Mathematics, and a BS degree in Mechanical Engineering. He is also a Registered Mechanical Engineer in California, and a Designated Engineering Representative (DER) for the FAA. He resides in California with his wife and three children. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Scaling-up a MOOC at a state university in a cost-effective mannerAbstractEducation in the world is changing rapidly. Online course offerings are increasing at anexponential rate as universities attempt to meet the needs of a diverse global community oflearners. Amidst this potpourri of online courses, massive open online courses (MOOCs) areemerging as an alternative way to educate a multifarious group of learners worldwide
would consist of foursegments. Students were required to work on assignments, take the quiz, and complete thesegment test by a designated date. They were permitted to work ahead of the schedule, butthey were unable to work past any pre-determined deadline.Course information was provided including course description, course goals, class syllabus,grading requirements, and test information (Figure 2). Page 6.356.2Proceeding of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright @ 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationFigure 2 Course information page A
studied how the lab reports were evaluated. We collected the instructional materials,such as course syllabus, lab handouts, or lab report assessments, given to the students from seveninstructors in nine lab courses from both electrical and mechanical engineering programs.The study results may contribute to engineering educators to visualize a school’s engineering labreport writing education. Also, this study presents engineering lab instructors’ writingpedagogies and preparedness for lab report assignments and assessment from the program level.It also suggests room for improvement in engineering lab report writing education.2. Methods of Approach2.1 Study AreaThis study took place in the engineering programs (Electrical and Mechanical) at
and lower the barriers to QISTentry? As outlined in the literature [11]–[16], various factors, such as learning environment, design andorganization of the curriculum, assessment, feedback, and learning new tools outside thestudent's comfort zone can impede learning. This research focused explicitly on identifyingfactors that could serve as barriers within the newly designed modules for the Introduction toQuantum Computing course (EEE 4423).Course Structure of Introduction to Quantum Computing (EEE 4423)The course syllabus was designed to cover the 9 key concepts for Quantum Information Science(QIS) learners [17]. This course aims to provide engineering students with an in-depthunderstanding of quantum computing software as well as some
introduce core computer design concepts primarily to college students studying applied science and technology programs, such as computer science and information technology. With a particular focus on single-board computers and associated hardware modules, students are introduced to core computer compo- nents early in their coursework, and encouraged to study advanced engineering concepts as higher elective courses to help them better understand the underlying design of hardware modules. Hands-on ac- tivities and problem-based modules are re-designed with the flexibility to be applied in settings that involve all in-classroom cohorts, as well as courses offered in synchronous and/or asynchronous online learning methodologies, which is
ideas, and workingcollaboratively with interactive virtual media which aligns with active learning strategies [4]Meanwhile, many round table discussions focused on the advantages and disadvantages ofdistance learning, including a radical idea of permanently replacing certain in-person classeswith a remote teaching mode. Online teaching has been perceived as a temporary response to theglobal health crisis but it warrants careful assessment and consideration as a viable teachingmethod for the next generation of students. The author’s institution deployed diverse modes ofinstruction for the Fall 2020 semester, including asynchronous, synchronous, hybrid, live stream,and in-person courses. Table 1.1 shows the definitions of the various instruction
education (based on Fall 2022 enrollment data) were considered ineach state (n=100). The research team recognizes that there are other institutions beyond these100 teaching civil engineering and that using this set of institutions does not encompass allcoursework offered to students in the U.S. However, following this method enables a reasonablescope while still supporting evaluation of a broad cross-section of civil engineering programs.For the educational institutions identified, the online course catalogs were reviewed forundergraduate- and graduate-level engineering courses related to timber or wood. Course titlesand descriptions were screened for keywords, including “wood,” “timber,” “design,” and“engineering.” General civil engineering
discussion and group problem solving. Computer projectors are typically available, and many instructors project their solutions to problems and explore the models developed in class. PowerPoint is extensively used, as are online videos and images of real reactor systems. Some environments allow students to solve problems on computers alongside the instructor. Some classes are taught in a studio environment to facilitate interaction amongst students.In addition to program determined outcomes, individual instructors tend to have areas ofemphasis corresponding to their individual perceptions of importance of class topics. Typicalindividual goals for this course include Application of conservation laws
teaching that seeks out divergent and creative thinking5. Examples of stepswithin this process may be (a) revision of syllabus to reflect a more inclusiveenvironment, (b) revision of course materials and assignments to reflect a morediverse perspective (for example, choosing readings which reflect a diverseperspective), and (c) using teaching methods which promote openness andinclusivity (including use of non-agonistic rhetoric). These particular methodshave been successfully developed and employed in the authors’ iSTEAMworkshop program which has been applied to a wide variety of STEM courses.Reported results show an increase in student comfort and motivation, reflected inenhanced learning gains6. These rhetoric-based interventions can also help
and2021 – 2022 with an average enrollment of 35 students. Five face-to-face sections utilizing WAGwere offered by five other instructors. Majors from various colleges within the university arerepresented in the student population as College Algebra is a general education requirement(GER) for most majors and programs at the institution.ImplementationStudents in the SBG College Algebra courses were evaluated on demonstrated mastery of 25standards listed in Appendix A. Grading for the course comprised in-class, written assessments,and homework assignments completed using the MyMathLab online homework system. Lettergrades were assigned at the end of the term using the scale in Table 1. Table 1: Grading
in real time during the lab sessions, itbecame clear to me that in most cases the major deficiencies resided in post-lab work and in theirability to submit a coherent, well written final report. Trying to dissect the source and location ofthe deficiencies, I decided to keep track of the performance of the various lab classes with themetric of these parameters. The hope was to be able to characterize with some quantitativemeasures (a) the progress of the class, if any, within the same semester/lab and (b) the progressof the class along the sequence of the four lab courses described above.Accordingly, while all the reports were graded following the syllabus description, I also kept arecord for myself with the marks assigned in each one of the
as an on-demand consultant to thefaculty members in departments delivering the targeted courses. At the end of the semester, asecond meeting with each Chair/Director took place to assess progress toward a systematic androbust process for assessing the Core Outcomes addressed by the targeted courses.5.3 Introduction to Philosophy (PHL 1000)In the original collection of syllabi, only one PHL 1000 syllabus was available. Because this is arequired course for all undergraduate students, multiple sections are offered, and several full-timeand part-time faculty participate in teaching the course. After identifying PHL 1000 as a targetedcourse in this study, the first author requested and obtained from the department Chair the PHL1000 syllabi from
development, areas of greatest mastery and greatest confusion, andcommunicate their understanding to the instructor. A literature review of both homeworkstrategies and classroom assessment techniques shows the development of the dual-submission-with-reflection homework methodology. The instructors administer the methodology throughsyllabus explanations, coversheet templates, and online learning management systems.Instructors discuss the effectiveness, benefits, and drawbacks of the methodology. Results fromstudent surveys illustrate the effectiveness of each component of the dual-submission-with-reflection homework methodology.KeywordsHomework, Instructor Perspectives, Student PerspectivesIntroductionHomework in engineering courses serves many
both of these areas. He has implemented online instructional tools to enhance student experience in hydraulics and hydrology courses.Dr. Ken Rainwater, Texas Tech University Dr. Ken Rainwater is a Professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineer- ing at Texas Tech University. Rainwater has 34 years of experience in water resources and environmental engineering. He teaches courses in fluid mechanics, environmental engineering, engineering hydrology, water systems design, groundwater hydrology, groundwater contaminant transport, and water resources management. His research expertise is in problems of groundwater quantity and quality, remediation of soil and groundwater contamination, and
tools withtheir courses? And does this embracement and usage change over time?This study examined both the embracement and usage patterns of a group of freshman studentswith an online learning management system in the School of Engineering and Technology atIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) through their first 18 months. Asurvey was administered twice, once following the first semester of the freshman year and oncemidway through the first semester of the sophomore year. The survey questions focused onevaluating the amount of engagement and usage of the learning management system. Severalopen-ended questions concentrated on learning what students found especially difficult innavigating the environment; how they perceive
as a resource to students [2] [3]. With larger research institutions oftenhaving more laboratory equipment available for student use, students benefit from the combinedresources of both institutions and collaboration between unique student cultures and perspectives[4].To foster such collaboration, MOOCIBL (Massively Open Online Course for Innovation-BasedLearning) was used as the central learning management system for a multi-institutionalCardiovascular Engineering course across four universities around the United States [5]. Thecourse introduces students to a non-traditional Innovation-Based Learning environment. In thislearning model, students define and track their learning goals by creating tokens representingtheir completed learning
students and advisors. Like a course syllabus, it is a sort ofcontract and spells out the roles and responsibilities of both advisor and student. It is meant to beupdated each semester and contains practical information such as resources, deadlines, andrelevant campus offices. It also should contain learning objectives or outcomes. Such a syllabuscan then provide a basis for assessment of an advising program or individual advisors.If the ideas of Lowenstein24 are applied to the syllabus, i.e. that the advisor’s job is to inculcatethe student with the entire curriculum, both formal and informal, then the advising syllabuswould be expected to differ for liberal arts degrees and professional degrees. In the case ofengineering degrees, we propose that
over 32,000 times, an average of 232 views perstudent during one semester of Molecules and Cells.The Blackboard course site and syllabus links provide access to over 100 videos, animations, andsimulations. The videos are generally under five minutes and give the student a quick firstexposure to the terms and concepts which will be covered in more depth during the lecture.Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWUBased on survey data, 30% of the students took advantage of these online resources. Thesimulations on Blackboard allowed students to work through multiple scenarios, such as theeffect of varying concentrations of an enzyme inhibitor on product formation, or the effect ofglucose on activation of the lac operon. We
SUN MON TUE WED THUR FRI SATFigure 3: Students accessed the Blackboard site over 32,000 times, an average of 232 views perstudent during one semester of Molecules and Cells.The Blackboard course site and syllabus links provide access to over 100 videos, animations, andsimulations. The videos are generally under five minutes and give the student a quick firstexposure to the terms and concepts which will be covered in more depth during the lecture.Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWUBased on survey data, 30% of the students took advantage of these online resources. Thesimulations on Blackboard allowed students to work through multiple scenarios, such as theeffect of varying concentrations of an enzyme inhibitor
platform.The relation between CDIO and these platforms are shown in Fig. 2. These platforms areillustrated below.1) Teaching integration platformThis platform can integrate, manage and adapt a variety of teaching resources withcustomization features including e-learning systems, virtual training or simulation systems,online to offline teaching laboratories, etc. The platform is employed for the management ofhandouts, simulation, courseware, practice, exams, and students, and it covers all teachingtasks of the required courses of related product projects. After learning all task-specificknowledge points involved in a CDIO product project, students can access and learn allneeded knowledge and skills to complete the project, for example, the application
using e-mail to clarify assignments was enough, but a largemajority (87 percent) wanted both clarification and reminders.Much of the information students want in e-mail is already in the syllabus and course materials.Reading these materials and taking notes in class would seem to be sufficient, thus making e-mail unnecessary. Surprisingly, 84 percent recommended a weekly Sunday night messagealerting students to happenings and assignments in the upcoming week. This method may seemlike coddling. To clarify this point, I later added a statement in a brief addendum to thequestionnaire: “Sending reminders of assignments one or two days before they are due and aSunday night reminder of the upcoming week’s work is coddling students.” Sixty-nine
sequencing was deemed important as these topics served as examples in CAD topicslater (e.g. designing machine elements) and students had to be mindful of engineering designconsiderations (e.g. mechanical strength, cost, quality) in design assignments. Moreover, itwas thought that having traditional, in-person sessions that required moderate engagementand were predictable in their flow at the start of the semester would allow the students andthe instructor to ‘settle in’, develop a sense of community, and understand the norms andexpectations of the course. In subsequent weeks, the less traditional pedagogical approachesdiscussed next were deployed.Flipped Teaching:It was inadvertently discovered during the first (online-only) iteration of the course
workplacesuccess.Pre-Research ActivitiesThe research team conducted a comprehensive literature review in the areas of advancedmanufacturing education, employment, entrepreneurship, and intrapreneurship. This literaturereview will be used to refine the research questions and ground the study findings. The researchteam has also compiled relevant national, state, and professional AM competency standards aswell as prevailing industry certifications.Data Collection and Analysis MethodsTo answer the RQs, the research team completed several data collection and analysis activitiesincluding:1. We used content analysis of AM course syllabi to develop lists of skills gained by students who successfully completed AM coursework. The unit of analysis was a syllabus from
://www.serceb.org/dualuse/welcome.htm)and the NIH Office of Extramural Research online module “Protecting Human ResearchParticipants”(http://phrp.nihtraining.com/users/login.php). Using publically available onlineresources created some challenges. For examples, updating of resources meant that theinstructors could not rely on the content or location of the assigned materials to remain stablebetween syllabus development prior to the start of term and the date students completed or triedto complete assignments. Some students also had trouble accessing materials, especially videoclips. On the positive side, students received their CITI Program RCR training certificates as partof the course. Starting in June 2010, our institution has required all graduate
curricular level due to the fact that the results were not sharedwith other faculty members of the same curricular block or area. Neither were improvementactions shared, thus in this aspect, faculty efforts were autonomous and isolated.Beginning in 2011, we implemented curricular reform based on the CDIO Syllabus 2.0 [5] [6],which takes the evolution and consolidation of knowledge and skills along the curriculumbuilding blocks into account. At that point, we used the CDIO Syllabus 2.0 (linked to Standard3) as a resource for curriculum benchmarking. We did not use the complete CDIO framework,which includes twelve Standards focused on program improvement. As a result, the curricularcontent of the courses of a given block or area began to exhibit
faculty in southeast Georgiaand remotely by faculty on the main campus. This system is further complicated by the fact thatcourses are delivered to three partner institutions as well as the GTREP facilities.In order to effectively deliver course content in this situation, we have developed a combinedsynchronous and asynchronous system for content delivery. Asynchronous course contentcreation is based on the inFusion system we developed for rapid multimedia content generation.In order for faculty to become involved in the development of online or computer enhancedlecture materials, the production process must be easy and convenient. Faculty use a very simpleinterface to synchronize graphics, video, and audio into a coherent presentation viewable
courses gradually decreased from 85-90% to 55-60 % in large classes. In 2016 theuniversity established an “Instructor-initiated Drop policy”. The policy allows instructors to dropthose students who exceeds the absence or missed assignment limits for the class described andspecified in the course syllabus. The newly established “Instructor-initiated Drop policy” wasadopted and enforced in three different courses taught from fall 2018 through fall 2019 semesters.The policy improved class attendance, completion of homework assignments, and student passrates. During the COVID pandemic the university suspended the “Instructor-initiated Droppolicy” and did not re-initiated it until fall 2022. In teaching upper division courses in fall 2021and spring
Design-driven and a Science-driven teaching approach22 MethodologySyllabus Comparison Globally, University curricula of Materials Science and Engineering vary considerably. Studyprogrammes range from pure Materials Science, deeply focused on the microstructuralunderstanding of properties, to industrial applications with only the basics. Furthermore, manyUniversities have Materials Science courses closely related to Engineering. Five relevant syllabi(see Table 1) were studied to identify target areas and learning outcomes.Table 1. Description of the courses selected to represent relevant syllabi# University Degree Course Syllabus 1 Tampere University of Technology (Finland) MSci
Enhancement of Engineering Education in October 2021 and shared with the task force.Table 1 depicts the syllabus statements reviewed in the coding analysis and the percentage ofinstructors who included those topics in their course syllabus. This review found that facultyexpectations in FYS sections varied greatly by instructor. It was determined that the extant FYSgoals and objectives outlined by the College were not being consistently communicated tostudents via FYS instructor syllabi. The Engineering Passport to Success, a COE-sponsoredcollection of assignments which presently represent the only centralized content in FYS coursesacross all sections, were referenced in only half of the reviewed syllabi. The most commoncomponents across most FYS
students in at least 14 sections, it was apparent thatthis model would not work. So, two engineering librarians teamed up with the group ofinstructors to provide library information modules for the course.Technical writing is an essential skill for developing and practicing engineers. Engineering 101is a freshman-level engineering problem-solving course at WVU which requires students to writeat least two technical reports. Past experience indicates that students typically have difficultyunderstanding the function and content of the parts of a technical report, defining and avoidingplagiarism, evaluating the validity and veracity of online sources, and finding appropriatesources to use in research background information on an assigned topic. The