“integral part inengineering baccalaureate degree production in higher education [4].” According to the NationalScience Foundation's report, 42% of recipients of an undergraduate degree in engineeringattended a community college [5].Thus, research is needed on this viable and significant university transfer student population. TheNational Science Foundation commissioned a study that was overseen by the National Academyof Engineering’s Committee on Engineering Education and the Committee on Diversity in theEngineering Workforce as well as the National Research Council's Board on Higher Educationand Workforce the National Academies. This study was, in part, to investigate how "educationalinstitutions could improve pathways to careers in engineering
work on academicand undergraduate research projects. Over the years, the activities have outgrown the space. Thecenter and the rest of the building it is housed in will undergo a major renovation through a $450 millionbond package for the Alamo Colleges District. Of that, $83 million will make capital improvements at SanAntonio College.Establishing a college-going culture and promoting STEM was an integral part of MSEIP, which fundedthe Early Development of General Engineering (EDGE) from 2011 to 2015. The summer camp programtaught mathematics, engineering and robotics to high school students. It started with an NSF discretionarygrant in 2003 [50] and served over 300 students with a steady participation of underrepresented minorities,including
assistiant in the Curriculum and Instruction department in the Curry School of Education at University of Virginia. She earned her BS in Chemical Engineering from The Ohio State University.Karina Sylvia Sobieraj, Ohio State University I am a third year Biological Engineering Student pursuing a minor in Biomedical Engineering. I am active in many clubs on campus including Make a Wish and the Society of Women Engineers and I am also an undergraduate researcher for en engineering education research group.Teresa Porter, Ohio State UniversityAlessandra St.Germain, Clemson University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
introduction of computerintroduced in the first segment, all while being attentive to the programming (i.e., in the K-12 years) without good softwaregood software engineering practices acquired in the second engineering practice (including a focus on requirements,segment. In addition to presenting the course curriculum, the design, testing, etc.) risks developing a generation of nearlypaper also discusses a first offering of the course in a three- capable students who are familiar with
and Ethics of Technology). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019The influence of learning context on engineering students’ basic needs, and motivationResearch PaperAbstractIntroduction: Learning context plays an important role in students’ motivation to learn.Intrinsic motivation is important in order to foster students’ deep learning, better performanceand overall well- being. According to Self Determination Theory (SDT) of motivation, threebasic needs should be satisfied for students to achieve intrinsic motivation: the need forautonomy, the need for competence and the need for relatedness. However, less attention hasbeen given to what influences those basic needs
lessons learned in the first year, students were broken intofour groups or teams: the Airframe Team, the RPIC Team, the Video Analysis Team, and theFlight Controls Team. Their respective assignments, which are shown in Appendix A of thispaper, were, for the most part, selected by the students themselves. As would be expected, the Airframe Team was mainly composed of mechanicalengineers who understood lift design, loading characteristics, and the importance of structuralstrength in picking an airfoil profile and design. The team also needed to work with the otherteams to integrate the components needed for the aerial photography mission and autonomousflight mission. Fortunately, mechanical drawings and building techniques were well within
. Eskridge, “What engineers want: lessons learned from five years of studying engineering library users,” in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 14-17, 2015.[3] D. Zwicky, “Work-in progress: “ask us here” in the shadow of hunt library,” in 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 23-26, 2013.[4] A.J. Carroll, B.P. Change, H.N. Eskridge, “Lab-integrated librarians: engagement with unreachable researchers,” in 124th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 25-28, 2017.[5] M. Gross, D. Latham, “Attaining information literacy: an investigation of the relationship between skill level, self-estimates of skill and library anxiety,” Library & Information Science Research
, and fairness and mistreatment in the workplace and in STEM classrooms and programs.Dr. Jeffrey E. Froyd, Ohio State University Dr. Jeffrey E. Froyd is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State Uni- versity, College Station. He received the B.S. degree in mathematics from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. He was an Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Inte- grated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in
[24]. If guidedIBL is used throughout the curriculum, students will be more comfortable with the process andneed less support. For example, the first author has added scaled-back elements of guided IBL toa preceding laboratory course to help the students to get comfortable with the process used in thecourse in this study: students identified the parameters controlled for a series of trials and thedata that needed to be collected to answer an authentic question, but the instructor provided thetesting procedure.We also found it helpful to design a class session during which students develop their methods,so that they have time to think through the authentic problem with their teams, but also for wholeclass discussions to ensure that everyone is
, “Developing and Assessing Students’ Entrepreneurial Skills and Mind-set,” Journal of Engineering Education, 2005, 94 (2), pp. 233-243. 3. MW Ohland, SA Frillman, G Zhang, CE Brawner, and TK Miller III, “The Effect of an Entrepreneurship Program on GPA and Retention,” Journal of Engineering Education, 2004, 93 (4), pp. 293-301. 4. Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network website. Online: https://engineeringunleashed.com. Accessed October 15, 2018. 5. C Korach and J Gargac, “Integrating Entrepreneurial Mindset into Freshman Engineering Curriculum through Active Learning Exercises,” submitted to Proceedings of the 2019 American for Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition. June 16
build a supportive relationship. They are not questioning your knowledge or authority, but rather seeking information and guidance 3. It is beneficial to faculty advisor to understand as much as possible about all programs and the department as a whole. Faculty advisor also should be knowledgeable about courses, curriculum, policies, strategies, and an in-house procedure. They should also be aware of any changes to the program and relay that information to students as soon as possible.ConclusionEffective academic advising is crucial to the long term success of students in Engineering andEngineering Technology disciplines. The academic advisor is the liaison or link between thestudents and the university. It is
is anemerging, highly-connected healthcare network between patients and providers that will improvethe quality of healthcare, facilitate more individualized or personalized therapies, lower costs,and expand accessibility, especially in the developing world. Many of the nodes of the IoMTrequire imaging devices for sensing, patient monitoring, surveillance, and diagnostics. Ashealthcare comprises an increasingly large (∼20%) share of the economy, opportunities fosteredby low-cost, pervasive imaging for the IoMT and other biomedical applications, along withenvironmental monitoring, the technology and should be more prominent in the undergraduateengineering curriculum, either integrated into current course laboratories, such as fluidmechanics
Paper ID #28122Board 14: Materials Division: Measuring Student Learning of Crystal Struc-tures Using Computer-based VisualizationsDr. Susan P. Gentry, University of California, Davis Dr. Susan P. Gentry is an Assistant Professor of Teaching Materials Science and Engineering at the Uni- versity of California, Davis. In her current position at UC Davis, she is integrating computational modules into the undergraduate and graduate materials curriculum. She is specifically interested in students’ com- putational literacy and life-long learning of computational materials science tools. c American
the music and engineering technology curriculums. By leveraging tools from Lean Six-Sigma DMADV process (Define, Measure, Analyze, Design, Verify) the students were able togo from concept to prototype in seven weeks.Background and IntroductionThe inception of this project was with an Electrical Engineering Technology student whosupports himself as a disk jockey (D.J.) His music was stored and controlled by a laptop. Thishad several drawbacks. First, he had to stay at the table with the laptop to start or mix anymusic; he wanted to have options to control the music with a hand-held device, like a smartphone. Another concern was the vagaries of the PC operating system: if the computer needed tore-boot, or had other problems with software, the
marketable skills.2. Project Goals and Tasks The project has multiple goals, as presented next. Goal 1: Establish and integrate a cybersecurity curriculum into the bachelor degrees in IT at USC and NNMC.The programs follow the philosophy of the Wright State Model (WSM)1 of Education. While theyare technology programs, students are required to take math and science up to calculus I. The taskssupporting Goal 1 include: Tasks for Goal 11.1 Create a new cybersecurity core course and implement major modifications in an existing course, which will become the second cybersecurity core course.1.2 Enhance a pre-requisite course by infusing cybersecurity content.1.3 Incorporate an internship experience in
Paper ID #25124Pedagogical Risk Taking: Is It Worth It?Dr. Mohammad Moin Uddin P.E., East Tennessee State University Dr. Mohammad Moin Uddin is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering, Engineering Technology, and Surveying at East Tennessee State University. He holds a joint appointment as an As- sociate Professor of Engineering and Engineering Technology and as a Graduate Faculty member of the Graduate Studies. Dr. Uddin is active in research and scholarship. He has been awarded grants from National Science Foundation, Tennessee Department of Transportation, DENSO and ASEE (ETD mini- grants) and
students in Portugal found that while CSR curriculadid affect student views, there was a strong need for more coherence in how social responsibilitywas integrated into the curriculum in order to effectively put social responsibility andsustainability in the center of the college graduate’s radar screen [17].Still other studies have focused on curricular strategies to increase social responsibility and otherglobal citizenship measures. For instance, Tarrant et al. [18] found that shifting the focus of acourse to a critical social issue (sustainability) did not in and of itself guarantee an increase insocial responsibility. However, offering sustainability-focused courses abroad did produce asignificant increase in attention to social responsibility
commercialFEA software for stress/strain simulations on components and assemblies.4. REFERENCES[1] Lee, R., Capece, V. R., and Baker, J., “Integration Of Finite Element Software In Undergraduate Engineering Courses,” 2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 16-19, Albuquerque, New Mexico.[2] Zecher, J., “Teaching Finite Element Analysis In An Met Program,” 2002 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 16-29, Montreal, Canada.[3] Le, X., Moazed, A. R., and Duva, A. W., “The Design Projects for the Simulation-Based Design Course,” 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 26-29, New Orleans, Louisiana.[4] Papadopoulos, J. M., Papadopoulos, C., and Prantil, V. C., "Philosophy of Integrating FEA Practice Throughout the
Paper ID #27186Board 9: Measuring Change: Research Updates Helping Engineering Stu-dents Tackle Complex, Sustainability ProblemsDr. Elise Barrella, Wake Forest University Dr. Elise Barrella is an Assistant Professor and Founding Faculty Member of the Department of Engineer- ing at Wake Forest University. She is passionate about curriculum development, scholarship and student mentoring on transportation systems, sustainability, and engineering design. Dr. Barrella completed her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Georgia Tech where she conducted research in transportation and sustain- ability as part of the Infrastructure
Links to Retention Research," Minnesota Campus Compact, Minnesota, 2008.[14] T. Kennedy and L. Houghtalen, "Engagement in Practice: Lessons Learned While Developing Community Partners (and a New Engineering Program) for Service Learnin," in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, 2018.[15] W. Oakes, E. Coyle and L. Jamieson, "Curriculum, EPICS: A Model of Service-Learning in an Engineering," in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, St. Louis, 2000.[16] W. Oakes and M. Thompson, "Integration of Service Learning into a Freshman Engineering Course," in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual
extracurricular activities is voluntary andusually based on the inherent interests of the students [4], it can serve as an avenue for theindividual to develop student interests and talents, independent of the engineering curriculum [3].Typically extracurricular activities satisfy the following criteria [3]: (1) not a requirement forgraduation, (2) voluntary participation, (3) structured; participants meet regularly in a contextspecific to the activity, and (4) requires efforts; it must pose some measure of challenge to theindividual engaged in the activity. The motivations for getting involved in EPA P3 projects were to become more attractive topotential employers (e.g., resume builder), to learn hands-on experience on emergingtechnologies, and to
University incollaboration with Bay de Noc Community College. [1] This software was developedspecifically for incorporation into an academic curriculum to give institutions an opportunity tooffer training in situations where robots cannot be afforded, or to augment training in limitedaccess scenarios.This paper will explore the implementation of the “RobotRun” software into an existing roboticscourse as a “Virtual Lab” component. This “Virtual Lab” is then run in parallel with lecture, anda hands-on lab, reinforcing weekly concepts. The course “Programming Industrial Robots” isoffered as an elective, and as course two of a four course robotics concentration for the ElectricalEngineering Technology (EET), and Mechatronics Engineering Technology (MCET
development [17]Nonetheless, while innovation may be an indirect benefit of myriad engineering curricularefforts, instruction may be framed in such a way as to encourage [17] (or discourage [18,19])students’ development of innovative behaviors. Some scholars have emphasized innovation as adesirable outcome of instruction or learning environments [20,21], others as the demonstration ofcertain abilities [22], and yet others as appropriate conceptualizations [23]. As researchers, wemight ask how goals directed towards these distinct ends vary in terms of outcomes. It might bethat the ideal modality involves the integration of multiple efforts, as studies of expert innovatorssuggest that they demonstrate and deploy a variety of approaches and mindsets
the exciting and complex world of professionalengineering practice.References:[1] S. Medha “Cooperative Learning Strategies For Large Classes” Paper presented at 1998 ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle, Washington, USA June 28-July 1 1998. https://peer.asee.org/6990[2] E. Koehn “Collaborative Learning In Engineering Classrooms” Paper presented at 2000 ASEE Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri, USA June 18-21, 2000. https://peer.asee.org/8209[3] N.D. Mallette, M.K. Bothwell, and C. Kelly “Developing an Integrated Curriculum-wide Teamwork Instructional Strategy” Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June 24-27 2018. https://peer.asee.org/30299[4] M
interpreting the regression coefficients, we achieve our secondresearch goal to suggest specific improvements that instructors can use to give their students morefailure opportunities during PBL.1 IntroductionABET’s Criterion 5 requires engineering programs to provide all undergraduate students a majordesign experience that entails technical knowledge and skills acquired through the curriculum andincorporates realistic standards and constraints. The major design experience mentioned in thecriterion is an example of project-based learning (PBL): the theory and practice of using real-worldprojects that have time restrictions to achieve specific objectives and to facilitate individual andcollective learning [1]. PBL is a learner-centered approach that
mental imageryis engaged for both blind and sighted people when interpreting engineering graphics.Mental imagery is cognitively part of visuospatial working memory, used for reasoning [11], andnot merely an internalization of the visual percept (actual sight). Mental imagery differs fromvision in that vision is a bottoms-up process, where visual stimuli are processed into sight, versusa tops-down process where knowledge is processed into imagery [8]. Some visual processes donot occur in mental imagery [12], but mental imagery does seem to depend on areas of the brainrelated to higher levels of integration in typical visual processing [13].Since this study examines how a blind student learned engineering graphics, understandingdifferences in the
consumption in office buildings by integrating research and curriculum development. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019, American Society for Engineering Education
- things like workforce preparation, service and stew- ardship, integrity, equity and justice, or faith.✔ TIP: Craft messages that communicate how change supports the shared values, how change aligns the organization’s values to today’s realities, and how change creates an opportunity to position the organi- zation to enact shared values. “I think all of us want to know how can we make the engineering curriculum more inclusive, what can we do, and at the same time everybody still struggles with needing to cover core content, and if we do something else, will we lose that.” Speak to Stakeholder Motivations Change projects have numerous stakeholders, all with different interests in the process and outcome. Successful
extended beyond my discipline curriculum and I believe it has a great impact on improving my professional skills preparing me for my future career. While participating in this project, I had the opportunity to practice and integrate much of the knowledge I learned during my three years of course work as an undergraduate student. Working in the renewable energy lab in a team of two with an expert professor, enhanced my communication abilities; team working skills; and added a valuable experience that I could not obtain during my usual course work. Throughout the time I spent working on this project, I had the chance to express my ideas and think critically and independently in solving related problems
and international environmen- tal assessment and verification work coupled with radiochemical characterization studies for Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensed sites; and as the lead radiological instructor sup- porting the Global Materials Security - Office of Radiological Security. Mr. Harpenau is also a member of the Department of Energy’s Radiological Assistance and Emerging Threats Programs.Mrs. Evelyn Ann Kaelin, Evelyn Kaelin is a Senior Manufacturing Engineer with Acuity Brands Lighting. She graduated with an A.A.S in Computer Integrated Manufacturing from Vincennes University; going on to complete a B.S. in the same discipline from Indiana State University. After spending over 15