significant problems have arisen. Companies have spentmillions of human activity hours, have required a lot of resources and have created products withno value at all. Managers have made a countless number of costly mistakes which may haverequired rectification. Factories have had a great deal of products that were neither needed norappreciated by the customer and this situation has resulted in overstock of inventories. All theseproblems can be summarized in one word: Waste, what the Japanese manufacturers refer to as“muda.” For many years, there were several attempts to decrease this “muda.” The mostsignificant among these techniques are “lean thinking.” With lean thinking, demand is anticipated and it is the engine that moves the
Paper ID #39713Board 112: Creating an Institutional Culture of Empowering Faculty forStudent-centered Learning through a Pilot ProgramDr. Sally J. Pardue, Tennessee Technological University Sally Pardue, Ph.D., is an associate professor of mechanical engineering at Tennessee Tech University, and former director (2009 - 2018) of the Oakley Center for Excellence in the Teaching of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.Dr. Kumar Yelamarthi, Tennessee Technological University Kumar Yelamarthi received his Ph.D. and M.S degree from Wright State University in 2008 and 2004, and B.E. from University of Madras
nature resources over the long term.By doing this ideally, we should get rid of the single minded pursuit of profits in the short termand make the right decisions. But how these can be done in reality is difficult, because we can’talways give a straight answer priori for a specific eco-engineering project. Rather, the answersonly come from the planning, design, and engineering process. By which each agent of theprofessional discipline will negotiate in project with each others.Intertwining Generalist Pedagogy into Participatory PlanningLet’s retrospect the situation we face right now. As a planner, designer or engineer, how can wefind the actual position or correct orientation in the triangle and deal with the conflict by differentdimensions
Session umber 8-3 Establishing Multiple Assessment Methods for Accreditation ripendra Sarker and Cajetan M Akujuobi Department of Engineering Technology Prairie View A&M University Prairie View, TX 77446 AbstractProgram Outcome (Criterion 3) is one of the eight Criteria used by the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) in assessing the quality of a program. The objective of thiscriterion is to assess the professional attainment of graduates over several years
Paper ID #18653Using a Techno-Economic Model to Promote Consideration of Uncertainty inBioengineering DesignXuwen Xiang, Oregon State University Xuwen is currently a doctoral candidate in Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He currently has research focused on techno-economic analysis of glucosamine and lipid from algae.Prof. James D. Sweeney, Oregon State University James D. Sweeney is Professor and Head of the School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental En- gineering at Oregon State University. He received his Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Biomedical Engineering from Case Western Reserve University in 1988
onsmart materials is to focus on the following aspects of teaching and learning: Page 9.1101.2 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering" Teaching • Nurture curiosity, creativity, critical thinking and enterprise. • Remain relevant to the demands of a rapidly transforming society. Learning • Merge academic rigor with the thrill of discovery. • Stimulate minds and encourage cross-disciplinary discourse.The success of this
performance can be immediate; students canwork through entire problems instead of small analytical pieces, since the technology reducestime to “crunch numbers”; and finally, students can get a better conceptual understanding asmore information is available and since modeling in a software package can be modified quicklyto conduct a sensitivity analysis for example. 3 With this in mind, computers were selectively integrated into two lessons of anintroductory mechanical engineering design course in order to facilitate the teaching of QualityFunction Deployment (QFD) methods using QFD Designer v.4 software from Qualisoft. 4 In theopinion of the instructors, the use of QFD software adds value to the teaching of the QFDmethod by providing a
is not enough today.What is continuous improvement? Despite many complete books written on the topic, mostfaculty and administrators remain unsure. In an article in Quality Digest, Danny Langdon4states, “Continuous (Process) Improvement is designed to utilize the resources of the Page 6.271.2 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationorganization to achieve a quality-driven culture. Individuals must think, act, and speak quality.An organization attempts to reach a single-minded link between
course pathways to ensure that the students will have The original (Fall 2013) approved curriculum for ourthe appropriate foundational knowledge needed to succeed in Bioengineering (BIOE) department had to meet the College oftheir chosen capstone course. The pathways have some Engineering’s mandated minimum of 124 semester hoursflexibility in case a student wished to move between particular (s.h.). In addition, the number of credit hours was defined bypathways, but the choice of pathway has to be made fairly ABET requirements for engineering programs. ABETearly in the student’s plan of study. suggests a minimum of 31 credits in foundation math and
AC 2010-2428: LEARNING BARRIERS IN SERVICE COURSES - AMIXED-METHODS STUDYQaiser Malik, Michigan State UniversityPunya Mishra, MSUMichael Shanblatt, MSU Page 15.833.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Learning Barriers in Service Courses: A Mixed- Methods StudyAbstractThis paper reports the results of a longitudinal study conducted on a service course offered tonon-electrical engineering majors at a large Midwestern university. The study focused onunderstanding the reasons why students perform relatively low in service courses. The mixedmethod approach was used to measure the performance in two different ways and
UniversityProcess Control School of Chemical Engineering and BioengineeringFall, 2004 Richard L. Zollars Semester Tuning ProjectOver the latter portion of the semester you are going to be asked to tune a controller tomeet certain specifications for a heat exchanger that is located in Chattanooga, TN. Theschematic for this system is shown below. To assist you you will be given a contact for another engineering student at theUniversity of Tennessee, Chattanooga. That person will conduct the tests you requestaccording to your instructions.The first task is to determine the dynamics for this system. Keep in mind that the systemmay be idle when the
engineering/design notebooks) were once standard practice in theprofession, but in recent years the practice has waned as digital technologies have provided newways to represent and store engineering information. In the same bent, the MechanicalEngineering program at Montana State University once required students to keep design journals,but abandoned the practice when journal quality became poor. While the faculty intuitively feltthat journals could be valuable to aspiring engineers, especially in design courses, they haddifficulty assessing journals consistently and guiding students in good journaling practice.As part of a larger research effort to better understand student design processes, I proposed re-instituting journals in the senior capstone
2002-2096 A New Method to Calculate Phase Coexistence James P. Russum and Donald P. Visco, Jr. Georgia Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Atlanta GA /Tennessee Technological University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Cookeville TNIntroductionA classic problem in thermodynamics is the evaluation of phase equilibria from equations ofstate (EOS). The development and solution of said problems is normally presented during theundergraduate chemical engineering thermodynamics course, with the problems solved eitherthrough an iterative procedure [1-3] or using a root-finding
1 Critical Thinking in STEM Through Liberal Arts Paradigms: Transference of Skills Nathan K. Mitchell Division of Social Sciences & College of Engineering Prairie View A&M University Aburi Anil Kumar Department of Electrical Engineering Prairie View A&M Universiy AbstractThis paper addresses the well-known need for critical thinking in the sciences and engineering. Insome areas, standard
Paper ID #7205Technological Literacy: Assessment and Measurement of Learning GainsDr. John Krupczak, Hope College Dr. John Krupczak is a professor of Engineering at Hope College in Holland, Mich. He is a former chair of the ASEE Technological Literacy Division and a former chair of the ASEE Liberal Education Division. Dr. Krupczak was a CASEE senior fellow from 2008 to 2010.Kate A Disney, Mission College Kate Disney teaches engineering at Mission College in Santa Clara, California. She has been involved in teaching technology literacy at both Mission College and Cabrillo College in Aptos, CA
Session 2554 Creating a Truly Multidisciplinary Entrepreneurial Educational Environment John B. Ochs, Todd A. Watkins and Berrisford W Boothe Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics/Economics Department/Department of Arts and Architecture Lehigh University, Bethlehem PA 18015-3085AbstractIn our age of technological growth and change, the role of the engineer has evolved from lonespecialist to team player, from internally focused to globally aware, from reactionary toentrepreneur. The entrepreneur has created much of our social wealth. The characteristics of
ineducational settings. Not all of these methods are appropriate or applicable to the problem athand though; the specific NLP technique implemented must be adapted to fit the type of textbeing analyzed and the purpose of that analysis [8].Existing Uses of Natural Language Processing in AssessmentWith the ethical concerns and limitations of more advanced models in mind, the use of naturallanguage processing in educational assessment is by no means a new endeavor. The use ofautomated essay scoring techniques have been widely developed and discussed across multiplesubject areas [9]. However, their usage remains problematic and they do not see significant usein the field of engineering education.This said, there have been many attempts at more detailed
hands-onprojects, is widely acknowledged as an effective way to learn. [1] Students are givenopportunities to direct their own learning, focusing on a fun and exciting outcome that isbeyond simply the knowledge required. [2, 3] Previous studies have found that a hands-on or project freshman experience can have impacts on student attitudes and persistencein engineering. [4-7]A critique of the MIT curriculum is that the core classes in the freshmen year are allscience and humanities classes, however the majority of the students complete a degree inengineering. To better connect freshman core science classes to engineering concepts, aclass was developed that focused on hands-on projects in the freshman year. Thisseminar, called Mens Et Manus (Mind
analyze GR data and to report frequency information gathered by one trainedobserver, a comprehensive statistical analysis across observers must be attempted. Comparingdata across these observers may help to provide information about the reliability of the GRportion of the VOS, and a comparison of GR data with data collected from other parts of theVOS may help to prove the validity of the VOS itself. With this information, classroom normsfor bioengineering may be determined and may be compared with other engineering disciplines.Bibliography1. Harris, A.H., A Manual for the VaNTH Observation System, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 2002.2. Bransford, J., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and
-Key scholarship.Opinions of members of the Banneker-Key scholarship committee is that there is less creativity,imagination, and originality evident in the application materials than there once was. There are“Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Page 6.996.1Ó 2001, American Society for Engineering Education”other indicators of homogeneity: out of 28 randomly-selected applications materials, there were11 females and 17 males, with average SAT scores of 1452 and average high school GPA of4.25 (weighted). Six of these were first generation college applicants, two
Session 2632 A Novel Graphical Technique for Selection of a Robust Design Point José G. Colom*, R.R. Barton**, Lynn Carpenter**, Rafael Rodríguez Solís* *University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez/ **Penn State UniversityI. INTRODUCTIONThe concept of robust design was introduced by Genichi Taguchi, and popularized in the U.S.following his visit to Bell Laboratories in the mid-1980’s. Since this technique has becomeimportant in industry, the topic has been included in many undergraduate engineering statisticscurricula. Unfortunately, the experiment design and data analysis issues are complex
AC 2011-2270: ACCLIMATING MECHANICAL DESIGNERS TO MANU-FACTURING TOLERANCES IN THE FRESHMAN YEARJulia L Morse, Kansas State University, Salina Julia Morse is Associate Professor and Program Coordinator for Mechanical Engineering Technology at Kansas State University, K-State Salina. She teaches lecture and laboratory courses in the areas of computer-aided design, manufacturing and automation. Ms. Morse earned a B.S.I.E. from the Univer- sity of Tennessee-Knoxville and an M.S. in Manufacturing Systems Engineering from Auburn University, where she also worked with Auburn Industrial Extension Service. Her work in industry includes engi- neering experience in quality control, industrial engineering, and design and
] KEEN Foundation, “The Framework for Entrepreneurially-Minded Learning,” Engineering Unleashed: Powered by KEEN. https://engineeringunleashed.com/framework (accessed Feb. 24, 2023).[3] KEEN Foundation and Arizona State University, “Mentorship 360: Entrepreneurship + Innovation,” Mentorship 360. https://entrepreneurship.engineering.asu.edu/mentorship-360/ (accessed Jan. 05, 2022).[4] S. E. Zappe, “Avoiding Construct Confusion: An Attribute-Focused -Approach to Assessing Entrepreneurial Mindset,” Adv. Eng. Educ., p. 12, 2018.[5] “Entrepreneurial Mindset,” Network for Teaching Entrepreneurship. https://www.nfte.com/entrepreneurial-mindset/ (accessed Feb. 01, 2023).[6] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the entrepreneurial
the elevenABET (a) through (k) student outcomes. More details about the integration of senior designassessment into program assessment may be found in [5]. 214x Prepare a test plan and conduct a subsystem hardwareCourse Outcome ABET Student Outcome (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, asx Approach engineering design problems with an open and test. well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or creative mind, and use various
/interest in Engineering Education.• It gives me an opportunity to learn about best practices in other institutions It offers a forum for me to fraternize with people who share my passion for education and learning• Networking with like-minded faculty colleagues• To be informed about the current trends in engineering curriculum development. To learn about the new effective teaching techniques in engineering. To remain updated about the awards, fellowships, summer internships etc. available to students and faculty. General Benefits• To receive copies of PRISM to allow me to keep (somewhat) abreast of developments in Eng.• ASEE is the professional organization that represents the educational aspects of our collective
programming. This will be something to keep in mind for future iterations of thisresearch.In addition, the student comments need to be viewed and judged also in the context of the entireRED program. This group of students had increased workload through the individual core junior-level electrical engineering courses and their LSMs, the associated knowledge integrationmodules between the courses, foundations and professionalism sessions, and team activities.Many students found the “extra” MATLAB assignments overwhelming and overly time-demanding in the context of all the other newly established and required course and programcomponents. “I never had a chance to really try all the problems with multiple other timeconstraints.” “I feel this assignment
Paper ID #30003Software Support for Materials-related Active LearningDr. Kaitlin Tyler, ANSYS Inc. Kaitlin is currently an Education Fellow with the Granta Education Division at ANSYS. She received her PhD at the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign under Professor Paul Braun. Her research was split: focusing on manipulating eutectic material microstructures for optical applications and examining how en- gineering outreach programs influence participants’ self-perceptions of engineering and self-confidence. Her interests lie in materials education and STEM outreach.Dr. Claes Fredriksson, ANSYS Granta Currently
Paper ID #42185Board 293: How to Teach Debugging? The Next Million-Dollar Question inMicroelectronics EducationHaniye Mehraban, Oklahoma State University Haniye Mehraban obtained her Master of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, in 2017. Currently, she is a Ph.D. student in Electrical Engineering at Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA. Her research interests are primarily focused on Analog Integrated Circuit Design.Dr. John Hu, Oklahoma State University John Hu received his B.S. in Electronics and Information Engineering from Beihang University
Group had in mind a written format. However with a strong backgroundin video production, and a vision shared with others such as D.A. Rodgers [1] regarding theability of video to enhance the learning experience, the author felt that video was an appropriatemedium. This was reinforced by previous experience using video material produced by thirdparties [2] to take students on a virtual tour of silicon foundries and also by producing videos for Page 10.1048.1PSpice instruction. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for
Paper ID #9228How to structure an internship that is great for the intern and the manager?Dr. Sudarsan Rangan, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University Malini Natarajarathinam is an Associate professor with the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Dr. Natara- jarathinam’s teaching activities surround classes in purchasing, distribution networks and strategic re- lationships. She strives to make learning fun, relevant and perpetual to her students. The students of the Industrial