of cognitive maps. A detaileddescription of these protocols is available elsewhere25. This paper focuses on how
active MSE Clubmembers. The present work describes the structure and activities of the pre-college program, andpresents the model for the annual club meeting and the summer program with correspondingassessment results.IntroductionThe Nanotechnology Center at the University of Puerto Rico-Mayagüez Campus (UPRM) wascreated to: (1) advance the state of knowledge in engineered nanomaterials, while achievingnational competitiveness; (2) prepare students for successful insertion into the futureNanotechnology workforce; and (3) increase the number of minority students entering andreceiving engineering degrees related to materials science and nanotechnology [1]. With regardsto the third objective, since 2014 the Center has impacted with Science
. 2Course ContentThis 2-week summer course emphasizes design of products based on 3D modeling and FiniteElement Analysis. High-level 3D solid modeling is taught using CATIA, which is one of themost widely used CAD software in the automobile and aerospace industries. To design morestructurally safe, cost-effective, and easily manufacturable products, Finite Element Analysisusing ABAQUS or ANSYS is taught along with brief lectures on the theory of Finite ElementMethod.The objective of the course is as follows.1. Understanding the basic steps to feature-based and solid modeling.2. Constructing 3D models and assembly structures with CATIA3. Generating 3D models for finite element analysis with CATIA.4. Making complicated 3D models made up of multi
in all aspects of discovery and design. The course interactively involves thelearner in directing and defining the material under discourse. The paper presents the fine pointsof pedagogical approach that were implemented in successful completion of this course.1. IntroductionPlastic bottles find common use in a wide range of applications in our daily lives. As a resultproduction and use of plastic bottles has increased remarkably over the years. The high demandof plastic bottles, especially in the water and soft drink industry, has brought with it severeenvironmental problems due to careless disposal of these bottles [1]. Statistical data reveals thatyearly people add up to 8-9 million tons of plastic waste to our environment, which includes
andexamine all relevant existing knowledge of the effects of undergraduate work experiences on keyfactors in student retention. This method allows for a holistic perspective by sourcinginformation from multiple sources and primary studies. Inclusion criteria are defined as follows:(1) examines participants of an undergraduate engineering program who are employed full-timebefore obtaining their degree; (2) presents empirical research or evaluates results of affectivestudent outcomes; (3) disaggregates data by gender; (4) published as a report, article, conferencepaper, or dissertation in English since 1990. The search yielded 13 results.Examining these results provides insight into students’ experiences. Most studies examinedsome measure of interest
Education, 2018 A systematic literature review of analysis of success of undergraduate engineering women students in the USIntroduction Over the past three decades, women in the United States (US) have outpaced men inenrollment and degree obtainment in higher education1, but not in engineering education2,3.Figure 1 provides the percentage engineering bachelor's degrees awarded to female students ofall engineering bachelor's degrees awarded in the US from 2006 to 2014. While the earlierdownward trend is reversed, the significant underrepresentation of women in engineeringremains. The underrepresentation of women creates a lack of diversity in engineeringworkforce, which hampers development of innovative and
(US) have outpaced men inhigher education enrollment and degree obtainment 1. However, their representation in STEM(Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields, and especially in the engineeringfield, has significant scope for improvement 2 3. Figure 1 provides the percentage engineeringbachelor's degrees awarded to female students of all engineering bachelor's degrees in the USfrom 2006 to 2014. While the earlier downward trend is reversed, the significantunderrepresentation of women in engineering remains. Percentage engineering bachelor's degrees awarded to female students from the US engineering institutions 20.5 20 19.5 19 18.5
faceincreasingly complex endogenous and exogenous challenges affecting program accountabilitythat include technological changes, financial stability, and demographic shifts in studentpopulations. Entirely related is Buhrman’s discussion [1] on accountability that includesdocumenting formative and summative assessment techniques to evaluate instruction.Elizandro et. al. developed a vertically integrated approach to stakeholder engagement inregional university accountability [2] that originates from this proposed implementationstrategy for ABET accredited programs. However, the concept is easily extendable to allscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) programs [3]. STEM programaccountability is critical because of the regional university
organizational platform and analytical toolsto administer institutional accountability. The approach originates from the quality movementproposed in the 1990’s by W. Edwards Deming for reinventing government as a customer-drivenservice and an adaptation of the Federal Government’s Office of Management and Budget,Congressional Budget Office, and Government Accounting Office. Advantages of the proposedenvironment are an increased emphasis on institutional accountability and quantifying institutionalrisk.I. BackgroundRegional institutions face increasingly complex challenges affecting accountability that includetechnological changes, political uncertainties, financial stability, demographic shifts in studentpopulations, and cultural issues [1]. Dynamic
. Guzey is an assistant professor of science education at Purdue University. Her research and teaching focus on integrated STEM Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Teacher’s Use of Engineering Language in an Engineering Design-Based STEM Integration Unit (Fundamental)IntroductionEngineering practices and concepts are increasingly expected to be taught in pre-collegeclassrooms, as is evident in state [1] and national [2] science standards. One of these practices isthe ability to communicate engineering effectively, which includes understanding and usingengineering design language. A Framework for K-12 Science Education, the document uponwhich the national science
expectations ofcollege level classes and specifically introductory mathematics courses. As a result, withoutappropriate support, most DHH students fail to succeed in introductory mathematics courses intheir first year.For this group of underprepared students, a transitional community and transitional engineeringcourse has been shown to significantly improve their academic success. This paper describes 1)how the establishment of a community of peers with an appropriate academic support structureimproves graduation persistence, 2) how a transition engineering program with an appropriatesupport structure improves success in succeeding in engineering and 3) resources available forinstructors who have DHH students in the classroom.IntroductionPhysical
incorporate the newest technologies in theclassroom either as new course modules or as entirely new courses. Textbooks and laboratoryguides for these courses either don’t exist yet or are out-of-date due to fast-paced changes intechnology, low textbook volumes, and the significant expertise required to write them.The VR course at Colorado State University - Pueblo was designed to introduce graduate studentsto VR concepts through lectures and practical exercises culminating in a mechatronics-related VRproject. However, the developers of this VR course had to overcome a number of challenges. TheSherman and Craig [1] textbook chosen for the course is technologically outdated (published in2003), but is well organized and provides good explanations of
within engineering courses, labs, and programs. The analysis focuses on facultyawardees and their motivations linked to this opportunity. An assessment is presented looking atthe types of projects proposed, how EM was incorporated, when the idea was first conceived,how many times an individual faculty member applied, motivation to apply, and the role offunding in the actual implementation of the project.IntroductionChanging engineering faculty practices in classrooms, labs and programs is challenging and anongoing undertaking within engineering units [1-2]. A major reason for the challenge is thereluctance of faculty to change if what they are doing is familiar and seems to be “working.”Difficulties associated with change are faculty’s readiness
are widely offered at U.S. universities and colleges. Theircharacteristics vary in areas such as content [1], [7], [10], instruction, length of course [2] andtarget student population [5], [8], [11]. For example, based on their content, first-year seminarsare classified into four general categories. Academic seminars focus on the development of skillssuch as critical thinking and written and oral communication. Basic study skills seminars focusprimarily on the development of study skills, grammar, and note taking. Discipline-specificseminars introduce students to specific majors and their related curricular demands. Extendedorientation seminars emphasize adjustment to college and include an introduction to institutionalpolicies, procedures