, though not fully uniform along the entire length. Figure 7: (A) Top view of LNMC-PLA filaments (B) Close-up view of the obtained filamentOnly the LNMC-PLA was used to 3D print two 3D objects. Printing dimensions as well asresulting 3D objects for those two tests can be found in figures 8 and 9. The first print had a layerheight of 0.12 mm with a shell thickness of 1.2 mm. Print speed was set at 70 mm/s, printingtemperature at 200 °C and bed temperature at 65 °C to improve adhesion of the first layer. The filldensity was set at 20%. It was observed that the first layer stayed mainly intact, while subsequentlayers degraded in quality and became very porous. For this reason, height of the 3D object for thesecond print was reduced to 1 mm, the fill
. Raubenheimer, “Effects of Active Learning on Student Performance and Retention”, in 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2008, pp. 13.473.1-13.473.8.[2] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol 111, no 23, pp. 8410–8415, Jun 2014.[3] S. Ghanat, J. Kaklamanos, S. I. Selvaraj, C. Walton-Macaulay, M. Sleep, “Assessment of Students’ Prior Knowledge and Learning in an Undergraduate Foundation Engineering Course”, in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2017, p. 27642.[4] A. M. Johnson, G. Ozogul, M. Reisslein, “Supporting multimedia learning with visual
that Kung et al.’s (2022) paper actually listed ChatGPT as a co-author. On the other hand, Thorp (2023) has declared that ChatGPT cannot be considered anauthor since research is an intrinsically human endeavor. Thorp (2023) similarly specified thattext generated by artificial intelligence has been restricted from appearing in Science journals. Inany case, the text of the proposed question group follows: A major writing assignment is coming up for an engineering student’s capstone design course during a very busy part of the semester. There are a few major sections of the paper that require mostly formulaic responses. A student in the course decides to use ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence chatbot, to write those
; Exposition, Montreal, Canada, June 16-19, 2002.2. Martino, N., & Ghanem, A., “Innovative Approach to Teaching Applied Structures Courses,” Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 26-29, 2016.3. Sitaram, P., & Manyama, A. M, “Computer Analysis of Structures for Architectural Technology Students,” Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE North Central Section Conference, Morgantown, WV, March 27, 2020.4. Rojiani, K.B., & Schottler, R., “Java Applets for Structural Analysis,” Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, St. Louis, MO, June 18-21, 2000.5. Navaee, S., & Das, N., “Utilization of MATLAB in Structural Analysis
. González-Álvarez, S. González-García, and M. Mauricio, "Potential impact on the recruitment of chemical engineering graduates due to the industrial internship," Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 26, pp. 107-113, 2019.[5] R. S. Pillutla, L. Mohan, V. Choppella, A. Jesrani, P. Raman, and Y. R. Reddy, "Towards Massively Open Online Virtual Internships in Computing Education," in 2019 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), 2019, pp. 90-93.[6] D. Oner, "A virtual internship for developing technological pedagogical content knowledge," Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 36, pp. 27-42, 2020.[7] N. C. Chesler, A. Ruis, W. Collier, Z. Swiecki, G. Arastoopour, and D
need forSIVs as a tool in their courses.ReferencesReferences[1] Belo, R., Ferreira, P., and Telang, R. (2014). "Broadband in School: Impact on StudentPerformance." Management Science, 60(2), 265–282.[2] Melton, B., Graf, H., & Chopak-Foss, J. (2009). “Achievement and Satisfaction in BlendedLearning Versus Traditional General Health Course Designs. International Journal for theScholarship of Teaching and Learning. V.3 I.1.[4] Adhikari, S., Mosier, R and Langar, S.. (2021). “Challenge of Delivering Constructioncourses in an Online Environment Based on Faculty Experiences.” Conference Proceedings,Associated Schools of Construction April 2021.[5] Edgcomb, A. D., Vahid, F., Lysecky, R., Knoesen, A., Amirtharajah, R., and Dorf, M. L.(2015
and Student Motivation," J. Ed. Psych., vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 261-271, 1992.[3] A. Kaplan and M. L. Maehr, "The Contributions and Prospects of Goal Orientation Theory," Educational Psychology Review, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 141-184, 2006, doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5.[4] A. Kaplan, M. J. Middleton, T. Urdan, and C. Midgley, "Achievement Goals and Goal Structures," in Goals, goal structures and patterns of adaptive learning, C. Midgley Ed.: Taylor & Francis, 2002, ch. 2, pp. 21-53.[5] C. Senko, C. S. Hulleman, and J. M. Harackiewicz, "Achievement Goal Theory at the Crossroads: Old Controversies, Current Challenges, and New Directions," Educational Psychologist, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 26-47, 2011
Paper ID #36585Action-State Orientation as An Impediment to EngineeringStudent SuccessPaul E SpectorChris S Ferekides (Professor) (University of South Florida) Chris S. Ferekides received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of South Florida. He has been a faculty member in the Electrical Engineering Department since 1992. He is currently service as the department chair, and is the principal investigator of a NSF Funded RED Project that addresses the professional formation of electrical engineering students. His research is in the areas of electronic materials with a focus on
Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, vol. 16(2), p. 2–22, 2017 (Spring). [5] D. S. Rose M. Karra, Kelly A. Rodgers and B. Bogue, “Leaving engineering: A multi-year single institution study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101(1), pp. 6–27, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x [6] K. Jensen and K. J. Cross, “Student perceptions of engineering stress culture,” in The ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019. [7] E. Godfrey and L. Parker, “Mapping the cultural landscape in engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99(1), pp. 5 – 22, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01038.x [8] J
, title is checked to ensure proper formatting of the plot. Points will beassigned to each test evenly if the instructor selects the “Correct/Incorrect” option underAssessment Method. Different weights can be assigned to different tests by choosing the“Weighted” option, as shown in Figure 2, if the instructor would like to emphasize certainaspect(s) of the solution. Figure 2, Types of tests for assessmentNormally the default feedback shown under a failed test case is sufficient to help students correctthe mistake. Additional feedback can be entered by the instructor if necessary. An example of afailed test with default feedback is shown in Figure 3. When students are attempting theexercises in MATLAB Grader, their
to Germany. He is currently an Associate Professor at York College of PA. His current research interests include unmanned systems, drones, control theory, and astrophotography.Stephen Andrew Gadsden Dr. S. Andrew Gadsden is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at McMaster University and is Director of the Intelligent and Cognitive Engineering (ICE) Laboratory. His research area includes control and estimation theory, artificial intelligence and machine learning, and cognitive systems. Dr. Gadsden completed his Bachelors in Mechanical Engineering and Management (Business) and then earned his PhD in Mechanical Engineering at McMaster in the area of estimation theory with applications to
summer course focused on writing in engineering.Christopher D. Schmitz (Teaching Professor and Chief UndergraduateAdvisor)John S Popovics John Popovics is a Professor, Associate Head, and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Civil & Environmental Engineering Department at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His interests include writing instruction for engineering students.Holly M Golecki (Teaching Assistant Professor) Dr. Holly Golecki (she/her) is a Teaching Assistant Professor in Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign and an Associate in the John A Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences at Harvard University. She holds an appointment at the Carle-Illinois College
STEM programs toidentify any additional challenges they may face. Finally, since this survey was completed pre-COVID, future assessment will be conducted to determine and compare the change betweenengineering and science students’ challenges and needs during and post-pandemic.References[1] C. de Brey, T. D. Snyder, A. Zhang, and S. A. Dillow, Digest of Education Statistics 2019. 55th Edition. NCES 2021-009. National Center for Education Statistics, 2021. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED611019[2] “The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2022 | NSF - National Science Foundation.” https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221/u-s-and-global-stem-education-and-labor-force#s-e- higher-education-in-the
Paper ID #37526Work In Progress: Reversi: A Platform for TeachingProgramming LanguagesSiwei He (Student) Siwei is a fourth-year undergraduate student at University of Toronto. He works on research projects in file system, debugger, and machine learning application. Before that, he had experience in projects related to FPGA and worked as an FPGA software engineer intern at Intel. Siwei is an active contributor in the GNU GDB project. Github: @Louis-HeHamid S Timorabadi (Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream) Hamid Timorabadi received his BSc, MASc, and PhD degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of
will draw on research team meeting notes, formative feedback survey responses, andnarrative reflections from URFs to support our claims. Research leads also share theirperspectives on recruiting, onboarding and working with the URFs and describe some of themacro-ethical considerations that motivated their partnership with URFs [4, 5].Dr. Turpen and Dr. Radoff, the research leads, and a subset of URFs (K. Rahman, S. Bikki, K.Adkins, and H. Sangha) collaboratively developed this paper. We organize our findings into threeparts; we describe: (a) the multiple ways the research leads benefited from this collaboration, (b)the multiple ways the URFs have benefited from this collaboration, and (c) the joint workprocesses and routines within our
prototyping activities. The specifics of theproject appear to influence the general way that students engage with the design process.However, in both projects, many students engaged in the studying the brief and planning theprocess steps, which is more characteristic of expert designers. Based on our results, wehypothesize that the nature of the materials selection process may prompt students to engage inthese crucial knowledge gaining steps.References[1] H. Mahajan, S. M. Naik, S. M, C. Kannaiah, and S. Majeedullah, “Impact of Project-Based Learning for Improving Students Skills by Incorporating Design Thinking Process,” J. Eng. Educ. Transform., vol. 34, no. SP ICTIEE, Art. no. SP ICTIEE, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157150.[2
development.AcknowledgementsThe ORCA team would like to show thanks to Dr. Ana Goulart for the support on this capstoneproject task. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & ExpositionReferences[1] R. D. Ballard, A. M. McCann, D. Yoerger, L. Whitcomb, D. Mindell, J. Oleson, H. Singh, B. Foley, J. Adams,D. Pechota, C. Giangrande, “The discovery of ancient history in the deep sea using advanced deep submergencetechnology,” Deep sea research part I: Oceanographic research papers, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1591-1620, 2000.[2] W. Koterayama M. Nakamura, and S. Yamaguchi, “Underwater Vehicles and Buoy Systems Developed forOcean Observations in the Research Institute for Applied
: Routledge), 2016, pp.183–195.[2] B. Bevan, J. J. Ryoo, A. Vanderwerff, M. Petrich, and K. Wilkinson, “Making deeperlearners: a tinkering learning dimensions framework,” Connect. Sci. Learn. 7. 2018.[3] M. South, S. Ozonoff, and W. M. McMahon, “Repetitive behavior profiles in Aspergersyndrome and high-functioning autism,” J. Autism Dev. Disord. vol. 35, pp. 145–158, 2015, doi:10.1007/s10803-004-1992-8[4] X. Wei, J. W. Yu, P. Shattuck, M. McCracken, and J. Blackorby, “Science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) participation among college students with an autismspectrum disorder,” J. Autism Dev. Disord, vol. 43, pp. 1539–1546, 2013, Doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1700-z[5] P. T. Shattuck, S. C. Narendorf, B. Cooper, P. R. Sterzing, M. Wagner, and
Professor in the Center for Writing Studies and the Department of English at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Since 2016, he has been part of a team engaged in transdisciplinary action research on writing in STEM classes and curricula.John Gallagher John R. Gallagher is an assistant professor at the University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign. He studies interfaces, participatory audiences, and technical communication.John S Popovics John Popovics is a Professor, Associate Head, and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Civil & Environmental Engineering Department at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His interests include writing instruction for engineering students.Celia Mathews
# 1741910. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. This project investigates the potential of the Collective Argumentation Learning and Coding(CALC) concept for integrating the teaching of computer coding and other computer sciencecontent into the standard practices already used to teach different elementary (grades 3-5)curriculum content. Elementary school teachers significantly influence student motivation toengage in coding and are being asked to provide increased instruction on coding. Unfortunately,few practicing teachers have academic backgrounds in computer coding. This project aims toidentify
they be assessed?. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 41-55.4. Khan, H. N. (2017). Scaling Moore's wall: Existing institutions and the end of a technology paradigm. Doctoral dissertation. Carnegie Mellon University.5. Benham, M., Foster, T., Gambell, T., & Karunakaran, S. (2020). The resilience imperative for medtech supply chains. McKinsey & Company. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/ourinsights/the-resilience- imperative-for-medtech-supply-chains.6. Batur, D., Bekki, J. M., & Chen, X. (2018). Quantile regression metamodeling: Toward improved responsiveness in the high-tech electronics manufacturing industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(1), 212-224.7
technology innovation and entrepreneurship: Moving beyond research funding through the NSF I- CORPS™ program. Technology & Innovation, 19(4), 773-786. [3] Rao, G. N., Williams, J. R., Walsh, M., & Moore, J. (2017). America's seed fund: How the SBIR/STTR programs help enable catalytic growth and technological advances. Technology & Innovation, 18(4), 315-318. [4] Fechner, H., & Shapanka, M. S. (2018). Closing diversity gaps in innovation: Gender, race, and income disparities in patenting and commercialization of inventions. Technology & Innovation, 19(4), 727-734. [5] Gassmann, O. (2001). Multicultural teams: increasing creativity and innovation by diversity
pathway for sustainability,” Sustainable Development, vol. 15, no.6, pp. 370–381, 2007, doi: 10.1002/sd.322.[3] Z. Fadeeva, “Promise of sustainability collaboration—potential fulfilled?,” Journal of CleanerProduction, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 165–174, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1016/S0959-6526(03)00125-2.[4] A. L. Powers, “An Evaluation of Four Place-Based Education Programs,” The Journal ofEnvironmental Education, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 17–32, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.3200/JOEE.35.4.17-32.[5] D. X. Román, M. Castro, C. Baeza, R. Knab, S. Huss-Lederman, and M. Chacon, “Resilience,collaboration, and agency: Galapagos teachers confronting the disruption of COVID-19,” The Journal ofEnvironmental Education, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 325–334, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1080
equity, inclusion, and diversity activities in first-year engineering classes," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019 [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32782[4] L. Mohandas, N. Mentzer, A. Jaiswal, and S. Farrington, "Effectiveness of Undergraduate Teaching Assistants in a First-Year Design Course," in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020 [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/34503[5] A. M. Phillips, K. M. Kecskemety, and D. A. Delaine, "First-year Engineering Teaching Assistant Training: Examining Different Training Models and Teaching Assistant Empowerment," in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018 [Online]. Available: https
platform is encouraged as it broadens the types ofproblems that instructors can successfully implement in the platform.AcknowledgmentsThis work was completed under Cornell University IRB protocol #2108010487. We thank Dr.Mariana Silva and Nicolas Nytko for their helpful conversations about how best to implementexploded FBD support in PL and technical assistance incorporating the new object into theplatform. We thank also Dr. Erika Mudrak from Cornell Statistical Consulting Unit for invaluableassistance with the statistical analysis.References [1] P. Cornwell and A. H. Danesh-Yazdi, “Good strategies to avoid bad fbds,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32877 [2] K. N. Leipold and S. R
, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (2021). Flow. Natur & Kultur Allmänlitteratur.Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109.Interpol. (2020). COVID-19 Cybercrime Analysis Report. https://www.interpol.int/en/News- and-Events/News/2020/INTERPOL-report-shows-alarming-rate-of-cyberattacks-during- COVID-19Krauss, C., Chokshi, N., & Sanger, D. (2021, May 12). Gas pipeline hack leads to panic buying in the southeast. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/11/business/colonial-pipeline-shutdown-latest- news.htmlMcKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C
, J.C., Small, M.J., Shonnard, D.R., Hokanson, D.R., Zhang, Q., Chen, H., Sorby, S.A., James, V.U., Sutherland, J.W. and Schnoor, J.L., “Sustainability science and engineering: the emergence of a new metadiscipline.” Environmental science & technology, 37(23), pp.5314-5324, 2003.3. Brundtland, G.H., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S. and Chidzero, B., “Our common future.” New York, p.8, 1987.4. Haapala, K. R., Zhao, F., Camelio, J., Sutherland, J. W., Skerlos, S. J., Dornfeld, D., Jawahir, I. S., Clarens, A. F., and Rickli, J. L., "A Review of Engineering Research in Sustainable Manufacturing." J. Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 135 (4): 041013, 2013.5. Nidumolu, R., Coimbatore P. K., and
Science Foundation for support of this research (Award # EEC-1734347). The views expressed herein are solely the authors’. References[1] R. Brent, M. Orr, C. E. Brawner, and C. Mobley, “Who tells your story? A card-sort activity for eliciting authentic narratives,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 20, pp. 1-11. 2021.[2] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, Social cognitive career theory,” in Career choice and development, 4th ed., D. Brown, Ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2002, pp. 255- 311.[3] K. Meyers, V. Goodrich, S. Blackowski, and E. Spingola, “Factors affecting first-year engineering students’ choice of majors,” International Journal of
Teaching Practices, Students’ Self-Perceptions, and Gender,” Rev. High. Educ., vol. 24, pp. 173–191, Dec. 2001, doi: 10.1353/rhe.2000.0028.[3] J. Ponterotto, “Racial/ethnic minority and women students in higher education: A status report,” New Dir. Stud. Serv., vol. 1990, pp. 45–59, Aug. 2006, doi: 10.1002/ss.37119905206.[4] S. J. Quaye and S. R. Harper, “Faculty Accountability for Culturally Inclusive Pedagogy and Curricula,” Lib. Educ., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 32–39, 2007, Accessed: Jan. 26, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ775570[5] J. Milem, M. Chang, and A. Antonio, “Making Diversity Work on Campus: AResearch- Based Perspective,” May 2012.[6] G. L. Bauman, L. T. Bustillos, E. M. Bensimon, M. C. B. Ii, and R
based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. 2010237 and 2010139. We wish to thank the student participants in the Design Talksproject.ReferencesBloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart‐Faris, N. (2004). Discourse analysis and the study ofclassroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. Mahwah, NJ: RoutledgeCapobianco, B.M., DeLisi, J., & Radloff, J. (2018). Characterizing elementary teachers’ enactment of high-leveragepractices through engineering design-based science instruction. Science Education. 102(2), 342–376.Carlone, H. B., Mercier, A. K., & Metzger, S. R. (2021). The Production of Epistemic Culture and Agency during aFirst-Grade Engineering