students in pursuing their undergraduate studies.AcknowledgementsPartial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation Scholarships inScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S STEM) program under Award No.2130428. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.ReferencesApriceno, M., Levy, S. R., & London, B. (2020). Mentorship during college transition predicts academic self-efficacy and sense of belonging among STEM students. Journal of College Student Development, 61(5), 643-648. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2020.0061Bagès, C., & Martinot, D. (2011
the formal.Architectural form was a function of a resolution of forces acting upon it. August Choisy and Guadetof the Ecole de Beaux Arts in Paris had laid the foundation of this attitude. While Lutyens and hisdisciples paid lip- service to Indian motifs, a thorough grounding in the art and craft of constructionwas always held to be a prerequisite for architectural training. This was reflected in the fact that theBombay school had a strong technical component and all the schools that followed it, such as theBengal Engineering College at Calcutta, Baroda's Kalabhavan (House of Art), Delhi's Polytechnic,were primarily technical/engineering institutions with a department of architecture. Engineering andconstruction courses took up the lion's
in the water and wastewaterclass were also in the previous hazardous waste class. These students were asked to reflect on thetwo experiences and were specifically asked if the lectures should be graded and if moreguidance should be given. Below are some comments. - “I will say though that I knew the stuff I taught on much better than the stuff my classmates taught.” - “I think doing it again would be very beneficial for the future class.” - “I think a general structure for the lecture would be very helpful for preparing, but since each chapter is very different a loose structure would be best.” - “I liked it, I think that it helped me engage in the content.” - “I liked how it was done in HazWaste (than in
entire program. ConclusionsAn attempt has been made to identify the desirable characteristics of “good” teamplayers. Some of these results may have been correctly anticipated. For example, older,more academically successful students with hands-on and work experience seemed to bebetter candidates for “good” team players. On the other hand, the fact that women andthe representatives of the “majority cultures” seemed to do better may not be so obvious.The fact that high analytical and low verbal SAT scores seemed to indicate “poor” teamplayers, may simply be a reflection of the fact that a large fraction of them were Asians,who usually do well in mathematics but tend to have (English) language
). µ is the weight of the device in pounds (µ ≤ 5.0). δ is the volume (in cubic feet) of the container (actually the cube of its longest edge dimension) (δ ≤ 4.0). Figure 1: Problem Statement for Design I ClassThe artifacts are ordered from “best” (instructor’s judgment) to “poor” in Table 1 asindicated by the numbers from 104 to 32 in the second column that can be referred to therating system described in Figure 2. Note that these ratings are completely subjective,and only reflect the testing (figure of merit) to the extent that the evaluator chooses. The104 rating was awarded for one group’s extraordinary success in achieving the goals ofthe project (routinely depositing all ten ping pong ball in 1.2
D. The students canthen instantly see how their answer corresponded to their classmates’ answers. The correctanswer can be discussed and the students gain valuable feedback, essentially in real- time. Theinstructor can also save the data gathered during a CPS session for further study and analyses. Italso can help the instructor identify and improve the content of topics that are difficult. Testing the Iron Cross ModuleBefore the Iron Cross module was presented, the instructor handed out a reflective activity sheetin class with some probing questions that the students should study. This was intended to getthem to think about the biomechanics of the Iron Cross maneuver and to think about whichmuscles are involved
and to try to statistically contrast the results. Such statistics would be the ever moreenhanced if collected over the course of several semesters of teaching.In conclusion thus, the author’s first experiment with PBL in an engineering Dynamics classproved helpful although certainly not perfect. It appears that more preparation and carefulplanning for such experiments is an absolute must. Qualitative evidence pointed to the benefit ofsuch an experiment to student learning as reflected by student feedback and general studententhusiasm about the assigned design project. References 1. National Research Council, 2000, “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School,” National Academy
from the homework than I would was: (a) Conflict with other majorhave otherwise. homework (b) Conflict with Exam (c) Sick (d) Fight with Girlfriend/Boyfriend (e) Late night partying (f) OtherAgain, the free-form comments reflect many of these quantitative assessments. One commoncomplaint about the late days pertains to the period before an exam. The problem set before anexam is not eligible for late days, so that the graded work can be returned to the students in timeto study for the exam. Several students feel that this is when they most need the opportunity toturn in homework
degree of freedom forrealizing more complex three-dimensional MEMS structures. References1. Lang, W., “Reflections on the future of microsystems,” Sensors and Actuators, vol. A72, 1999, pp. 1–15.2. K.E. Peterson, “Silicon as a mechanical material,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 76, May 1982, pp. 420–457.3. Kussul, E.M., D.A. Rachkovskij, T.N. Baidyk and S.A. Talayev, “Micromechanical engineering: a basis for the low-cost manufacturing of mechanical microdevices using microequipment,” J. Micromech. Microeng., vol. 6, 1996, pp. 410–425.4. Koester, D., R. Mahedevan, A. Shishkoff and K. Markus, “Multi-User MEMS Processes (MUMPS) Introduction and Design Rules,” revision 4, JDS
roof are literally the buildingblocks that make the building. These components can either degrade the energyefficiency of the building or enhance its performance and increase occupant comfort.Many new energy-saving components are coming to market. These products do doubleduty, performing their primary jobs while also saving energy. Roof shingles, for example,may be coated with heat-reflective materials that send the sun's heat away from thebuilding, rather than being absorbed and can even generate electricity for the building.Compact fluorescent lights use less energy and put less heat into the building, andadvances in HVAC technology mean more comfortable spaces that use less energy.The benefits from these components will not be realized
internal temperature: minimize heat lossthrough appropriate insulation and unwanted heat gains with solar shading, insulation,and reflective finishes. Consider using thermal mass to moderate daily temperaturevariations and as a seasonal heat source to make use of summer heat in the winter andprovide natural ventilation and cooling, if possible.Design the building envelope to minimize electrical lighting needs: provide ample naturallight and encourage a resource-saving lifestyle.Use energy efficiently: provide heating and cooling through energy-efficientmechanical appliances. Use energy-efficient lights and appliances and provide communalheating and electricity where possible. Set energy design targets and monitor buildingperformance in addition to
power factorcorrection for an 11 kV industrial distribution network in the State of Qatar. The networkmodel has been developed using EDSA professional power system software. The energy afteradding the shunt capacitors (i.e. after power factor correction) has been determined from thepower flow solutions. The on-site measurements have been conducted and the measurementshave been verified by the network model that was developed by EDSA software. IntroductionIndustrial power distribution networks experience increase in power losses during summerperiod 1, 4. This is mainly related to the excessive use of air conditioning system and motordrives which reflects an increase in the electric load. Such increase in
asthey work it: • Understand how to locate and read typical meteorological year 2 (TMY2) data. • Correct for the difference between TMY2 timestamps and local solar time. • Choose a diffuse radiation model and assume a reasonable value for ground reflectance. • Correct the SRCC collector efficiency data for angle of incidence, flow rate and fluid heat capacity. • Assume some mathematical behavior for the incidence angle modifier beyond its specified limit of 60 degrees. • Remember to integrate total gain throughout the night, not just when the sun is up! Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of New Mexico – Albuquerque
Quarter-Wave Transformer, Measurements Mismatches, Impedance and 5 Lab 3: Basic Operations Using Advanced S-Parameters Design System Software 6 Lab 4: Quarter-Wave Impedance S-Parameters, ABCD Parameters, Matching (Week 1) Lumped- Element Impedance Matching 7 Lab 4: Quarter-Wave Impedance Single-Stub Tuning Matching (Week 2) 8 Lab 5: Circuit Tuning and Quarter-Wave Transformer, Theory of Electromagnetic Small Reflections, Binomial 9 MIDTERM EXAM Basic Coupler Properties, Quadrature Hybrid
Quarter-Wave Transformer, Measurements Mismatches, Impedance and 5 Lab 3: Basic Operations Using Advanced S-Parameters Design System Software 6 Lab 4: Quarter-Wave Impedance S-Parameters, ABCD Parameters, Matching (Week 1) Lumped- Element Impedance Matching 7 Lab 4: Quarter-Wave Impedance Single-Stub Tuning Matching (Week 2) 8 Lab 5: Circuit Tuning and Quarter-Wave Transformer, Theory of Electromagnetic Small Reflections, Binomial 9 MIDTERM EXAM Basic Coupler Properties, Quadrature Hybrid
effects with care, and the surveyasked students to reflect back to the beginning of the term.Implications and Non-Implications We end by emphasizing some implications of this work, and perhaps more importantly,some non-implications of this work. First, we see an important implication in the hiring of morediverse faculty. In order for students to experience positive MRMEs, there is a need for morefaculty that can serve as role models based on a variety of social markers and personal identities.To draw on the vaccine metaphor, we emphasize that while increasing instructor diversity amongmultiple
helps you learn how to work with others an employee for the company. and, like, especially people who, like, you don't work well with or who you never worked with before"Personal Being able to create the best version "You're going to apply to a lot of jobs. Itgrowth of yourself through self-reflection, might take a while for something to stick, marketing yourself efficiently, and and you can't just say, "No, no, nobody being able to recognize and wants me." You gotta, you gotta keep improve upon
- Networking among postdocs Networking - Identifying collaborators Personal Reflection - Identifying professional interests and values - Project assignments allocation Project Management - Project financial management, funding allocation - Not just doing, but finish projects and publications - Giving guest lectures in classesTeaching and Learning - Teaching a course - Developing teaching philosophy/teaching dossier - Managing deliverables to meet the deadline Time Management - Ability to work under time pressurediscipline were generated and appended to the
' proactivity in socialization (e.g., [20], [23]), theresearch in the context of engineering organizations was largely untouched. Morespecifically, there is rare research about newly hired engineers' proactivity in the aerospace &defense (A&D) industry. A&D organizations employ engineering graduates from multipleengineering majors and offer a wide variety of positions [20]. In particular, A&Dorganizations recruit electrical, mechanical, manufacturing, computer-related engineers,along with recruiting graduates with explicit aerospace engineering degrees. Therefore,organizations in the A&D industry reflect the features that many organizations may haveacross different engineering disciplines. Hence, to address the above-mentioned gaps
students appreciating the in-person courseexperience during a time when most of their other courses had been moved online. The increasedteacher scores may have been a reflection of the students’ appreciation of face-to-face interactionwith their instructors, or perhaps a reflection of the students’ acknowledgment that in-personinstruction during this time may have required more effort and preparation than in mostsemesters. Depending on the experience of the instructors in this category, the increase may alsobe partially attributed to the additional experience gained by the instructors between
of:performance accomplishments, vicarious learning, social or verbal persuasion, and emotionalarousal [4, 11]. Performance accomplishments or “mastery of experiences” are believed to be amajor source of self-efficacy beliefs. They are past direct experiences that demonstrate to aperson that they are able to successfully perform a future task (i.e., if you have done it before andperformed well, you can do it again). High self-efficacy evolves from success in pastexperiences and low self-efficacy from failures at activities within the given domain. Vicariousexperiences are observations of others successfully completing a task (i.e., if they can do it, socan I). However, since observing is not a direct reflection on one’s one skill it is believed tohave a
collaboration and communicationand disrupted project schedules. While the pandemic created many barriers to the capstonedesign experience, it also provided a substantial real-world constraint for students to assess andaddress. In this respect, the pandemic was an unanticipated learning opportunity for students tolearn how to improvise, innovate, and adapt over the course of their design experience.A limited number of studies have examined how the capstone design experience changed duringthe pandemic. Jamieson reflected on the challenges during the pandemic and strategies used topreserve the quality of the students’ learning experience in a chemical engineering capstone, asenior design course and a transdisciplinary freshman course. One of the key
reflected on their concepts acrossboth concept generation sessions. Our research goals were to identify how designers consideredpeople and whether their process changed with the request to explicitly include drawings ofpeople within sketches. The conceptual sketches and associated “think-aloud” transcripts werethen analyzed to determine the impact of the representational prompt on engineers’ thoughtprocesses and design outcomes. With a simple intervention to represent people within sketches,we found several positive effects on how engineers considered people during design.BackgroundHuman-centered design (HCD) has been an important approach in engineering since the 1980s.This framework is commonly used in design when solutions to problems are
on designer one “frequently if not always” for transitional tasks such asplanning, setting team goals, and developing strategies. The number “1” in the (1,2) positiondepicts designer 2’s reliance on designer 1 for the same function. The relations reflect the surveyresponses of the designers and are directional and of equal magnitude. The disconnect of nodesthree, four, and five to the other designers in this DSM indicates a weak connection of the networkat this particular threshold and function [61]. Twelve DSMs are constructed representing the threeleadership functions and three communications modes at two distinct frequency levels. Designer (Sink) 1
[10], as online learningexperiences lacks the overall interpersonal connections that would otherwise be present in face-to-face courses [11]. Hands-on learning also proves to be challenging, such as medical studentsreporting that “online classes proved to be an excellent opportunity for theoretical subjects likebasic sciences but not suitable for clinical subjects like clinical skills” [4]. These challenges areall reflected in engineering design education, where social group dynamic is vital for projectsuccess, and the hands-on component cannot be conveyed as effectively online.Many of the concerns around the impact of online learning on students and the effectiveness ofcontent delivery for engineering design education can be addressed with
]. Collectively, our findings are in line with caring pedagogy research [39] thatreports increased motivation and learning outcomes on the part of students when they perceivefaculty as caring about them by getting to know students and providing constructive feedback[40]. This line of work suggests that part of why learner-centered instruction is effective is thatstudents increase in their engagement and see more opportunities to learn, such as from feedbackand from peers. Faculty who care and hold high-but-reachable expectations for students may seesimilar expectations and behaviors reflected by students.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1623105. Any opinions, findings, and
chance to reflect on their improvements and progressand realize where designs might fail. This is a critical piece in the engineering self-efficacy development[13]. Second, it allowed the professor the opportunity to understand which students required moreindividual support and design coaching in the classroom. Those that were independently problem solvingand constructing could be left to their own devices. Those that were stuck were offered more guidance andprompting to help move the activity along. If the activity were done in teams, those that struggled to getstarted might not get the opportunity to independently construct limited fidelity prototypes due to the natureof team dynamics and would miss this critical part of the design realization
workshop but rather a year-long teacherprofessional development program that provides teachers with 100 contact hours to acquire andapply new knowledge and reflect on their teaching practices. Several studies emphasizecontinuous PD that occurs periodically throughout the school year to best support teachers asthey make adjustments to their lessons and teaching practices. [17,18,19,20]. In addition to PDduration, teachers in AMP! learn how to shift their current lessons to include more effectivestrategies such as inquiry-based and team based lessons [21,22]. Inquiry based teaching can bedescribed as an open communication between teachers and students to freely ask questions topromote conceptual understanding and puts an emphasis on lesson
characteristicsof engineers in the future. Writing in the year of 2020, when engineering education yet againfaces looming paradigm shift driven in part by a global pandemic and major powers’ adjustmentin attitudes and strategies to globalization, we attempt to reassess visions of “engineers for thefuture,” as reflected through policy discourses in the United States and China, two major playersin global engineering education. For this purpose, we present a careful reading of recent policydocuments published by the US National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and the ChineseMinistry of Education (MoE).The NAE (2018) report Understanding the Educational and Career Pathways of Engineersresulted from a study commissioned by the Academy to “understand
resumes on file, especially from successful internsor contractors who could just as easily by-pass the online job advertising recruitment process. Also, it shouldbe noted that job description may not provide a complete reflection of the type of work an engineer does onthe job. The nature of the work conducted by engineers evolves as time and projects go on, meaning theactual activities of a practicing engineering may be very different from those that were written into the jobadvertisement. In addition, the rate of occurrence of activities within a job posting is unlikely to reflect theproportion of time spent on each activity by the engineer. While acknowledging these limitations, the researchteam does not claim that the findings of this paper