our communities, orthe structure of our political and economic systems — tend to have the least influence on thosedecisions and how they are made. Design justice rethinks design processes, centers people whoare normally marginalized by design, and uses collaborative, creative practices to address thedeepest challenges our communities face.” [1]. Two core tenets of the Design Justice movementare that “absolutely anyone can participate meaningfully in design,” and “those who are directlyaffected by the issues a project aims to address must be at the center of the design process.” [4]Engineering education community and design researchers generally agree that pedagogicalinnovations are needed to ensure that current and future technologies are
-ethics, Undergraduate EducationIntroductionEngineers are fundamentally problem solvers. Sometimes engineering solutions come withethical implications, this is what engineering ethics courses aim to help students betterunderstand. Ethics education for engineers takes many different forms across a wide variety ofinstitutions. As Hess and Fore attest, “... there is neither a consensus throughout the engineeringeducation community regarding which strategies are most effective towards which ends, norwhich ends are most important.”1 Believing that student self-awareness and the capacity toidentify and effectively communicate their own values is an “end” worth pursuing, we created anengineering ethics course for that purpose. The newly adopted
Technologies at the Computer Sciences Department in the Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile (UC). She entered university throught Talent and Inclusion Program. She is interested in STEM education, equal opportunities in STEM education (gender and social disparities) and engineering design related to computer sciences. She has worked as a researcher at the DILAB UC (Engineering Design Initiative) in Chile where she has also worked as a Teaching Assistant in Design Lab Studio (2019-1, 2, 2020-1), and Technology, Entrepreneurship and Design (2021).Delaney RyanDr. Scott A. PattisonSmirla Ramos-Montanez ˜Viviana L´opez BurgosSabrina De Los Santos Rodr´ıguezMaria D. QuijanoAmy R Corbett ©American
share a visionthat aims to foster the growth of inclusive STEM future faculty, further details on the vision ofthe collaboratives can be found in our previous publications [1],[2].The Texas RC collaboratives recognize that graduate students are at an ideal career stage todesign their professional pathways based on their positionality, especially for junior/ communitycolleges and regional universities. An emphasis on the versatility of graduate degrees allowsstudents to explore their professional development to become inclusive STEM future faculty [3].This recognition results from newfound interest among graduate students in future academiccareers [NSF, 2021]. Along with the versatility of degrees opening industry and researchpositions for
, journalism, etc., do not communicate, although theywill need to work together in the future to create viable new paths forward. A hurdle tocurriculum change is that faculty have not been trained in sustainability concepts and typicallydo not teach across colleges. They are also unsure of how to address DEI, not wanting to get itwrong and cause harm as they experiment in the classroom. Some programs have therefore takena “train the trainer” approach, holding faculty workshops [1, 2]. The effectiveness of suchworkshops is not altogether clear; for example, instructors’ confidence in identifying effectiveways to include sustainability into their courses may not increase. We focused squarely onequipping faculty by providing demos and boosting
engineeringeducation, more research should be done to collect and interpret students' stories to betterhighlight the engineering student experience.Keywords: narrative inquiry, systematic review, undergraduate1.0 IntroductionEngineering education research tends to prefer quantitative methods due to training engineeringresearchers to use a post-positivist perspective and advanced mathematical and technical skills[1-2]. In Borrego, Douglas, & Amelink's [1] methods sourcebook specific to engineeringeducation, they claim that quantitative research should be limited to outcomes that aregeneralizable to a larger subset of the population. In contrast, qualitative research shouldexplore questions that cannot be answered without "rich, contextual descriptions of
made a shift from a field primarily focused ondeveloping engineering curriculum to considering identity and experience as core aspects ofeducation [1]–[3]. Much of this work has focused on engineering identity, or professionalidentity, formation and highlighting the interplay between individual identity and engineeringculture [4]–[6]. While work in engineering identity has become a prominent area of engineeringeducation research, it can also be somewhat narrow. Implicitly, studies in engineering identitytend to position students’ formation of an engineering identity as a positive outcome thatpromotes retention in the field [7]–[9] and students’ lack of engineering identity formation as aproblem to solve. Instead, the formation of student
last several decades, there are an increasing number of programs designed toengage preschool-age children and their families in engineering design [1], [2]. Creating learningopportunities for children at an early age is critical for supporting long-term engineering-relatedinterest development and career pathways [3], [4]. Out-of-school, family-based engineeringexperiences can be powerful catalysts supporting young children’s engagement with engineeringdesign practices and the development of engineering-related interests and identities [5]–[8].These experiences can also have an important influence on parents, including their motivation tocreate new engineering-related learning opportunities for their children and the ways theysupport children’s
worked as a lecturer for two years at the University of Lahore, Pakistan. Additionally, he has been associated with the software industry in various capacities, from developer to consultant. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Native and Immigrant students: An Analysis of Wellbeing using PISA 2018IntroductionThe United States of America currently hosts the largest immigrant population in the world withalmost 46.6 million people who were not born in the country [1]. Moreover, the immigrantpopulation in the USA is also very diverse with people belonging to almost all countries of theworld. In recent years due to the global political climate and regional conflicts in many parts ofthe world
area and not general or introductory engineering. These, among otherfactors, make designing an effective introduction to engineering courses challenging. Landis [1]recommends five course objectives for introduction to engineering courses: community building,professional development, academic development, personal development and orientation.Design projects apply to many of these. In community building, the team aspects of numerousprojects help students develop professional skills and build a support network for their collegeexperience. Teaching the engineering design process and engineering’s role in a better society isexcellent professional development. Productive interactions with peers and faculty, as well aslearning to prioritize important
benefitted from pictural design problems, as well.IntroductionEngineering education is a dynamic field influenced by the industry's shifting demands. TheAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Vision 2030 Project (V2030) has identifiedseveral goals that are crucial for the preparedness of future engineers. One goal is to enhance"Student design/build project experiences in the degree program" [1]. However, this goalchallenges educators as they strive to implement it effectively.Implementing the goal poses a challenge for educators as it leaves many decisions to be made,which should only be done with consideration for the students. One crucial factor to consider isthe academic major of the students. As demonstrated by Vieira, the regions of
contributed to their professional and personal development. Thedesign of the REM program—to be both inspirational and inclusive for the population of studentswho apply to be a part of CISTAR’s REM program—has been described at length already in anearlier paper [1]. Important to reiterate here, however, is that the 6-week program is specificallydesigned as a first-research experience (approximately 70% of our participants). Further, the REMstudent participants over the last two years have reflected our applicant pool as follows: an estimated80% Black/African American, 10% Hispanic/Latinx, 10% White, 50% female; and one‐third of thestudents are first-generation college. Thus, the students belong to several groups that areunderrepresented in STEM fields
this group, we have found that there is much variation in thesupport, guidance, and promotion pathways depending on their individual institutions anddepartments. The purpose of this paper is to explore these differences and provide examples ofpolicies and procedures at a number of institutions to be used as a potential model.This paper has two specific objectives: (1) Discuss the results of a survey given to the faculty inthis group. This survey asks questions about the length of their service and contract, their titleand opportunities for promotion, support given to them for professional development, theirjourney to take a teaching-track position and the level of support they feel in their departments;and (2) Provide examples of teaching
Faculty Identity Development through the Tenure and Promotion Process as Black and Hispanic Engineering Faculty **This is a Work-In-Progress**Introduction With the presence of about 1.5 million faculty members as of 2020 (NCES, 2022) yetcontinued underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic faculty, it is important to understand whymarginalization persists. This is especially the case at selective higher education institutions likeR1 (Research 1) universities, particularly in science and math departments (Li & Koedel, 2017).When looking deeper at departments of engineering for example, we often find limited to noBlack and Hispanic engineering faculty (BHEF) members (Nelson & Brammer, 2010). Whilethere
is a past President of WEPAN. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 GRADS (GRaduate & Advance Degree Students) Mentoring Groups: Building a supportive community for Hispanic graduate students in STEMBackground/MotivationResearch shows the importance of mentoring for student success, and this is particularlyimportant for graduate students in engineering [1]. However, most graduate students do not havea mentorship relationship outside of their faculty advisor and many times this relationship mightnot go beyond academics [2]. Results from a recent Needs Assessment conducted by Society ofHispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE) during 2021-2022 shows that approximately 25% ofpredominantly Hispanic
and sens ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Intern Perceptions and Learning Experiences: Assessment Insights from a Research Internship Program1. IntroductionThe SOAR internship program is an excellent example of what the National Academy ofEngineering defines as a “high-impact practice” [1]. The purpose of the program is to supportunderrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)majors and serve as an opportunity to intern with the ARL at Penn State (ARL) to develop theskills needed to succeed in the workforce. Through a cohort and mentorship structure, theprogram provides interns with hands-on and relevant internship experience. The
structured interviewdata collected through an extracurricular student project. We investigated three key aspects ofgraduate school, particularly experiences with 1) work-life-balance, 2) imposter syndrome, and3) burnout. To develop the survey and interview instruments, we developed a pool of memes andgraduate student oriented advice columns then used thematic analysis to identify 9 thematicquestions about the graduate student experience. For this work, the data set was abbreviated toconsider only the 3 most salient topics. We found that students generally disagreed with thenegative themes identified and that memes tended to exaggerate these features of graduatestudent experience. However, emergent themes of self-efficacy in our analysis demonstrated
electronics, mechanics, computer programming, and robotics.The progression of classes provides students with the skills to develop autonomous roboticsystems as part of the senior design capstone. Senior Design students in the program haveparticipated in the Autonomous Vehicle Challenge (AVC) as part of the National RoboticsChallenge [1] each of the last two years. The Program has sent two teams to participate in theAVC each of the last two years (2022 and 2023). In the first year that AVC was available aftercovid (2022) the team placed 1st and 3rd in the competition.The Program applied for accreditation as an Engineering Physics program during the 2022/2023review cycle. The Engineering Physics designation best matches the interdisciplinary nature
’ career aspirations and expectationsIntroductionIn the last decade the representation of women at the undergraduate engineering level has slowlybut steadily increased, reaching 24% Canada-wide in 2020 [1]. At the institution providing thesetting for the present study women now make up nearly 40% of the undergraduate cohortsuggesting a promising trend toward gender equity. However, representation of women amonglicensed Professional Engineers (P.Eng.) has not kept pace, with women comprising only 20% ofnewly licensed Canadian P.Eng.’s each year and just 14% of Professional Engineers overall [2-3]. This representation gap in the profession is compounded with the low rates of licensureamong engineering graduates in
. 2019 [1] showed that very few programs offerlabs in Thermodynamics courses. Our program has integrated experimental design into somethermodynamic laboratories to strengthen students’ understanding of fundamental concepts. OurIntroduction to Thermodynamics course requires students to learn basic yet complicatedconcepts, such as determining properties of pure substances, calculating heat and workexchanged during a process, and the first and second laws of thermodynamics before undertakingcomplex applications such as thermodynamic cycles or combustion systems. These basicconcepts are conducive to simple, conceptually oriented laboratory assignments and are an idealplace to have students design an experiment. The learning gains made by switching
Multilingual Board GameIntroductionSerious games are a category of games that are often used in education to provide access tocomplex systems. In past research and curriculum development, engineering teachers haveimplemented curriculum around STEM-focused games [1], such as for urban planning [2],transportation engineering [1], chemistry education [3] and computational thinking [4]. Due tothe increased interactive engagement of games compared to lecture [5], [6], [7], engineeringeducators have utilized games to positively impact students' learning. However, theseeducational games are often only available in English. Students whose first language (L1) is notEnglish may be limited in how they present their ideas to peers in these playful spaces
First-Year StudentsIntroductionDiscussion of engineering curriculum development often focuses on technical knowledge andskills needed to prepare students to design engineering solutions. However, the context in whichthese solutions are applied is important as indicated in the first cannon in the National Society ofProfessional Engineers (NSPE) Code of Ethics which states that "engineers shall hold paramountthe safety, health, and welfare of the public" [1]. The focus on preparing students for thetechnical demands of engineering design may lead to them not fully appreciating the societalimpact of engineering solutions. Cech [2] studied the evolution of the interest of students inpublic welfare issues, such as ethical responsibilities
identify students as Students with Access Challenges andAccommodation Needs (SACAN) if they faced conditions that prevented them from attendingclass at some point while not having an officially recognized disability by the university or if theyare a SWD. Preference regarding feedback methods, class formats, and demographic questionssuch as gender and major were also included.Our preliminary survey results from 148 students (including 50 SWD, 77 SACAN) of more than20 majors showed that: 1) The five most useful UDL practices among all students are: searchablerecorded lectures, flexible deadlines, transcripts for videos, official discussion platform, andalternative learning formats to lectures (i.e: textbooks, and slides); 2) Female students
even introduced awalking component to a class [1].As previously noted, walking also has important mental health benefits. These mental healthbenefits include self-esteem, cognitive functioning and a positive mood. One study alsosuggested that there is growing evidence that physical activities such as walking can help preventor treat depression and anxiety, although more research in these areas is still necessary. Thatbeing said, additional research is starting to illustrate being in nature and green-spaces canincrease your well-being. Thus walks on campus in and around nature could have additionalpositive effects for the students [2, 3, 4, 5]. In addition to the mental health benefits, walking hasbeen shown to improve physical health metrics
integration into a coursedesigned to introduce first-year students to civil engineering. The details of the curricularintervention are described, followed by an examination of evidence indicating the effectivenessof the DEI integration, and then determining if there was student resistance (or the lack ofresistance) to DEI instruction.BackgroundEngineers are increasingly recognizing the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)in our work. This includes the benefits of inclusive and diverse teams in developing creativesolutions to society’s most difficult problems, as well as the social justice issues of providingequitable opportunities for all people regardless of their demographic traits [1], [2], [3].Engineers are still not very diverse
col- laborations between countries in Latin American and the European Union (EU). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Our Learning Experience with MATH 101, a Virtual and Adaptive Remedial Course1. IntroductionThe lack of mathematics proficiency among high school students in Guatemala is a significantconcern (see [1] for details). Some students wishing to pursue a university degree in science orengineering face difficulties in their first year, as a strong background in mathematics is requiredto succeed in these fields. This problem is also evident at Galileo University, where many first-year engineering students struggle to pass their first mathematics course. This
and money management, and actively participatedin the financial literacy course implemented for the introductory engineering class.IntroductionA solid working knowledge in financial literacy is a critical factor in students’ success, especially forunderrepresented minority (URM) students in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)disciplines (see examples, [1] thru [4]). This is particularly important with the recent impacts of thepandemic on the national economy, the changing landscape of the job market, as well as the globaleconomic crisis. Students’ financial literacy will help them make sound decisions to succeed professionallyin their career paths. Unfortunately, traditional university curricula do not expose students
/or satisfyingCriterion 3 requirements [1]–[3]. In comparing responses from 2004 graduates against their 1994counterparts, the study completed in 2006 uncovered one surprising result: 2004 graduatesreported a “chillier diversity climate than that cited by their predecessors” [1, p. 6]. The studyreport speculated that several factors could be at play, including “differences in the gender andracial/ethnic mix in 1994 and 2004, graduates’ awareness of diversity issues, and/or theirwillingness to discuss and challenge prejudice or discrimination.” Nevertheless, continued thereport, “[t]he evidence provides no guidance in the way of an explanation”[1, p. 6]. Though it’snot clear what, if any, work was done to unpack these or other potential
teachers scaffoldlearning to their students’ needs and progress teaching toward a targeted performance goal. Thispaper will highlight the research and development work that was enacted to draft the EPMs anddiscuss how they can be used for developing engineering lessons and activities as well asaligning/scoping P-12 engineering programs.Where Did They Come From? The Research & Development ProcessThe Framework for P-12 Engineering Learning states that engineering literacy is threedimensional and involves engineering habits of mind, practices, and knowledge (See Figure 1).The framework also describes that engineering literacy should be developed for students acrossthe span of their P-12 education experience, scaffolding from more explicitly
, Calculus 1 in their first year. Depending upon the college (and state), math courses can be accelerated to achieve the goal of calculus readiness. • Introductory Technical Coursework: Along with their math courses, STEM Core students take introductory engineering and/or computer science courses, ideally one per semester. These first-year courses vary by college, but often include Introduction to Engineering, Engineering Graphics/CAD, Introduction to Programming, Python, C++, etc. • STEM Career Orientation: First-hand STEM career orientation via industry and university field trips, guest speakers from partner employers, a virtual career speaker series, etc. • Wraparound Academic and Social Support: A