Paper ID #32573Can I have More Problems to Practice? Student Usage and Course SuccessRelated to Auto-graded, End-of-chapter Problems in a Material and EnergyBalances CourseKayla Chapman, Kayla Chapman is currently studying chemical engineering at the University of Toledo and expects to earn a B.S. degree in 2021. She has assisted with multiple areas of research and data analysis regarding zyBooks reading participation and challenge activities. She became interested in performing research after completing a chemical engineering course that used zyBooks.Prof. Matthew W. Liberatore, The University of Toledo Matthew W
Page 8.178.1sophomore year, the 300-level the junior year and the 400-level in the senior year."Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education"The BSOE officially began in 1988, had its first seven students graduate in 1992, and operated asa small (~100 students maximum) but successful program throughout the 1990's. Accreditationby the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) was not sought at either ofthe regular-cycle ABET accreditation visits that occurred during this period for a number ofreasons (e.g., waiting to gain program experience, program didn't fit traditional
Session 3531 Cross College Courses: Creating a Modern Day Tower of Babel Learning Experience Joel Weinstein, Vincent Butler, John Friar, Eric Clark, Anthony Gabrielson, Michael Lake, Jonathan Nierenburg & Justin Noel Northeastern UniversityWhen students from accounting, business and engineering technology are combined in aproject-based software engineering course, the stage is set for creating a modern dayTower of Babel. The students are exposed to a totally unfamiliar problem: an insurancecompany is expanding and relocating its claims adjustment office. The company needs tolink
Paper ID #43460Exploring the Impact of Study Sheets on Students’ Performance in an EngineeredSystems in Society CourseMr. ISAAC DAMILARE DUNMOYE, University of Georgia Isaac Dunmoye PhD in Engineering (in view), University of Georgia, USA, M.Sc. in Electrical Engineering, University of Cape Town, South Africa, 2022. B.Eng. in Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, University of Ilorin, Nigeria, 2016.VINCENT OLUWASETO FAKIYESI, University of Georgia Vincent Oluwaseto Fakiyesi earned a Bachelor of Technology degree in Chemical Engineering from Ladoke Akintola University of Technology in Ogbomosho, Oyo State, Nigeria. He is
, American Society for Engineering Educationefforts at the sending US campus have been discussed, along with a number of current efforts toimprove this process.Bibliography1. Policies and Procedures for ABET Substantial Equivalency Evaluations, Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology, Inc., 1994.2. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc.,2001-2002 accreditation cycle.3. Accreditation Policy and Procedure Manual, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc., 2001-2002 accreditation cycle.4. Manual of Evaluation Procedure of the Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology, Inc.5. Kathryn B. Aberle, Demetrius T. Paris, and
U U U Geological Engineering U Industrial Engineering U U U Information Technology Engineering U Instrumentation and Control Engineering U Irrigation Engineering U U U Manufacturing Engineering U Mechanical Engineering U U U Mechatronic Engineering U Metallurgical Engineering and Material Science
teach students from diverse disciplines someessential concepts on computer technology in the context of applying cyberinfrastructure. Thesecourses developed for K13 & K14 levels will be offered in an innovative classroom setting forhands-on experimental learning with a focus on solving scientific problems as a team. Thesecourses will also be deployed for online learning in a virtual classroom. The effectiveness of suchan approach, introducing concepts from engineering education to the non-engineering students,will be assessed through formative and summative methods for further development anddissemination._____________________________________________________________________________*CIBRED is funded by NSF award OCI-0753375 to O
Session 2322 University/Industry Partnership: Customized Electrical Engineering Fundamentals Program For Non-Electrical Engineers at Delco Electronics Chi-Wook Lee Department of Mechanical Engineering University of the PacificAbstractEngineering curriculum must stay abreast with changes taking place throughout industry in theway products are designed, developed, and manufactured. As technology advances, new andmore challenging problems force manufacturing companies to adapt and overcome obstacles inorder
change in the avenues in which these calls can be heeded [31].Transdisciplinarity is perhaps the most recent conceptualization of engaging students acrossdisciplines to solve 21 st century, real-world challenges. Funding for interdisciplinary research hasrisen as agencies pour resources into avenues that will enhance their global competitiveness [1].In the context of U.S. undergraduate engineering education, the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) has required that students meet outcome 3.d which is theability for graduates to function on multidisciplinary teams [2]. External drivers are pushingmulti-, inter-, and transdisciplinarity into higher education, but there are layers of internalwebbing that are rarely explored when
Paper ID #32223A Workshop for Shared Teaching Materials for Advanced Manufacturing ¨ E. Okudan-Kremer, Iowa State University of Science and TechnologyDr. Gul G¨ul E. Kremer received her PhD from the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engi- neering of Missouri University of Science & Technology. Her research interests include multi-criteria decision analysis methods applied to improvement of products and systems. She is a senior member of IIE, a fellow of ASME, a former Fulbright scholar and NRC Faculty Fellow. Her recent research focus includes sustainable product design and enhancing creativity in
EngineeringIntroduction With the publication of the Framework for K-12 Science Education (National ResearchCouncil, 2012) and the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), emphasis is now placed onthe integration of engineering principles and practices into K12 science education. Although only18 states and the District of Columbia have formally adopted the NGSS, other states, includingSouth Dakota, Montana, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia have adopted similar standards.Unlike the previous set of national science education standards (NRC, 1996), the Framework forK-12 Science Education (NRC, 2012) places engineering and technology alongside the naturalsciences for two critical reasons: to reflect the importance of understanding the human-builtworld and to
Session 1608 Internet-Ready Instruction Modules in Engineering Education R. Sureshkumar, J. Sato Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130.AbstractThe primary objective of Internet-Ready Instruction Modules (IRIMs) is to utilize the globalaccessibility of the Internet to aid and enhance traditional classroom instruction. Recent advancesin Internet technology offer a myriad of possibilities for IRIMs. In this paper, we outline howIRIMs can be used to promote multidisciplinary learning, to illustrate difficult concepts throughaudio-visual aids, for the development of virtual/real
Computing from Polytechnic University of Bucharest, and her Ph.D. degree in Automation and Computing from University of Craiova. She is a faculty member in the Computer Science and Software Engineering Department at Auburn University, where she has worked since 1996. Her teaching experience includes a variety of Information Technology and Computing courses (e.g., Object-Oriented Programming for Engineers and Scientists, Introduction to Computing for Engineers and Scientists, Network Programming with HTML and Java, Web Development and Design Foundations with HTML 5.0, CSS3.0 and JavaScript, Personal Computer Applications, Spreadsheet-Based Applications with Visual BASIC, Web Application Development). Her research areas
education.Dr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is the immediate past chair of the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation; Chair of the International Network for Engineering Studies (INES); past chair of the ASEE Liberal Education / Engineering and Society Division; and a former member of the Society for the History of
AC 2008-1791: PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN TEACHINGENGINEERING: AN ETHICAL MANDATE TO PRODUCE RESPONSIBLEENGINEERS.B. Kyun Lee, LeTourneau University B. KYUN LEE is a professor in the School of Engineering and Engineering Technology at LeTourneau University, where he taught since 1988. He received his B.S. degree from Young Nam University, M.S. and PH.D. from Oregon State University in mechanical engineering. Prior to joining LeTourneau University, he was a research and development engineer at Hyundai Motor Company. His professional interests include system dynamics, control, and applied mechanics. Email: kyunlee@letu.eduPaul R. Leiffer, LeTourneau University PAUL R. LEIFFER
this paper wedescribe the design of the new general engineering curriculum at the University of San Diego.The argument for an engineering curriculum with a broad foundation that includes the liberal artsis not novel. Just after the creation of the National Science Foundation (NSF) in 1955, theEngineers’ Council for Professional Development commissioned a study to investigate howengineering education could keep pace with rapid developments in science and technology. Theresult of this study was the influential Grinter report1, among whose recommendations includedan emphasis on the importance of integrating liberal arts into engineering education. While thereport argued for balance between the technical and liberal arts, few current
Comparative Analysis of Engineering Ethics TextbooksABSTRACT - Engineers play a critical role in bettering humanity via technological andscientific innovations. This ethical responsibility to the practice of engineering is the reason thatengineering ethics is required of all accredited engineering programs at all levels of education,and engineering ethics is required of all facets of professional licensure in engineering. Educatorsat all levels leverage textbooks to teach engineering ethics. In this paper, we conduct asystematic, comparative review of twenty-six of the most widely used engineering ethicstextbooks. This comparative analysis has enabled us to identify over forty thematic topics thatare collectively covered across these twenty
Communication lecturer and a Engineering Education researcher at the University of Michigan. Her teaching is primarily in team-based engineering courses, and her research focuses on equity in communication and collaboration as well as in group design decision making (judgment) under uncertainty. She is especially interested in how power relationships and rhetorical strategies affect group judgment in engineering design; one goal of this work is to to understand factors that inhibit full participation of students who identify with historically marginalized groups and investigate evidence-based strategies for mitigating these inequities. In addition, she is interested in technology and how specific affordances can change the
scientists, many of them in their sixties andseventies, for providing both intellectual and administrative leadershipin rebuilding its institutions of education. The revolution hinderedtheir social and technological advances needed to feed China's populationand improve their standard of living. It is ironic that the young peoplewho initially strongly supported the revolution were the ones who forceda halt to the activities. It must be recognized that some progress wasmade in engineering education even during these chaotic conditions.Positive elements, including the balance of theory versus experimentation,the integration of knowledge with practical applications and the inter-action of universities and factories, were stressed during this period
, including but not limited to four-year engineering and engineering technology programs, play in the preparation of PreK-12 engineering educators?NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING BOARD ON SCIENCE EDUCATION Science Investigations andEngineering Design Experiences in Grades 6-12• Revisits America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science (2006)•Scope expanded to includemiddle schoolNATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING BOARD ON SCIENCE EDUCATION Statement of TaskProvide guidance for designing andimplementing science investigations andengineering design for middle and highschool students that takes into account thenew vision for science education embodiedin the Framework for K-12 ScienceEducation and standards based
Dual-use & End-to-end System Testing Industrial Technology Institute (Michigan) Optical Metrology and Durable Goods University of Connecticut Laser Materials Processing The University of Texas at Austin Semiconductor The International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE) (NAPEM is partially funded through a federal Technology Reinvestment Project grant.) Additionally, each regional program recruits a Curriculum Advisory Board. NAPEM unites thestrengths of a professional society, educators, engineering managers, engineers, and human resource personnelin designing, implementing, and evaluating experimental continuing education programs
1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 Prescribed Courses (9 credits) EE 408 (1x2) Leadership Seminars for Engineers x x EE 409 (3) Leadership Principles for Engineers x STS 460 (3) Science, Technology, Society & Public Policy x EE 495 (1) Internship Project x EE 407 (3) Technology Based Entrepreneurship x Page 1.457.2
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Fostering Entrepreneurship in Project-Based Software Engineering CoursesIntroduction.The 2013 ASEE report on Transforming Undergraduate Engineering Education identifiedentrepreneurship and intrapreneurship as in-demand skills that require additional attention inengineering curricula for “expanding on business and economics acumen and enabling studentsto learn more than economic capitalization, but also the process of starting a business from anidea” [1]. Meanwhile, the technology sector is growing, led largely by software companies likeApple, Microsoft, Alphabet (parent of Google), and Facebook. Accordingly, many of the leadingsoftware companies emerged from a “tech startup” culture and
HOLLEBRANDS is an Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education at North Carolina State University. She completed her Ph.D. in Mathematics Education at The Pennsylvania State University. Prior to attending Penn State, Dr. Hollebrands taught high school mathematics in New York and North Carolina. She is currently serving as the editor of the Technology Tips column in the Mathematics Teacher.Elizabeth Parry, North Carolina State University ELIZABETH A. PARRY is currently the Project Director of RAMP-UP, a K12 math outreach program funded by the GE and the National Science Foundations. She obtained her BS degree in engineering management with a minor in mechanical engineering from the University of
as elementary school. Elementary (andeven secondary) schoolteachers who have an appreciation for technology will likelyconvey that appreciation to their students. This will, in turn, broaden the horizons ofthese students regarding the opportunities they may have regarding careers in scientificand engineering disciplines. Engineering faculty believe the Toying with Technologycourse is a component of the long-term recruitment of K-12 students, particularlyminorities and women, into technology-based fields3, 4, 5.This course is designed to explain the principles behind many of the technologicalinnovations in wide use today via a collection of hands-on laboratory experiences basedupon simple systems constructed out of LEGOs and controlled by
the US has declined from about 40 tenyears ago to about 20 today. Of those that are currently accredited, only one is accredited at anadvanced level, that at the Air Force Institute of Technology, a graduate degree institution.University Working ConferencesThe American Nuclear Society (ANS) has co-sponsored with the ASEE Nuclear andRadiological Engineering Division two University Working Conferences (UWC) during the pasttwo years. The first UWC was held in Philadelphia during 1995 and the second in Reno, Nevadaduring 1996. The goal of those meetings was the continuing exploration of issues related to thefuture success of nuclear engineering academic programs. An especially compelling issue is theability of NE programs to obtain and retain
in the future. This paper explores how the classroomlecture has changed with technology and student expectations. Current discussions and conflicts onwhat engineering education should look like in the future will be discussed as well as the dilemmafacing new faculty with increased expectations to achieve tenure. Cutting funds for highereducation by many states has been a high priority of legislators and research funding is being cut bythe federal government. So why should one go into a career in higher education? The importantrewards are still the same as they were a half century ago!Foundations for the FutureFor the past several years there was an article published on the incoming class of freshman studentswith the emphasis being on the
AC 2012-4849: HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT ENGINEERING DESIGN THINK-ING AND PERFORMANCEProf. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University Kurt Becker, Ph.D., is a professor and the Department Head of Engineering and Technology Education. He is the Co-principal Investigator for the National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE). His areas of research include adult learning cognition, engineering education professional development, and technical training. He has extensive international experience working on technical training projects funded by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, and U.S. Department of Labor, USAID. Countries where he has worked include Bangladesh
Paper ID #21239Developing a Summer Engineering Teaching Institute for Community Col-lege Engineering FacultyDr. Amelito G. Enriquez, Canada College Amelito Enriquez is a professor of Engineering and Mathematics at Ca˜nada College in Redwood City, CA. He received a BS in Geodetic Engineering from the University of the Philippines, his MS in Geode- tic Science from the Ohio State University, and his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Irvine. His research interests include technology-enhanced instruction and increasing the representation of female, minority and other underrepresented groups in
Paper ID #9099Integration of Manufacturing into Mechanical Engineering Education Cur-riculaProf. Robert L. Mott, University of Dayton Robert L. Mott, P.E. is professor emeritus of engineering technology at the University of Dayton. He is a member of ASME, SME, and ASEE. He is a Fellow of ASEE. He holds the Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering degree from General Motors Institute (Now Kettering University) and the Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University. He serves the Society of Manufacturing Engineers through the Manufacturing Education & Research Community and the SME Center for Education and