presenting technical results clearly and concisely. This paper describes thecombined approach, which can serve as a model for future courses aiming to developtechnical and writing proficiency in undergraduate engineering courses.IntroductionLaboratory courses have been a part of the engineering curriculum for the last two centuriesto provide students with a practical experience of applying the engineering concepts taught inlectures [1]. Generally, laboratory courses have been designed to address ABET studentoutcomes 3, 4, and 6. The ABET outcomes are: • Outcome 3 - "an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences" [2]. • Outcome 4 - "an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering
Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Learning. Dr. Hammack’s research focuses on the connection of local contexts to STEM interest and identity development in youth, particularly rural youth in elementary and middle grades, as well as how elementary teachers develop teaching efficacy and identity as STEM educators. Through her research, Dr. Hammack aims to advance understanding of how to enhance STEM education in rural schools and communities, providing opportunities to meet the unique needs of rural students.Dr. Nick Lux Lux, Montana State University Nick Lux is a Professor of Curriculum and Instruction in MSU’s Department of Education and is an affiliate of the Montana Engineering Education Research Center. He
practical pedagogical implications, showing that intentionallyintroducing CD while providing structured support strengthens students’ problem-solving,adaptability, and confidence in generating innovative solutions, ensuring students are betterequipped to tackle complex, real-world STEM challenges. Introduction Innovation-based learning (IBL) signifies a transformative change in engineeringeducation, focusing on using engineering principles to address real-world issues in ways thatextend past conventional project-based learning. IBL is an overall broad curriculum that includesmany courses that are designed to equip students to confront intricate, open-ended challengesthat demand innovative answers by promoting creativity, critical thinking
. Saleem is an Associate Professor with the Department of Industrial Engineering at the J.B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. He is also a Co-Director of the Center for Human Systems Engineering (CHSE). Dr. Saleem received his Ph.D. from the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech in 2003, specializing in human factors engineering and ergonomics. Dr. Saleem’s research interests focus on the integration of human factors engineering with the development of health information technology (HIT). His research also focuses on provider-patient interaction with respect to exam room computing, as well as virtual care tools and applications. Dr. Saleem also maintains an
Engineering at Iron Range Engineering in the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University, MankatoDr. Justine Chasmar, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Chasmar is a professor for Iron Range Engineering’s Bell Program through Minnesota State University, Mankato. She teaches self-directed learning classes for the professionalism curriculum, one of the three pillars of the Bell Program. Dr. Chasmar earned a Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education and M.S. and B.S. in Mathematical Sciences from Clemson University. She is a STEM educator, practitioner, and scholar. Dr. Chasmar spent the last decade serving in and directing learning centers. Most recently, Dr. Chasmar served as an Assistant
: Agile Methods Coupled with Project Based Learning to Train Mechanical Engineers in the Era of Industry 4.0AbstractAs the Industry 4.0 revolution reshapes manufacturing, design, and engineering processes, therole of mechanical engineers is expanding beyond traditional boundaries. Since mechanicalsystems are increasingly interconnected with digital technologies, training the next-generationmechanical engineers in Internet-of Things (IoT) programming and software engineeringmethodology is critical for meeting industry demands. However, these critical skills are oftenmissing in traditional mechanical engineering curriculum. To address this challenge, we havemodernized our curriculum by integrating IoT technologies and software
to engineering students innovativelyand entertainingly. It also fosters an entrepreneurial mindset by infusing curiosity,creativity, and connection-making into the curriculum. Emerging evidence of thecase study's effectiveness is based on student perceptions and teaching reflectionsof instructors who implemented the activity. By introducing the activity andlessons learned, this paper significantly contributes to promoting economicliteracy in engineering education.Keywords: Principles of economics, economic literacy, entrepreneurial mindset,teamwork.Background and MotivationEconomics can often feel foreign to non-majoring students, particularly engineering students.Yet, economics, society, and engineering are intertwined. In engineering
, and engineering design, with particular attention to cognitive stress, cognitive load, and STEM accessibility. He also focuses on the professional development of K-12 teachers for teaching engineering design. By integrating these strategies into a holistic framework, Dr. Raju enhances workforce development, strengthens engineering pathways, and broadens participation in STEM fields. His work equips educators with tools to personalize instruction and foster professional identity, ultimately preparing future engineers to thrive in a rapidly evolving global landscape.Dr. Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University Dr. Kristi J. Shryock is the Frank and Jean Raymond Foundation Inc. Endowed Associate Professor in
discussed inthe documents and how the findings can be used to integrate AI ethics into engineering education.3 Overview of AI Policy Documents3.1 US’s Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Making Automated Systems Work for the American PeopleThe ”Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Making Automated Systems Work for the American People” [23],hereafter mentioned as the AI Bill of Rights, is a white paper published by the White House Office ofScience and Technology Policy (OSTP) in October 2022, outlines five principles intended to guide theethical and responsible development and use of automated systems in the United States. While it is not anofficial policy document, it seeks to protect the American public from potential harms arising
ChatGPT to be very helpful. A clearexception to this was a single student who did not use it much and provided the most negativereviews. During lab sessions in the first half of the semester, students used ChatGPT to resolvemost syntax issues. For comparison, in previous years students struggled a lot more with theseissues early in the semester. Additionally, a few students developed a strong interest in the topic.One student stated that this was the most interesting course in the entire curriculum due in largepart to this use of AI. The instructor also noted much less frustration with syntax issues withinthe classroom.Misuse of AI ToolsWhile ChatGPT can be an excellent resource for learning and debugging VHDL code, it issometimes misused by
] Mondisa, Joi-Lynn, Becky Wai-Ling Packard, and Beronda L. Montgomery. "Understanding what STEM mentoring ecosystems need to thrive: A STEM-ME framework." Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 29.1 (2021): 110-135.[2] Lisberg, Anneke, and Brett Woods. "Mentorship, mindset and learning strategies: An integrative approach to increasing underrepresented minority student retention in a STEM undergraduate program."Journal of STEM education 19.3 (2018).[3] Kumar, Amruth, M. Doyle, V. Hong, A. Joshi, S. Kurkovsky and S. Rollins, "Helping Academically Talented STEM Students with Financial Need Succeed," 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Lincoln, NE, USA, 2021.[4] Cabrera, A. F
decision-making. This paperexamines how integrating the development of these professional skills into core engineeringsubjects—such as Thermodynamics, Fluid Mechanics, and Electrical Circuits—can foster a morecomprehensive and holistic student education. Through the use of problem-based learning andreferencing real-world applications, the approach aims to enhance both technical knowledge andessential soft skills. The paper also explores alternative assessment methods that extend beyondtraditional exams to evaluate competencies crucial for professional success. By aligningengineering curricula with industry expectations, and supporting faculty development in this area,the study offers a framework for curriculum design that strengthens both
,in laying the groundwork for engineering interest. While early exposure often occurs throughengaging, hands-on activities, they are rarely framed as part of the engineering discipline. Withsupport from curriculum designers and educational leaders, elementary teachers can enhancestudents’ STEM learning by integrating basic engineering vocabulary and explaining whatengineers do in developmentally appropriate ways. As prior studies suggest, elementary school isa critical time for developing students’ interests [10], making it an ideal time to introduceengineering as a subject and a future career pathway. Empowering teachers with simple languagecues, accurate career context, and institutional support can help students develop theirengineering
Paper ID #45827Advancing Engineering Economics Instruction Through Open EducationalResources: Implementation, Instructor Feedback, and Student OutcomesDr. Tamara R Etmannski, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Dr. Tamara Etmannski is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of British Columbia (UBC), Canada. She is also the Co-director of the Environmental Engineering program. Her role centers on curriculum development and teaching, with a focus on topics related to engineering impacts, including sustainability, leadership, economics, and entrepreneurship. Her
the Department of Learning and Instruction at the University at Buffalo. Her research lies at the intersection of language and STEM education, with a focus on equity, bi/multilingualism, and identity in community-based learning environments. She studies the linguistic practices of youth in STEM learning contexts, examining how their participation, meaning-making, and identities are represented through their languaging. Fatemeh brings to this work an academic background in language and literature, along with over a decade of teaching experience.Stacy M Scheuneman, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Stacy is a doctoral student in Curriculum, Instruction and the Science of Learning at the UB Graduate
Florida Dr. Harrison N Oonge is an assistant dean for academic planning in the College of Undergraduate Studies at the University of Central Florida (UCF). Harrison leads articulation and the curriculum alignment effort of 53 gateway courses between UCF and DirectConnect partner institutions. Prior to joining UCF, Harrison worked for three years at West Virginia University (WVU) as a project specialist in Undergraduate Academic Affairs and an adjunct professor in WVU’s College of Education and Human Services where he taught undergraduate and graduate-level courses. Harrison holds a B.A. in Education (Kenyatta University, Kenya), a M.A. in Special Education (WVU), and Ed.D. in Curriculum and Instruction (WVU). His
conducted by Balgopal, two teachers werehired through these networks who created an integrated STEM curriculum combined withgeometry with construction principles. The reform was driven by professional satisfaction, andwillingness to take risks and these factors empowered these teachers to pursue and sustain theefforts of reforms (Balgopal, 2020). However, the extent to which this influence appears varies because of the demographiccharacteristics of study participants and the structure of the education sector in the country. Thereexists a gap in the previously published research studies regarding longitudinal studies to find thelong-term impacts of automation, robots, and coding clubs on deciding careers in STEM fields.(Tran, 2018). Thus, to
educational programming. Her research and evaluation has focused on educational programs, outreach and collective impact activities that foster inclusion and equity in computing and engineering. College student development and faculty career development are central themes across her body of work, which focuses on focus on capacity building in research and evaluation, organizational change in STEM education, and integration of computing into pedagogy.Dr. Praveen Ramaprabhu, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Praveen Ramaprabhu is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering & Engineering Sciences at UNC Charlotte, where he heads the Laboratory for Multiscale Computational Fluid Dynamics (LMCFD). Starting with his
pursuing a B.S. in Chemical Engineering with a minor in Humanitarian Engineering at The Ohio State University. Involvement includes working as an Undergraduate Research Associate and Lead Undergraduate Teaching Associate for the Fundamentals of Engineering Program within the Department of Engineering Education. Research interests focus on sense of belonging, concept mapping, instrument content validation, and metacognition.Sydney Cooper, The Ohio State University Sydney Cooper is pursuing her B.S. in Biomedical Engineering at The Ohio State University. She is involved in the Department of Engineering Education as an Undergraduate Research Associate. Her research interests include inclusion in engineering.Dr. Krista M
Paper ID #48073Exploring Engineering Perceptions Among First-Year Undergraduate Studentsfrom Low-Income Schools: A Mixed Methods StudyJames Finn Morton, University of Georgia Finn Morton is an undergradute student at The University of Georgia. He wrote this paper because of his past experiences with his high school. Finn loves to swim, go to the gym, and take naps in his free time.Taiwo Raphael Feyijimi, University of Georgia Taiwo is a highly skilled AI Engineer, Researcher, and Doctoral Student at the University of Georgia who completed his MS in Electrical and Computer Engineering in the College of Engineering. He is
results from our National Science Foundation (NSF) grantentitled Elementary Teacher Professional Learning in Equitable Engineering Pedagogies forMultilingual Students. This project works with third grade teachers of emerging multilingualstudents to integrate translanguaging practices into their classrooms as well as engineeringlessons. Preliminary results of our teachers' learning and growth as teachers of engineering canbe found in other papers [1], [2], [3]; this paper focuses on a major goal of our project, asustained professional learning experience model for elementary school teachers.IntroductionThe United States has and will continue to have an increase of English language learners, oremerging multilingual students, in elementary school
to considerwhen developing a new semiconductor program. Building stronger collaboration requires notonly the dedication of individual faculty members but also support at the departmental andinstitutional levels. Collective curriculum development helps reduce the burden on individualfaculty members within each institution and benefits from industry support, such as the provisionof equipment and the integration of industrial needs directly into coursework, to better preparestudents for careers in semiconductors. Holistic regional efforts are also essential, as the growthof the semiconductor industry cannot rely on a single major player. Instead, a collaborativeinfrastructure with specialization is necessary to strengthen the roles of unique
promoting high academicstandards and flexibility. These points underscore the need for systematic ways to measure andassess curricular complexity.Data-Driven Approaches for Quantifying Curricular ComplexityIn recent years, there has been an increased interest in data-driven approaches to studying andquantifying the complexity of engineering curricula [12]. Over the past decade, several studieshave introduced diverse methods for measuring this complexity. For instance, Roland et al. [13]analyzed curriculum prerequisite networks using a probabilistic student flow model. Theyidentified how individual courses affect graduation timelines and developed software to facilitatesimilar analyses. Meanwhile, Heileman et al. [14] proposed a network-analysis
” (PDS) [18]. The PDS measures various domains including“Professional Development Attitude” which is based upon the ABET Engineering Criteria 2000(EC2000), an accreditation criteria focused on learning outcomes rather than curriculum [19].The PDS aligns with the goals of this research and was selected to evaluate the influence oflearning coaches on professionalism among engineering students. The PDS has been validated inprior research to assess the professional development of engineering students at ClemsonUniversity and aligns with ABET EC200 criteria. While it was originally designed for broaderuniversity assessment, the modifications made in this study, which replace the focus of “ClemsonUniversity” to “Learning Coaches”, maintain the
, assess how they intend to integrate these tools into future curriculum, and identify theconcerns and challenges associated with AI usage. The survey comprised 105 students from threemajors: Mechanical Engineering (11.4%), Engineering Management (43.8%), and MechanicalEngineering Technology (44.8%). The participant group was evenly divided between undergraduate(49.5%) and graduate (50.5%) students.The survey featured a combination of multiple-choice and Likert-scale questions focused on four mainareas: first, the survey explored usage patterns and engagement with AI tools with questions focus onhow students interact with AI tools, the various applications of these tools in their studies, and theperceived engagement and efficiency benefits; second
, 2003. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/ 10400419.2003.9651403[9] E. Perignat and J. Katz-Buonincontro, J. STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002[10] Comisión Nacional de Acreditación. (2007). Criterios de evaluación para carreras de ingeniería. 07 de Marzo, 7, 1–21, 2007.[11] Abet Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018 – 2019. Retrieved from https://www.abet.org/[12] S. R. Daly, E. A. Mosyjowski, and C. M. Seifert. Teaching creativity in engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(3), 417-449, 2014.[13] M. G. Holguín, A. F. Tavera, and M. B. López
Paper ID #45273WIP: Factors Influencing Faculty Pedagogical Decisions around Diversity,Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) in Engineering: A Comparative CaseStudyMr. Avis Carrero, Tufts University Avis Carrero is a civil and environmental engineering PhD candidate at Tufts University. He previously earned an M.S. in Civil Engineering from Tufts, focusing on geosystems engineering. Avis’ research focuses on advancing racial and educational equity in engineering education through exploring the experiences of students and faculty. His dissertation research examines factors that shape faculty pedagogical and curricular
paper presents the results of a survey, which explored the extent to which students’perceptions of the most and least important EPI pillars and competencies changed over asemester. Surveyed students included those enrolled in an introductory Civil Engineering course(control group), and students in two new RED integrated project-based learning courses thatwere delivered for first year and second year environmental engineering students.2. Course Descriptions2.1. RED project-based coursesOne overarching goal of implementing project-based courses in the 1st and 2nd yearof the curriculum is to motivate students with a range of skills and backgrounds to continueto pursue environmental engineering. Our project-based courses, EENV 102, Introduction
Paper ID #48147Democratizing the Analysis of Unprompted Student Questions Using Open-SourceLarge Language ModelsBrendan Lobo, University of Toronto An MASc candidate in the Integrative Biology and Microengineered Technologies Laboratory at the University of Toronto.Sinisa Colic, University of Toronto Sinisa Colic is an Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream with the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. He completed his PhD at the University of Toronto in the area of personalized treatment options for epilepsy using advanced signal processing techniques and machine learning. Sinisa currently teaches
and themes that emerged as focal pointsfor the center as communicated through their work with an industry advisory board, from the first meeting ofthe board in 1991 through the year 2024. To reiterate, the themes were found through reviewing archivalrecords of past advisory board meetings. The timeline highlights the major themes that the Leonhard Centerpursued by year. Important dates related to the Leonhard Center are also highlighted by year. Overarchingthemes included student development (SD); faculty development (FD); DEI initiatives, including genderequity and racial/ethnic equity; informing the curriculum (CUR); entrepreneurship (ENT); globalization(GLO); online programs (OP); ethics (ETH); graduate education (GE); entrance to