students' interest and motivation in engineering are to use project-based learningto learn in a more contextualized environment and improve the sense of ownership inengineering through engineering design tasks [3]. Engineering design is a systematic anditerative process of planning, modeling, testing, and improving products and processes. Due toits complexity and open-endedness, appropriate ways of engaging students in engineering designare needed for quality teaching and learning. Further studies have found that interacting inengineering design using a design-based learning framework to let students use a CAD simulatedenvironment to work on several engineering design challenges will increase their engagement,motivation, and interest in learning
need to provide support, yet allow forfrustration, contrasts with what is often experienced during school when a teacher helps studentsfind and then rewards a correct answer. In WGG, making multiple attempts and engaging in aredesign was rewarded. The figure in Appendix A presents an example of the design challengeand assessment criteria used by youth to evaluate their design. Youth are encouraged to use theassessment criteria as they planned for their redesign.Learning Facilitators stressed that they found a connection between youth engagement and easeof use. Youth did not mind and often enjoyed complex design challenges. However, they wantedtheir learning about the challenge, using the technology and answering any questions, to beeasily done
other person who even if you are born in the US. I have met studentshere who have come here for summer programs, who have gotten their passports just becausethey were coming for the summer program. They experience afterwards is just unbelievable. It’slike someone has opened up a new world for them. So for me, the first thing everybody needs todo, and I plan to do it even for my children, is to internationalize their education.Table 1: Summary of the topics and questions discussed in each round table. Questions asked of the Panelists Sample of questions generated/discussed Roundtable One – The Uneasy Relationship Between Politics and Science Is there an uneasy relationship between When was the last time in history
bridge forMariabella to connect to engineering. In contrast, Mariabella discussed the value of working inthe more open design context, where the group took up her idea as a meaningful experience. Mariabella’s experiences offer insight into what it might take to engage more youth frommarginalized backgrounds in engineering. Designing and developing ways for youths’knowledge and experiences to not only be elicited, but also have an impact is one direction thatmay support more youth connecting with engineering. Borrowing from science education: …lesson planning for agency requires teachers not only to allow space for students to exercise control over their own commitments to knowledge, but also to imagine students as
. Students may be co-located in a classroomor in separate locations interconnected via videoconferencing. Faculty evaluators are located at aremote location and communicate via videoconferencing. During the first thirty minutes of an eval-uation, students jointly present their work uninterrupted. During the subsequent twenty minutes,faculty evaluators ask the students questions and they are given opportunities to respond. The finalten minutes are reserved for private faculty evaluator discussion and graded team assessment.During the first semester of the project course, preliminary design and prototype design evaluationsare performed. The preliminary design evaluation provides students feedback on the planned workand the project goals early in the
eliminate variables due to cultural differences and variations ininternational undergraduate education. Ultimately, 300 valid survey responses were collected.While the survey included a wide variety of questions about past experiences, motivation,learning in the classroom, decision process, and future plans, this particular study focusedexclusively on questions of confidence related to academic performance. These questions were: ● How confident did you feel prior to taking the GRE? (Very confident, Somewhat confident, Neither confident nor unconfident, Somewhat unconfident, Very unconfident) ● How confident are you that you will complete your Master’s degree? (Very confident, Somewhat confident, Neither confident nor unconfident
? ● What experiences do you plan to take advantage of during your time here to help move you towards that goal?○ Design ■ In your own words, what is “design” as it relates to engineering? ■ In your opinion, what should the role of an engineer be in the design process? ■ ■ In your opinion, is it important for an engineer to interface directly with a person they’re designing something for? Why or why not? ■ In your opinion, is it important for engineering courses to explore topics that aren’t just technical? Why or why not? ● If so, what topics or concepts come to mind? ■ What’s important for you to have in a class project? ● Creativity/freedom
top heavy and would ruin the integrity when the motors and blocks would move. Therefore, re- engineering these blocks to what would have been a great help in the process. Overall this project was helpful in learning new processes, thinking outside of the box, and problem solving. I had a great experience completing this project and have future plans to make the modular pieces self-configuring with sensors and other new technology. • Team Member #2: This project was very helpful for learning how industrial robots work. At the beginning, I spent time doing research about industrial robots which were SCARA, articulated, spherical, cylindrical, Cartesian, and parallel robot type. Each robot
possible without proper comprehension of the concepts [1, 2] and will diminishover time without proper revision and review [3]. To ensure concept retention, a typicalengineering curriculum is divided into multiple sequences of courses. Each sequence covers asubfield and reinforces core concepts over several semesters. The structural mechanics’curriculum in mechanical engineering is a sequence of four courses: Statics, Mechanics ofMaterials, Mechanical Design, and Kinematic Design. Each course is focused on core conceptsthat are prerequisites to the following course, in order for students to develop a deep knowledgethrough the sequence. Assessing student comprehension levels and identifying gaps in students’knowledge can help educators plan and
. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ Appendix B Classroom Schedule for the Intervention Topic Day Class ScheduleIntroduction/ Setup 1 • Introduce project, overview/ purpose, show clubhouse • Consent/assent forms 2 • Pre-Questionnaires • Smart Homes (architecture, trends, needs) • Brainstorming Ideas- what could my clubhouse look like? Architecture / 3 • What’s the process of creating a building from start to finish? Construction • What are blueprints? • Scaling activity • Floor Plans
COVID-19 changed the face of education. At MichiganTechnological University (Michigan Tech) , planning for the Fall 2020 semester started wellbefore the end of the 2019-20 academic year. For the Fall 2020 semester, faculty at ouruniversity had the option to teach in various modalities according to what fit their personal andcourse needs. The options included online (asynchronous materials completed with time andplace flexibility), remote (synchronous, scheduled meetings that students can attend virtually), orhybrid (classes that have face-to-face meeting times, but offer students opportunities to completemost activities virtually and/or remotely). Restrictions placed on class size with physicaldistancing measures limited the number of students
) Results. Inthe first stage, students must analyze the information, propose a work plan, and make aninventory of the relevant conceptual content that will be helpful for the analysis. In the secondand third stages, students analyze the information using the tools and conceptual knowledgegained in the module to make sense of their results. Finally, students present their solutions to thechallenge, their conclusions, and recommendations in the last stage, orally or in writing. Eachmodule's class sessions consist of 8 hours dedicated to learning concepts, techniques, and skillsand 4 hours working in small teams to solve the challenge and present its solution. Below, wedescribe the challenge for each avenue.Innovation and TransformationThe challenge
interchanges of process knowledge that could be mutually useful. Our process for gathering data on systems engineering programming is described below. Gathering Initial Data and Future Plans We obtained a list of ABET accredited Systems Engineering Programs the United States from the ABET web site [9]. We started with a basic search of “Systems Engineering” and filtered other program titles through to identify programs that are related to systems engineering. For example, Industrial Engineering programs are often in the same department as Systems Engineering program. The final list included Industrial and Systems Engineering, Systems Engineering, Systems Science and Engineering and a
development of the aPriori technology, and his graduate student team won the Harvard Business Plan competition in 2003. In 2004, the company achieved $4.5M venture capital 1st round funding from Bain Capital and Sigma Partners, and has since grown to 150+ employees. Mike received his MS in 1979 and PhD in 1986 from Cranfield Institute of Technology, England, and worked for a number of years as a design engineer in the British automotive and machine tool industry, specifically Land Rover, Jaguar, and Molins Machine Tool.Dr. Brian Woodard, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Dr. Woodard received his Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign in 2011. His Aerospace research
overall goal of the improved game system is to improve student comprehension and classroom results. Additionally, the finished system is planned to be fully automated, requiring no intervention from instructors or researchers. Assessments of the effectiveness of the game system will be shown through the following: 1. Student game performance. 2. Student performance on content tests related to the game content. 3. Student lab work performance. 4. Student surveys.1. AcknowledgementThis work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant 1913809.2. IntroductionMajor research within higher education focuses on the divide between discovery-based studentlearning and directly
, challenges and results of this virtual andhands-on hybrid experience of engineering summer camp is presented in this paper. 2. Planning and ImplementationThe purpose of the summer camp was to introduce some fundamental background related to variousengineering disciplines to middle and high school students and inspire them to become next generationengineers.2.1 Objectives of the 2020 Engineering summer campFollowing objectives align well with the mission of the university, 1) Utilize the resources of the College of Engineering to impart knowledge through hands-on projects to K-12 students, 2) Design projects to middle school and high school students with apt levels of intricacy to challenge and arise intellectual curiosity in
instruction.Online learning is not a novel phenomenon and has been a major component of higher educationfor many years across disciplines, including business, education, and criminal justice [1].However, the change that took place during Spring 2020 was not traditional online instructionbut rather an emergency transition to remote teaching. Emergency remote teaching (ERT) isdefined as “a temporary shift of instructional delivery to an alternate delivery mode due to crisiscircumstances” [2, p. 7]. Emergency remote teaching is distinct from traditional online teachingand learning, in which virtual experiences and online instruction have been planned from thebeginning [2, 3]. ERT, in comparison, is enacted in response to a crisis; it entails hastyadjustments
. C. Critical findings for PH Courses: The faculty of PH have learned a lot from their instructional experience in Fall 2020, whichhad eventually helped them modify the instructional plan for spring 2021. Our online coursesexperiences suggest that students get inspired and motivated by learning the subject mattersthrough instructional video clips developed and posted by the instructor, YouTube video clips, ordocumentaries. This is a key finding since many students will continue to rely on remote learningduring pandemics, natural disasters, or other socio-economic hardship in the Southwest. We planto develop more instructional videos with the voice of the instructor embedded. On the other hand,our findings regarding the blended format
rooms. To help teams know they are in the correct place, like The AmazingRace TV show, the author hangs miniature yellow and red flag markers on the room placardslisting the room number (also typical to most university buildings- see Figure 1). By lettingstudents know to look for this flag symbol, you can prevent them from knocking on a bunch ofpeople’s doors or disturbing other individuals you did not plan as part of the race. Figure 1: Flag Marker on Room PlacardThe answers to each problem results in one or more numbers. The author provides an answer boxfor these values with dashed lines for the students to enter the answers on, similar to a game of“Hangman” or “Wheel of Fortune”. Underneath some of the lines the
,seating a large number of students physically in a traditional classroom is not considered safeduring the pandemic and teaching modalities that minimize spread of the virus are adopted. Whilea transition to virtual learning can eliminate the spread of the virus, such transition cannot be takenlightly by everyone. A report by Allen and Seaman [1] indicates that institutions with onlineofferings in 2014 to 2015 are just as positive about it as ever, but those who have no onlineofferings say that it will not be part of their plans for the future. Moreover, academic leaders atinstitutions with online offerings have consistently held a more favorable opinion of the learningoutcomes for online education than those at institutions with no offerings
now planned near the end of the summer break.2.4 Pou Kaiāwhā MI coaches training workshopTo end the training program a 3-hour bespoke workshop was run using key experts and serviceproviders from across the campus. It was designed to ensure participants would know who to referstudents to for follow up support and also how to better understand the perspectives and lenses ofdifferent student groups. In addition, there was a crucial panel session on how to handle the storieswe hear from students who are often distressed and handling multiple complex issues.The workshop program was as follows: 1. Introduction: The intent of the Pou Kaiāwhā MI coaches program and their roles as MI coaches. 2. Cultural context: Information on cultural
to build the motor control and power distribution board for therobot. Lastly, the students learn how to program using an Arduino Uno and peripheral devicessuch as light-emitting diodes, switches, sonar sensors, and photoresistors. These skills areapplied when programming the Arduino controller on the robot.Block 2: Robotics Design and Implementation The second block is designed to reflect a large-scale engineering project and uses anincremental approach observed in the spiral model or agile software development model. Eachlaboratory is presented as a distinct requirement and product solution. Students must stick to adeadline and work through an entire development process to plan, design, develop, test, andevaluate each component
with new technologies and tools. As the summer of 2020 approached our EEdepartment pondered how to implement its fall laboratory courses appropriately without thestudents meeting in the university’s laboratories, as the university’s response to the pandemicrequired. We considered conducting the laboratories using only virtual, simulated laboratoryexperiments; although, limiting the students to simulated laboratories does not afford the studentthe opportunity to work with real hardware and to face, identify, and overcome realisticimplementation issues. The latter we believe are essential components of the intended studentlaboratory experience. So we had to come up with an alternate laboratory hardware plan andtake action in preparation for the
alsoconsiders the effect of offering the OER implementation of the course for the first time in aremote learning environment, as was done during the Fall 2020 semester. Class assessmentmeasures, as well as survey data, were used to consider how well the three goals outlined abovewere addressed. The preliminary results point to a successful implementation of OER in theremote learning environment.BackgroundEngineering and Engineering Technology courses often require the purchase of expensivetextbooks and other materials. Construction Management Technology, in particular, involvingareas of practice such as plan reading and production, cost estimating, safety, scheduling, andproject management, can require numerous onerous purchases. Through previous
Project Planning Problem Definition and Instruction, Constraints Assessments,and Guidance Field Knowledge and In Training and development of Expertise Deliverables Support • Subject • Students Matter Experts Figure 2. Model of Capstone Design Course Integrated with Subject Matter Experts
Model Product take-back Risk assessment Life cycle engineering Natural resources Eco-efficient manufacturing Human & ecosystem health Societal Sustainability Informed citizenry Risk communication Stakeholder participation Public policy Social justice Knowledge diffusion Equity Land use planning Figure 1. The Sustainable Futures Model (from Mihelcic & Hokanson, 2005)In spite
graduate [67]. Faculty members then translate the attributes into course objectivesand develop an assessment plan. Finally, course content is developed and implemented, andassessment measures are made. Incropera and Fox note that the reasons for change must becommunicated to the faculty before beginning the reform process and then repeatedly over thecourse of the reform effort. Techniques for engaging faculty, students, and industry in thereform process include: surveys, focus groups, workshops, interviews, regular departmental andarea meetings [29,66,68]. An external facilitator may be used.ConclusionDesign curricula both motivate and teach valuable skills. Design motivates by: engagingstudents with hands-on, active learning; attracting different
Futures Willingness to pay Technology market Model Economic risks Societal Sustainability Health Regulations National strategic plan Water purification technology customers International organizations and NGOs involvement Figure 3. Sustainable Futures Model applied to the example projectAssembling of an appropriate teamTo achieve the project objective, three specific tasks were identified: market analysis, technologyevaluation and selection, and business case study. The market analysis included
perception, the factthat the first group struggled for most of the time until after sitting in the session of the sec-ond group is an indication that this approach may be effective. Future plans include rigorousevaluation of this approach using a big sample and better statistical methods.5 Summary and ConclusionThis paper has outlined critical steps that must be followed by the instructor who teaches thesubject of microcontrollers to students who have a limited background in electrical , electronicand computer engineering. It stresses on the need for students to be taught the general inter-nal structure of microcontrollers and where to find specific programming information for anyparticular microcontroller. The paper believes that it is through
ResultsThe author has been developing and introducing some of the laboratory experiences describedabove for several years. It has not been until recently that he decided to formalize the process bydeveloping a comprehensive assessment plan to evaluate student perceptions of this approachand their engagement in the program. This assessment protocol was approved by the InstitutionalReview Board of Penn State as listed at the end of this paper. The first formal assessmentoccurred after the Fall 2019 term and was focused on comparing a subset of traditional and newexperiments. A second focus of this assessment was to better understand student perceptions onthe Microcontroller and EMG system. The author had planned to continue and expand theassessment