published in scientific journals and presented at the national and international conferences. Dr. Genis has three U.S. patents. From July 2003 to July 2005, as a team facilitator, he worked on the development of the curriculum for the “Partnership for Innovation in Nanobiotechnology Education” program in collaboration with the University of Pennsylvania and several Community Colleges.Michael Mauk, Drexel University Dr. Michael G. Mauk is an Assistant Professor in the Applied Engineering Technology Program at Drexel University. Dr. Mauk’s research and teaching interests are in nanotechnology, Quality methods, rapid prototyping, microfluidics, and solar energy. Dr. Mauk has a Ph.D. in Electrical
accreditation.3 Papers by Oakleaf4 and by Riley,Piccinino, Moriarty and Jones4 have pointed out the overlap between ABET accreditationoutcomes and ACRL/ILST standards.6 There are significant commonalities between the two setsof standards, which librarians can capitalize on to embed information literacy lessons in theengineering curriculum. Students are bound to benefit from a focus on “the ability to engage inlife-long learning” -- one of the ABET criteria and a foundation of information literacyinstruction.Our institution requires all students to have at least one class with an embedded informationliteracy component.7 For engineering students, that class is ES 1000, which has the statedobjectives of teaching students to “pose a research question
STEM. His research interests include diffusion of research innovations, information visualization, data mining, Bibliometrics, social network analysis, and user study.Dr. Krishna Madhavan, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Krishna P.C. Madhavan is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He is also the Education Director and co-PI of the NSF-funded Network for Computational Nanotechnology (nanoHUB.org). He specializes in the development and deployment of large-scale data and visualization based platforms for enabling learning analytics. His work also focuses on understanding the impact and diffusion of learning innovations. Dr. Madhavan was the Chair of the IEEE/ACM
Paper ID #31920Advancement of Women in Engineering: Past, Present and FutureDr. Bhuvana Ramachandran, University of West Florida Dr. Bhuvaneswari Ramachandran, who has more than 20 years experience teaching Power Engineering, is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of West Florida. Her many research areas include Auction Strategies in Electricity Markets, Real Time Power System Modeling and Simulation using Software Tools, Integration of Distributed Generation, Storage and Plug-in-Hybrid Vehicle into the Grid, Smart Grid and Micro Grid Scheduling and Economics, and Phasor
work independently or in small learning teamsas they acquire and integrating information in a process that resembles that of inquiry.Problem-solving learning has its roots in the medical school setting where small groupsof mature, motivated students work to solve very real-world problems. In this process,problems are defined and researched, and high levels of learning occur as they progressthrough the exploration, analysis and implementation cycle.Students soon see that learning is an ongoing process and that there will always be (evenfor the teacher) new learning issues to be explored. Because they learn concepts incontext, they are more likely to retain that knowledge and apply it appropriately in novelsituations.5 As they work through real
409 Curricula for Using Waste Tires in Civil Engineering Applications DingXin Cheng, Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering, CSU, Chico Joel Arthur, Professor of Civil Engineering and Construction Management, CSU, Chico Albert M. Johnson, California Integrated Waste Management BoardThe United States generates about 300 million waste tires each year. Approximately 40 millionof these are generated in California alone. Waste tires stored in stockpiles can pose significantpublic health and environmental issues. Stockpiled waste tires provide an ideal breeding groundfor mosquitoes and rodents
the language is only a meansto social gains with very little interest in the culture or the community of people who speak thelanguage. On the contrary, the integrative orientation implies a personal involvement or desireto connect with the community that speaks the language, get access to its culture or evenbecome a member of the group. The former distinction is not supposed to be taken as amutually exclusive dichotomy since there is an element of instrumentality in the integrativeorientation [21] [22]. The remaining sections of this paper will present a study on language attitudes amongundergraduate students enrolled in an engineering public university. Before moving on to thenext section, a brief synthesis of the discussion up to this
skills instruction provided during the design experience. Thepaper does not evaluate or assess the effectiveness of any one method but rather attempts toprovide a comprehensive look at the variations and possibilities within a major designexperience.IntroductionThe culminating major design experience has been an integral part of selected engineeringcurricula for decades. However, with the introduction of ABET’s EC 2000 it became arequirement for all engineering programs for accreditation. ABET’s current language for the2011-2012 accreditation cycle reads, “Students must be prepared for engineering practicethrough a curriculum culminating in a major design experience based on the knowledge andskills acquired in earlier course work and
time devoted to individualized instruction was not reduced by using the gradingsheets, but that the time was used more effectively.Primary Trait Analysis proved very useful for assessing student learning. It produced data thatcould easily be converted to show progress towards the course and curriculum goals, and clearlyshowed areas requiring improvement and suggested the manner in which they might beimproved. It is particularly valuable because the process of grading results automatically in thedata for the assessment report; it is not necessary to grade the work and then later ask, “So, whatdid that mean?” It seems most useful for courses such as UO Lab, where mastery of importantskills cannot be tested with an exam question.Bibliography 1
the beginning of the learning progression (stages 1 and 2). The lastcategory of activities target more advanced concept applications and support the end of thelearning progression (stage 4). The SMK approach described here introduces a fourth categoryof model-based learning activities that targets stage 3 in the learning progression.We use the SMK to construct models that are physical embodiments of the introductoryproblems (e.g. the example above in Figure 1b) in which modeling assumptions (support models,simplified geometry abstractions) are already made, thus targeting stage 3 of the learningprogression and integrating this practice with an emphasis on developing basic concepts usingmultiple representations. The rationale, inspired by the
bepresented at the ASEE conference in June 2011 and published in a future paper.BackgroundIn the 1920s, less than a third of engineering educators considered the study of differentialequations to be necessary for an engineer’s education, now such study is integral to theengineering curriculum. In the engineering world of the future, a sound understanding of thetheoretical and practical sides of engineering ethics will be as necessary to the proper educationof engineers as a knowledge of differential equations is today, if not more so”.4Robin Tatu in her article “Knowledge Isn’t Enough” takes the famous quote from the Greekinventor Archimedes “Give me a place to stand and I will move the Earth” and argues that “thepotential to wield such power is
processingwill provide a quick way to start identifying these trends and relationships between assessmentscores and student reflections.References[1] J. A. Turns, B. Sattler, K. Yasuhara, J. L. Borgford-Parnell, and C. J. Atman, “Integrating reflection into engineering education,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2014.[2] S. A. Ambrose, “Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum: The Ultimate Design Challenge,” in The Bridge - Linking Engineering and Society, vol. 43, no. 2, 2013, pp. 16–23.[3] IBM, “What is natural language processing (NLP)?,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ibm.com/topics/natural-language-processing.[4] E. Cambria and B. White, “Jumping NLP curves: A review of natural language processing research,” IEEE Comput. Intell
Paper ID #11791Identifying Factors Impacting First Year Persistence in Computer GraphicsTechnologyMr. Eric Scott McCrae, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Eric McCrae is a senior graphic designer and web developer at Blue Octopus Printing Company, a large printing and mailing facility in Indianapolis, Indiana. He has over 17 years experience in the printing and mailing industry specializing in graphic design for print and mail marketing. Eric is the father of 1 and husband to Mia the love of his life.Dr. Eugenia Fernandez, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Eugenia Fernandez is an Associate
AC 2010-2211: A UNIQUE UNDERGRADUATE LABORATORY-BASED COURSEIN ENGINEERING FAILUREDavid Lanning, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityWahyu Lestari, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. Wahyu Lestari is an Associate Professor in the Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University at Prescott, ArizonaShirley Waterhouse, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. Shirley Waterhouse is the Senior Director for Academic Excellence and Innovation, Office of the Chief Academic Officer, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, Florida. Page 15.109.1© American
autonomy, empowerment, and affinity, whichprovide an add-value to one or both parties in the mentoring relationship.Mentorship in higher education most often adheres to traditional mentoring frameworks, whichare primarily concerned with mentor-driven mentee development and can be grouped into twofactions [22]: development through assimilation into institutional culture (this may occur byincreasing mentee involvement [23], [24], [25], facilitating mentee integration [26], [27], [28], andproviding the mentee with support and challenge [29], [30]) and development through emulatingthe mentor (which occurs by the mentor serving as a role model [31], [32], [33]). Traditionalmentoring frameworks assume that student mentees can only ever be impacted in
for large classrooms and developing K-16 curriculum in earthquake engineering and spatial visualization.Prof. Nathan Delson, University of California at San Diego Nathan Delson is a Teaching Professor at the University of California at San Diego. His research inter- ests include robotics, biomedical devices, and engineering education. He teaches introductory design, mechanics, mechatronics, capstone design, medical devices, and product design & entrepreneurship. His interests in design education include increasing student motivation, teamwork, hands-on projects, and integration of theory into design projects. In 1999 he co-founded Coactive Drive Corporation (currently General Vibration), a company that provides
– Part II," in 126th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, 2019.[9] M. C. Lovett, "Making Exams Worth More Than the Grade," in Using Reflection and Metacognition to Improve Student Learning: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy, Sterling, VA: Stylus, 2013, pp. 18-48.[10] C. S. Dweck, Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, New York, NY: Random House, 2006.[11] K. A. Sethares and M. E. Asselin, "Use of Exam Wrapper Metacognitive Strategy to Promote Student Self-Assessment of Learning: An Integrative Review," Nurse Educator, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 37-41, 2022.[12] M. S. Schuler and J. Chung, "Exam Wrapper Use and Metacognition in a Fundamentals Course: Perceptions
with Architectural Engineering Curricula” Architectural Engineering Institute National Professional Conference, April 2011, Oakland, CA 5. Azhar, S.; Hein, M; and Sketo, B. (2008). “Building Information Modeling: Benefits, Risks and Challenges”, Proceedings of the 44th ASC National Conference, Auburn, Alabama, USA. 6. Burr, K.L. (2009) “Creative Course Design: A Study in Student-Centered Course Development for a Sustainable Building/BIM Class.” Proceedings of the 45th ASC Annual Conference, Gainesville, Florida, April 1-4, 2009. 7. Sabongi, F.J. (2009). “The Integration of BIM in the Undergraduate Curriculum: An Analysis of Undergraduate Courses.” Proceedings of the 45th ASC Annual Conference
a sustainable development model for modernmanufacturing industries. Sustainable green manufacturing encompasses the design ofmanufacturing processes to prioritize energy conservation, pollution prevention orreduction, and increased health and safety of communities, employees, and consumers. Inthis paper, we will discuss key advanced technologies and environmental topics that canbe integrated into manufacturing coursework to include sustainability principles. Thiscourse has been taught, evaluated, and reviewed to identify barriers to the inclusion ofemerging issues into the course manufacturing materials.1. IntroductionMET 101 Manufacturing Materials is an undergraduate engineering course taken byfreshman level students in the Engineering
museum to help it beginupdating its displays on recent developments in materials; junior fluids, junior circuits, seniormicroprocessor, senior design of machine elements, and senior capstone design are havingstudents design and build various parts of an automated canal lock opener for a local nationalpark. Many of the projects are low-cost and can be implemented by individual faculty memberswithout the requirement of a formal institutional program. These S-L projects are integrated intoa wide variety of core courses (and not just design courses) and represent typically from 10 to20% of the grade.IntroductionWe define service-learning as a hands-on learning approach in which students achieve academicobjectives in a credit-bearing course by
Paper ID #23209Engagement in Practice: Developing a Sustainable K-12 Outreach STEMProgramDr. Joan B. Schuman, Missouri University of Science & Technology Dr. Joan Schuman is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Engineering Management and Systems Engineering Department at Missouri S&T. She earned her Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from University of Arkansas and completed her Ph.D. in Polymer Science and Engineering from the University of Southern Mississippi. Schuman is a Project Management Professional (PMP) certified through the Project Management Institute. She worked for several years
, hopefully, inthe future to students in the Mechanical Engineering program.IntroductionElectrical Engineering (EE) programs across the United States have seen a decline in electricalpower engineering courses for the last few years 1. This same trend has been witnessed in the EEprogram at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). At MSOE however, there is anincrease in interest in the power systems option among Architectural Engineering (AE) students.The driving force behind this interest is an increasing demand for graduates with a powersystems background for facilities engineering 2. A group of 25 local design firms and contractorsrecently approached MSOE and requested a sequence of courses that would prepare AE studentsfor a career in the
2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings Exploring the Potential Benefits and Risks of ChatGPT in Engineering Education Sinan Onal Department of Industrial Engineering Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville sonal@siue.eduAbstractThis paper examines the potential benefits and risks of using ChatGPT, an AI-powered chatbot developedby OpenAI, in engineering education by generating sample questions and answers and solving samplemathematical problems related to course subjects in the industrial engineering curriculum. The
regarding representation and faculty's acknowledgment of their role in fosteringstudent belonging, are integral components of creating an inclusive learning environment. Thismutual recognition highlights the importance of inclusivity and the impact it has on students' senseof belonging.Listening to Student VoicesUnderscored in the other themes, the last theme, Listening to Student Voices, explores beliefssurrounding the importance of making sure students feel comfortable speaking up and alsoincorporating feedback to foster an inclusive atmosphere. One student described the importanceof feeling listened to as related to feeling included. When I think of inclusive teaching, I think of making sure everyone in the classroom kind of
). In an attempt to reduce thisjob-skills gap, the state has allocated funds to increase the number of Engineering B.S. degreesat the UW and WSU.The STARS program provides first-year students from low-income backgrounds an extra year ofacademic, financial, and social support to encourage retention in engineering. Students areselected for the STARS program if they show a strong interest in engineering, are highlymotivated, and are Pell-eligible and/or attended an under-resourced high school. STARSparticipants receive a targeted first year curriculum focused on advancing academic preparationin math and science, developing learning skills, broadening career awareness and vision, andconnecting with resources on campus; individualized academic
thisfield. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) now encouragesengineering departments to emphasize adding “professional skills” to their curriculum. Theseskills include communication, teamwork, ethics, and professionalism, to name a few.Course ProfessionalismAttendance in class is mandatory, as is punctuality. Since these traits are not optional in theworkplace, they are also strictly reinforced in this class in an attempt to introduce the students tothe rigors of being an engineer or construction manager. Since these skills are difficult toestablish on the first day of work, starting them off as first-year students is thought to be goodpreparation for their eventual careers.Reading the chapter of the week before coming to
Paper No. 2004-1253 A Peace Paradigm for Engineering Education: A Dissenter’s View Dr. George D. Catalano Department of Mechanical Engineering, The State University of New York at Binghamton Abstract Proposed modifications to ABET Criterion 3 are described which are based on apeace paradigm for engineering education. The Integral Model of Education for Peace,Democracy and Sustainable Development developed in response to the Earth Charter isused as a basis for the implementing the model in engineering education. Examples areprovided for beginning an implementation of the integral model
in carrying out the experiment of thesituation worked on in class. Finally, students, working in groups, carry out theexperimentation and reflect on it at the end. This reflection occurs in their working groups.The modified ILD combines the theoretical class (mainly exposition by the instructor) withthe experimental class to offer students an integrative experience. This study involved 47students from two groups of a first-year university course in acoustical physics.Applying the modified ILD methodology, a qualitative study was conducted analyzing thestudents' responses to the guides and their conclusions. This study presents the results of theanalysis with a focus on determining the students' scientific skills in obtaining data
complicatedproblem of the two, a natural question to ask is why anyone would bother solving thesimpler problem analytically. This leads to a discussion of what information is availablefrom the analytical solution versus what is available from the numerical solution, theadvantages of an analytical solution, and under what circumstances one would seek anumerical solution. Finally, it leads to a point that is seldom appreciated when the threemain topics of this course are taught in a non-integrated manner - that the analyticalsolution of a simpler case can serve as a limiting case check of the numerical solution ofa more complex case. As simulations become more and more complex, students areencouraged to find ways to check their simulation results with
the course material, and in the design and delivery of the project itself. Forexample, in the earliest version students were introduced to the nature of problems (discerningthe difference between those of description, calculation, explanation and invention). In thecurrent version, there is greater focus on what specific questions need to fully understand andcomprehend the scope and nature of an engineering problem. It is a common element of mosthigh school science curriculums to focus the students on providing detailed solutions to aclearly defined problem. The critical skills of learning how to frame and comprehend a problemfrom primary sources such as end users, clients, society or management are not taught. Studentsneed to make sense of