2018,” World Economic Forum, https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2018. 8. “Transforming Undergraduate Engineering Education (TUEE), Parts I-IV,” ASEE-NSF workshop Report, https://www.asee.org/member-resources/resources/transforming- undergraduate-engineering-education. 9. Benešová, A., Tupa, J., “Requirements for Education and Qualification of People in Industry 4.0,” 27th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, FAIM2017, 27-30 June 2017, Modena, Italy. 10. Das, Kleinke and Pistrui, Reimagining Engineering Education: Does Industry 4.0 Need Education 4.0?, American Society for Engineering Education, 2020. 11. Das, Pistrui, Kleinke, Gehrig
knowledge to build a morediverse and representative future.References [1] S. Zweben, J. Tims, and Y. Timanovsky, “ACM-NDC study 2019—2020: eighth annual study of non-doctoral-granting departments in computing,” ACM Inroads, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 26–37, Aug. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3410475 [2] S. Zweben and B. Bizot, “2017 CRA Taulbee survey,” Computing Research News, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1–47, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://cra.org/resources/taulbee-survey/ [3] E. M. Mercier, B. Barron, and K. M. O’connor, “Images of self and others as computer users: The role of gender and experience,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 335–348, 2006, publisher: Wiley Online Library. [4
learning in the workplace: The Learning Evaluation and Reflection Narrative (LEARN) framework,” J. Work. Learn., vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 658–671, 2018.[4] D. Fisher, A. Bagiati, and S. Sarma, “Fostering 21st century skills in engineering undergraduates through co-curricular involvement,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 24–623.[5] H. Ozturk, L. Cartee, and F. Ligler, “Professional Development for Engineers: A Certificate Program for 3D Undergraduate Experience in Engineering Education,” 2019.[6] A. Webster-Wright, “Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 702–739, 2009, doi: 10.3102/0034654308330970
Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, Paper No. AC 2010-925 7ASEE 2022 Paper, Minneapolis, MN, June 22, 2022 (Submission 22; April 10, 2022)[4] C. Carroll, S. A. Sell, and M. B. Sabick, “Introduction to Entrepreneurial-minded Learningfor Faculty of Foundational STEM Courses Using the KEEN Framework”, 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, Paper #18279[5] https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/618AppendixIn this appendix, the tasks of each module are briefly introduced and student video samples areused to illustrate how each module works in the following sections.Module 1 Tasks: Atomic structure of engineering
the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] B. D. Lutz and M. C. Paretti, “Exploring school-to-work transitions through reflective journaling,” presented at the 2017 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2--28332.[2] R. Stevens, A. Johri, and K. O’Connor, “Professional engineering work,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 2014.[3] J. Trevelyan, “Technical coordination in engineering practice,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 191–204, 2007, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00929.x.[4] D. J
. 168-177, 2019.[6] A. R. Daane, S. R. Decker, and V. Sawtelle, “Teaching about Racial Equity in Introductory Physics Courses,” The Physics Teacher, vol. 55(6), pp. 328-333, 2017.[7] H. Calder, R-J. Sung and J. M. Liu, “Integrating Antiracism, Social Justice, and Equity Themes in a Biochemistry Class,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 99(1), pp. 202–210, 2022.[8] S. E. Walden, Chair, ASEE Commission on Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion, “CDEI Leadership’s Call To ASEE Members To Join The Work Of Disrupting Racism.” [Online]. Available: https://diversity.asee.org/deicommittee/2020/06/09/cdei-leaderships-call-to- asee-members-to-join-the-work-of-disrupting-racism/. [Accessed February 5, 2022].[9] P. H. Bucksbaum, S
from the University de Guanajuato, México, and her MS and PhD degrees (both in Civil Engineering with Environmental emphasis) from Kansas State University. Her research interests are in water and wastewater treatment, natural treatment systems for water remediation, sanitation in developing countries, engineering outreach, service learning, and engineering education. Dr. Palomo has served as chair of the student council, ASCE Environmental and Water Resources Institute (EWRI), she served as division chair and is current member of the Board of Directors of the Environmental Engineering Division of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Dr. Palomo also serves as an ABET Program Evaluator. She is a 2009
be noted that instructorsoften denote several outcomes as “required” for successful completion of the course, for examplein prerequisite courses. The instructor maintains as much control as is needed to ensure largerlearning goals are met, but within that, students can choose the learning level they wish to attain.This Author’s Experience: Motivation for Change.The author first learned about specs grading at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference, whenmeeting with a former colleague who presented his work in that area [5]. The initial appeal wasthat it linked a course more firmly to student learning outcomes, which not only helped withprogram assessment but also reduced the scoring for partial credit that I found distasteful. Basedon the
, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Dr. Sandekian earned degrees in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at CU Boulder (B.S. 1992/M.S. 1994), a Specialist in Education (Ed.S.) degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies (2011), and a Ph.D. in Higher Education and Student Affairs Leadership (2017), both from the University of Northern Colorado. She is a Founding Leader of the American Society of Engineering Education Virtual Community of Prac- tice for LGBTQ+ Inclusion in Engineering and a facilitator of Safe Zone training and participates in various activities of the ASEE Commission of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI).Ms. Dana Francesca Stamo, University of Colorado Boulder Dana earned her bachelor’s degree in
made its initial appearance in education when scholars expressed doubt about the 1956Brown vs. Board of Education ruling (Ladson-Billings & Tate, 1995). Derrick Bell believed theruling pushed an agenda that benefited white elites of the country rather than the educationalwell-being of Black people, a phenomenon Bell (1980; 1995) referred to as interest convergence. In much the same way, traditional citation practices and the manuscript review processbenefit established scholars often with privileged identities (Mott & Cockyane, 2018). Forexample, the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) author’s kit for papersubmissions discusses citation guidelines almost exclusively as it relates to issues of plagiarismor redundant
developed a prescriptive guide for educators.K-12 engineering education has adopted the models used for higher education and industry, andsimplified them to be more age- and developmentally-appropriate. Most of the models arecreated to be prescriptive for the use of educators. In elementary grades, the Engineering isElementary [18] and PictureSTEM [19] curricula introduce simple versions of the engineeringdesign process to students. The Next Generation Science Standards have also presented anengineering design model that is used across all K-12 grade, with three main components:defining and delimiting engineering problems, developing possible solutions, and optimizing thedesign solutions. The recent ASEE Pre-college framework for engineering
Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including Dean’s Awards for Outstanding New Faculty, Outstanding Teacher Award, and a Faculty Fellow. Dr. Matusovich has served the Educational Research and Methods (ERM) division of ASEE in many capacities over the past 10+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal, Advances in Engineering Education and she serves on the ASEE committee for
,” Equity Excell. Educ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 169–180, 2002.[6] K. Cross, K. Clancy, R. Mendenhall, P. Imoukhuede, and J. Amos, “The double bind of race andgender: A look into the experiences of women of color in engineering,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition Proceedings, 2018.[7] N. Griffith, N. M. Hurd, and S. B. Hussain, “‘I didn’t come to school for this’: A qualitativeexamination of experiences with race-related stressors and coping responses among Black studentsattending a predominantly White institution,” J. Adolesc. Res, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 115–139, 2019.[8] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Women,Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017
Student Persistence,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, vol. 2016-June, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.27280.[3] K. A. Feldman, J. C. Smart, and C. A. Ethington, “Using Holland’s Theory to Study Patterns of College Student Success: The Impact of Major Fields on Students *,” Accessed: Aug. 31, 2021. [Online].[4] J. R. Edwards and A. J. Shipp, “Relationship Between P-E Fit and Outcomes 1 The Relationship Between Person-Environment Fit and Outcomes: An Integrative Theoretical Framework,” Accessed: Aug. 31, 2021. [Online].[5] C. Bohndick, T. Rosman, S. Kohlmeyer, and H. M. Buhl, “The interplay between subjective abilities and subjective demands and its relationship with academic success. An
advisors teach?” NACADA Journal, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 65–73, 2005.[4] B. B. Crookston, “A developmental view of academic advising as teaching,” NACADA Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 5–9, 1994.[5] D.G. Creamer and E.G. Creamer, “Practicing developmental advising: theoretical contexts and functional applications,” NACADA Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 17–24, 1994.[6] K. C. Davis, “Examining the efficacy of exam wrappers in a computer science course” Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://216.185.13.174/37120, July 2021.[7] C. Napier, “Thinking about thinking: the relationship between confidence, attainment and metacognition in computer science
, vol. 276, pp. 1-20, 2020.[5] N. Lieu Le and S. P. Nunes, "Materials and membrane technologies for water and energy sustainability," Sustainable Materials and Technologies, vol. 7, pp. 1-28, 2016.[6] L. Malaeb and G. M. Ayoub, "Reverse osmosis technology for water treatment: State of the art review," Desalination, vol. 267, pp. 1-8, 2011.[7] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, "The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education," J. Eng. Ed., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121-130, 2005.[8] W. Chen, U. V. Shah and C. Brechtelsbauer, "A framework for hands-on learning in chemical engineering education—Training students with the end goal in mind," Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 28, pp. 25-29, 2019.[9] S. Freeman, S. L
is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. Grant Nos. 1821638, 1821439, and 1821445. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] M. Koretsky, S. Nolen, B. Self, C. Papadopoulos, J. Widmann, M. Prince, D. Dal Bello, “For Systematic Development of Conceptests for Active Learning,” in Proceedings EDULEARN 19 (11th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies), 2019, vol. 1, pp. 8882–8892.[2] M. D. Koretsky, B. J. Brooks, R. M. White, and A. S. Bowen, “Querying the Questions: Student Responses and
, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] C. G. P. Berdanier, “Genre maps as a method to visualize engineering writing and argumentation patterns,” J Eng Educ, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 377–393, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20281.[2] M. Borrego, “Conceptual difficulties experienced by trained engineers learning educational research methods,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 91–102, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00920.x.[3] S. Dart, S. Trad, and K. Blackmore, “Navigating the path from technical engineering to engineering education research: A conceptual model of the transition
. "Assessment of student learning in an entrepreneurship practicum course." 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2017.[11] M. Pynnönen, J. Hallikas, M. Immonen. “Innovation Commercialisation: Processes, Tools and Implications.” In: Chechurin, L., Collan, M. (eds) Advances in Systematic Creativity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78075-7_19. 2019[12] N. Duval-Couetil, A. Huang-Saad, and M. Wheadon. "Training Faculty in Entrepreneurship and Innovation: An Evaluation of the National Science Foundation Innovation-Corps™ Program." Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy 4.4: 583-608. 2021Appendix AInnovation commercialization surveyThe study is to assess the level of
projects that provide virtual educational experiences for K-12 students on marine science. She loves to cook, ride her bike, and play with her dog. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Reimagining Methodologies: Why We Center Marginalized VoicesAbstractWe are a student, alum, and faculty research team seeking to reduce harm, be responsive to /mitigate / reduce trauma, and grow justice within engineering education pedagogy / practice,related research communities (including ASEE), and the broader world. We seek to utilizeresearch methodologies that align with these aspirations, goals, and commitments. However,many standard
Paper ID #38132“What’s getting in the way?” Personal and ProfessionalBarriers to Engineering LeadershipCindy Rottmann (Associate Director Research) Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director, Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. She conducts research on engineering leadership, engineers' professional practice, and ethics and equity in engineering. She is currently the Program Chair of the ASEE LEAD division.Emily Moore Dr. Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto
, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.24059/olj.v19i2.454.[5] O. Balci, K. Deater-Deckard, and A. Norton, “Challenges in teaching modeling and simulation online,” in 2013 Winter Simulations Conference (WSC), Washington, DC, USA, Dec. 2013, pp. 3568–3575. doi: 10.1109/WSC.2013.6721718.[6] M. Aldoayan, R. Sahandi, D. John, and D. Cetinkaya, “Collaborative Cloud-based Online Courses: Issues and Challenges,” p. 5, 2019.[7] C. Chhetri, “‘I Lost Track of Things’: Student Experiences of Remote Learning in the Covid- 19 Pandemic,” in Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Information Technology Education, Virtual Event USA, Oct. 2020, pp. 314–319. doi: 10.1145/3368308.3415413.[8] J. Bourne, D. Harris, and F. Mayadas, “Online Engineering
minimal Brought no evidence of Work Product of work, in format evidence of evidence of work from last week (0) ready for report (4) work (3) work (2)Figure 1: Original individual report document flow (orange/blue) and revised flow (green/blue)Current DesignIn 2019, we moved to a new assessment model with a team of two to four faculty mentoring andassessing all capstone project teams. No team is assigned to an individual faculty member,instead the mentoring and assessment responsibilities are distributed so that each team hasopportunities to interact with all the faculty mentors. In parallel with this shift, we
construction software applications). Thefirst part of the survey results (as shown in table 1) show that the students believe that theCM260 has moderately prepared them for most conceptual topics except for project schedulingand project management, for which students responded with “slightly prepared”. The “slightlyprepared” could be due to the lack of background knowledge (e.g. construction workflows andthe sequence of construction activities courses that these students would learn after CM 260)among the students for learning the more complicated topics such as construction projectscheduling and management. However, it is possible that the students that took the survey mostlikely took their CM 260 course in the 2019-20 academic year and during the
, pp. 49-60, 2020.[3] A. M. Helmenstine, “How to Write a Lab Report,” thoughtco.com, https://www.thoughtco.com/how-to-write-a-lab-report-606052 (accessed Aug. 27, 2013).[4] R. O’Neill, C. Geiger, K. Csavina and C. Orndoff, “‘Making Statics Dynamic!’ Combining Lecture And Laboratory Into An Interdisciplinary, Problem Based, Active Learning Environment,” in 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii: ASEE, pp. 12.1618.1-12.1618.16, 2007.[5] D. Pink, Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us, New York, NY: Riverhead Books, 2009.[6] C. Walker, “Experiential Learning as a Strategy for Student Completion and Course Success in the Community College
.x. [Accessed Jan. 16, 2022][9] L. Mayo and C. Voter, “Introducing Students to Engineering by Helping Them RePicture Their World,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2019. [Online]. Available at: https://peer.asee.org/32265. DOI 10.18260/1-2--32265[10] N. Fouad, R. Singh, “STEMMNIG the Tide: Why Women Leave Engineering,” 2011. [Online]. Available https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/NSF_Stemming%20the%20Tide%20Why%20Wome n%20Leave%20Engineering.pdf [Accessed Jan. 16, 2022][11] A. Groth, “Most Big Companies Have A Tracking System That Scans Your Resume For Keywords,” Business Insider, January 24, 2012. [Online]. Available https://www.businessinsider.com/most-big-companies-have-a-tracking-system-that-scans- your
other video chat options for virtual instruction.References[1] National Center for Education Statistics, '"Number and percentage of undergraduate studentsenrolled in distance education or online classes and degree programs, by selected characteristics:Selected years, 2003-04 through 2015-16," 2018. [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov[Accessed Jan. 25, 2022].[2] M. Cameron, et al., "2019–20 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:20): FirstLook at the Impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic on Undergraduate StudentEnrollment, Housing, and Finances (Preliminary Data)," 2021. [Online]. Available:https://nces.ed.gov [Accessed Jan. 25, 2022].[3] A. G. Cavinato, R. A. Hunter, L. S. Ott, and J. K. Robinson, “Promoting student
research topics include Engineering Education, Structural Dynamics and Applied Mechanics. He has been a member of the National System of Researchers (SNI) in the Mexican Council of Science and Technology. He has held several position within the School of Engineering, including Head of School and his current post as head of the regional department of Sustainable Technologies and Civil Engineering for the Southern Region of Tecnologico de Monterrey, including seven campuses. His research interests include Computational Mechanics and Engineering Education. Prof. Rodriguez-Paz is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). He is the author of more