the School. It should be stressed that thetechnology professor teaches engineering concepts to the students and is explicitly notattempting to “steal” engineering students.3.2 Data collectionData were collected for six years in three forms: transcript information, number of majors, andbrief in-class surveys. The six years involve twelve semesters: six fall semesters and six spring Page 25.1421.4 semesters. Here, a semester is referred to as the academic year with a “F” or “S” for fall orspring; e.g., the last semester examined was the spring of the 2010-2011 year, or “1011S'”.The transcript information was collected for EGR120 students from
be cleverly incorporatedinto courses. A future paper in which a large class can be assessed for comparative results usingwikis is planned.Bibliography1. Rhoulac, T.D. and Crenshaw, P. (2006). Preparing Civil Engineering Students to Meet Workplace WritingExpectations. Proceedings of the 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, CA.2. Plumb, C. and Scott, C. (2002). Outcomes Assessment of Engineering Writing at the University of Washington.Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), July 2002, pp. 333-338.3. Lang, J.D., Cruse, S., McVey, F., and McMasters, J. (1999). Industry Expectations of New Engineers: A Surveyto Assist Curriculum Designers. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(1), January 1999, pp. 43-51.4. “Criteria for
AC 2012-3515: UTILIZING PROJECT-BASED MULTIDISCIPLINARY DE-SIGN ACTIVITIES TO ENHANCE STEM EDUCATIONDr. Andy Shaojin Zhang, New York City College of Technology Andy S. Zhang earned his master’s in mechanical engineering from the City College of New York in 1987 and his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the Graduate Center of the City University of New York in 1995. Zhang’s research area includes materials testing, product design and prototyping, CAD/CAE, and mechatronics. From 2007 to 2009, Zhang served as a member of the Pre-engineering Advisory Commission of Advisory Council for Career and Technical Education of NYC Department of Education, which was designed to help high schools to enhance existing technology
a reasonable “value” for your performance improvements along with a commonly used formula for estimating "real" training costs, the spreadsheet will calculate a Return on Investment for the training. The calculation can help you determine if it is worth your while to take the training. Each section is explained as you come to it. ENTER YOUR DATA IN THE ORANGE SHADED CELLS. ALL OTHER CELLS ARE PROTECTED. Step 1: TASK COMPENSATION This section calculates the weighted value of the portion of your base total "cash value" compensation (pay plus benefits) that is devoted to tasks involving the use of the knowledge/skills set(s) dealt with in the training program you are considering. Enter your base annual gross salary in line 1. In line 2, enter
. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 35, 240-247.2. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., and Roth, G. (2002). Choice is Good, but Relevance is Excellent: Autonomy-Enhancing and Suppressing Teacher Behaviours Predicting Students’ Engagement in Schoolwork, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261–278.3. Cordova, D. I., and M. R. Lepper (1996). Intrinsic Motivation and the Process of Learning: Beneficial Effects of Contextualization, Personalization, and Choice. Journal of Educational Psychology 88 (4) 715-730.4. Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1988). Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination, and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 3-22.5. Green, S., Davis, C., Karshmer, E., Marsh, P., & Straight, B. (2005). Living
. Page 25.1494.93. Miline, I., and Rowe, G., 2002, “Difficulties in Learning and Teaching Programming-Views of Students and Tutors”, Education and Information Technologies 7:1, pp. 55–66.4. ABET Accreditation Commission, 2009, “Effective for Evaluating During the 2009-2010 Accreditation Cycle”, Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs.5. Lister, R., et al., 2004, “A Multi-National Study of Reading and Tracing Skills in Novice Programmers”, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 119-1506. Tenenberg, J., et al., 2005, “Students Designing Software: a Multi-National, Multi-Institutional study”, Informatics in Education, vol. 4, no.1, pp.143-162.7. Pears, A., Seidman, S., Malmi, L., Mannila, L., Adams, E., Bennedsen, J
NewsPatent Information News is a free newsletter published quarterly by the European Patent Officethat often contains helpful tips and information on patent searching. Archived copies back to2004 are available at http://www.epo.org/service-support/publications/patent-information/news.html.References[1] W. Macomber, Engineers’ Handbook on Patents, Little, Brown & Co., Boston, 1913. Page 25.1029.9[2] M. White. (2008). How are Engineering Librarians Using Patent Literature? A Pilot Survey[Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1377.[3] S. Adams. “Patent Searching Without Words: Why Do It? How to do It?”, Free PintNewsletter, 130, Feb. 6
isalways an additional help. When the professor poses a problem and then works with theclass to generate feedback to solve it, understanding for a Deaf student is enhanced. Page 25.1037.7 BLACKBOARD P 1 2 SFigure 1 – Basic classroom setup. As the professor (P) lectures, one interpreter (1)translates to the deaf student (S). Meanwhile, a second interpreter (2) is preparing for thenext topic, as well as assist the deaf student.Although I
fall semester. Employed inthe current study, was a pragmatic approach, where the researchers utilize both qualitative andquantitative research methods to address the research problem, research question(s), and researchcircumstance. Surveys were used to gather quantitative data, while semi-structured interviewswere used to obtain qualitative data. Both the survey and semi-structured interview data werecollected and analyzed separately.ResultsQuantitative Analysis: SurveyThe survey provided the quantitative data to examine students’ perceptions of the classroomculture and social transactions. Means and standard deviations were calculated for level ofsatisfaction for faculty advising, availability and instruction. The higher the score the
contractors were awardedcontracts to build F-16s [ii] using the exact same design and drawings. The parts were made tostrict specifications. Naturally, as the blue prints used by both were the same, equivalentperformance was anticipated from both. But this was not the case when the field history resultscame in after some use of the jets in the field.What was found was that the Japanese built planes had a mean-time-between-failure (MTBF)reliability that was twice as that of the U.S. F-16’s! Such a difference in performance cannot beattributed purely to chance. There has to be an uncommon cause that resulted in this. Onconducting an analysis, it was found that the U.S. manufacturers used the full spectrum oftolerance that was available to them, whereas
topics –thereby making the structure of the lecture more interesting in the process. This is exhibited inTable 3. Table 3: Causes of failures with Examples Important causes of failures Example(s) 1 Failure in communication Challenger space shuttle disaster, Airline accidents ( Tenerife airport disaster) 2 Quality related failures BP oil spill, Therac 25 (the computerized radiation therapy machine) 3 Failure in leadership Exxon Valdez Oil Spill - Joseph Hazelwood, the person selected to be the ships leader, consumed
of the UCSD Peer Review tool. This screen shot for 3 person team, but most of ourteams have 4-6 members. Page 25.1096.3 Fig. 1: Initial Rating ScreenshotSingle Parameter Assessment with a Fixed Pie ApproachA key difference between the UCSD Peer Review tool and CATME tool is that the UCSD toolhas a single parameter that the each student applies to their teammate to indicate overall teamcontribution. Moreover, this single parameter is applied in a fixed-pie fashion, meaning that ifone teammate is rated above average then other teammates(s) must be rated below average. Thenumber of points that can be allocated is
Education”, Section 2546, 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 18-21, Chicago, Illinois.[4] O’Brien, S; Abulencia, J.P, “Learning Through Reverse Engineering”, Section 505, 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 20 - 23, Louisville, Kentucky.[5] Kellogg, R.S; Jenison, R., “Utilizing Reverse Engineering to Explore the Design Process”, Section 2438, 1997 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 15-18, Milwaukie, Wisconsin.[6] McCracken, W.M; Newstetter, W., “Reverse Engineering or Design Recovery: Two Approaches to Uncovering Designing”, Section 2225, 2000 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 18-21 St. Louis, Missouri.[7] Robertson, J; Wales, B.; Weihmeir, J., “Reverse Engineering as a Means
] “Wyoming Institute for Disabilities WIND Resource and Information Center.” Internet:http://www.uwyo.edu/wind/resource_info_center/index.html[5] S.F. Barrett. “Undergraduate Design Projects to Aid Persons with Disabilities.” NSF CBET Proposal 0962380,August 17, 2009. [6] S.F. Barrett, S.A. Morton, S. Root-Elledge. “Undergraduate Design Projects to Aid Persons with Disabilities,”in Proceedings of the 44th Rocky Mountain Bioengineering Symposium, (Denver, CO), Apr. 2007. Also available inISA Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, vol. 43. , pp. 296-301.[7] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs – Effective for Evaluations During the 2011-2012 AccreditationCycle.” ABET, Inc. October 30, 2010.[8] “Accessible Fishing.” Internet: http
, Research, Training, Education, and Remediation for Teamwork,” American Society for Engineering Education 2010 Annual Conference. Layton, R.A., M.L. Loughry, M.W. Ohland, and G.D. Ricco, “Design and Validation of a Web-Based System for Assigning Members to Teams Using Instructor-Specified Criteria,” Advances in Engineering Education, 2(1), Spring 2010, pp. 1-28. Zhang, B., and M.W. Ohland, “How to Assign Individualized Scores on a Group Project: an Empirical Evaluation,” Applied Measurement in Education, 22(3), 2009. Meyers, K., S. Silliman, M. Ohland, “Comparison of Two Peer Evaluation Instruments for Project Teams,” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2008
desenvolvimento das Engenharias: Situação Atual. Revista de Ensino de Engenharia, 18. Rio de Janeiro: ABENGE, 1998, p.74-82.[07] Naisbitt, J.A. Megatrends 2000: Ten New Directions for the 1990’s. New York: AvonBooks, 1999. 416p.[08] JC e-mail 2426, de 11 de Dezembro de 2003; Engenharia e a Sociedade Brasileira: reflexões para o dia dosengenheiros, artigo de Denis L. Balaguer[09] Ciampi, M. M.; Brito, C. da R. New Trend in Education: Port Engineering Graduation Program. In: International Society of Engineering Education (IGIP) Annual Symposium, 39, Trnava, 2010. Diversity unifies - Diversity in Engineering Education. Trnava: IGIP, 2010
Sommer, Curt Acredolo, Michael W. Maher, and Harry R. Matthews. "A Study Comparing Traditional and Hybrid Internet-Based Instruction in Introductory Statistics Classes." Journal of Statistics Education 3rd ser. 11 (2003). 2. Hilton, S. C., and Christensen, H. B. "Evaluating the Impact of Multimedia Lectures on Student Learning and Attitudes," Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, ed. B. Phillips, Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute(2002) Page 25.1250.8 3. Bourne, John; Harris, Dale; and Mayadas, Frank, "Online engineering education: Learning anywhere
methods: definitions, comparisons, and research bases’, J. Enging. Educ., 95 (2006), 123-138.[3] Albanese, M. A., and Mitchell, S., ‘Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Page 17.15.10 its Outcomes and Implementation Issues’, Academic Medicine, Vol. 68, 1993, pp. 52– 81.[4] Malicky, D. M., Kohl, J. G., and Huang, J. M., ‘Integrating a machine shop class into the mechanical engineering curriculum: experiential and inductive learning’, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, vol 38 num 2, 2010, 135-146[5] Azevedo da Silveira, M., and Scavarda-do-Carmo, L.C., ‘Sequential and
form of a stage-gate process. The concept of stage-gate processesare widely utilized in industry settings. This is especially true for companies that develop andlaunch new products on a regular basis. This paper reports on how the stage-gate process wasimplemented into the course sequence. The paper will also cover the lessons learned after thefirst cycle of the course sequence and the future direction of the capstone course at PittsburgState.IntroductionEngineering technology programs often employ a senior level design course(s) in theircurriculum. The objectives of these design courses vary, but the basic concept is to providestudents an opportunity to devote a relatively large portion of their time and their skill set to asingle applied
can use the videos to review some topicscovered in the class and learn about things that are not covered in the regular lecture courses. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to acknowledge the Missouri University of Science and Technology Centerfor Educational Research & Teaching Innovation (CERTI) for their support in developing thisproject and for the CERTI grant which allowed me to spend some time developing the concept. Iwould also like to acknowledge the Missouri S&T Educational Technology (EdTech) office forthe assistance in creating the web space for the student produced videos.Proceedings of the 2012 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education
Workbook & Lab Manual, Season 12 - Spring 2012. Hofstra Engineering Dept., 2012.[2] Lieu, D. K., Sorby, S., The Fundamentals of Visualization, Modeling, and Graphics for Engineering Design. Delmar, Cengage Learning, 2009. 8
. Mattern, S. Packman, “Research Report No. 2009-2: Predictive Validity ofACCUPLACER® Scores for Course Placement: A Meta-Analysis,” The College Board, NewYork, 2009 [On-Line].http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/pdf/09b_765_PredValidity_WEB_091124.pdf[3]. Hodges, C. B., & Kim, C. (2010), “ Email, self-regulation, self-efficacy, and achievement ina college online mathematics course,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(2), 207-223.[4]. Attewell, P., Lavin, D., Domina, T., & Levey, T. (2006). New evidence on collegeremediation. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 886–924.[5]. COMPASS (2009). COMPASS Guide to Effective Student Placement and Retention inMathematics. Iowa City, Iowa: ACT.http://www.act.org/compass/pdf
; Exposition, 2010.[12] Jeanne Christman, and Eric J. Alley, “A Hands-On Approach to Demonstrating Hardware/Software Tradeoffs in an Embedded System Design.” Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011.[13] S. G. Northrup, “Work in progress - development of a two-semester introduction to electrical engineering hybrid design Studio.” Frontiers in Education Annual Conference, pp. S2C-6-S2C-7, 2007.[14] Kenneth A. Connor, Craig J. Scott, Mohamed F. Chouikha, Adam M. Wilson, Adrianna Anderson, Yacob Astatke, Frederick C. Berry, Dianna Newman, Judith E. O'Rourke, Thomas D.C. Little, and Don Lewis Millard, “Multi-Institutional Development of Mobile Studio Based Education and Outreach.” Annual Conference & Exposition
318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (ACI 318M-11),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2011, 503 pp.[2] Felder, R.M., and L.K Silverman, “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education,” EngineeringEducation, V. 78, No. 7, Apr. 1988, pg. 674-681.[3] National Concrete Masonry Association, “Allowable Stress Design of Concrete Masonry Lintels,” TEK 17-1B, Herndon, VA, 2001, 4 pp.[4] Tarr, S. M., and Farny, J. A., Concrete Floors on Ground, EB075, fourth edition, Portland CementAssociation, Skokie, IL, 2008, pg. 47-90.[5] Wight, James K. & James G. MacGregor, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics & Design, fifth Edition, Pearson PrenticeHall, 2009, pg. 218-221.Cullen
Workbook & Lab Manual, Season 12 - Spring 2012. Hofstra Engineering Dept., 2012.[2] Lieu, D. K., Sorby, S., The Fundamentals of Visualization, Modeling, and Graphics for Engineering Design. Delmar, Cengage Learning, 2009. 8
. Mattern, S. Packman, “Research Report No. 2009-2: Predictive Validity ofACCUPLACER® Scores for Course Placement: A Meta-Analysis,” The College Board, NewYork, 2009 [On-Line].http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/pdf/09b_765_PredValidity_WEB_091124.pdf[3]. Hodges, C. B., & Kim, C. (2010), “ Email, self-regulation, self-efficacy, and achievement ina college online mathematics course,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(2), 207-223.[4]. Attewell, P., Lavin, D., Domina, T., & Levey, T. (2006). New evidence on collegeremediation. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 886–924.[5]. COMPASS (2009). COMPASS Guide to Effective Student Placement and Retention inMathematics. Iowa City, Iowa: ACT.http://www.act.org/compass/pdf
Education. ASEE Zone 1 Conference 2008 (pp. USMA-1-0100). West Point, NY: ASEE.3. List of collaborative software. (2012, January 25). Retrieved January 28, 2012, from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_collaborative_software4. Sheppard, S. D., Macatangary, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. (2009). Eduction Engineers. Stanford, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.5. Redmine software home page. Retrieved February 23, 2012, from: http://www.redmine.org/6. VirtualBox software home page. Retrieved February 23, 2012, from: https://www.virtualbox.org7. DocPu Document publishing Plugin. Retrieved February 23, 2012, from: http://www.redmine.org/plugins/redmine_doc_pu8. Apache Subversion
? iv. You? c. What are the downsides of this design/product? What actual and/or potential negative impacts will it have on society? d. What can be done to minimize the negative impacts? e. Should this design/product be continued? Discontinued? Explain your answer. f. Which guiding ethical principle(s) applies here? Justify your answer.To be most effective, students should be required to choose a design/product/concept (DPC)whose impact (positive and negative) has yet to fully play out. In this form, students are given a Page 25.584.4fair amount of latitude regarding the topic of their analysis
pilot course complements the College’s first-year engineering projects course thatemphasizes a hands-on design-build-test cycle, so the students start with design requirements andend with a product. For the pilot course, students were required to scope an Engineering GrandChallenge(s), to reduce it to a manageable project, then to develop design requirements.Several of the module instructors created teams using the Comprehensive Assessment for Team-Member Effectiveness (CATME) TeamMaker tool.7 As stated, teams were guided in a four-week exercise to scope a project that applies the engineering discipline to a specific GrandChallenge, including some basic calculations for feasibility, cost estimates, and preliminarydesign requirements. The team