same span of time. Much of the interdisciplinary collaboration between majors hashad a significant impact on such. Majors that wouldn’t normal collaborate such as graphic design andelectrical/computer engineering have shown to have had some of the most impressive outcomes in terms ofend design and function. Below are a few photos of the exhibits as they have progressed from year to year toget a conceptual idea of the final product(s), so the reader will have context in which to understand theassessment pieces.Figure 1. Photo of the project in 2011Figure 2. Photo of the project in 2013Figure 3. Photo of the project in 2014Figure 4. Photo of the project in 2016Figure 5. Photo of audience iPad control system (early design phases in Xcode
revolutionary) approach to e-learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Aldrich, C. (2009). The complete guide to simulations and serious games: How the most valuable content will be created in the age beyond Gutenberg to Google. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86- 107.Clark, D. B., Nelson, B., Chang, H., D’Angelo, C. M., Slack, K., & Martinez-Garza, M. (2011). Exploring Newtonian mechanics in a conceptually-integrated digital game: Comparison of learning and affective outcomes for students in Taiwan and the United States. Computers
problems 1-3 on the worksheet Pattern completion: Complete a missing Worksheet (after they read Pattern Fish with the teacher and explore pattern with colors and letters. patterns as they go through the book). Pattern abstraction: Show abstraction by Teacher asks: Can you use letters to describe the patterns in representing a color patter using letters. problems 1 and 2? 4B Have students complete #1-3 on the BLM by labeling the Pattern identification: Identify a pattern Worksheet patterns with letters (As and B s). Share out student ideas demonstrated in class and represent them about Pattern#3 (AABAAB
with a variable frequency drive (VFD) for controlof the free-stream velocity up to 3.3 ft/s. The maximum Froude number for the 24 in depth waterat maximum flow speed will be 0.42 which indicates the subcritical or tranquil flow [4]. Thepump serves as the main drive of the entire system and dictates the flow speed and quality. TheVFD is controlled by a user friendly programmable logic interface (HMI) on the control console.The PLC/HMI also controls a filtration loop electronically with a series of electronic componentsranging from pressure transmitters to solenoid valves. All of these components need to worktogether in order to create a water channel with laminar flow. (a) (b
Colleges and Universities (2016). Recent Trends in GeneralEducation Design, Learning Outcomes, and Teaching Approaches, Association ofAmerican Colleges and Universities, Washington, DC.Barber, James. Integration of Learning: A Grounded Theory Analysis of CollegeStudents’ Learning, American Educational Research Journal, June 2012, Vol. 49, No. 3,pp. 590-617.Bloom, B. S.; Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl, D. R. (1956).Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. HandbookI: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.Boix-Mansilla, V. (2005). Assessing student work at disciplinary crossroads. Change, 37(January/February), 14–21.Bordogna, Joseph, Fromm, Eli, and Ernst, Edward W. (2013
also extend to the mentors.ReferencesAmaral, K. E., & Vala, M. (2009). What teaching teaches: Mentoring and the performance gains of mentors. J. Chem. Educ, 86(5), 630.Collings, R., Swanson, V., & Watkins, R. (2014). The impact of peer mentoring on levels of student wellbeing, integration and retention: a controlled comparative evaluation of residential students in UK higher education. Higher Education, 68(6), 927-942.Gafney, L., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2008). Peer-led team learning: evaluation, dissemination, and institutionalization of a college level initiative (Vol. 16): Springer Science & Business Media.Hug, S., Thiry, H., & Tedford, P. (2011). Learning to love computer science: peer leaders
specifically, responses from Question 2 of the firstand second activities were qualitatively evaluated using the rubric presented in Table 4. Thisparticular question, which was repeated in both activities, prompts the students with “Whatinformation do you think you need to know to answer the driving question? List all of the factorsand/or variables that are needed and identify which ones are the most important. For eachfactor/variable listed, offer a rationale for why it is needed. For example, through whatmechanism/s does it affect strength enhancement?” The rubric was designed to gain an overviewof the general state of student understanding of nanomaterials at the nanoscale and theirrelevance in the context of cement mortar. Scores of Poor, Good
. Science Education, 78:527–554, 1994. [3] B. Chen, M. West, and C. Zilles. Do performance trends suggest wide-spread collaborative cheating on asynchronous exams? In Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 2017. doi: 10.1145/3051457.3051465. [4] J. A. Kulik and C.-L. C. Kulik. Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58:79–97, 1988. [5] K. A. Lack. Current status of research on online learning in postsecondary education. Ithaka S+R, 2013. [6] McGraw-Hill. McGraw-Hill Connect. URL http://connect.mheducation.com/. [7] H. Pashler, N. J. Cepeda, J. T. Wixted, and D. Rohrer. When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning
be more directly comparable with Senior Exit Survey responses and FE Exam scores. 3. Expand course-based Embedded Indicator results to include sample standard deviation allowing analysis of sample variance and evaluation of standards with regard to acceptable lower distribution limits for student performance, rather than merely a comparison of a student average.References 1. Little, D. L., Quardokus Fisher, K., Brown, S. A., Koretsky, M., Bouwma-Gearhart, J., “Measuring Student Perceptions of Engineering Classroom Activities and the Use of Such Measures by STEM Faculty: The Development of the Student Class Activity and Engagement Instrument,” Proceedings of the 122nd American Society for Engineering
-study Scholar. She served as chair of S-STEP from 2013-2015 and is a current Co-PI of two National Science Foundation (NSF) funded grants: Designing Teaching: Scaling up the SIMPLE Design Framework for Interactive Teaching Development and a research initiation grant: Student-directed differ- entiated learning in college-level engineering education. Her research centers on facilitating and studying her role in faculty development self-study collaboratives. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Applying Conjecture Mapping as a Design-Based Research Method to Examine the Design and Implementation of a Teaching Development Project for
impacting them and their students (if they are, in fact, teaching inclassrooms).Just over half (51%) of the respondents indicated that they were K-12 teachers (almost one-quarter of whom had been teaching for at least 20 years), 6% indicated that they were “K-12educator[s] in an informal learning setting,” 3% “engineer[s] engaged in K-12 outreach,” and 2%“community member[s] engaged in K-12 outreach.” Another 38% of respondents identified withan “other” category, which included students, homeschool teachers, university faculty,community college instructors, as well as a self-described curriculum developer, a scienceinstructional coach, and a teacher’s aide.The users varied in how often they reported teaching TeachEngineering curriculum in
/218525261154.Andrade, H. L., Wang, X., Du, Y., & Akawi, R. L. 2009. "Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing." The Journal of Educational Research 102 (4): 287-302.Elawar, M. C., & Corno, L. 1985. "A factorial experiment in teachers’ written feedback on student homework: changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot." Journal of Educational Psychology 77: 162–173.Griffin, J., & Minter, D. 2013. "The rise of the online writing classroom: Reflecting on the material conditions of college composition teaching." College Composition and Communication 140-161.Harvey, R., Johnson, F. S., Newell, H. L., Dahm, K., Marchese, A. J., Ramachandran, R. P., ... & Von
. Pinnell, M., et al. Can service-learning in K-12 math and science classes affect a student’s perception of engineering and their career interests. in 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. 2008. IEEE.25. Furco, A., Advancing Service-Learning at Research Universities. New Directions for Higher Education, 2001. 2001(114): p. 67-78.26. Conway, J.M., E.L. Amel, and D.P. Gerwien, Teaching and learning in the social context: A meta-analysis of service learning's effects on academic, personal, social, and citizenship outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 2009. 36(4): p. 233-245.27. Holland, D., et al., Identity and agency in cultural worlds. 1998, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Press.28. Wortham, S., From good
studentsprovides mutual benefits, particularly improved understanding of stakeholder requirements forthe engineering students and the realism of working with a product development team for theadvertising students. Achievement of certain student outcomes targeted in engineeringaccreditation criteria is an added benefit.AcknowledgementsThis material is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant Number 1159626. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References Cited[1] Don Dekker, Stephen Sundarrao, Rajiv Dubey, 2007, “Capstone Design and theRehabilitation Engineering Program
further refined the compassionate design framework itself which is the subjectof a journal paper that is currently under review.References[1] Kirkpatrick, A. T., Danielson, S., Warrington, R. O., Smith, R. N., Wepfer, W. J., & Perry, T. (2011). VISION 2030 Creating the Future of Mechanical Engineering Education. In Proceedings for the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Conference, June 26-29, Vancouver, British Columbia.[2] Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational technology research and development, 48(4), 63-85.[3] Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & McGourty, J. (2005). The ABET "Professional Skills" - Cant They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed
–624 (2012).3. Tursz, T., et al; Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8, 177–183 (2011).4. Disease, Committee on A Framework for Developing a New Taxonomy of Disease, Board of Life Sciences, Division of Earth and Life Sciences, N. R. C. of E. N. A. Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease. Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease (2011). doi:10.17226/132845. Chivers, T. Genomics: the revolution that’s transforming medicine. The Telegraph6. Jordan, T. C. et al.; mBio 5, (2014).7. Daack-Hirsch, S. et al. Integrating Genetics and Genomics into Nursing Curricula. Nurs. Clin. North Am
conclusion of the course. Interviews were semi-structuredwith questions focused on students sharing the experience of intercultural growth. Students wereasked to recount and interpret specific experiences of intercultural growth. Phenomenologicalhermeneutic analysis is underway with discussion to be provided at a future date.The students’ responses on the pre-trip survey indicate not only a strong desire to learn aboutdifferent cultures, but also an awareness of a lack of intercultural competence in their lives. Forexample, one student states, “I hope that this experience continues to expand my horizons andhelp[s] me develop a better worldview.” Another student states, “I like to think that I amproficient at nonverbal communication, but I now
, 2016.[4] D. Doorn, S. Janssen and M. O'Brien, "Student Attitudes and Approaches to Online Homework," International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 4, no. 1, 2010.[5] R. L. Bangert-Drowns, C.-L. C. Kulik, J. A. Kulik and M. Morgan, "The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-like Events," Review of Educational Research, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 213-238, 1991.[6] D. M. Nguyen, Y.-C. Hsieh and G. D. Allen, "The Impact of Web-based Assessment and Practice on Students' Mathematics Learning Attitudes," Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 251-279, 2006.[7] J. P. Carpenter and B. D. Camp, "Using a Web-based Homework System to Improve Accountability and Mastery in
Engineering from the University of Illinois in Urbana- Champaign.Dr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Robin S. Adams is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and holds a PhD in Education, an MS in Materials Science and Engineering, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering. She researches cross-disciplinarity ways of thinking, acting and being; design learning; and engineering education transformation.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) enay Purzer is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. She is the recipient of a 2012 NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students
integrated engineering curriculum ongraduation rates and student satisfaction: A longitudinal study," Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 93, p. 23, 2004.[2] S. S. Courter, S. B. Millar, and L. Lyons, "From the students' point of view: Experiences in afreshman engineering design course," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, pp. 283-288,1998.[3] D. W. Knight, L. E. Carlson, and J. F. Sullivan, "Staying in engineering: Impact of a hands-on, team-based, first-year projects course on student retention," Proceedings of the 2003American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, vol. 8, p. 1,2003.[4] Cindy P. Veenstra, Eric L. Dey, and Gary D. Herrin. A model for freshman engineeringretention. Advances in Engineering
also slow the process ofdiscovering groundbreaking research due to prioritizing and giving a huge amount of time intraining and tutoring, instead of students already have developed and gained experience on thosepractical skills. The vision is to incorporate a set of guidelines that can be taken into considerationin order to ease the transition from an inexperienced student into a high-end proficient student thatwould not need huge time investment on teaching. In addition, an infrastructure model will beshown with capabilities to scale up/expand and adapt to each college needs without restructuringeverything all over again.INTRODUCTION:The earliest 3D printing technology was developed in the late 1980’s and was referred to as rapidprototyping
. Moreover, this experience enhancesstudents’ technical research skills such as scientific thinking, ability to analyze and interpretresults, and presentation skills.References 1. A. C. Jan M. Rabaey and B. Nikolic. Digital Integrated Circuits. Prentice Hall, 2003. 2. S. Yu and P.Y. Chen, “Emerging Memory Technologies: Recent Trends and Prospects,” IEEE Solid State Circuits Magazine, vol. 8, no. 2, 2016 3. I.Y. Loh, “A. C. Jan M. Rabaey and B. Nikolic. Digital Integrated Circuits. Prentice Hall, 2003,” Master thesis report, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sep. 2009 4. X. Fong, Y. Kim, R. Vekatesan, S. H. Choday, A. Raghunathaan, and K. Roy, “Spin-Transfer Torque
., Felder, R.M., Fuller, H. (2000). “Accounting for individual effort in cooperative learning teams,” J. Engr. Education, 89(2), 133–140. www2.ncsu.edu/effective_teaching. 8. Thornton, R. K. (1997) Learning Physics Concepts in the Introductory Course: Microcomputer-Based Labs and Interactive Lecture Demonstrations, Conference on the Introductory Physics Course, J. Wilson, ed. Wiley, New York, 69-85. 9. Hestenes, D., Wells, M. and Swackhamer, G. (1992) Force Concept Inventory, The Physics Teacher 30, 141-158. 10. Schwartz, Daniel L.; Chase, Catherine C.; Oppezzo, Marily A.; Chin, Doris B.Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol 103(4), Nov 2011, 759-775. 11. Perkins, K. K., Adams, W. K., Pollock, S. J
Kenneth Ball, Legislative Update 115th CongressUniversityASEE Engineering Deans Council Public ASEE Policy Colloquium Engineering Deans Council Kenneth Public Ball, Policy ColloquiumGeorge Mason S. Ball, Update University • Kenneth George Mason University • Amr Elnashai, Penn State University Legislative Highlights from 2016• American Innovation and Competitiveness Act (reauthorization of America COMPETES)• Manufacturing Engineering Education provision in 2016 National Defense Authorization Act• 21st Centuries Cures Act Key Budget Question• Repeal of the 2011 Budget Control Act.• The most recent
projectchanges, but also to raise their level of professional skills in expecting, coping with, accepting, managing,and even embracing uncertainty as preparation for their professional careers. These are skills andperspectives that we can also embody as faculty, to serve as examples and role models to our students.References:[1] Dutson, AJ, Todd, RH, Magleby, SP, & Sorensen, CD, “A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 17 (1997) pp 17-28.[2] Furnham, A & Ribchester, T. “Tolerance of Ambiguity: A review of the Concept, Its Measurement, and Applications”, Current Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 3 (1995) pp 179-199.[3] Mohammed, S, Okudan, G, &
recommend something to you but you have to do everything you want, you have to choose what you want to do.’ He always says this to me. I didn’t like this actually because this is like being responsible...He told me that if he train me like this, this is better for my future...if I do this decision[s] on my own.”The guidance that Trisha’s advisor provided in research and the program allowed her toself-manage. Trisha’s interview indicated that her advisor offered a guided approach that did notinfringe, but rather pushed Trisha to be autonomous throughout her graduate experience. We seeclear evidence of this in her description of her advisor’s statements of choice within her research,“you have to choose what you want to do
in key concepts is not affected by differentinstructors and offered class times. Through engineering a board game students’improvement in innovation, prototyping, and design is strongly supported. Thisunique pedagogy is an effective measure for teaching and learning that can at anygrade level truly help students prepare for their senior design.Appendix 1Figure 8: A comparison of a board game and medical device. The left columnuses an example of the process a board game has to address before getting tomarket. The right column shows the process a medical device ,specifically a bloodglucose meter, needs to consider before market.References1. Malkoc A, Krause S, Ankeny CJ. Value of Student Resources in Materials
intensive, immersive 3-weekinternational program, ENGR 290: Engineering in a Global and Societal Context,4 forundergraduate engineering students. As opposed to many short-term study abroad courses thatreturn to the same sites on a regular basis, ENGR 290 addresses a consistent set of course outcomesin a manner that may be adapted to a variety of course themes and locales. The program has beendelivered as shown in Table 1.Table 1: ENGR 290 course locations, subtitles/themes. Year Location(s) Subtitle/Theme 2004 United Kingdom Transportation & Environment 2006 United Kingdom Transportation & Environment 2007 Argentina Water Resources
type of discussion and the other activity to the other discussion tool. While in the Piazzaactivity, they engaged in a forum-based discussion and critiqued each others answers on Piazzafor the next 48 hours, the CONSIDER discussion phase was organized as two 24-hour rounds,where students engaged in a rounds-based discussion and posted their responses anonymously asdescribed in Section 2. Figure 3 shows an example discussion in CONSIDER. The student whosealias is S2 disagrees with S1’s initial post (indicated by the red background for that post) and pro-vides explanation for why she disagrees with S1 in the text box at the bottom of the screenshot. InPhase-3 for both conditions, students were asked to submit their final answers to the same ques
by NSF, Air Force and DoD. She have several publications regarding to the research and educational projects.Dr. James D Kiper, Miami University James Kiper is Chair and Professor of the Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering at Miami University. He teaches a variety of courses across the CS and SE curricula. His research is in the areas of software testing, software risk assessment, design rationale, and computer science and software engineering teaching and learning.Dr. Gursimran Singh Walia, North Dakota State University Gursimran S. Walia is an associate professor of Computer Science at North Dakota State University. His main research interests include empirical software engineering, software