their incoming graduate students. In this paper, focusing on the 5-week version,we outline the initial format and structure of the course, discuss the curriculum and studentengagement during the first-two implementations of the course, and highlight some of the earlylessons learned and plans for improvement from this effort. We begin with an introduction to theframework we are using to guide the development of the GSSME course.The Academic Plan ModelThis paper is structured around Lattuca and Stark’s (2015) model of an Academic Plan inSociocultural Context, which we used to guide our reflection on the initial implementation of theGSSME course and opportunities for improvement. The Academic Plan model was developed toprovide a framework through
innovative culture, and York University focused onentrepreneurial mindset in the core curriculum for undergraduate engineering and computerscience students. The program culture aspect does not fit well in the current constructive alignmentmodel; however, it is an important element that can potentially influence the learning outcomesand program design as identified by the educators.4. DiscussionEntrepreneurship education is expanding in Canada, with over 245 programs identified from 65universities. On average, each university offers four different programs, demonstrating thediversity and complexity of entrepreneurship program offerings. While these offerings are notlimited to the college of engineering, they provide multiple pathways for students
experiences were the most common career choiceinfluence. This reinforces the notion that creating, facilitating, and integrating careerdevelopment experiences into curriculum is important in development of professional profilesand career interests [28]. Throughout a student’s K20 academic career, integration of positiveexperiences and decisional support will help them to approach career decision-making in a moreorganized manner [29]. Specifically, for traditional students the influence of father and classeswas significant. Prior research also citing the importance of parental influences on careerdevelopment has suggested leveraging these influences to form new relationships to supportfinding jobs and strong career pathways [30]. It is however
courses are designed to satisfy the “major designexperience” portion of ABET’s Curriculum outcome, they must, by definition, be “based onknowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work” [3]. Moreover, the learning in capstonedesign is not only related to discipline-based skills and knowledge, but something greater: theapplication and integration of that knowledge into the solution of a new problem, sometimes aspart of a team. This represents the sort of experience students will have as engineers once theygraduate and go on to work. Indeed, capstone design projects have evolved to prepare studentsfor “design and practice” as a supplement to core curriculum focused on “theory and research”[4], and capstone is some students’ first significant
the concepts learnt in theclass and thoughtfully consider project requirements and constraints while seeking possiblesolutions. PBL also allows the instructor to integrate oral and written communicationcomponents into the course through required presentations, project reports and team meetings.The application and hands-on components of PBL are especially crucial in an applied scienceprogram such as engineering. Also, it is argued in this paper that integrating a PBL course in thejunior year curriculum can serve as a very good preparation for the Capstone project.While it is extremely important to design engineering curriculum so as to meet specific programoutcomes and deliver specific content, it is being increasingly recognized that a focus
liberal-arts education provides unique opportunities [1] to integrateinterventions within the curriculum. Cognitive approaches such as design and innovative thinkingcan be integrated into the curriculum and can be implemented through active learning and humancentered design methodologies. We incorporated these methodologies into our curricula to preparestudents to address the ever changing and complex environmental challenges that affect society[2]. Traditional lecture-based learning does not provide adequate preparations for students toutilize their learning and apply their knowledge in various real-life scenarios outside of theclassroom. Problem based learning provides a novel teaching and learning model where studentsinteract with concepts and
motivation was one of the most influential factors to academic success,alongside intellectual ability.8 Moreover, intrinsic motivation factors have also been shown togreatly impact an individual’s decision to pursue creativity and design.9 Therefore, motivation ishypothesized to affect a students’ drive and success in mechanical engineering design courses.Design courses are of particular interest here because many schools put an emphasis on cornerstoneand capstone design. Further, many students who enter engineering fields site their eagerness todesign and “take things apart” as motivation to pursue engineering. Universities have caught on tothis and made design an integral part of their engineering curriculum. However, we have yet tostudy how
ineffective in promoting high-level skilldevelopment and self-learning in engineering problem-solving [5-7]. Instead, design thinking,integrated or inductive-learning models, and abductive-thinking, which introduce fundamentalprinciples in the context of solving a given engineering problem, are being used as newparadigms in engineering education [8-13]. These models provide learners with an environmentfor problem-solving while offering feedback and guidance. There are also many active learningstrategies like cooperative learning, problem-based learning, hands-on learning, and computersimulation that have been shown to improve student learning and engagement [14-19]. However,many chemical engineering faculty members are not trained in these
, Cornell University, and the University of New Mexico.Ms. Amy Dunford, New York University Tandon School of Engineering Amy K. Dunford is the Manager of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program at the NYU Tan- don School of Engineering. Amy earned an M.S. in Engineering Education from Purdue University and an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Irvine. Amy specializes in project-based learning management and curriculum development, and has prior experience as a first-year engineering instructor.Dr. Jack Bringardner, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering Jack Bringardner is the Assistant Dean for Academic and Curricular Affairs at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. He is also an
of AerosPACE who studied MechanicalEngineering at Brigham Young University said: “As an undergraduate senior in mechanicalengineering, I had already been exposed to the fundamentals of engineering throughout the coremechanical engineering curriculum at a mountain west university. As well as having a coreunderstanding, I also understood the design applications of those core principles (i.e.,Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Computer Aided Engineering (CAE), Finite ElementAnalysis (FEA), and optimization methods) to the level of a novice. The AerosPACE programintegrated all of the knowledge that I had obtained throughout my undergraduate career andprior, and allowed me to apply it in a real situation (i.e., the design of a fully 3D
. First-year projects differ across universities, but typical projects can include a focus ondesigning and building prototypes, working in teams, full- and small-scale projects, case-studyanalysis, reverse engineering, and the integration of engineering, math, and science courses 2.The course described in this paper builds on the effective components of project-based, hands-onfirst-year design projects, and uses the human centered design process to frame an approachwhere students are encouraged to incorporate the user, environment, and ethical considerationsthroughout the process. The course has capacity for over 1,600 students annually at theUniversity of Florida providing meaningful individual hands-on makerspace skills to eachstudent, and
and teamwork [4]. Nevertheless, researchers argue that there is stilla need to develop empirical representations of engineering work and engineers in practice to helpengineering educators design curricula for students [5]. Yet, while studies have investigated theskills students develop in design, research is limited in focus to the design courses themselves[6], [7].The capstone senior design courses are among the main areas in the curriculum where studentsdevelop design skills, integrate technical knowledge from previous courses, and further theirprofessional skills. There is, as a result, an opportunity to examine students’ perceptions of theirskill development across the entire curriculum and possibly leverage the entire curriculum
assessment practices in their curriculum through an online surveygiven to the same cohort of students in third year and fourth year undergraduate engineering.Keywords: Assessment practices, Design based learning, Students’ perceptions.IntroductionAssessment in higher education is a process of evaluating students curricular performancebased on learning outcomes using limited context of standardized rubrics. In this 21st century,students need to acquire career focused knowledge and skills expected by the industry. Tomeet those industry requirements and societal needs as a graduate, student’s level ofachievements have to be assessed appropriately. Academia has to develop changing qualityof assessment methods, which will fulfil the demand of new
modeling, project based engineering design, and robotics in manufacturing.James R. McCusker, Wentworth Institute of Technology James R. McCusker is an Associate Professor at Wentworth Institute of Technology in the Department of Electrical Engineering. Since joining Wentworth in 2010, he has been heavily involved with an array of interdisciplinary design courses that range from introductory to capstone courses.Prof. Lynette Panarelli, Wentworth Institute of Technology Lynette Panarelli is an Associate Professor of Interior Design at Wentworth Institute of Technology. She teaches across the curriculum with a special interest in technology and healthcare design. Before arriving at Wentworth ten years ago, Lynette
keytechnologies: design software, manufacturing tools, and integrated control systems. Intuitivecomputer-aided design software programs provide users with an ability to quickly master basicfunctions and design sophisticated systems. Once designed, components can be manufactured(and some automatically) with a variety of traditional and modern machines including 3Dprinters; laser, water and plasma cutters; and computer controlled mills, lathes and routers.Sensors that measure nearly any physical parameter can then be readily integrated with systemsto monitor and control functions.Access to manufacturing technology has been made easier due to a convergence of factors,including the ease of use of tools, reductions in the cost of manufacturing equipment
for industries to attract and recruittalented graduates, offering students potential employment opportunities [6]. Acknowledgingits numerous advantages, UIC is labeled as a strategic approach to enhance innovationefficiency and encourage the practical use of technological advancements in various tertiaryeducation systems worldwide [7] [8].As extensively studied in academic literature, universities employ a comprehensive range ofstrategies to prepare students for successful engagement in industrial collaboration. Thisapproach includes curriculum design wherein universities intricately integrate industry-relevant courses and practical training into their curricula [9]. Study reveals that embeddedand extra-curricular internships, as well as
computer science depend on persona and identity, it is critical that everyindividual working in this area have an acceptable level of ethical awareness and sensitivity, andthey must be able to make an ethical decision whenever they face an issue [2]. To achieve this,we need to teach computer and information ethics to students from undergraduate programs,along with theories and technologies in computer sciences. Recent research shows us that ethicseducation improves students’ ethical awareness and sensitivity as well as moral reasoning [3]–[4]. While many undergraduate computer science programs include ethics in their curriculum,the teaching methods, topics, target students, credit hours, and instructor expertise vary [5]–[8].There is an urgent
of the introductory curriculum. These courses haveteaching assistant who was also interested in encouraging women’sinterest in CS.The student monitor played an important role in monitoring thehomework discussions where the entire process of how studentsfinish their project was tracked. Most of the time, the mechanismfor solving the problems was not unique and other times differentstudents suggested different solutions. This created an interestingdynamic in the discussions where we could see the collision of theirideas, which was a great motivation for the students and furtheredtheir interest in the subject. The students were given the option toshare their continued progress of their code until the day ofsubmission. It was fascinating to
Electronic Engineers.12. Wood, W. H., (2004), “Decision-Based Design: A Vehicle for Curriculum Integration,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.20.no.3, pp. 433-439.13. Dym, C.L., Wesner, J.W., and Winner, L., (2003)., “Social Dimensions of Engineering Design: Observations from Mudd Design Workshop III,”Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.92,No.1, pp.105-107.14. Rittel, H.W.J., and Webber, M.M.,(1973), “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning,”Policiy Sciences, Vol.4, ,pp.155-16915. Bucciarelli, L. L.,(1994), Designing Engineers, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.16. NSF’S Program for Gender Equity in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics: A Brief Retrospective 1993-2001, Wash. D.C., National Science Foundation
deserving attention.Critical When needing to make a critical judgment, the student People: understandingThinking (skill) perceptively states a project-related question and clearly asserts a Project: defensibility reasoned conclusion that addresses alternative perspectives, key assumptions, and supporting evidence in context.Ethical When facing an issue with ethical or professional dimensions, the People: ethics andStandards and student identifies and appropriately applies relevant ethical or responsibilityResponsibility professional principles or standards in ways that demonstrate Project: legal and societal(ability) integrity and
that has been taught by the capstone engineering professors. Three years ago, wedecided to bring in outside experts to lecture on topics such as project management, ethics andstandards to augment the training for our capstone students. The following year we decided toextend this concept and turned to experts trained in the field of business communications tobetter train students in how to effectively operate as a team.This paper describes an ongoing pilot project to integrate professional training on teamdynamics, team conflict and team leadership into our existing engineering capstone curriculum.Business Communications professors from the School of Management developed curriculum andpresented to engineering students in the Biomedical and
cause consequences foremployability of engineering graduates as some employers may value soft skills more highlythan technical skills 4,15. Therefore, it is integral to teach engineering students skills in empathyon top of the theoretical knowledge and practical application within their specific field 4.In order to increase the effectiveness of designs for assistive technologies, the United States mustupdate the nation’s understanding of disability. This calls for reforms in the educationalpractices for engineering curriculum 12. 2.1.1. Senior Capstone Design EducationSenior capstone design is typically a final requirement for graduation in university levelengineering curriculum. The duration of a senior capstone design class may vary
plays an essential role in the design curriculum forengineering students to construct their ability to meet the requirements of industry andsharpen their integrated design skills, and meanwhile, to meet the ABET criteria. However, the most common form of capstone design course in China is research-oriented. It is based on students’ individual projects mainly supervised and sponsored byprofessors, in which students are expected to acquire in-depth knowledge. However, thiskind of capstone design has some significant drawbacks, such as lack of teamwork, designcommunication, problem identification, and system engineering thinking, etc., which are 1ranked as top of core competencies by industry. It
make curricular connections between the liberal arts and engineeringeducation. In many cases, multiple faculty members from different disciplines create and co-teach courses, which may take substantial time and effort for faculty to sit together to design thecurriculum. On the other hand, faculty members might be fiercely proud of their disciplines.They may resist an integrated curriculum that devalues their own discipline while elevatinganother [2]. No matter what the course is, faculty members should be devoted to creating aneffective learning environment and then ensure students achieve designed learning outcomes.Thus, understanding students’ motivation for learning is one of the prime factors that contributeto achieving the goal which is
Innovation Center for En- trepreneurship and Director of the Global Leadership program. Her responsibilities include interdisci- plinary program evaluation and assessment, course/workshop instruction in the areas of leadership and human centered design. She received her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan and an MBA from Wayne State University and is currently working on her PhD at Michigan Technologi- cal University. Before joining MTU she held various engineering and management positions during a 15 year career in the automotive industry.Dr. Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University Gretchen Hein is a senior lecturer in Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Tech. She have been teaching
STEM. Craftingmitigation plans aimed at student success should be research based and implemented to welcomeand benefit all students. Researchers have worked to identify predictors of STEM persistence,both before matriculation and after. A student’s level of academic success before matriculation isa strong predictor of STEM persistence. These predictors include standardized test scores andtaking calculus in high school [9], [10].Research has found that, after matriculation, a student’s likelihood to complete an undergraduatedegree was linked to a student’s level of academic and social integration. Tinto [11] definesacademic integration by a student's academic performance and their perception of their ownacademic experience. Therefore, it
educator and an engineering professor workedtogether to design and teach an undergraduate honors course to students from multipledisciplines at the University of Cincinnati. We discuss our planning process, share our courseassignments, discuss challenges encountered, and reflect upon outcomes for our students. Weexplain how the course enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration, fostered deep discussion, andinvestigated the links that connect artistic and scientific disciplines. We believe that throughintentional integration of engineering and art, students gained experience in a variety of modesof inquiry. They developed creative research approaches, problem solving skills, and innovativehabits of the mind that will serve them in their respective
pretest and posttestresults show there is a significant improvement in students’ spatial cognition when the proposedtool is used to assist the course.Introduction The development of technology has led to the high demand in engineering design careersthat undergo required training involved with innovative technology. Computer-Aided Design(CAD) have become an essential tool for engineers and other STEM-related fields, which requiresan adequate spatial cognition skill (Sorby et al. 2013). Strong spatial skills are necessary to notonly complete the engineering course but also to succeed in professional practice after finishingthe curriculum (Hsi et al., 1997). Improving students’ interpretation, analysis, and visualization ofmodels, as well as
Cornerstone Design, Senior Capstone Design,Engineering Education, Engineering Retention1. IntroductionEngineering curriculum at the university level typically culminates in a senior design capstonecourse. The goal of the senior capstone design course is to challenge the students with an exampleof a real-world project, preparing them for industry. University curriculum used to focus heavilyon design and design challenges, typical of industry level engineering. Due to increasing systemcomplexity, engineering curriculums were prompted to add more science and mathematics classesto help students understand needed tools and methods.1 However, over time this produced studentswith a decreasing understanding of the practical applications of engineering and
Electrical Engineering Using a Para Didactic LaboratoryAbstractThe objective of this paper is to report the implementation of a Para didactic Laboratory in aprivate college of engineering in Brazil to improve the training of engineering students so thatthey can become industry-ready graduates.A very important component in the education of an engineer is the professional tacit knowledgewhich is obtained through the interaction with more experienced professionals. This normallytakes place after graduation. In order to expose the students to an element of professional tacitknowledge sooner, in lieu of the traditional approaches such as curriculum change and teachertraining, we founded a Para didactic Laboratory at our college