desirability, feasibility, and viability17. Design thinking is a human centered,empathetic approach involving divergent and convergent thinking resulting in solutions morealigned with user needs. Closely aligned with the ‘desirable, feasible, and viable’ themes is arepresentation of innovation in an entrepreneurial or existing organization as shown in Figure 1. Current State Future State Offering Model Offering Model (Product, Service, New, Revisions, Enhancements (Product, Service, Process) Process
engineering and to STEM concepts in general[1], [2]. The simplicity of the vehicle’s design makes it tractable to beginning students (frommiddle school on up) with little or no building experience, yet once students see it maneuver in apool they are immediately inspired to add capabilities. We have developed two systems toenable students to add capabilities to the Sea Perch as well as to enhance its utility as an oceanengineering and STEM teaching platform.As it is the Sea Perch is an excellent tool for teaching basic hydrostatics in a quantitative way.The displacement of the vehicle, its overall weight, and the distribution of weights can bemeasured and the centers of gravity and buoyancy can be calculated. Experience withhydrodynamics, the forces
, the studentslearn and perform every step necessary to express fluorescent proteins (e.g. GFP, mCherry) andchromoproteins (e.g. aeBlue, tsPurple, eforRed, et al.) in bacterial and animal cells by completingthe following modules.Module 1: Molecular Genetics & Cloning The course begins with an overview of DNA and different cloning techniques, includingPCR and Circular Polymerase Extension Cloning (CPEC). The first module includes 5 labs, inwhich the students amplify the gene for a colorful chromoprotein with PCR (Lab 1), clone thatgene into an expression plasmid (Lab 2), transform the new plasmid into E. coli (Lab 3), thenextract (Lab 4) and sequence (Lab 5) the plasmid.Module 2: Bacterial Fermentation – Expression of Chromoproteins
students such asthe National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) in contributing to the interlinking of personaland professional identities, and to the career pathways of African American students enrolled inPWI and HBCU, respectively.Theoretical Perspectives: Social Identity and Ecological Systems TheoriesSocial identity theory [1, 2] emphasizes the distinction between relevant and meaningful socialgroups and an individual’s commitment to and identification with specific social groups. Thetheory examines the psychological processes associated with identity negotiations based on in-group affiliation and social categorization of self and others. Specifically, social identitynegotiation is a social phenomenon that becomes subjectively meaningful by
University of Athens, Greece. In 2017 she was inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018(Work in Progress) 3D Undergraduate Experience: An innovativestructure to foster the co-curricular activities in engineeringThe era of producing graduates that perform reliably from a one-size-fits-all flowchart calledcurriculum is over. The sharp increase in co-curricular activities has been calling for a newframework. The 3D framework we developed has the capacity to create the eco-culturenecessary for educational innovation. The book “A Whole New Engineer: The comingRevolution in Engineering Education [1]” inspired us to create this cultural transformation.In the final
students behave similarly to FYE college studentswhen doing peer evaluations, thereby making the use of assessment tools such as CATMEappropriate in K12 contexts.IntroductionTeamwork and the correct team behavior are key attributes sought after by a large number ofcompanies when hiring new employees [1, 2]. Working in teams not only helps distribute theworkload better but leads to greater efficiency, better communication in the future as well ascreates a supportive environment for workers that can serve as a platform for even betterperformance. Hence, teamwork skills training has become more prevalent throughout collegeprograms and in businesses [3]. In fact accreditation bodies in Business, Engineering andHealthcare have mandated teamwork
next steps. These adjustments are driven by our reflection ofwhat, precisely, is our revolution, and how our project team is adapting to accelerate progress onthe pathway to reach the revolution.Where Have We Been?—Background on ASU RED projectOur focus is to empower faculty and students to become risk-takers and innovation leaders. Byencouraging risk-taking, we create an environment that rewards experimentation and enablesfaculty and students to become passionate about their work. The project leverages an additiveinnovation mindset [1] by using a mode of collaboration where participants in a community are:1) inspired by shared artifacts/ideas, 2) openly share (and learn about) the technology andprocess used to create these artifacts/ideas, 3
). The hybrid rule leads to only a small number of iterations and makes it possible to perform the column generation approach in an undergradu- ate class using Microsoft Excel. We perform a large scale computational experiment and show that the hybrid rule is effective.1 IntroductionA column generation approach performs the simplex method to solve a hugescale of linear programming problem which we call the master problem. Whilea general linear programming approach enumerates the reduced costs of thecolumns which measure the contribution of the columns toward the optimalsolution, the column generation approach keeps and updates only a small setof columns, which we call a basis, without enumerating the columns. Instead,the
the studentprojects for 2016 and 2017 are included in Table 1.After the mentors and projects were identified, the next step was to design the 10-week program,which included many activities and workshops offered at LSU and around the state of Louisiana(Table 2). The goal of the workshops was to provide students with training in areas besides juststandard research. To accomplish this, we developed seminars focused on laboratory safety, howto use the library, research ethics, effective communicating, how to apply to graduate school, howto apply for graduate fellowships, and a panel discussion led by current graduate students in thechemical engineering department at LSU. Each of the seminars lasted ~60 minutes and was led byvolunteers from
government. According to the FederalAviation Administration (FAA), drones are currently not allowed to be flown for commercialdeliveries in the United States [1]. They have approved certain exceptions which have allowedcompanies to test drone delivery technology, and these tests have been successful. Once safetycan be established, companies will still have to determine how best to utilize drones, increasepayload and establish drone networks. The outlook for commercial delivery using drones doesappear to be bright and getting brighter every year. Figure 1: US Consumers of Perception, Source: United States Postal Service Public Perception of Drone Deliveries Report [2]With the rapid demise of snail mail and the explosive
National Lab, 1996-1997, Chicago State, 1997-2002. Dr. Richard is a Sr. Lecturer & Research Associate in Aerospace Engineering @ Texas A&M since 1/03. His research is focused on computational plasma modeling using spectral and lattice Boltzmann methods for studying plasma turbulence and plasma jets. His research has also included fluid physics and electric propulsion using Lattice-Boltzmann methods, spectral element methods, Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory (WENO), etc. Past research includes modeling single and multi-species plasma flows through ion thruster optics and the discharge cathode assembly; computer simulations of blood flow interacting with blood vessels; modeling ocean-air inter- action
Paper ID #24542SRobot ProjectMr. Phuong Ngoc Binh Do, Saigon Institute of Technology -I got my Bachelor Degree in Mecha-tronics from Ho Chi Minh University of Technology, Vietnam. -I got my Master degree in Project Management (MBA) from Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia. -I got 1 year experience in the Semi-conductor industry (Design for Test). -I got 1 year experience in construction industry as project manager assistant. -I got 2 years experience in project management for CST industries (USA) (Steel industry) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Running head: SROBOT-STEM
Impacts Technology Students (SKIITS)1 developed an online,asynchronous, accessible-from-anywhere course that community colleges can use as a resourceto offer spatial skills training to their students with a nominal investment of institutionalresources. The course is based on research and materials created with the support of NSF fundingthat were successfully used in face-to-face instruction in four-year universities.SKIITS focuses on three research questions:1. Can effective materials developed through earlier NSF funding to improve spatial skills be transformed into an effective set of online resources?2. Does providing spatial skills training improve the retention of low-spatial-ability students, including women in technician programs?3
Student” [1], honors education not only has a particular function to develop top oroutstanding students, but also has special significance for the entire undergraduate education[2]. In the 1920s, Frank Aydelotte Project which was founded at Swarthmore College byFrank Aydelotte - the founder of Honors Education in the United States, was considered thefirst blueprint for modern honors education in American colleges and universities [3].Influenced by it, many other U.S. colleges and universities began to set up honors projects.Honors education in China was originated in the 1970s. Although relatively late, it hasattracted the great attention by the state and universities. Through literature review and on-site observation, it was found that many
alsosummarize the outcomes of focus groups held once a year with the ECE scholars. The paperprovides lessons learned and suggestions for those who would like to implement a similarprogram at their institutions.1. BackgroundSeattle The Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department offers an undergraduate-only program that provides an integrated, contemporary perspective of the electrical andcomputer engineering profession. Students have the choice of earning a BSEE or a BSEE withComputer Engineering Specialization degree. Our students experience small class sizes, extraacademic support, and an emphasis on oral and written communication, as well as leadershipand teamwork skills. Our rigorous student-centered program provides a sound foundation
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018The Online Tutorial Room (OTR): Improving the Sampling Frequency of the Engineering Knowledge Signal!1. IntroductionMotivating engineering students to practice problem-solving has always been on the minds ofengineering educators across the globe. Active Learning [1], Problem-Based Learning [2], andthe Flipped Classroom [3], among other methodologies, are educational techniques designed toimprove learning retention through the continuous improvement of problem-solving skills. In thefollowing, the process of conducting a problem-solving activity for engineering students istermed assessment, whereas the process of evaluating the performance of engineering studentson an
students changes faculty mindsets andinstructional practices. Ongoing research into student experiences is investigating how the variedcurricula, advising, and cohort models used across the six institutions influence student retentionand sense of identity as engineering students.I. IntroductionStudents from low-income backgrounds are underrepresented in engineering programs, and thosewho do enter engineering are more likely to struggle academically [1]. In particular, suchstudents may have attended under-resourced high schools and consequently lack the preparationin science and mathematics needed to directly enter four-year engineering and computer sciencecurricula that are designed for students who are calculus-ready. Low-income students also
a start-up academic institute, how SCUPI, learning from excellentmakerspaces world-wide, launched innovative maker education activities based on theexisting resources and characteristics of Chinese students. These activities include: 1. Regulartechnical lectures for training makers 2. Hands-on projects based on engineering courses 3.Supporting students in STEM competitions; 4. Involved in feature events and outreachactivities of SCUPI 5. Guiding students to take part in academic research 6. Establishment ofan online maker sharing community. As a result, SCUPI has initially created a dynamicmaker education system based on this small-scale makerspace, which provides guidance tobrainstorming, CAD model simulation, prototype manufacturing and
suchas investment in construction of power generation facilities or decommissioning of such facilities.Such decisions constitute strategic flexibilities or "real options" because the decision maker canalter the course of an investment over time when an uncertain aspect of the project such as theprice becomes known. The current practice in engineering curricula, however, does not addressthe declarative and procedural knowledge necessary for critical economic decision making. Wepropose to (1) develop a module in an introductory course emphasizing the concept of theaforementioned strategic flexibilities and (2) develop an advanced course that is mathematicallyrigorous, yet with in-depth case studies for the CEPs. The module addresses the valuation
design in STEM education. In this paper, we describe our approach for developing theproject usage model. Using examples from our analysis, we show and describe the steps taken toconstruct the model by jointly developing and combining three specific user-centered designtools (i.e., personas, scenarios, and landing zones) using an iterative, qualitative approach.Background and PurposeThere is a well-documented lag between the dissemination of educational research findings andthe application of evidence-based instructional strategies within STEM classrooms [NRC, 1,PCAST, 2, 3-5]. Moreover, STEM education scholars attest to a growing discontent within thefield related to the slow transfer of research-based innovations into education practice [6-9
positiveimpact on those people. In brief the study will address; 1. What: (Multinational Student Project, Vertical Garden, Hydroponic, Smart (Digital & Automated).) 2. How: (Vertical structures, Water Tank, Irrigation System to each tank, Sensors and robots, Controlled environment) 3. Why: (Less land, Vertical), No soil (Hydroponic), Less water (Hydroponic), No pesticides (Smart), Higher food yield per crop (Smart), Year round food yield (Smart), Yield even outside of native environment (Smart), Global and Universal Applications, Faster food yield (Smart), Higher food quality (Smart).The plant growing process is digitized/made smart by incorporating multiple sensors to
their relationships withSTEM faculty. To gather both qualitative and quantitative feedback from current studentsparticipating in the program, students were asked to respond to questions in an annual surveythat is administered at the end of each year and to participate in two focus group interviews.Results were used to answer the research questions: (1) How do the Elites scholars perceivethe Elites leadership program in helping them prepare for their futures? (2) How motivatedare the Elite scholars to engage in the Elites leadership program? Before, the study isdescribed, background about the Elites leadership program and the theoretical framework thatcomprises the motivation model.3. Overview of the Elites Leadership ProgramElites goals
extended by the inclusion of academic thought-leadership and tech-savvy students’ insights into new products, services and business models development. Having completed aseries of industry-supported hackathons and design-thinking workshops, the authors provide an explicitdescription of use-case scenarios, key success factors, and implications for applying the proposed model. Thepaper conclusion offers a list of benefits for using the model and further insights into setting up and runningacademia-business collaborations aimed at innovation design and applied research rather than skillsdevelopment. 1. IntroductionWith an apparently increasing number of natural disasters (earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanic eruptionsmass movements, floods, and storms
participated in a research training and development period, carried out six-monthparticipatory action research projects, and documented their project findings. Each participant’swork contributed to our understanding of two overarching research questions: 1. What kinds of activities or interactions do participants feel most effectively invite them to draw explicitly on their own cultural assets and diverse life experiences (or those of their peers) to inform the engineering design work they are doing, teaching, or learning about? 2. What kinds of activities or interactions do participants feel most strongly influence their perceptions of themselves as engineers, or as contributors to an engineering design
and maturation. Thestudents are highly encouraged to present their work during student and professional conferences.All this provides an intensive research environment where the students learn, by means of hands-on learning, the state-of-the-art in UAV technologies. The students also attend weekly researchseminars held at Cal Poly Pomona, and meet with their research supervisors every week.Cal Poly Pomona is currently engaged in several UAV research projects. The ongoing researchprojects include development and validation of flight dynamics models of UAVs,1 modeling andsimulation,2,3 development of obstacle and collision avoidance capabilities4,5,6, vegetation growthanalysis using UAVs,7 and search and rescue using UAVs.8 An excellent
product-safety challenges of our ever-changing, complex world.IntroductionThe National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) has in its Code of Ethics, as its firstFundamental Canon, the admonition: Hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of thepublic [1]. This ideal is widely regarded as being the ethical, moral, or simply the right thing todo. It resonates with most members of society including practicing and soon-to-be-practicingengineers of all disciplines.Although the above is recognized and accepted, today’s engineering students are given littleinstruction and guidance in their formal engineering educations about designing andmanufacturing safe products or about practicing engineering ethically. Most engineeringstudents are told
shorter student attention spans [1]. Also, easy accessibility of textbook solutionmanuals online intended for instructors makes it easier for students to cheat and copy textbookhomework solutions instead of solving them [2].Granted that many textbook solutions manuals are available on the web, a good number of studentsperceive copying solution manuals as equivalence to learning the material [3]. In contrast to thisperception, both homework and exam scores have shown, in the case of one semester of materialand energy balance students, that copying the solutions manual as a form of studying does not leadto success in the course [4]. Therefore, finding new ways to develop interesting and textbook-quality homework problems to both engage and educate
gender, race, and ethnicity. Thus, efforts to quantitatively assess, andsubsequently increase, diversity in STEM fields are focused primarily on demographiccategories. Myopic focus on demographic diversity may mask homogeneity in other respectsamong the students admitted into STEM fields. For example, there is evidence that individualswho are typically attracted, selected, and retained by engineering programs tend to expresscertain personality characteristics of Introversion, Intuition, Thinking, and Judging (INTJ) asdefined by Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) [1]. As STEM-based education programs, engineering in particular, prioritize an increasedemographic diversity, student recruitment efforts pay less attention to personality and
at IPFW”, Award Number:1565066. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Building an Infrastructure to Enhance and Sustain the Success of STEM Majors who are CommutersIntroductionThe US has been experiencing a shortage of STEM workers for many years now and, if currenttrends continue, projections indicate that the US will be short 1.1 million STEM workers by2024 [1]. How to increase the number of STEM workers is a matter that is still being debated inthe US, including in the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration. Some people encourage the USto hire STEM workers from other countries, in order to allow employers to fill urgent shortages.Others argue that bringing foreign
licensure as a result of construction andinfrastructure failures in the late 1800s and early 1900s. These catastrophes and a need to restrictsurveying and engineering work to those trained in these areas (not lawyers, prospectors, etc.) ledCalifornia to pass surveyor requirements in 1891, and Wyoming to adopt an engineering statute in1907. The remaining United States adopted similar statutes over the next 40 years [1]-[3]. In the1950s and 1960s the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES),working with state boards, developed national exams. While it took until 1984 for all state boardsof examiners to use uniform Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) and Principles and Practice ofEngineering (PE) exams, the need and motivation