Focus: Industrial EngineeringFigure 3. Industrial Engineering Demonstration: Motorized Conveyor Belt, Photogate Sensor,and Supporting Circuitry. This demonstration highlights industrial engineering in a manufacturing environment.Mechanical engineering is included as a secondary focus, as product design overlaps closely withmanufacturing and factory planning. The project application is as follows: after undergoing amechanized process, a product is placed on a conveyor belt to be transported to the next, humandriven, manufacturing process. The students are directed to implement a Vernier Photogatesensor to stop the conveyor belt and signal a pause in production until the product has beenremoved by the human operator. The intended effect is
that ideainto actions requires planning. So before one can write any code, or design any system,one has to take the time to explore the possible techniques and technologies. The mainchallenge for non micro-controller based TEG systems is that the utilization efficiency ofthe energy is low, a large amount of the generated energy may be wasted. Hence there isa potential need for an energy management system which can acquire, store and deliverenergy efficiently, with minimum energy wastage. With proper mentoring, capable tutelage,and guidance, these burgeoning and talented young students will contribute to the bestpractices in implementing future system design and apps development.ResultsSo far we have used this series of modular design projects
subject. An additionallearning opportunity that enhances student learning is the ability to work on small portions of along-term project. The instructor in this environment acts as a facilitator to provide guidancethroughout the design process rather than a director of a classroom. Due to the great variety ofPBL activities, research in this area has revealed that there is generally no universal model forPBL [4]. Without a universal model for PBL, this suggests that the planning, managing, enacting,and assessing projects specifically designed for PBL is a challenging problem. On the flip-side,PBL has great impact on self-directed learning skills [5]: Allowing students to workcollaboratively during the research and implementation phases of design
expectations and the process to tenure and to make a plan to separate work from personallife [10]. Becoming aware of the expectations is key, since vagueness in what is expected can bedetrimental to a faculty members psyche.References[1] R. Varma, “The tenure system and engineering institutions,” in 2004 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, June 20-23, 2004, Salt Lake City, UT.[2] AAUP, “History of the AAUP,” American Association of University Professors,https://www.aaup.org/about/history-aaup. [Access date 1/11/2019][3] R. McKenzie, “In Defense of Academic Tenure,” Journal of Institutional and TheoreticalEconomics, pp. 325-341, 152(2), 1996.[4] T. Sowell, Inside American Education: The Decline, the Deception, the Dogmas. Free Press:New York, 1993.[5
/Acceptance Tests PlansOnce all the verification test plans are approved, students will proceed to implement the finalvalidation/acceptance tests.Final tests procedures are executed and demonstrated to the customer. All the tests must validatethe Tier 2 requirements above.Conclusions and Future StepsThe paper has discussed growing needs in the aerospace industry in the Denver region. Thesegrowing needs will require more expertise in the manufacturing and testing of space vehicles andspecifically of small satellites. The scope of activities in this area includes vehicles for spaceexploration, communication, tourism and national security. The testing system needs, andequipment have been discussed. Using a system engineering approach, the paper has
by the class it wascombined with, typically 30 minutes. Next, this same process was repeated with any classesdedicated to material review in preparation for major assessments, to include the finalexamination. The next step in restructuring was to combine complementary lessons in a fashionthat did not overwhelm students with new material. While the previous actions were relativelysimple to execute across all course subjects, this particular step relied heavily on instructorknowledge of the curriculum and individual lesson plans. Not surprisingly, decisions made atthis juncture appear to be the most identified for potential changes during end of course facultyreviews. Instructors with little or no familiarity of course progression found
theseorganizations to offer the recently recommended student interventions.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSFunding for summer internship provided by the UD Office of the Associate Dean for Diversityand Inclusion.REFERENCES1. Yoder BL. Engineering by the Numbers. ASEE 2017.2. Page SE. The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, andsocieties. Princeton University Press; 2008.3. Planning Commission for Expanding Minority Opportunities in Engineering. 1974. Minoritiesin Engineering: A Blueprint for Action: Summary and Principal Recommendations. New York,NY: Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.4. Ross M, Yates N. Paving the Way: Engagement Strategies for Improving the Success ofUnderrepresented Minority Engineering Students. National Society of
accountable and providemotivation to equally share the work.Assigning the final deliverable earlier would also be useful, so students could begin planning thefinal product before in-class work days. That way time in class, with the professor to help withmath or verification of ideas, is not spent brainstorming and designing more general parts of thefinal refrigeration device.Another way to improve the project would be to offer two project ideas, addressing more studentinterests. Students in BAE have such varied interests including food, agricultural, biological, andecological engineering. There are students who want to go to medical school, do research, workin industry, or work on family farms. Thus, for the context of the project to act as a
University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WIP: Assessing the Creative Person, Process, and Product in Engineering Education.Introduction: why assess creativity?This work-in-progress paper investigates different instruments for assessing individual creativity,an essential tool to engineers. Historically, the basis for most modern engineering curricula canbe traced to the 1955 ASEE recommendations on engineering curricular, aka the Grinter report[1] that recommends “an integrated study of engineering analysis, design, and engineeringsystems for professional background, planned and carried out to stimulate creative andimaginative thinking […]”. The National Academies of
engineering students should possess to successfully enter the labormarket. In the systematic review of Passow and Passow [4], planning and time management,problem-solving, communication and teamwork were identified as highly important byengineers. Identified as less, but still important, were ethics, lifelong learning, taking initiative,thinking creatively, and focusing on goals. Does this mean that engineering students needmore teamwork skills than lifelong learning skills? Or do students need to finish theireducational program with an advanced level mastery of lifelong learning and an expert levelmastery of teamwork? These questions raise the need to not just investigate the importanceof the competencies but also of the competency levels required
Católica de Chile (PUC). (2018). IDI 2015: Antro-Diseño course syllabus. Santiago, Chile: author.Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4(2), 155-169.Rosenthal, G. (2004) "Biographical Research," in C. Seale, G. GoboJ. Gubrium, and D. Silverman (eds.), Qualitative Research Practice. London: SAGE. pp. 48-65.Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., and Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI). In Hofer, B. K., and Pintrich, P. R. (eds.), Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Vigotsky, L. (1931). Historia del desarrollo
problem directions. Designing task Designing the task's complexity (i.e., how many steps or how much advanced complexity planning is needed for an adequate response). Providing scaffolds Designing the way a problem is broken into sub-tasks or the provision of extra guidance or hints. Expecting length Expecting responses to be an approximate length. Expecting openness Expecting a range of acceptable answers. Expecting task Designing the dependence of separate tasks within a problem. dependence Expecting Designing the extent to which students will likely need to provide explanation interpretability to interpret their responses. Expecting depth of
works closely with the departmental leadership to manage the undergraduate program including: developing course offering plan, chairing the undergrad- uate curriculum committee, reviewing and approving course articulations for study abroad, serving as Chief Advisor, and representing the department at the college level meetings. She is also engaged with college recruiting and outreach; she coordinates three summer experiences for high school students visit- ing Bioengineering and co-coordinates a weeklong Bioengineering summer camp. She has worked with the Cancer Scholars Program since its inception and has supported events for researcHStart. Most re- cently, she was selected to be an Education Innovation Fellow (EIF
planned, students in the Fall 2018 course offering completed laboratory assignmentsindependently during the first 8 weeks of course. The last 8 weeks of the course, studentscompleted laboratory assignments in pairs. Once pairing began, each week students were pairedrandomly with a new partner at the beginning of class; as before, students were never paired withthe same partner twice. Students continued to be responsible for completing individualassignments outside of the computer laboratory; however, they now had group assignmentswhich could only be completed during class and with a partner as well. Upon completion of eachweek’s group assignment, students completed a questionnaire surveying their experiences withtheir current partner.As in the
. After the test is finished the machine prints out the high, low, and average value.5.3 Noise LevelA Larrison Davis sound meter was used to measure the noise level of our machine. The device allowed us tofirst zero out background noise, and then run the snowmobile to measure the decibel level. We then used thisbaseline data to determine what the plan of action would be for redesigning the exhaust system.5.4 Exhaust SystemThe goal for the modified exhaust system was to reduce the harmful emissions, and noise levels of the machine.The team chose to use a three-way catalytic converter and muffler to replace the existing exhaust system on themachine. The team chose to go with a larger catalytic converter and place the muffler on the sled behind
that described by Taylor[3] to determine possibleerrors in Young’s modulus, yield strength, or ultimate strength. Similar examples have beenadded to manufacturing, materials, fluid power and thermodynamics classes. This work describesan effort to add measurement activities to a first semester freshman class that serves as a“gateway” class with the broader objective to provide engineering technology students asampling of interesting and relevant hands-on activities that they can expect to experiencethroughout their plan of study.Gateway ClassWhen students transfer into mechanical engineering technology from a mechanical engineeringprogram, they often relate that they spent 2, 3, or 4 semesters without ever touching a piece ofreal equipment
Authority, addressed Quality of Life (QL) Credit 2.6,Improve site accessibility, safety, and wayfinding. The airport authority needed to design a newairport terminal next to an old terminal, and maintain service during construction. The exampleillustrated project phasing and plans for access and egress routes during construction, withemphasis on safety and emergency access.Next, the authors worked with each team by discussing their project and the integration of theavailable rating system tools and sustainability. Use of the Pre-Assessment Checklist requiresanswering 144 questions about the project, to be answered as yes, no, or not applicable. Throughthe answering of the questions within the Pre-Assessment Checklist, the student
, 2015, 1-8.[18] Lee, G. C. & Wu, J. C. Debug it: A debugging practicing system. Computers & Education,Elsevier, 1999, 32, 165-179.[19] Sirkiä, T. & Sorva, J. Exploring programming misconceptions: an analysis of studentmistakes in visual program simulation exercises. Proceedings of the 12th Koli CallingInternational Conference on Computing Education Research, 2012, 19-28.[20] Ebrahimi, A. Novice programmer errors: Language constructs and plan composition.International Journal of Human Computer Studies, London; San Diego: Academic Press, c1994-,1994, 41, 457-480.[21] Spohrer, J. C. & Soloway, E. Novice mistakes: Are the folk wisdoms correct?Communications of the ACM, ACM, 1986, 29, 624-632.[22] zyBooks. https://www.zybooks.com
workforce research characterizing, expanding, sus- taining, measuring and training the technical and professional construction workforce in the US. The broader impact of this work lies in achieving and sustaining safe, productive, diverse, and inclusive project organizations composed of engaged, competent and diverse people.Meltem Duva, Michigan State University Meltem Duva is a PhD student and graduate research assistant in the Construction Management Program in the School of Planning Design and Construction at the Michigan State University. She holds a B.S. de- gree in architecture and M.S. degree in construction management. She has worked for several companies and projects prior to starting PhD. Meltem Duva pursues
andcan be versatile to many types of classes; traditional or not. Instructors can use the One WordPrompt Quiz as a bridge-in [14] to their lesson plan. This quiz can also be adapted to a SRS (studentresponse system) depending on the teaching goal or student learning outcomes [15]. It can be usedwhen a huge volume of reading is assigned for less problem-solving-oriented classes. If there is aheavy load of concepts, a taxonomy can be provided for students to prepare for class according tothe teaching goals.Future Analysis:Morris and Savadatti’s research [16] showed that the number of full videos watching drops duringthe semester for a flipped class. A more in-depth analysis of the implementation of the One WordPrompt Quiz should be performed to
undergraduates with these skills. The accrediting board for engineeringprograms in the U.S. and many schools abroad is ABET, and they define student outcomes as“what students are expected to know and be able to do by the time of graduation.” One of theStudent Outcomes for 2020 is “(5) an ability to function effectively on a team whose memberstogether provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals,plan tasks, and meet objectives ” [8]. These strategic documents guide all engineering programsand are more than aspirational. They are meant to affect change, to implement action to producestudents with technical and non-technical skills.BackgroundSocio-technological challenges drive the need for engineering education to
the principles and theory of cybersecurity, but also equipped students with practical hands-on skills. This approach helped studentsturn abstract concepts into actual skills to solve real-world problems and challenges.This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 illustrates conceptual framework. Section 3describes game-based learning. Section 4 discusses problem-based learning. Section 5deliberates integrated learning. Section 6 demonstrates student-centric learning. We then describeself-paced learning in Section 7 and evaluation plan in Section 8. Finally, we conclude our workin the last section.2. Conceptual FrameworkIn this project, we built a learning system for cyber security education. It employed a variety ofeducational methods in
-classroom session to on-line videos provides amore comprehensive education, a quantitative attempt was made using the final class project asthe focus. The results show the students who attended the flipped session had marginally betterprojects according to the scoring rubric used, but nothing significant. Reasons for the lack ofanything conclusive might be due to how the metric was used in the experiment and studentmotivation. Further study is needed to develop a more in-depth experiment. Future workinclude repeating the study, but providing more incentives to motivate the students. Incentivescould include a competition for best projects. Our current plan is to offer extra credit toward thefinal grade if students add more components, increase
AdvancedManufacturing are working full-time in their field than their peers in other fields, while in the overallsample, a greater percentage of students work full-time in an unrelated field. Lastly, a greaterpercentage of students in Advanced Manufacturing do not aim to complete a degree or plan tocomplete an Associate’s degree in comparison to the overall sample, where the majority are aiming tocomplete either an Associate’s or Bachelor’s degree. Taking these descriptive differences together, wesee a younger group of students in Advanced Manufacturing, more men than women, less racial andethnic diversity, more students working full-time within manufacturing, and lower levels of degreeaspirations. Comparison of Advanced Manufacturing Students
effectively on a team whose members together provideleadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks and meetobjectives” [1]. Educational research has shown that group work has a significant impact onlong-term material retention, critical thinking and communication skills. Group work can alsoincrease individual productivity and performance (a student can achieve more than working ontheir own), skills development (interpersonal, leadership, motivational), and knowledge about theself (identifying strengths and weaknesses) [2]–[4].Although group work has many benefits, in the worst case, it can also present many challengesincluding ostracism (some members may feel like an outcast in a group), unequal
taught duringthe semester. During the proposal development (2-3 months), participants had a regular meetingwith the principal investigator (PI) to produce ideas and discuss their findings from literaturereviews. They also conducted a brief preliminary test on the ideas which were discussed andfinalized in the laboratory. For each project, a quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC)plan was created and their potential end users and partnerships were identified for theirtechnology applications.Leadership improvementThe engineering education community has begun to focus on leadership abilities ofundergraduate students in engineering fields [5]. Higher education institutions have beencriticized for their lack of success in instilling leadership
projects while American students went to Denmark at the end of the projectsin order to present the results of their work for the companies involved. The first face-to-face visitis absolutely crucial for the development of common goals in the project, as well as in order toestablish the proper communication during the entire project work. The visit is always planned incooperation with the American team as they are the host and provide both housing and activities forthe stay of Danish students. Danish students stay with a couple of the American students and theirmates and spend a lot of time socializing with them. By spending all this time together both parts ofthe team, Americans and Danish, are able to get a better idea of culture, language and
exercise □ The Mr Men Book Exercise □ The Helium Stick Exercise □ The Egg Drop Exercise □ Why?5. Today helped me improve my teamwork skills6. Today helped me make friends with fellow students7. Today helped me get to know members of staff better.8. Finding out my Belbin team role helped me understand my role in teams better9. Today was fun10. I would enjoy similar workshops such as this in the future11. I consider teamwork an integral part of a chemical engineering education12. It is important that I am friends with the people I carry out group work with13. Today has changed the way I plan to approach group work while at University14. When carrying
students (Students 4-6) were somewhat vague in specifyingtheir ideal job position. Example student responses are as follows: Student 1 (Junior, Male): I'm very interested in joining a program such as FEMA or NIMS and working with a group of people who are familiar with disaster and figuring out an effective plan to mitigate disaster, to respond to the disaster, to act as disaster relief. Student 2 (Sophomore, Male): I would like to have a paid internship related to cybersecurity, in the coming summer to allow myself to get actual real world experience of what a job I might have later on would look like. Student 3 (Senior, Female): Upon graduation, I hope to apply for a few internships, to gain a
pinpoint the areas where the trainee lackscompetency in a fraction of the time of what current assessment methods would need on similartasks. The comparison map highlighted that the trainee had the necessary competency in regardsto the actions needed for a successful change plan. However, lacked the knowledge of theprocess flow to implement the strategy. This helped the trainer identify where they would needto focus in order to follow up with the trainee and bring up their competency to the desired level.ConclusionsAssessing training effectiveness and transfer is crucial for organizations (Zumrah et al. 2013;Kirkpatrick, 2004; Gomez-Mejia et al., 2001). However, since current methods of trainingassessment are time-consuming (Rothwell, 2007), new