Conference Session

Active and Project-based Learning

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tony Lee Kerzmann, Robert Morris University; Eugene Joseph Werner Jr., GAI Consultants, Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

, New Jersey, U.S.A.: Prentice Hall.3) Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York, NY, U.S.A.: David McKay Co. Inc.4) Dziegielewski, B., Kiefer, J. C., Opitz, E. M., Lantz, G. L., Porter, G. A., (2000). Commercial and Industrial End Uses of Water. Washington, DC: American Water Works Association.5) Oertel, H., Prandtl, L. (2004). Prandtl’s Essentials of Fluid Mechanics. Boehle, M., Mayes, K., (Eds.). New York, NY: Springer.6) Calvert, J. B. (2003). Turbines. In Tech Index, University of Denver. Retrieved from http://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/tech/fluids/turbine.htm#Refs

Conference Session

Hands-on Laboratory and Design Experiences in Environmental Engineering

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sudarshan T. Kurwadkar, Tarleton State University; Daniel K. Marble, Tarleton State University

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

”. Retrieved December 2011 from https://www.sarc.miami.edu/ReinventionCenter/Public/assets/files/contentAnalysis.pdf4. Lopatto, D. (2003), “The essential features of undergraduate research “Council of undergraduate research quarterly, 139-1425. Hunter, A.B., Laursen, S. L. and Seymour, E. (2007), “Becoming a scientist: the role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development”. Science Education, 91, 36–74.6. Aghayere, A. (2005), “Strategies for embedding scholarship in the educational experiences of engineering technology undergraduate students”. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 11487. Boyer

Conference Session

Recruitment and Retention Matters in Engineering Technology

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian P. DeJong, Central Michigan University; Dru M. Wilson Wilson, Central Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

the School. It should be stressed that thetechnology professor teaches engineering concepts to the students and is explicitly notattempting to “steal” engineering students.3.2 Data collectionData were collected for six years in three forms: transcript information, number of majors, andbrief in-class surveys. The six years involve twelve semesters: six fall semesters and six spring Page 25.1421.4  semesters. Here, a semester is referred to as the academic year with a “F” or “S” for fall orspring; e.g., the last semester examined was the spring of the 2010-2011 year, or “1011S'”.The transcript information was collected for EGR120 students from

Conference Session

Going Viral: Effective Instructional Techniques in an Online Environment

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monique H. Head, Morgan State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

be cleverly incorporatedinto courses. A future paper in which a large class can be assessed for comparative results usingwikis is planned.Bibliography1. Rhoulac, T.D. and Crenshaw, P. (2006). Preparing Civil Engineering Students to Meet Workplace WritingExpectations. Proceedings of the 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, CA.2. Plumb, C. and Scott, C. (2002). Outcomes Assessment of Engineering Writing at the University of Washington.Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), July 2002, pp. 333-338.3. Lang, J.D., Cruse, S., McVey, F., and McMasters, J. (1999). Industry Expectations of New Engineers: A Surveyto Assist Curriculum Designers. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(1), January 1999, pp. 43-51.4. “Criteria for

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Potpourri

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andy Shaojin Zhang, New York City College of Technology; Farrukh Zia, New York City College of Technology; Iem H. Heng, New York City College of Technology; Sidi Berri, New York City College of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

AC 2012-3515: UTILIZING PROJECT-BASED MULTIDISCIPLINARY DE-SIGN ACTIVITIES TO ENHANCE STEM EDUCATIONDr. Andy Shaojin Zhang, New York City College of Technology Andy S. Zhang earned his master’s in mechanical engineering from the City College of New York in 1987 and his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the Graduate Center of the City University of New York in 1995. Zhang’s research area includes materials testing, product design and prototyping, CAD/CAE, and mechatronics. From 2007 to 2009, Zhang served as a member of the Pre-engineering Advisory Commission of Advisory Council for Career and Technical Education of NYC Department of Education, which was designed to help high schools to enhance existing technology

Conference Session

Engineering Education for Modern Needs Part II: Novel Curriculum Development and Project-based Courses

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine M. Polito, University of Texas, Austin; Leslie P. Martinich, Competitive Focus

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

a reasonable “value” for your performance improvements along with a commonly used formula for estimating "real" training costs, the spreadsheet will calculate a Return on Investment for the training. The calculation can help you determine if it is worth your while to take the training. Each section is explained as you come to it. ENTER YOUR DATA IN THE ORANGE SHADED CELLS. ALL OTHER CELLS ARE PROTECTED. Step 1: TASK COMPENSATION This section calculates the weighted value of the portion of your base total "cash value" compensation (pay plus benefits) that is devoted to tasks involving the use of the knowledge/skills set(s) dealt with in the training program you are considering. Enter your base annual gross salary in line 1. In line 2, enter

Conference Session

Lessons Learned through Community Engagement of Engineering Students

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lynne A. Slivovsky, California Polytechnic State University; James M. Widmann, California Polytechnic State University; Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University; J. Kevin Taylor, California Polytechnic State University; David W. Hey, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 35, 240-247.2. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., and Roth, G. (2002). Choice is Good, but Relevance is Excellent: Autonomy-Enhancing and Suppressing Teacher Behaviours Predicting Students’ Engagement in Schoolwork, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261–278.3. Cordova, D. I., and M. R. Lepper (1996). Intrinsic Motivation and the Process of Learning: Beneficial Effects of Contextualization, Personalization, and Choice. Journal of Educational Psychology 88 (4) 715-730.4. Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1988). Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination, and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 3-22.5. Green, S., Davis, C., Karshmer, E., Marsh, P., & Straight, B. (2005). Living

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lin Li, Prairie View A&M University; Jaime Israel Juarez, Prairie View A&M University; Yonggao Yang, Prairie View A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

. Page 25.1494.93. Miline, I., and Rowe, G., 2002, “Difficulties in Learning and Teaching Programming-Views of Students and Tutors”, Education and Information Technologies 7:1, pp. 55–66.4. ABET Accreditation Commission, 2009, “Effective for Evaluating During the 2009-2010 Accreditation Cycle”, Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs.5. Lister, R., et al., 2004, “A Multi-National Study of Reading and Tracing Skills in Novice Programmers”, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 119-1506. Tenenberg, J., et al., 2005, “Students Designing Software: a Multi-National, Multi-Institutional study”, Informatics in Education, vol. 4, no.1, pp.143-162.7. Pears, A., Seidman, S., Malmi, L., Mannila, L., Adams, E., Bennedsen, J

Conference Session

Information Literacy in Context: Enabling Real World Problem Solving

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael J. White, Queen's University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

NewsPatent Information News is a free newsletter published quarterly by the European Patent Officethat often contains helpful tips and information on patent searching. Archived copies back to2004 are available at http://www.epo.org/service-support/publications/patent-information/news.html.References[1] W. Macomber, Engineers’ Handbook on Patents, Little, Brown & Co., Boston, 1913. Page 25.1029.9[2] M. White. (2008). How are Engineering Librarians Using Patent Literature? A Pilot Survey[Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1377.[3] S. Adams. “Patent Searching Without Words: Why Do It? How to do It?”, Free PintNewsletter, 130, Feb. 6

Conference Session

Adaptive and Supportive Learning Environments

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shiran Zhavian; James P. Abulencia, Manhattan College

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering, Minorities in Engineering

isalways an additional help. When the professor poses a problem and then works with theclass to generate feedback to solve it, understanding for a Deaf student is enhanced. Page 25.1037.7 BLACKBOARD P 1 2 SFigure 1 – Basic classroom setup. As the professor (P) lectures, one interpreter (1)translates to the deaf student (S). Meanwhile, a second interpreter (2) is preparing for thenext topic, as well as assist the deaf student.Although I

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Afiya C. Fredericks, Howard University; Lorraine N. Fleming P.E., Howard University; Jennifer O. Burrell, Howard University; Ashley R. Griffin, Howard University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

fall semester. Employed inthe current study, was a pragmatic approach, where the researchers utilize both qualitative andquantitative research methods to address the research problem, research question(s), and researchcircumstance. Surveys were used to gather quantitative data, while semi-structured interviewswere used to obtain qualitative data. Both the survey and semi-structured interview data werecollected and analyzed separately.ResultsQuantitative Analysis: SurveyThe survey provided the quantitative data to examine students’ perceptions of the classroomculture and social transactions. Means and standard deviations were calculated for level ofsatisfaction for faculty advising, availability and instruction. The higher the score the

Conference Session

Development of Manufacturing Engineering Laboratories I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Merwan B. Mehta, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

contractors were awardedcontracts to build F-16s [ii] using the exact same design and drawings. The parts were made tostrict specifications. Naturally, as the blue prints used by both were the same, equivalentperformance was anticipated from both. But this was not the case when the field history resultscame in after some use of the jets in the field.What was found was that the Japanese built planes had a mean-time-between-failure (MTBF)reliability that was twice as that of the U.S. F-16’s! Such a difference in performance cannot beattributed purely to chance. There has to be an uncommon cause that resulted in this. Onconducting an analysis, it was found that the U.S. manufacturers used the full spectrum oftolerance that was available to them, whereas

Conference Session

Pedagogical Advancements in Engineering Management

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn D. Abel, Stevens Institute of Technology; Anirban Ganguly, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

topics –thereby making the structure of the lecture more interesting in the process. This is exhibited inTable 3. Table 3: Causes of failures with Examples Important causes of failures Example(s) 1 Failure in communication Challenger space shuttle disaster, Airline accidents ( Tenerife airport disaster) 2 Quality related failures BP oil spill, Therac 25 (the computerized radiation therapy machine) 3 Failure in leadership Exxon Valdez Oil Spill - Joseph Hazelwood, the person selected to be the ships leader, consumed

Conference Session

Design Tools and Methodology I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

of the UCSD Peer Review tool. This screen shot for 3 person team, but most of ourteams have 4-6 members. Page 25.1096.3 Fig. 1: Initial Rating ScreenshotSingle Parameter Assessment with a Fixed Pie ApproachA key difference between the UCSD Peer Review tool and CATME tool is that the UCSD toolhas a single parameter that the each student applies to their teammate to indicate overall teamcontribution. Moreover, this single parameter is applied in a fixed-pie fashion, meaning that ifone teammate is rated above average then other teammates(s) must be rated below average. Thenumber of points that can be allocated is

Conference Session

Design Cognition I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hamid Rad, Washington State University, Vancouver

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Education”, Section 2546, 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 18-21, Chicago, Illinois.[4] O’Brien, S; Abulencia, J.P, “Learning Through Reverse Engineering”, Section 505, 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 20 - 23, Louisville, Kentucky.[5] Kellogg, R.S; Jenison, R., “Utilizing Reverse Engineering to Explore the Design Process”, Section 2438, 1997 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 15-18, Milwaukie, Wisconsin.[6] McCracken, W.M; Newstetter, W., “Reverse Engineering or Design Recovery: Two Approaches to Uncovering Designing”, Section 2225, 2000 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 18-21 St. Louis, Missouri.[7] Robertson, J; Wales, B.; Weihmeir, J., “Reverse Engineering as a Means

Conference Session

Capstone Design and Innovations in ECE

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven F. Barrett, University of Wyoming; Scott A. Morton, University of Wyoming; Jeffrey R. Anderson, University of Wyoming; Sandra Root-Elledge, University of Wyoming; Cameron H. G. Wright P.E., University of Wyoming

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

] “Wyoming Institute for Disabilities WIND Resource and Information Center.” Internet:http://www.uwyo.edu/wind/resource_info_center/index.html[5] S.F. Barrett. “Undergraduate Design Projects to Aid Persons with Disabilities.” NSF CBET Proposal 0962380,August 17, 2009. [6] S.F. Barrett, S.A. Morton, S. Root-Elledge. “Undergraduate Design Projects to Aid Persons with Disabilities,”in Proceedings of the 44th Rocky Mountain Bioengineering Symposium, (Denver, CO), Apr. 2007. Also available inISA Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, vol. 43. , pp. 296-301.[7] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs – Effective for Evaluations During the 2011-2012 AccreditationCycle.” ABET, Inc. October 30, 2010.[8] “Accessible Fishing.” Internet: http

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Misty L. Loughry, Georgia Southern University; Richard A. Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Hal R. Pomeranz, Deer Run Associates; Wendy L. Bedwell, University of Central Florida, Institute for Simulation and Training; Rebecca Lyons, University of Central Florida, Institute for Simulation and Training; Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kyle Heyne, University of Central Florida; Tripp Driskell, University of Central Florida; David J. Woehr, University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, Research, Training, Education, and Remediation for Teamwork,” American Society for Engineering Education 2010 Annual Conference. Layton, R.A., M.L. Loughry, M.W. Ohland, and G.D. Ricco, “Design and Validation of a Web-Based System for Assigning Members to Teams Using Instructor-Specified Criteria,” Advances in Engineering Education, 2(1), Spring 2010, pp. 1-28. Zhang, B., and M.W. Ohland, “How to Assign Individualized Scores on a Group Project: an Empirical Evaluation,” Applied Measurement in Education, 22(3), 2009. Meyers, K., S. Silliman, M. Ohland, “Comparison of Two Peer Evaluation Instruments for Project Teams,” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2008

Conference Session

Global Engineering Education: Cross-cultural Awareness and Social Impacts

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melany M. Ciampi, Safety, Health, and Environment Research Organization; Claudio da Rocha Brito, Science and Education Research Council

Tagged Divisions

International

desenvolvimento das Engenharias: Situação Atual. Revista de Ensino de Engenharia, 18. Rio de Janeiro: ABENGE, 1998, p.74-82.[07] Naisbitt, J.A. Megatrends 2000: Ten New Directions for the 1990’s. New York: AvonBooks, 1999. 416p.[08] JC e-mail 2426, de 11 de Dezembro de 2003; Engenharia e a Sociedade Brasileira: reflexões para o dia dosengenheiros, artigo de Denis L. Balaguer[09] Ciampi, M. M.; Brito, C. da R. New Trend in Education: Port Engineering Graduation Program. In: International Society of Engineering Education (IGIP) Annual Symposium, 39, Trnava, 2010. Diversity unifies - Diversity in Engineering Education. Trnava: IGIP, 2010

Conference Session

Engineering Education Ties and Engineering Programs in the Middle East and Latin America

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jaby Mohammed, Petroleum Institute

Tagged Divisions

International

Sommer, Curt Acredolo, Michael W. Maher, and Harry R. Matthews. "A Study Comparing Traditional and Hybrid Internet-Based Instruction in Introductory Statistics Classes." Journal of Statistics Education 3rd ser. 11 (2003). 2. Hilton, S. C., and Christensen, H. B. "Evaluating the Impact of Multimedia Lectures on Student Learning and Attitudes," Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, ed. B. Phillips, Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute(2002) Page 25.1250.8 3. Bourne, John; Harris, Dale; and Mayadas, Frank, "Online engineering education: Learning anywhere

Conference Session

International Forum Poster Session & Welcome Reception: Sponsored by Quanser and Cypress Semiconductors

Collection

2012 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Margaret Pearl Lyn Blackstun, Air Force Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

ASEE International Forum

methods: definitions, comparisons, and research bases’, J. Enging. Educ., 95 (2006), 123-138.[3] Albanese, M. A., and Mitchell, S., ‘Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Page 17.15.10 its Outcomes and Implementation Issues’, Academic Medicine, Vol. 68, 1993, pp. 52– 81.[4] Malicky, D. M., Kohl, J. G., and Huang, J. M., ‘Integrating a machine shop class into the mechanical engineering curriculum: experiential and inductive learning’, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, vol 38 num 2, 2010, 135-146[5] Azevedo da Silveira, M., and Scavarda-do-Carmo, L.C., ‘Sequential and

Collection

2012 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Mauro J. Caputi; George DeMarco; Jacqueline Pierson; Brittney Schmidt; Evan Sick

Workbook & Lab Manual, Season 12 - Spring 2012. Hofstra Engineering Dept., 2012.[2] Lieu, D. K., Sorby, S., The Fundamentals of Visualization, Modeling, and Graphics for Engineering Design. Delmar, Cengage Learning, 2009. 8

Collection

2012 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Yacob Astatke; Craig Scott; Kemi Ladeji-Osias; Grace Mack

. Mattern, S. Packman, “Research Report No. 2009-2: Predictive Validity ofACCUPLACER® Scores for Course Placement: A Meta-Analysis,” The College Board, NewYork, 2009 [On-Line].http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/pdf/09b_765_PredValidity_WEB_091124.pdf[3]. Hodges, C. B., & Kim, C. (2010), “ Email, self-regulation, self-efficacy, and achievement ina college online mathematics course,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(2), 207-223.[4]. Attewell, P., Lavin, D., Domina, T., & Levey, T. (2006). New evidence on collegeremediation. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 886–924.[5]. COMPASS (2009). COMPASS Guide to Effective Student Placement and Retention inMathematics. Iowa City, Iowa: ACT.http://www.act.org/compass/pdf

Conference Session

Professional Issues in Ethics Education

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

A. Dean Fontenot, Texas Tech University; Richard A. Burgess, National Institute for Engineering Ethics

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

? iv. You? c. What are the downsides of this design/product? What actual and/or potential negative impacts will it have on society? d. What can be done to minimize the negative impacts? e. Should this design/product be continued? Discontinued? Explain your answer. f. Which guiding ethical principle(s) applies here? Justify your answer.To be most effective, students should be required to choose a design/product/concept (DPC)whose impact (positive and negative) has yet to fully play out. In this form, students are given a Page 25.584.4fair amount of latitude regarding the topic of their analysis

Conference Session

Problem-based and Challenge-based Learning

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Brett D. Jones, Virginia Tech; Philip R. Brown, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

FPD IV: Innovative Curriculum Elements of Successful First-year Courses

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian M. Argrow, University of Colorado, Boulder; Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel W. Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Nathan E. Canney, University of Colorado, Boulder; Suzana Brown, University of Colorado, Boulder; Adam J. Blanford, University of Colorado, Boulder; Corrina Ladakis Gibson, University of Colorado, Boulder; Eric Donnelly Kenney

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

pilot course complements the College’s first-year engineering projects course thatemphasizes a hands-on design-build-test cycle, so the students start with design requirements andend with a product. For the pilot course, students were required to scope an Engineering GrandChallenge(s), to reduce it to a manageable project, then to develop design requirements.Several of the module instructors created teams using the Comprehensive Assessment for Team-Member Effectiveness (CATME) TeamMaker tool.7 As stated, teams were guided in a four-week exercise to scope a project that applies the engineering discipline to a specific GrandChallenge, including some basic calculations for feasibility, cost estimates, and preliminarydesign requirements. The team

Conference Session

K-12 Teacher Professional Development

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keith A. Schimmel, North Carolina A&T State University; Muktha Jost, North Carolina A&T State University; Tyrette Sherlone Carter, North Carolina A&T State University; Shawn Raquel Watlington, North Carolina A&T State University; Terrie Ruth McManus, Ragsdale High School, Guilford County Schools; Solomon Bililign, North Carolina A&T State University; Terry White Worrell, Guilford County Schools; Yuh-Lang Lin, North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

AC 2012-5279: MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER PROFESSIONALDEVELOPMENTDr. Keith A. Schimmel, North Carolina A&T State University Keith Schimmel is an Associate Professor of chemical engineering, Chair of the Energy and Environmen- tal Systems Department, and Deputy Director of the NOAA ISET Cooperative Science Center.Dr. Muktha Jost, North Carolina A&T State University Muktha Jost is Associate Professor and Coordinator of the online graduate program in Instructional Tech- nology. She has served as a teacher educator for 14 years.Dr. Tyrette Sherlone Carter, North Carolina A&T State University Tyrette S. Carter’s research interests include how to improve the teaching and learning of mathematics

Conference Session

Android TA: Course Automation and the Fate of the Professor

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason Allen Toth, U.S. Military Academy; Joseph P. Hanus, U.S. Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Conference Session

Stops and Starts in the Development of Cooperative Education Programs

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative & Experiential Education

aforementionedfaculty are small size, seldom exceeding 35 students per class. The lecture format dominates theseen. Students listen, take notes, and are allowed to ask questions at the end of the lecture orduring office hours. There seem to be less interest (by most of the faculty interviewed) in theprocess by which the course content is delivered during the lecture period, and more of aconcern whether the rate of delivery would allow the instructor to finish the course on time. Theviews expressed by the faculty and the impression(s) arrived at by the author, leads one tobelieve that it is highly unlikely that new more effective teaching-learning strategies would bedeployed any time soon, unless drastic measures are undertaken. The author is more convincednow

Conference Session

Examining Problem-based Learning

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Z. Meyer, Illinois Institute of Technology; James Kedvesh; Joy Kubarek-Sandor, John G. Shedd Aquarium; Cheryl L. Heitzman, Illinois Institute of Technology; Sima Ala Faik, Illinois Institute of Technology; Yaozhen Pan, Illinois Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Level 0 on the Herron Scale. This further supportsour categories: those activities could not be labeled with an inquiry category because theywere bad inquiry activities. While all of the activities were underrepresented at Level 0,the underrepresentation of the Protocol, Design Challenge, Taxonomy and Modelingstructures were statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Of those four,Protocol, Taxonomy and Modeling were all overrepresented at Level 1. The Design Page 25.359.201 The very small number of 3’s should not be seen negatively. Three’s require even the question to comefrom the student, while our analysis is of planned

Conference Session

CoED General Technical Session I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dirk Schaefer, Georgia Institute of Technology; J. Lane Thames, Georgia Institute of Technology; Robert Donald Wellman Jr., Georgia Institute of Technology; Dazhong Wu, Georgia Institute of Technology; Sungshik Yim, Georgia Institute of Technology; David W. Rosen, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Page 25.472.6[5]. Running a CAD package on a provider’s server(s) through the cloud and paying a smallfraction of the original license fee on a pay-as-you-go usage basis is certainly appealing. Inaddition, time and cost intensive software updates and maintenance issues are out of the pictureas well. On the downside, it is obvious that an internal local area network connection allowssignificantly faster data transfer rates than an Internet connection. In addition, rendering CADdata can be very demanding in terms of computing power and over the Internet one mayexperience a slight lag in response time. Whether or not the lag is tolerable will depend on thevarious usage scenarios. While it may be perfectly acceptable in a CAD training environment