Approachreaction leading to reduced crop losses and an increase food security. Tsubsection presents the main idea that PHL technologies are not continually implemented due toa misalignment of resources, needs, and cultural norms. Here, cases found in the backgroundsection possible solutions are discussed.Figure 4. Solution section for volunteer module designed to be adaptable.Solution: This section discusses the process through which the issue will be addressed as shownin Fig. 4. The results from the background and household sections will be presented in anAudience subsection. Under Tools, volunteers will be asked to reflect on this module and discussthe teaching strategies used to engage with the audience and increase memory retention. Anyother
) providing energy for the future, (2) restoring andimproving urban infrastructure, (3) improving the environment, (4) improving healthcare, (5)improving education through personalized learning, and (6) securing personal and organizationalinformation more so than when they began the course (tables 3 and 4). However, significantdifferences between time points were not observed given our small sample size. Tables 1 and 2are broken up by gender to show the comparison of men and women’s interest in topics withinaerospace, while tables 3 and 4 reflect the knowledge all students of both genders felt they hadbefore and after the class.Table 1: Women’s reported interest in application of aerospace engineering at Time 1. Note: N=3 Provide en
informed videos, as well as comparingevaluations between evaluator categories. Faculty were generally of the opinion that studentwork that included TRAC input performed worse in the Analysis category (p<0.05). Graduatestudent evaluators agreed that the TRAC-informed videos were of a higher quality in thecommunication and visual aid categories (p<0.05), which may reflect a generational gap in theexpectations of audio-visual content. Faculty evaluations also exhibit a wider spread than that ofthe graduate student evaluations. A general trend (although not statistically significant, p>0.1)can be seen with faculty evaluations decreasing with higher Bloom’s Achievement levels. This issomewhat expected, as faculty are frequently subject to
of Danish and American students. This understanding fact made the first contacts very formal and reflected by writing long, very formal e-mails. This turned out to have a negative effect on the efficiency of communication and project progress. It should later turn out, that this assumption of having to stay formal was false and the visit of DTU students at PURDUE changed totally the students’ assumptions of cultural differences between the teams. As the project progressed, the cultural differences did seem to merge into a “universal culture”, with the aim of succeeding with the
to learn more about ground level air quality 4.32 ±0.77 This demo activity was a good use of class time 4.71 ±0.57 I benefited from this demo activity 4.57 ±0.66The remaining two questions asked students their perspective on the impact and quality of thedemonstration. Students provided ranked responses, No Impact (1) to High Impact (5), to thequestion on “What impact has this activity had on your understanding of inversion in theatmosphere,” resulting with an average and standard deviation of 4.23±0.75. Six of the 31 studentsdid respond “Neutral (3)” for this question, reflecting that they were not influenced in eitherdirection. For the
projects was also unable to provide the necessary time andfocus.Therefore at the end of academic year 2015, to better manage these increasingly large and diverseprojects, the discipline-specific course directors proposed several changes that resulted in theformation of XE401/402 from CS, EE, and IT 401/402. The development of the XE401/402sequence included several changes, including development of a hybrid “agile-waterfall” designprocess, a focus on reflection within the design process, and these faculty and stakeholder roles.This paper focuses on the implementation of the roles.Faculty model influences role assignmentThe faculty model at West Point includes a relatively large proportion of transient members.Approximately half our faculty consists
required for reproducible measurements,some students expressed frustration about the amount physical labor required to collect enoughwater to pump through the wetland, as well as the time required to measure water quality tests intriplicate on top of operating a wetland with a six to twelve hour retention time. The students whowere working solo on the project wished that they had a teammate to help with the physical laborand/or the measuring of the many water samples. They also reflected that a teammate would havebeen helpful when making decisions by acting as a sounding board. Students also wished for moredocumentation on procedures and practices.The summer students suggested that the extra programs such as journal club or university
methodologies. Upon further investigation, it also became clear that ourtenure and promotion guidelines varied significantly from one academic unit to another; somevaluing the quantity of work at the expense of quality, and others valuing grants received overthe impact of the scholarship. This structural variability was reflected also by the thoughtvariance among our senior leadership. The consequence was friction, misinformation, andfrustration at many levels of the university. In response, we read and then discussed ErnestBoyer’s model of scholarship [5]—the scholarships of discovery, application, integration, andteaching—with each group (i.e. organizational “top” and organizational “bottom”) individually.Outcomes to date include more open
Belonged More in this Whole Engineering Group:’ Achieving Individual Diversity,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 103–115, 2007.[5] D. M. Masters, A. S., & McNair, L. D., & Riley, “Identifying Practices of Inclusion in Maker and Hacker Spaces with Diverse Participation,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[6] V. Wilczynski, “Academic Maker Spaces and Engineering Design,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015.[7] J. Walther, N. Sochacka, and N. Kellam, “Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 626–659, 2013.[8] N. Kellam and A. Cirell, “Quality Considerations in Qualitative Inquiry
workas a reflection of themselves. For example, Wynita, a third-year robotics engineering student,described how the makerspace allows her to create. In the makerspace environment, I don’t feel like I’m being pushed to do something. I’m working on this. I’m going to do it my way. No ifs, ands, or buts about it. This is going to be me. This is going to be my own work.It appeared that more time in the makerspace for these participants to create their own projectsfostered more autonomy and confidence. The makerspace also represented an environmentwhere there was some flexibility for trial and error. Although Winnie noted that female makers,including herself, felt self-imposed pressure to maintain perfection, she also acknowledged
around, battling robots), without a human-centeredresearch narrative to show engineers serving humanity [6-11]. By integrating the open endedhuman-centered story, a wider diversity of students can be engaged about how engineers can usetheir skills to create items to help society. A second major outcome/deliverable are studentscreating fully documented engineering design reports covering background research, human-centered design, societal needs, technical specifications of their design, costs analysis, solidmodel drawings, and reflection on their functional prototypes. The third majoroutcome/deliverable is students have to give a 15 minute presentation on their final functionalprototype, with all students in the team contributing in the
reflects both the traditionalmechanism analysis and synthesis methods together with the best industry practices, e.g.,Rockwell Automation, Procter & Gamble. The mechatronic mechanism design process was implemented, and a slider crank wasbuilt to accomplish a prescribed task. This process was used in Mechanical Engineering SeniorCapstone Design during the fall 2018 semester. Seven design teams, with four students in eachteam, created four-bar mechanism applications using this mechatronic process, first creating aMatLab Simulink virtual prototype of the complete system, and then building a workingprototype with LabVIEW and the NI myRIO. The 7 four-bar mechanisms were: robot gripper,quick return, pick and place, windshield wiper, landing
Explanation Essays and Analysis (3 weeks) The third essay written by the student reflects student’s selection and causal explanationof a pattern in a brief essay. After that, the essays are being divided in groups of ten anddistributed to students.Comprehensive Moon Phases Assessment - Revised (CMPA-R) The Comprehensive Moon Phases Assessment - Revised (CMPA-R) post assessmentincludes 31 questions with a multiple-choice format, available free for students in the project. Itis an online assessment that takes up around 30 minutes to be completed. It can be takenoptionally, but it is suggested for teachers to take both pre- and post-test. Also, students areadvised to take the pretest so that teachers can see their weak areas and progress
significant misconceptions as reflected by the observation that only 37% of the studentscorrectly categorized the relevant keywords. Although not as pronounced, students also seem tostruggle with micro-scale structure concepts with only 50% of the students correctly categorizingthe relevant keywords.(a) (b)(c) (d)(e) (f)Figure 5. Analyses of student responses to the solid mechanics related keywords questions.Since the second given question had multiple correct answers, the students’ answers showed theirin-depth understanding and the connection between mechanics, materials, and processing. Allstudents who participated
and organize focus group interviews withunderrepresented students conducting undergraduate research in general. The objective is to assessthe process of attaining their research position. In this regard, focus group interviews will beutilized to facilitate collective reflection and dialogue by providing students opportunities toopenly discuss their learning experiences with fellow peers.Resultantly, Phase 3 of this long-term project involves developing communication channels withfaculty in the school of engineering who have underrepresented minorities conducting researchunder their supervision in order to assist each other in identifying and recruiting more students.REFERENCES[1] Russell, S. H. (2006). Evaluation of NSF support for
International Conference on Web and Open Access to Learning (ICWOAL), 2014.[3] E. D. Lindsay and J. R. Morgan, “Passing our students while we fail upwards: Reflections on the inaugural year of CSU Engineering,” in 45th Annual SEFI Conference, Terceira, Portugal, 2017.[4] J. R. Morgan, E. D. Lindsay and K. Sevilla, “A "MetroGnome" as a tool for supporting self- directed learning,” in 2017 Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, Sydney, Australia, 2017.[5] M. van den Bogaard, C. Howlin, E. Lindsay and J. Morgan, “Patterns Of Student's Curriculum Engagement In An On-demand Online Curriculum,” in 46th SEFI Conference, Copenhagen, 2018.
severaldays, the power generation curve from the solar panels under smoggy conditions remained“smooth”.Table 7 lists the peak and average power output for each converter type, as well as the total dailyenergy generated under smoggy conditions. From the data, it is evident that the smog diddecrease the power generated from the solar panels but not to the same extent as that of shadingthe panels. This is because even with the smog, diffuse and reflected irradiance were able toreach the solar panels. Table 7: Power and energy output with smoggy conditions Converter Weather Avg. temp (°C) Peak power (W) Avg. power (W) Total energy (J) AP Systems Smog 17 2083 1127
the EPA pollutionprevention website [6].The delivery of P2 and E3 engineering extension services has made adoption of manyoperational aspects of the program achievable for businesses of varied size. These programs helpincrease awareness of the local environment and help businesses understand how running a moreenvironmentally sustainable business can save them money. Through the programs offered byENMRN, businesses have become more open to adopting other Best Practices (e.g. Lean), andalso serve as strong referral to their peers, reflecting the grassroots impact these programs canhave on the environment.P2 and E3 programENMRN is focused on assisting small and medium-sized businesses to adopt operationalprocesses that are both economical and
solving problems that do not requirelibrary use [2]. Even though most colleges require humanities and language arts courses forundergraduates in science and engineering programs, these students typically seek helpdifferently than those in liberal arts majors. They typically don’t use the library beyond itstraditional purpose of a place to study. They may be unaware of library services and resourcesand are not known to ask for help in using library resources or completing research assignments[2]. Their confidence and competence in being technologically savvy makes them morereluctant to fully utilize library services [3].Carroll, et. al. [4] hypothesized that engineering and science students low usage of the librarydoesn’t reflect on their lack of
. Over the course of this semester, the fellowwill participate in activities that prepare him or her for teaching the following semester, such asmeeting regularly with the teaching mentor, completing structured reflections on theobservations, developing course materials (homework assignments or exams), grading, orholding office hours, etc. In the second semester, the fellow teaches or co-teaches anundergraduate course, taking on significant instructional responsibility for the course. A formalobservation and critique of the fellow’s teaching by the teaching mentor and a PFMF peer isrequired.3) Evidence-Based Professional Development3A. Core Competency ModelThe PFMF program incorporates a professional development model built on core competencies
the video lectures wererecorded in the media lab at the University’s Center for Teaching and Learning and were uploadedto the Panopto platform. The links to the videos were then posted on the class website.At the end of each experimental module in ECE-1212 and regardless of the teaching style used,each group was asked to share their design and performance analysis. All responses were collectedin one shared document such that each team could view other teams’ designs and results. I thenled a reflective debriefing class session to highlight the differences between the different designs,the discrepancies between results, and the factors that may have affected circuit behavior.ECE-1563 Given the feedback from ECE-1212 on the flipped classroom, I
reflect the population as a whole. [1].The report continues to state that: While continuing to pursue increased knowledge and higher standards of excellence in teaching, research and innovation, two- and four-year colleges in Texas will need to consider more explicitly the primary reason most students attend college: to get a better job and achieve a better life. [1]A primary outcome of the 60x30TX initiative relevant to our discussion is the following: By 2030, all graduates from Texas public institutions of higher education will have completed programs with identified marketable skills: The marketable skills goal emphasizes the value of higher education in the workforce. Students need to
large design projects. Experience with the course has suggested thatgiving students more agency in their team selection has resulted in more ownership in the team’ssuccess/failure as reflected in student evaluations. Since teams were formed in the same way inboth groups, team formation does not play a role in the differences found in the results betweenthe groups that will be discussed in later sections.Research MethodThe goal of this research is to understand if the intervention of cohering Introduction toEngineering and Small Group Communication has resulted in better team dynamics. Theexperimental group involved in this study includes two sections of the cohered courses with 37and 20 students each. The control group consists of four sections
in a post-typographic world (pp. 283-301).[15] Maxwell, Joseph A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interpretative approach (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.[16] Emerson, Robert M, Fretz, Rachel I, & Shaw, Linda L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes: University of Chicago Press.[17] Walther, Joachim, Sochacka, Nicola W, & Kellam, Nadia N. (2013). Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 626-659.[18] Stevens, Reed, O'connor, Kevin, Garrison, Lari, Jocuns, Andrew, & Amos, Daniel M. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of
that should be measured and identify where previously developedconstructs can be leveraged; or where new constructs must be developed and tested forvalidity and reliability. Critical evaluation of construct development is necessary as themost commonly used entrepreneurship scales have been developed in the context ofbusiness creation among business students. As engineering entrepreneurship educationcontinues to evolve into its own unique field and encompass a wider scope beyond newventure creation, it is critical to reflect on this evolution in research and assessmentdevelopment.As the research community collaborates to formalize a common definition of EM, weadvocate that this should not stop practitioners from assessing student-learning
example the “watershedmodeling” and “food processing” courses,), but in many of the courses, the computation softwareis still insufficient [26], [27], [28]. This fact has been reflected in the survey results of this study.This may result in some alumni engineers having to learn the software in post-graduationopportunities or internships. This underutilization of computer skills in some of the BAE courseshave challenged the students with class examples and homework problems that require the use ofthe software practice based on today job market needs [29], [30]. Therefore, the need to invest inand investigate this knowledge gap is a critical issue that has been highlighted in this study.The evaluation of results also indicates that many instructors
outcomes would reflect the evolution of civil engineering practice in theten years since the CEBOK2 was developed.The first section of the survey asked individuals to consider each of the 24 outcomes in theCEBOK2 (2008) in turn. A link to the rubric and the full CEBOK2 was provided. The surveythen asked individuals to rate the importance of the outcome using a 5‐point Likert-type scale of:1 = not important; 2 = minor importance; 3 = neutral; 4 = moderately important; 5 = veryimportant. Then the survey asked individuals to rate the quality of the rubric and description ofthe outcome using a 5‐point scale of: 1 = poorly described; 2 = not well described; 3 = neutral; 4= well described; 5 = very well described. Any ratings of 2 or below resulted in
machineFigure 4 – Skills deficiency and need for improvementThe following question probed the respondents’ opinion on which concepts/technologies willbecome mainstream over the next decade, and which might run their course and become obsoletewithin the same timeframe. Respondents were asked to qualify their answers on a Likert scaleranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The answers to the statements are shownhereunder and reflected in Table 1 below: • On the first statement: “Most cutting-edge technology available today will be mainstream in the next 10 to 20 years”, the responses were predominantly in agreement with a total of 84.38% ranking it between somewhat agree and strongly agree. The unsure or general
first-year course) is simulated via the windmill system. Students arethen tasked with critically reflecting on theoretical power values versus Arduino-measuredvalues. Figure 5. Visual representation of AC motor mount design challenge.Preliminary Course FeedbackAt the conclusion of the semester(s), students were tasked with answering survey questionscreated by course administrators as an assessment tool for course-related aspects. Twoquantitative queries, presented using a Likert scale, related to the teamwork experience in thecourse were “ENGR 111 has enhanced my ability to work effectively in a team” and “ENGR 111 has enhanced my understanding of the significance of effective teamwork”.The Likert scale was
University, North Carolina University, Michigan State University, Illinois Institute of Technology, Washington University in St. Louis, University of Illinois Collected Data Points: Prerequisites to the course, main topics covered, subtopics included, referenced materials, programs utilized, assessment standardsSince Data Science courses offered on online platforms reflect the current expectations of theindustry, we’ve included a small sample of Data Science courses offered by Coursera andfast.ai. Our approach for gathering data from these courses was the same as our approachtowards universities to keep our data consistent.The data points mentioned above were then used to create a